kapilrdave wrote:Clearly Sukhdev, Rajguru, Bhagatsing and also Gandhiji were just examples. He is talking about the need of a cleaner country which has been given to us by paying very high cost by the freedom fighters. That includes freedom fighters of Andaman-Nicobar. In any case, it is only laughable to even think that NM doesn't know Bhagatsign didn't went to A&N.
Yes. But "Bhagatsingh -> AN" saved NaMo from M-turn on FDI issue. IOW, ToI didnt write about M-turn on FDI issue which could have done huge damage to NaMo, but wrote about Bhagatsingh -> AN issue which does very low damage to NaMo. And why would ToI do that? Or let me tell you a principal in journalism --- write a lot about something else to cover silence on something. or divert the attemtion on some other issue. ToI is pro-FDI. And ToI wanted audience to ignore NaMo's M-turn on FDI. And so ToI went full throttle on "Bhagat -> AN" issue.
panduranghari wrote: Yah. Whatever. Dude. But TINA to Modi.
TINA is good for individual or party, but bad for nation.
I have never voted for Congress or any party. I didnt vote at all, or voted for 49O = NoTA. I believe in creating alternatives, not voting for Congress because BJP is bad.
Now what do you suggest I should do about M-turn of BJP leaders? Push them under carpet? eg BJP-leaders supported Sonia Gandhi's decision to suppress muslim % population numbers in census-2011. Now do you insist that I should hide this fact from my junior activists? And lose all their trust once they come to know that I had hidden this fact to me? Well, I have very very small number of junior activists now, but they are very sharp, very informed and IMO my company has made them more informed and sharper. If I dont raise hell on this issue of census coverup with full throttle, then my juniors will know in next few months that I hid the issue from them.
Likewise, BJP-leaders in year 2002 had increased juvenile age from 16 years to 18 years to promote love jihad in India. Now what do you suggest I should do? Should I hide this fact from my junior activists and lose their faith?
My junior activists have "chosen" me as their senior because they saw that I go around giving relevant information which no one else was giving. And over time they have put faith that if any relevant fact comes to me , I wont hide it. And now if I start hiding facts that come across me , then I will lose their trust for once and for all. So AFAIS, I have no choice but to tell all FACTS I see around me to everyone. You can call me "chugalikhor", but then thats what activist is supposed to be.
====NaMo's stand on tax-exemption to FDI-investors
FDI investors get tax exemptions on most taxes such as income tax. Will NaMo continue that policy? If yes, then IMO local Indian investors get royally ruined. Now for details, pls confirm with a CA as well.
FDI investors give dollars and get rupees from RBI and then they invest that rupee in India. Now whatever profits they may from this rupee they invest is tax exempt, unless they want dollars back. eg say Rs 60 = $1 is the rate. Say an MNC-owner brings in $ 1 crore to India and gives it to RBI. Then RBI will give him Rs 60 crore which he will invest. Now say that MNC-owner makes a profit of 15% i.e. Rs 9 crore on it. Then he will NOT have to pay tax of Rs 3 crore on it, which other normal Indian businessmen will need to pay. Further, whatever profits he makes from this 9 crore of investment next year too will be tax exempt !! FDI in certain sectors also get exemption from customs , excise, service tax etc. In such cases, there is no way local businessmen can compete against them.So will NaMo as PM support tax exemptions to FDI?
Now since I never voted for NaMo, I never voted for BJP. And in may-2014 I will be voting for Right to Recall candidate or NoTA and thus I wont be voting for BJP=NaMo. So I have no right to ask this question to NaMo=BJP. But NaMo-supporters might want to get answer to this question and also tell answer to this question to voters. Till now, NaMo-supporters had valid answer to question that "NaMo is Swadeshi, NaMo is anti-FDI and so this question doesnt apply". But now that NaMo has declared himself as pro-FDI, the question does come "will NaMo support tax exemptions given to FDI"? If yes, then IMO
, India is on way to become SoKo or Phillinpines or some combination. And MNC-owners are also notorious for splitting countries into pieces. So if MNC-owners become stronger, then they will split India into 20 parts and make each part fight with its neighbors. FDI and then tax-exemptions to FDI will make MNC-owners stronger and stronger and stronger in India. And they may become strong enough to split India. Further, MNC-owners are notorious for killing local religions and promote Missionaries. I dont need to give more details.
[OST ---- Solution I propose are RTR etc etc. I also propose complete cancellation of all tax exemptions to FDI, and making rupee free floating, 300% customs duty on all products except natural resources such as gold, crude etc and ending RBI's responsibility to give dollars to importers. And making all international trade gold\silver based in 5-10 years. But all that is OST]
So I request NaMo-supporters to get answers to this question whether "will NaMo continue tax exemptions to FDI"?