Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Locked
Pranav
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5280
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Pranav »

RoyG wrote:Like I said, he can't be ignored and has huge backing among support base.
Huge support base does not matter.

He will need loyal MPs who he can keep safely in a guest house until Advani & Co accept him as PM.

If he is being used just for campaigning, and tickets are being distributed by others then prognosis is very bleak.
Arjun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4283
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 01:52

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Arjun »

chetak wrote:She is a feminist, women's libber, ball-breaker...........
and a certified left-wing nutcase - as with most other 'humanities' types at these campuses ! Did she have the guts to protest against Bush, given her left-wing leaning ? Was Bush ever stopped from giving a speech at any US university ?
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

@RajivMessage
Wharton snub of Modi is meddling in Indian democracy. Like Oxford training East India Co. officers. Except now Indian sepoys are professors
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

Check Ishaan Tharoor son of Shashi Tharoor in Anti-Modi Campaign.

Image
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

@rahulkanwal
After canceling @narendramodi, Wharton student body now says they want to invite @ArvindKejriwal7 for India Business Forum instead.
Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3513
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Rony »

From Yahoo Group discussions email

This is the full text of the letter sent to the Wharton India Economic Forum authorities.

Kasturi Sen was the main organizer. Her key associates were

Madhura Chakraborty
Syed Samiullah
Vinod Mehra
Farid Husain
Rachit Seth
Gaurav Pandhi
Brian Ortelere
Kajri Mahishasurmardini
Yawer Yousuf
Sandeep Bapat
Basharat Ali
Ethan Winn
Gary Stephens
Laura Valencia
María Helga Guðmundsdóttir
Hayden Kantor
Divya Sharma
Uday Raj Anand
Chirag Mital
Aman Bhattacharya
Sania Hashmi
Anjali Monteiro
Yagna Nag Chowdhuri
Vinod K. Jose

**********
Text of the note.

“We are outraged to learn that the Wharton India Economic Forum has invited Narendra Modi, the Chief Minister of the Indian state of Gujarat, to be a keynote speaker at its 17th Economic Forum on March 23, 2013.

This is the same politician who was refused a diplomatic visa by the United States State Department on March 18, 2005 on the ground that he, as Chief Minister, did nothing to prevent a series of orchestrated riots that targeted Muslims in Gujarat. The most conservative estimates are that over a thousand people, mostly Muslims, died in those riots. Thousands more were forced to leave their homes and businesses. Human Rights Watch (among other international and Indian bodies) showed that politicians and the police in the state abetted the slaughter and displacement of Muslim Gujaratis:http://www.hrw. org/news/ 2002/04/29/ india-gujarat- officials- took-part- anti-muslim- violence.

AFP
Since then, the Supreme Court of India has repeatedly faulted the Gujarat government led by Modi for failing to prosecute those guilty of the crimes in 2002 and instead prosecuting whistle-blowers and activists who had tried to bring the guilty to justice. In February 2012, the Supreme Court again criticized the Modi government for harassing activists fighting for justice with trumped up charges. What this sordid record proves is Mr Modi’s callous disregard for the life of Indian citizens and for upholding the Indian constitution.

In taking cognizance of Modi’s culpability, the State Department also revoked his “existing tourist/business visa under section 212 (a) (2) (g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.� As David C. Mulford, U.S. Ambassador to India, explained then, “Section 212 (a) (2) (g) makes any foreign government official who ‘was responsible for or directly carried out, at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom’ ineligible for a visa to the United States.� Ambassador Mulford went on to say that the State Department’s decision was “based on the fact that, as head of the State government in Gujarat between February 2002 and May 2002, [Modi] was responsible for the performance of state institutions at that time.

The State Department’s detailed views on this matter are included in its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices and the International Religious Freedom Report. Both reports document the violence in Gujarat from February 2002 to May 2002 and cite the Indian National Human Rights Commission report, which states there was “a comprehensive failure on the part of the state government to control the persistent violation of rights of life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the people of the state� (http://2001- 2009.state. gov/p/sca/ rls/rm/2005/ 43701.htm).

It is incomprehensible to us that this is the man who the Wharton India Economic Forum wishes to celebrate as an exemplar of economic and social development. We find it astonishing that any academic and student body at the University of Pennsylvania can endorse ideas about economic development that are based on the systematic oppression of minority populations, whether in India or elsewhere. Our role as scholars and students—and indeed as would-be entrepreneurs and business managers—must be to develop conscientious and efficacious modes of economic organization, not to piggy-back onto the inhuman policies of politicians who not only lack a commitment to human rights and to ideals of social justice, but whose political success is based on the suppression of substantial sections of their own citizens. Modi still does not have a US visa to enter the US, but Wharton plans to present him on Skype to the audience. Recently there have been efforts to
whitewash Modi’s grim record and to grant him respectability. Wharton’s invitation lends itself to doing just that.

We urge the Wharton India Economic Forum to revoke their invitation to Narendra Modi. If it does not do not do so, we pledge to protest his presence—virtual as it will be, given that he remains ineligible for a US visaâ
Arjun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4283
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 01:52

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Arjun »

Sushupti wrote:@rahulkanwal
After canceling @narendramodi, Wharton student body now says they want to invite @ArvindKejriwal7 for India Business Forum instead.
Wharton inviting Kejriwal, Akhtar and Shabana ?? And it calls itself a business school ?

Sad day for Wharton alum. Their reputation just went irretrievably down the tube.
Pranav
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5280
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Pranav »

Sushupti wrote:@rahulkanwal
After canceling @narendramodi, Wharton student body now says they want to invite @ArvindKejriwal7 for India Business Forum instead.
Kejriwal may not be available. He is launching a civil disobedience program in Delhi on March 23rd, against corruption in Water and Power distribution. But maybe video link is possible. Kejriwal will be on indefinite Upvas.
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5620
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RoyG »

Pranav wrote:
RoyG wrote:Like I said, he can't be ignored and has huge backing among support base.
Huge support base does not matter.

He will need loyal MPs who he can keep safely in a guest house until Advani & Co accept him as PM.

If he is being used just for campaigning, and tickets are being distributed by others then prognosis is very bleak.

Advani & Co accept him as PM? What sort of influence do these people wield now? It's dwindling every passing day. Where do these MP get their support from?

btw, where are dumb (hazare) and dumber (kejriwal) these days?
kvjayan
BRFite
Posts: 236
Joined: 23 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by kvjayan »

NDTV ran several reports "updated March 04" on the Wharton-Modi affair.

It is interesting to find the number of casualties in the 2002 riots variously mentioned as:

1. More than 1,000 people, most of them Muslims, were killed on his watch.
2. communal riots in the state in 2002, in which more than 1,200 people were killed, most of them Muslims.
3. Mr Modi has not been issued a visa by the United States since nearly 1,200 people were killed in communal riots that lacerated Gujarat.

It is strange that after 11 years, these showbiz-news wallahs can not arrive at a definitive figure.
Pranav
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5280
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Pranav »

RoyG wrote: btw, where are dumb (hazare) and dumber (kejriwal) these days?
Kejriwal is getting good traction from the poorer people of Delhi. Maybe not on radar screen of well-fed individuals.

See facebook.com/AamAadmiParty .
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RamaY »

I think the Wharton incident is a blessing in disguise.

This means NM cannot and will not be invited to any forum in US, until
1. He becomes PM of India (I doubt any other post would make these vermin relinquish their idiocracy)
2. The US, HRW etc all international bodies take a stand on his involvement in 2002 riots.

The international bodies supported indian media and agents in their religious fight against NM. And they have to accept defeat first before in house vermin will be cleared.

Just few more years...
Pranav
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5280
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Pranav »

RoyG wrote: Advani & Co accept him as PM? What sort of influence do these people wield now? It's dwindling every passing day. Where do these MP get their support from?
MPs have to be kept safe and isolated, rivals will be desperately making big offers. MPs are bought and sold like cattle.

Once an MP is elected he has to get the best price because he has paid a huge amount to buy his ticket from his party.

That is the way politics in India works.
Gus
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8220
Joined: 07 May 2005 02:30

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Gus »

chetak wrote:
Gus wrote:Ugh the long haired leftie... How original....
the female is an ex JNU type to boot.
i'm talking about that guy
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5620
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RoyG »

Pranav wrote:
RoyG wrote: Advani & Co accept him as PM? What sort of influence do these people wield now? It's dwindling every passing day. Where do these MP get their support from?
MPs have to be kept safe and isolated, rivals will be desperately making big offers. MPs are bought and sold like cattle.

Once an MP is elected he has to get the best price because he has paid a huge amount to buy his ticket from his party.

That is the way politics in India works.
Sure, but at the end of the day you're dependent on votes. In the case of the BJP and RSS almost the entire cadre base is backing Modi. Moreover, the "well fed" bourgeoisie who is despised by the typical NACxalite for the first time in a long time has found a leader who can navigate through all the nonsense and deliver. Modi is the tallest leader in the room and he is on the offensive. You cant ignore your biggest vote catcher and most able administrator.
Pranav
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5280
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Pranav »

RoyG wrote: Sure, but at the end of the day you're dependent on votes.
Yes, but the end of the day is 5 years away. Meanwhile there is money to be made and business to be done.

If BJP tickets are sold by somebody else then Modi will have a hard time.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

Al-Qaeda slams 'Hindu aggression' in Narendra Modi's Gujarat, calls for new 'jihad'

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/alqae ... MYymy.dpuf
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5620
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RoyG »

Pranav wrote:
RoyG wrote: btw, where are dumb (hazare) and dumber (kejriwal) these days?
Kejriwal is getting good traction from the poorer people of Delhi. Maybe not on radar screen of well-fed individuals.

See facebook.com/AamAadmiParty .
This is the problem with you aam aadmi people. Your white hat leader takes pot shots at opposition without any evidence and runs away like a weasel. Then he goes deep in his hole when VVIP scam hits the headlines and has now come out to protest electricity availability to poor in Delhi. Instead of supporting NACxalites why don't you support Modi? He is committed to development and is taking on the family. He's not some condom that has been thrown away by Congress.
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5620
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RoyG »

Pranav wrote:
RoyG wrote: Sure, but at the end of the day you're dependent on votes.
Yes, but the end of the day is 5 years away. Meanwhile there is money to be made and business to be done.

If BJP tickets are sold by somebody else then Modi will have a hard time.
He may or may not be PM. Sure it may be 5 years away. However, he will be influencing policy. This is the key.
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5620
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RoyG »

Aam Aadmi of the country has reasons to feel disappointed, if not cheated, with the Union Budget 2013-14 presented by the ruling coalition that came to power in his name. All over the country, cutting across gender, regions, sectors, classes and the urban/rural divide, the aam aadami faces a crisis of economic opportunity and livelihood. She has suffered from a long period of high inflation, especially in food items. She has long suffered from growth that did not deliver more jobs, a decline in growth now threatens to cut down on existing livelihood opportunities. All the basic amenities that a citizen can expect from democratic governance – public provisions for heath, education and social security – are beyond the reach of the Aam Aadami. Rampant corruption from top to the bottom eats into whatever little could trickle down to them.

The Union Budget presented by the Finance Minister is a clever attempt to mislead the public in an election year. The Finance Minister’s speech offers little remedy for the key problems facing the Indian economy that he himself begins by acknowledging: slowdown of growth, rising fiscal deficit and current account deficit. The current crisis required the government to stimulate domestic investment by encouraging consumption from below; instead the FM remained focused on Foreign investors. Controlling inflation required expansion of PDS and reinforced subsidies on energy and focus on increasing agricultural output in pulses and oilseeds; instead the government has relied on hope. Meeting the demands and aspirations of the people required substantial and real increase in social sector expenditure, instead the government has resorted to statistical tricks and gimmicks rather than put its money where its mouth is. Nor is there any evidence of the government being serious about better usage and monitoring of the funds spent on these public provisions. Shockingly, the government has not come up with any measure to curb corruption and control the parallel black economy that the public is so visibly exercised about.

An analysis of the summary statistics of the budget make it clear that there is little connect between the rhetoric of the budget and its actual numbers. In his speech the FM claimed that the government has not spared money for welfare schemes; the fact is that the UPA has drastically cut down on most of the key welfare schemes in the current year itself. The FM’s claims about increasing outlays in key sectors is a clear case of statistical fudging; the ‘increase’ claimed by the FM is with reference to the drastically reduced expenditure (Revised Estimates). In most cases the rise in budget allocations is barely enough to cover inflation. In real terms there is no increase in spending for the aam aadami. The FM has also used the age old devise of distracting public attention with the help of some gimmicks that cost very little.

The government needed to increase tax revenue, which has actually fallen by 4% in the current year over what was budgeted; similar false assumptions seem to driving the current projections of 20% increase in revenue. The much talked about move to tax the rich turned out to be a damp squib, for it would affect only 42,000 super rich and bring very small gains for the country. This small gain would be more than made up by the generous increase in the tax exemption, mostly for the well off and the corporate. The amount of ‘Tax foregone’ has gone up from Rs. 5,33,000 crores to Rs. 5,73,000 crores. There is no change in the capital gains regime to curb speculative gains activity in the stock market.The budget gives no indication of a political will to curb black income generation in the economy. The deferment of implementation of GARR to 2016 is another example of the lack of political will to curb tax avoidance. There is nothing in the budget to do away with non-transparent instruments like Participatory Notes or to reformulate the double taxation treaties with ‘tax heavens’ and black economy conduits.

Most of the schemes meant for the aam aadmi have remained static or have in fact gone down in real terms or even compared to the actual expenditure in the year before. The central Plan size has come down from Rs. 6,51,000 crore in the Budget last year to the Revised estimate of 5,56,000 crores, huge shortfall of Rs. 96,000 crores. In 2012-13 expenditure on agriculture and allied activities, rural development, irrigation and flood control and welfare of ST has actually gone down compared to the actual expenditure of the previous year. A similar comparison of the expenditure on health and education shows a marginal increase that barely keeps pace with inflation. The total expenditure on social services has fallen short by Rs. 23,000 crores compared to the budgeted allocations. This fact acquires significance for much of the social sector expenditure takes place at the level of the states where the transfer has been cut down by as much as 10,000 crores.

It is unfortunate that even the opposition has not drawn the country’s attention to these statistical lies and inattention to the needs of the aam aadmi. Aam Aadmi Party resolves to take this collective conspiracy of the political establishment to the people’s court and place the concerns of aam admi at the heart of our economic policy.
Thank god this fellow or his party will never go anywhere. He will be worse than congress and bankrupt the entire country. :lol:
RoyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5620
Joined: 10 Aug 2009 05:10

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by RoyG »

--Double post--
Last edited by RoyG on 04 Mar 2013 20:31, edited 2 times in total.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

Image
Pranav
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5280
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 13:23

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Pranav »

RoyG wrote: Your white hat leader takes pot shots at opposition without any evidence and runs away like a weasel. Then he goes deep in his hole when VVIP scam hits the headlines and has now come out to protest electricity availability to poor in Delhi.
Arey bhai, you think BJP song and dance about VVIP choppers will lead anywhere? If you believe Swamy then a big shot opposition Damaad has also made money on the choppers. Why should they do anything more than the usual Nuatanki. Did Bofors go anywhere in 6 years of BJP.

AAP has commented about chopper scam but if it is not covered by main media outlets how will the well fed types get to know about it?
This is the problem with you aam aadmi people. Instead of supporting NACxalites why don't you support Modi? He is committed to development and is taking on the family. He's not some condom that has been thrown away by Congress.
Bhai I am just a humble dispassionate observer, nobody is my leader. I don't classify Modi as a useless eater, although we are waiting to hear why he gave a sweet deal to Shobhana Bhartiya's hubby and other such questions.
Arjun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4283
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 01:52

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Arjun »

RoyG and Pranav - no more talk about Kejriwal on this thread please. You have the other elections thread for that.
gakakkad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4667
Joined: 24 May 2011 08:16

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by gakakkad »

Adani likely to cancel his visit to fart-on ishkool of bij-nej.. and he is a primary sponsor of the Yindia economic forum..
Sagar G
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2594
Joined: 22 Dec 2009 19:31
Location: Ghar

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sagar G »

Modi should have himself rejected any offers from any US organization for any kind of guest appearance in any form be it televised or virtual, by giving those ba$tards the chance of inviting him and accepting the invitation he is leaving his flank open for attack which his detractors are waiting for to use in a big way. The current episode shows this only, even if he becomes the PM he can visit f*cking timbuktu but mustn't visit US. Bloody Unkil only understands when his medicine is administered to him in high dosage. Ack thoo on the dhimmi asshole "Indians" at Wart-ton for failing to stand up for Modi, typical caucasian asslickers.
Theo_Fidel

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Theo_Fidel »

Pranav wrote:MPs have to be kept safe and isolated, rivals will be desperately making big offers. MPs are bought and sold like cattle.
Once an MP is elected he has to get the best price because he has paid a huge amount to buy his ticket from his party.
This is exactly correct. End result will very much depend on who is run on the ground. Recruiting 'electable' candidates will be key. If NM is smart this selection process should be placed under his control. The right candidate talking the right policies can win in most unlikely places. Pon Radhakrishnan, Hindu munani type won in kanyakumari district promising to end temple entry restrictions, reservations for women and launch a full scale assault on the caste system. Local lore is that he peeled off a good 25% of the Christian vote with his electioneering.

The AAP very much has a small and loyal following in more distant and backward parts of the country. Land locked areas are often left cold by the disastrous effects unchecked industrialization has had on them. The best arguments I heard against industrialization was from folks who mentioned the atrocious pollution in Korba. In CI Kejriwal and AH were very much mentioned many times and the media was saturated. I think the Marathi orientation may have had something to do with that. Definitely has a solid 10% of the voting IMO. Center right types would do well to court this chunk.

Wharton nonsense only matters on the internets, no impact on ground...
devesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5129
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 03:27

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by devesh »

Wharton episode is good example of lack of power of the "Hindu".

it should tell us just how weak a position the political "Hindu" is in, when dealing with foreign "pillars" and power centers (even though it is a local franchise in India, the root source of prestige and power comes from the foreign base).

it is an indication of just how much the the political Hindu's views are given a rat's a** about, by Abrahamics.

they did a good job of brainwashing Indian slaves to do their bidding. it is coming to their help now.

for Modi or any other truly "Hindu-Right" leader, if they come to power, first thing to do is dislodge the Leftists from the Centrally-funded think-tanks and other "intellectual" foundations. cut their money, kick them out of govt-sanctioned housing in Lutyens and other cities. basically, completely disown them. the GoI cuts ties with these traitors in every way, shape, and form. that is a solid first step that the Vajpayee types were afraid to do. if Modi gets the post, he needs to do it.
Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sanku »

devesh wrote: Vajpayee types were afraid to do. if Modi gets the post, he needs to do it.
What are you saying Saar, ABV spent most effort in dismantling these parts of patronage culture. Modi has been doing the same in Gujarat.

ABV did more in his 6 years in Delhi, that Modi could do in his first 5 in GJ, however he got the second term, and then third.

ABV has achieved more in 6 years than was thought possible.
Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sanku »

Atri wrote:
Arjun wrote:I think its this leftist streak in the RSS that Atri ji clearly mentions that has produiced nincompoops like Govindacharya and others...And what the eff is RSS doing with Togadia and Bajrang Dal types ? Can someone explain how they fit in the grand scheme of 'integral humanism'?

Probably makes sense, like Atriji mentions, for Modi and Jaitley to break away from the RSS at some stage in the next 10 years and head their own right-wing party.
:)

That would be suicidal.. I do not wish OR expect that. I meant no such thing. I would be embarrassed if NM acted this rashly which I hardly think he will. Economic growth without unless all-rounded can make one a fat pig ready for slaughter. How much of our growth in past 10 years is "growth" and how much is "tumor", we need to ascertain that. We may not want to call tumor as growth, although it looks the same initially.

Why is being integral humanist OR a socialist a bad thing? Remember, it has always been the left (radicles as the center-right dwelling status quoists might say) who produce men of action. Even Namo, Shivraj Chauhan, Parrikar, Raman Singh and many others came up through this family. Same as Govindacharya, Kalyan Singh, Uma Bharti, ABV and LKA in their heyday.. It were the Indic leftist radicles of RSS and VHP who stirred the nation during Ramjanmabhumi movement. It is the idealists of VHP who are converting muslims and christians to Hindu faiths. It is the idealist socialists of Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram who have single-handedly kept the naxalite problem in central India under control. Without them, we would be no one. It were the same radicles who protected Hindus during every single riot.

Govindacharya, Togadiya et al have spent their lives for a cause. So have countless dharmagurus and their millions of disciples. It is the socialist and nationalistic leftist streak in Sangh Parivar which has produced millions of dedicated selfless workers who live and die for a cause. Hence I would desist from calling names to anyone who have lived their lives for a cause. It takes great deal of commitment.

They have held on to Dharma in most dire times and places. Why do you think the hindus in villages of Assam, Bengal and North Kerala still hold on their ancestral land, hain ji? It is same bajrang dal type people who are the sword arm of dharma when government is non-functional.

So, my brother, please do not insult them.. If you can, create new institutions and build new cadre in your image which is as nationalistic and dharmik as those belonging to Sangh Parivar, yet with diametrically opposite rightist socio-politico-economic world view about nation. Nation would be indebted to you. If you want NM and jaitley to do that, bid them goodbye politically. Then you would never see NM as PM. He will die watering the organization. And I do not think Jaitley has it in him. Not without RSS behind. You would need someone as committed and almost divine as Guru Golwalkar to see the fruits 2-3 decades from now.
gakakkad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4667
Joined: 24 May 2011 08:16

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by gakakkad »

how on earth do commie's end up as faculty in business-schools ? I mean , is not that an oxymoron ?
devesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5129
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 03:27

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by devesh »

Sanku wrote:
devesh wrote: Vajpayee types were afraid to do. if Modi gets the post, he needs to do it.
What are you saying Saar, ABV spent most effort in dismantling these parts of patronage culture. Modi has been doing the same in Gujarat.

ABV did more in his 6 years in Delhi, that Modi could do in his first 5 in GJ, however he got the second term, and then third.

ABV has achieved more in 6 years than was thought possible.

Sanku ji,

not sure if the Lefties in the "intellectual"/"academic" dens were really dealt with by Vajpayee. Their existence on the Central doll needs to end. every connection they have with "Central Power" needs to be cut. I am saying that there should be total ostracizing of them, by the Government of India. I don't think anybody tried to do that yet. INC, of course, doesn't want that. but BJP should try to do it, just to cut down the power of these traitors in India, and outside.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59800
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by ramana »

gakakkad wrote:how on earth do commie's end up as faculty in business-schools ? I mean , is not that an oxymoron ?

How do they get green card?
Theo_Fidel

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Theo_Fidel »

EB1 only. There are still plenty of USA Commies on faculty on USA universities. Last refuge and all...

In fact there was point last year when commies with 12% approval had a higher approval rating than congress with 9%....
Last edited by Theo_Fidel on 04 Mar 2013 21:56, edited 1 time in total.
fanne
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4293
Joined: 11 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by fanne »

Congress has two big 'PRP' or MNS this election - Aam Adami Party and Baba Ramdev. I believe, Anna Hazare is a very right person, but was propped and used by AK and MSM (you know on whose behest). Anna realized the game and quit, but AK has too much invested in him by ... (foreign company, he has himself resigned, but his wife continues to do a job for the same govt and institution that he so much despises). He has to give ROIs and he is being nicely propped (you know when MSM is in his side, whose side is AK). But it will fail.
BR is being black mailed for starting a party (he has been threatened physical violence and jail), he also realizes the game and will quit.
All three people, AK, AH and BR realize the game, two quit because they know it is anti-India, only one continues, because this is Anti India and Pro-XXX
rgds,
fanne
VikramS
BRFite
Posts: 1885
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by VikramS »

SwamyG wrote:
chetak wrote:
["Gus"]Ugh the long haired leftie... How original....[Gus]

the female is an ex JNU type to boot.
She has aged good.... :rotfl: not bad looking.
Many people dye their hair blonde.
She had dyed her color white! You can see the black roots.
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7113
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Muppalla »

Sushupti wrote:Adani Group cancels its Platinum Sponsorship sponsorship of Wharton event after Narendra Modi is dropped

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/naren ... hip-338093
This is really bold of adani groups. Sometimes we criticize all business groups are crony but they do work a lot of times with national interests.
vera_k
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4000
Joined: 20 Nov 2006 13:45

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by vera_k »

gakakkad wrote:how on earth do commie's end up as faculty in business-schools ? I mean , is not that an oxymoron ?
Not in the business school. But in the larger university system. The liberal arts programs have larger numbers of students than STEM or business. One consequence of which is that continuing need to import people from abroad for STEM employment. The Republicans have been trying to gut liberal arts since the cold war, by cutting state funding so universities have to raise tuition. The theory being that people will be reluctant to spend on a degree that has no guarantee of professional employment.
member_23629
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by member_23629 »

Arjun wrote:
Sushupti wrote:@rahulkanwal
After canceling @narendramodi, Wharton student body now says they want to invite @ArvindKejriwal7 for India Business Forum instead.
Wharton inviting Kejriwal, Akhtar and Shabana ?? And it calls itself a business school ?

Sad day for Wharton alum. Their reputation just went irretrievably down the tube.
Congress is behind this drama through friendly communists (who slyly call themselves leftists) in the US. This entire drama shows what is wrong with the psyche of the Hindu male and why Hindu women and children get enslaved again and again because of his low IQ.
Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Post by Sushupti »

BJP’s 9 year drift :) ends, battle for 2014 begins

http://blog.offstumped.in/2013/03/04/bj ... i-central/
Locked