The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Pratyush wrote:
Not exactly correct, as the the 23 liter chamber is still utilised in various 52 cal SPH such as the K-9, or the PZH2000. NATO JBMOU complaint.
SPG cannot utilise 25 liter chamber, to overcome the recoil will need proper arty carriage or Vehicle so heavy it will need 2 engines to travel.
DRDO is undertaking a number of projects for the Indian Army – these include Development trials of Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System (ATAGS) which are completed
Development trials of Pinaka guided rocket including salvo firing and demonstration of range with pin-point accuracy has been conducted.
Huge boost for Indian defence industry coming. A negative list of items banned from imports; includes artillery guns, certain types of ammunition; corpoporatisation of 15 OFB units; FDI in defence raised from 49 to 74 per cent; relaistic GSQRs; IPMTs and time-bound procurements
Pratyush, The term little effort will kill the SPG. Because Army won't be happy till it's 25 liters and DRDO will take forget and DGQA trials will be even. onger
So be happy and get armed with 23 liters available
https://twitter.com/Akash10j/status/126 ... 80803?s=20 ---> Talked to a L&T guy recently, according to him there's only one critical component that's being imported from South Korea. It makes sense because L&T being the vendor, would have to support the guns in the future with spares. This is also kind of confirmed here.
https://twitter.com/KSingh_1469/status/ ... 65666?s=20 ---> This is generally how these deals are structured. By the end of the X year delivery period close to 100% should be made from Indian raw materials in India. But what does this mean? L&T can build, while Samsung provides blueprints. What R&D capabilities have they accrued?
https://twitter.com/KSingh_1469/status/ ... 63686?s=20 ---> For the non-critical items I would not be surprised. And it depends how they define it - 80% is that by cost or volume? If it’s by volume then much of that will come just by sourcing high grade steel from Indian entities. It’s nothing really to be overly impressed by, now what?
Acquiring production engineering expertise and getting people ready is only helpful if the actual plan involved giving contracts to local designs. That's when the people that have worked on the production of K9 can be of any value.
Rakesh wrote:
https://twitter.com/KSingh_1469/status/ ... 65666?s=20 ---> This is generally how these deals are structured. By the end of the X year delivery period close to 100% should be made from Indian raw materials in India. But what does this mean? L&T can build, while Samsung provides blueprints. What R&D capabilities have they accrued?
The design driver will be DRDO. The whole point is with K9 been built by L&T, DRDO doesn't need to create a SPH from scratch. DRDO will give the ATAGS gun spec and dimension, recoil pressure etc to L&T and ask them to modify a K9 for a test. If something cracks, L&T will forge a stronger part.
With no K9, DRDO has to give the spec and find partners to build the entire SPH. And guess who will be that partner? HVF Avadi..
BF & Tata have not sold ONE piece of towed artillery to IA or to anyone. How did they manage to build ATAGS?
It is not like an aircraft where you need to know all the design drivers. Land systems are the easier ones to localize.. if there is really a will to do it.
Apparently the first regiment of Dhanush (18 guns) is on the verge or has already been inducted.
Original schedule for induction:
- 18x 2019
- 36x 2020
- 60x 2021
Total 114 guns. Post Covid changes are expected.
Few M777 pieces have been inducted, maybe a couple of batteries, 3 confirmed in 2019.
Our backbone for artillery continues to be the 105 mm, 130 mm and Bofors. The drastic spares and ammunition shortage of Kargil war is no longer there, 155 mm shells have even been exported to UAE.
Our artillery situation is definitely better than during the last war.
Helicopter situation, counter battery radars, rocket artillery numbers have also improved.
dinesh_kimar wrote:
Our backbone for artillery continues to be the 105 mm, 130 mm and Bofors. The drastic spares and ammunition shortage of Kargil war is no longer there, 155 mm shells have even been exported to UAE.
The ones useful in the mountains are 105 & Bofors. The Russia field gun, cannot do high angle fire (unless they keep something below the gun to angle it).
If we had sense to start developing the Dhanush couple of years before, we would have had that gun properly inducted. Everyone seems to have forgotten the number of times, artillery trials were started again, before of one scandal or the other.
No matter how much we want to spin it, 155MM is the argument winner. Range and firepower. All the dilly dailying, scandal is now hitting us a crucial time.
We are facing an army with 152MM & 155MM guns. Not with 105 & 120.
We have no match to what the chinese have in the Truck Mounted Gun category.The chinese have the PCL 181 which will be a force multiplier in the mountainous regions.
India could have had a comparable gun and OFB/BEML has exhibited its gun mounted system in 2018 and 2020 but nothing after that.
I recently read that our 105 mm Indian Field Gun has been out of production for some time now. Small numbers of Light gun LFG continue to be produced, for "Field regiments". This gun is air portable, but not mule capable.
Army is reportedly keen to standardise on 155 mm pieces in lieu of 105/122/130 mm.
The 81 mm mortar for infantry continues to be produced, as does the 120 mm for "Light Regiment' and Dhanush is now produced for "Medium regiments".
120 mm mortar at 425 kg weight is not only mule portable, but EME had converted a no. of Bullet bikes into 3 wheeled mortar carriers (Doklam crisis).
So 105 mm numbers , if slowly winding down, might not see much development towards new types of shells ( there was some talk of a 21 km ER shell similar to the Brits, but not happened).
New Fuses also may not be developed for these shells.
ramana wrote:Are they for 155mm or for 105mm shells also?
and whats their production rate?
105mm, 130mm, 155mm. ECIL and BEL made them so far, delivering on an order of over 3L fuzes placed on them. ECIL mostly assembles them based on SA TOT, limited indigenization. BEL has TOT from Israel, but much more indigenization. Ultimate aim for BEL is to get to 50k fuzes per month but they haven't achieved that yet. As of 2019, they had ramped up to around 9K fuzes per month after having started the plant in 2017. In 2018, IA put out another requirement for 5L fuzes but open to all private and public sector, BEL and ECIL could bid, but so could others.
Army ordered 150 LFG 105mm few years back & just recently the order has completed. Its a good Howitzer for mountains. OFB definitely ****** up enhancing production of Pinaka rockets, and its not clear if they hit 5000 per annum from 1000. Setting up the enhanced production factory is running 10 years late.
dinesh_kimar wrote:Some 145 M-777 heli portable howitzers are under induction, Saar. Weight 4.2 tons, uber gold tipped solution .
Maybe towed Sharang can substitute them, but cannot be hauled up mountains easily (8.5 ton) , and can't dismantle these heavier guns in the field.
IFG is light weight at 3.5 tons, and LFG more so at 2.3 tons, is mountain road capable, despite some shortcomings in the firepower.
I read a DTIC report on M-777. Its weight was designed to be airlifted in an Osprey.
Its just under the design limit of 10,000 lbs.
Thanks to this low weight it shakes after firing and has to be reset.
May be it has been fixed with computer or some fancy solution.
So when looking at gold plated solutions need to total picture and not just fan boy panting as the hype was made prior to the acquisitions.
There was some news about a new BEL facility near to Nashik to be close to the explosive filling plant to avoid road testing. Part of the new industrial estate.
LFG is more mobile. As its designed to be dismantled & transported. The heaviest piece is 1 ton. LFG & 120mm mortar can do most of work in the mountains.
M777 is difficult to dismantle & reassemble in Battlefield conditions (but it can be done).
Bharat Forge claims, that it can supply one Howitzer a day if bulk order is placed. Its light steel Howitzer 6.5 tons does deserve bulk orders. Its only costs 1/8th of M777. We can order 1000-2000 & easily pre-position batteries all across the borders.
I hope we induct Mounted Gun System (MGS) in big numbers. It has advantages due to obvious reasons:
Lighter in weight and much more mobile in Mountainous terrains.
Towed Guns are sitting ducks in counter enemy fire. Even the self propelled versions have very limited mobility and are vulnerable.
We have option for MGS between:
DRDO/OFB which has a 155MM 52 caliber gun on 6 X 6 Tatra v/s Bharat Forge 155MM gun on a 4 X 4 Ashok Leyland Truck.
Bharat forge also has a 105MM gun with soft recoil version weighing 950 Kgs on a pick up van sized vehicle!!!!
Before yellow material hits the fan i hope the babus are given jhapads to induct them soon.
ramana wrote:Gyan, What barrel length for Bharat Forge light howitzer? 39 calibers?
Yes their ULH is 39 cal. There was news in Feb that the Saudis were evaluating the Bharat 52 and I think their ULH as well. Not sure what happened to that. Probably delayed by covid.
155mm/"39 caliber" light steel 6.5 tons, Titanium 5 tons & ultra light titanium 4 tons. These are available at a fraction of cost of M777, reportedly around Rs. 4-8 crores each. Also dismantling & reassembling these howitzers is easier compared to M777. So they can be airlifted piece by piece by Mi17s
105mm jeep mounted only weights 900kg. Therefore can quickly reinforce any tactical position.
Apart from above, 155mm/"52 caliber" towed (15 tons) & mounted, both in steel construction while Titanium is ATAGS (12 tons) towed155mm/52 in collaboration with DRDO.
In mountains it makes sense to have cheap (& disposable) steel 155/39 howitzers backed with Pinaka (Guided & ordinary) placed in Depth for long range work.
By disposable, I mean cheap enough to be pre positioned in bulk & abandoned by destroying if position is over run or withdrawal becomes difficult
UDHAMPUR: Major highlights of all the operations in "Operation Vijay" was comprehensive destruction of enemy defences and suppression of enemy artillery forcing them to vacate their defences, leaving behind a large cache of arms, ammunition, equipment and stores. The suppression of enemy small arms and artillery fire reduced own casualties considerably. The infantry battalion Commanding Officers, company commanders, platoon commanders and men did not ..
One of the reasons why for years I'vf been crying like a prophet in the wilderness for upgrade and extra MI-26s. These are the only heavy-lift helos that can carry ourcstd. 155mm arty. anywhere in the mountains,have been invaluable at Siachrn,etc. The Chinooks can only carry the LW 777 howitzers which have an inferior range by about 10km to Bofors/ Dhanush,etc. Our upgrade for the 3 MI-26s left has been gathering dust for reportedly 4 years in the MOD.There is even a PAC (?) report questioning the selection of the Chinook over it as on every count including price it is far superior,can transport 80 troops compared to jusr 30+ of the latter.Anyway,that is water under the bridge for now. But the lack of MI-26s has even delayed BRO infra orojects as it is the only helo capable of lifting heavy road- building eqpt. It can carry 20t of cargo in a hold the size of an AN-12. An even better upgraded 26T is in production right now,time to order a few more,plus at least lease some right now just as NATO leased Ru helos in the Afghan conflict. Stalin (?) once said that " quantity has a quality of its own." It was used to great effect against hhe Nazis in WW2. Superior numbers of MBRLs ( Stalin Organs),T-34s,etc. overwhelmed the Germans,a lesson for us today as we rearm and modernise the forces keeping in mind that we now face a JV from the PRC and Pak whose combined numbers deployed against us may be superior numerically.
Look what I found after overhauling one of my cupboard after 10 years.
Bhim-T6 was DRDO + Denel (South Africa) product. This project was suspended after Denel was blacklisted.
Denel's turret on Arjun Chassis.
The specifications are almost same to K-9.
