Chandragupta wrote:RM saar Gul Panag will defeat Kiron Kher? Come on.
A big chunk of middle class is pro-AK. One needs a good candidate to attract them away from AK and make them vote for BJP. Kiron kher cant do that. So lower class will all vote for Congress i.e. Bansal, who has been a long time politician with base. And a big chunk of BJP voters will feel disillusioned with Kiron Kher and may not just vote.
So finally, some middle class will vote for BJP, some middle class will vote for AAP and lower class will vote for Bansal en-masse. And so Pawan Bansal will win.
My take is ------ media-owners threatened BJP-apex to use AK-card and then offered them a deal ---- put weak candidates in Haryana\Chandigadh, support FDI etc etc for some things in offer. And so we saw pro-FDI stand from BJP, mess in Haryana\Chandigadh BJP and in return , paid-media played anti-AK video of AK and Punya Prasson Vajpayee.
Now, I am NOT a BJP-supporter. And so I am not complaining on KH's getting ticket. I have no right to complain. I am throwing this issue ONLY because I want to tell nationalists NOT to waste anymore time in neta-andh-bhakti and organization-andh-bhakti. Both neta and organization (organization = set of neta) in the end are weak and will buckle out. Their strength is only dialog-baazi and posturing. If NaMo was all that dynamic and strong as story-tellers tell me, then why is NaMo putting up with people like KH? If NaMo cant control BJP-leaders, whoTH hell can he control MNC-mafia, judicious mafia, land mafia, medical mafia and 10s of other mafia going round India? Solution is that nationalists activists should focus on mass-movement to get good law-drafts passed ONLY and not waste time on leader-andh-bhakti.
Only a hard code 48 carat dhmmi will say that Tridevalaya is anti-development. In fact, this was the argument used by Rajiv Gandhi , PVNR and other Congressi that RJB Devalaya issue is anti-development. You guys carry on with your dhmmitude. But pls dont project us Tridevalaya-vaadies as aadi-manav. I have explained this point 10s of time, and I wont repeat it here.