Muppalla wrote:Every speech is creating a crisis for the media houses.
Rahul speak has become pappucock derived from poppycock or balderdash.
Muppalla wrote:Every speech is creating a crisis for the media houses.
Why it is wrong to compare Rahul Gandhi with Modi
http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/s ... 130409.htm
Allegations never have a credibility. Allegations only have deniability or admissibility in a formal scenario. In an informal scenario they also have 'tadka value'.disha wrote:The question is not about buying Viggen or not. The question is about conflict of interest. Just 30 years after independence, son of a PM and leader of nation is representing a foreign arms exporter and it is not disclosed!Pratyush wrote: I know that the first choice was the Viggen. It was not bought cause the Yanks put sanctions on it cause of some US made components. The point that I am making is that the INC can easily get away pointing out that the IAF did not buy the Viggen. So the allegations have not credibility.
And even more importantly, how much more is hidden? Of course, people will give a flimsy reason that Viggen was not bought and hence a non-issue. What would be the situation if Viggen was indeed bought? Given the Bofors scandal, it is imperative to think that how much money would have or exchanged hands.
In that case is Sonia a foreign hand?
johneeG garu, Saar, you are partially right no doubt, but I was not talking about the above comment. I was talking about another comment. Now we may not have talked about this, but you will agree that I usually have always maintained that the BJP should have taken a stronger Hindutva position post 2004, and not make good governance or development its sole prominent plank.johneeG wrote: Sanku saar,
did advani had to say that he cried in a corner when babri was demolished? He could have kept quite if he wanted to. Then why did he say what he said? Not because of court or any such thing. He said to try for an image make-over: from hindutva to 'secularism'. He thought he was being too clever when he did that. And he was given moh tod jawab by the BJP core voters in that elections. In a way, his position became like a dhobi ka ...
No Saar, there is no indication on the ground that is true. Look at the vote %. Congress votes are not really falling anywhere. Let us not live in that fond hope.Right now the biggest hurdle in Modi's path to throne is not MSM or mainos. They have already lost.
Law relaxed for Priyanka to buy farmland in Himachal
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress president Sonia Gandhi, and leading lawyer Prashant Bhushan are among 881 individual beneficiaries, companies, societies and trusts granted permission in the last three years to buy land in Himachal Pradesh. The strict land laws that do not permit outsiders or non- agriculturists to buy farmland were relaxed for these select few.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/o ... 595739.ece
RoyG wrote:^^I was thinking the exact same thing. The problem for him is he has no takers in India so he has to go abroad. Modi on the other hand is blitzing through different states and garnering more support so it's only natural that momentum will increase. I hope Modi shreds up this stupid constitution and helps draft a new one based on duties rather than rights and puts an end to all this secular socialist mumbo jumbo.
Conceptually, 'conveying his displeasure in the strongest possible terms' would be the rational thing to do. But you have to admit, if his definition of 'strongest possible term' is to divorce the current girl-friend and marry the prostitute - then that's just a wee-bit wonky, wouldn't you ? Perhaps you could even say that he's taken leave of his senses ?johneeG wrote:Offline, I argued against such policy of voting out BJP. VijayK saar has given a good explanation of how people by default go with castes but will rally with some group/person when he really takes up hindutva, but the same people will leave if that group/person is perceived as dishonest or opportunist(i.e. only using hindutva as a vote catching policy but not delivering anything on it).
But, I think that policy is not completely without merit. I'll explain by an analogy. Lets say a person lives in a mohalla near red-light area. That person has a girl-friend or wife. Now, this person will not be unduly bothered by the behaviour of a prostitute. But, if his girl-friend or wife were to be imitating the prostitute's behaviour, he would be alarmed. And will immediately take measures to convey his displeasure in the strongest terms. One can argue that his girl-friend or wife is still better than the prostitute anyday, then why is he getting alarmed. He is getting alarmed because he does not want her to proceed in that path. So, he wants to nip such attitude in the bud.
Hail Mary, most secular channel of India undieTV livecasting Namo Speech.!!!!RoyG wrote:Modi live in Kolkata, West Bengal:
http://www.ndtv.com/video/live/channel/ ... eststories
Ah the famous art of paraphrasing/summarizing, made famous by certain posters on BRF too.Tamang wrote:So on NDTV last night Amitabh Revi(?) say that there has been mixed reactions to Modi's speech. He cuts to his Chennai correspondent who has 3 women waiting, the correspondent asks them how they felt about the speech. Each one of them says that speech was extremely positive and impressive. Then he summerises it by saying that "we are getting mixed reactions about the speech...."
"He killed it" means he did outstanding.Arun Menon wrote:^More like the ovation doesn't end.
^^^ http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/left-r ... o-featuredChandragupta wrote:Around 9 yesterday, there was a show on some English news channel with Kiron Kher from BJP and Sanjay Jha(ntu) from the Congress, in the larger panel of around 5-6 people. Anybody remember which channel & show it was? I could just catch a glimpse of Jhantu speaking some nonsense.
Cause they are confident that they can silence Modi and know that at the moment he has not second string.Hari Seldon wrote:He says at the beginning that the Kolkata is the key to the rise of the entire eastern and NE region. He knows, he understands.
But why isn't uPA issuing daily edicts to the paid media and MSM to bury NM's speeches in thunderous silence? They've perfected the art of pretending not to see elephanst in the rom after all...
You are totally wrong. BJP supporters had more faith in Advani than ABV. If BJP had at least simple majority, then Advani would have been PM.Pratyush wrote:People never voted for LKA, they voted for ABV. Similarly, they will not be voting for the BJP. They will be voting for Modi. That being the case, LKA is not a threat to Modi.
Possible alliance with didi in the works??"In Gujarat, I spent 10 years in filling potholes which the Congress created ... here, they (Left government) made potholes for 30 years but the present (Mamata Banerjee-led) government is going in right direction," he said.