Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Cybaru
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3068
Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Contact:

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Cybaru »

So when does the procurement tender go out? EMB will need time to rework these platforms as well and make ready for DRDO...
Avinandan
BRFite
Posts: 314
Joined: 12 Jun 2005 12:29
Location: Pune

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Avinandan »

Why do we waste time in looking for aircrafts elsewhere. We have 4 of them for Airforce VIP transport. Just use them up and replace the transports aircrafts with some other aircraft which are cheaper to operate.

Reference : https://khalsavox.com/news/two-decades- ... -overhaul/
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14379
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Vayutuvan »

VKumar wrote: 26 Aug 2025 22:53 And plenty of growlers
VKumar ji, what is a growler?
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21696
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Rakesh »

Vayutuvan wrote: 28 Aug 2025 00:42
VKumar wrote: 26 Aug 2025 22:53 And plenty of growlers
VKumar ji, what is a growler?
EA-18G Growler ---> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_EA-18G_Growler
Khalsa
BRFite
Posts: 1854
Joined: 12 Nov 2000 12:31
Location: NZL

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Khalsa »

KSingh wrote: 24 Aug 2025 08:21
Khalsa wrote: 23 Aug 2025 16:41 Are the Airbus based Mk2s on top of the Mk1A or has the order for Mk1A been scrapped ?
MK1–> EMB-145 (2+1)
MK1A—> EMB-145 (6)
MK2–> A321 (6)

MK1A may be more complicated because they have to find the spare EMB-145 airframes laying around the world that are trusted enough to be converted for this role
Hi KSingh. Thank you for clarifying Saar. Elaborate the trusted bit please. Trusted so they have not been pre-wired to spy back on us. or we trusting the age left in them. Why would we not go for new frames.
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2741
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by SRajesh »

https://swarajyamag.com/defence/operati ... nd%20Spots
Wow!!
Is this really true!
If as per the article our 'Eye in the Sky' (our own desi Roti vision) is so poor that we actually lag behind the Jihadis, then how in the 'Bloody Jhumboodvipa' did we nanage to knock off the jihadi Eyerie!!
Are stil in the Bean Counting mode or Chai Biskoot mode vis-a-vis acquiring Desi Chapati or Jugad-Roti (and the Roti maker!!)
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6980
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

SRajesh wrote: 22 Oct 2025 22:56 ... then how in the 'Bloody Jhumboodvipa' did we nanage to knock off the jihadi Eyerie!!...
An AEWACs, even a small one like the Eyerie, is not exactly low observable. It has to fly high to do it's job, exposing it to detection and tracking by ground based radars.
Prem Kumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4626
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by Prem Kumar »

The Swarajya article is scathing & accurate. It lays the blame on 2 key doctrinal blindspots of the IAF:

1) Choosing perfect over practical: instead of ordering more Netra-Mk1 (battle proven in Balakot), they let the Embraer line go idle and wanted Chappatti-radar on Airbus. Now, they are scrambling for after-market Embraer. And even now, they want an Mk1a, which will take more time to certify. They have also belatedly realized that Netra-Mk2 (Airbus) need not have a chappatti but a beam-mounted radar will suffice, which is practical. So, they were twiddling their thumbs in anticipation of a platform that was 3 steps ahead of where they were. It also betrays that the IAF has no idea of how incremental improvements & mass-manufacturing works. End-result: PAF is years ahead of us in AEW&C, which is shameful!

2) Choosing shiny-platforms over architecture: the MRFA being parroted like the Kalma by different chiefs. As if 36 Rafales will magically solve all our problems! Unable & unwilling to do better networking of our existing platforms, which would be a much better force-multiplier. As the article points out, our Mig-21s getting jammed due to lack of SDRs during Balakot is a crying shame. The IAF ran for emergency-imports of SDRs from Israel, as usual. Just like they are doing now for Rampage, Scalp, LORA and what-not

There are many more biases I can add: import-bahaduri, infinite trials, piecemeal ordering, lack of prioritization (losing BVR edge vis-a-vis Pakistan), lack of planning/reactivity, pathetic understanding of budgets, jock-mentality (why risk air-launched Brahmos, when ground-launched Brahmos & Pralay can do the same job?)

The IAF rightfully deserves a pat on the back for their brilliant conduct of Op Sindoor. But it will be found wanting against an equal/superior adversary like PLAAF in a protracted war. IAF's individual heroes repeatedly save the day for them (just like the IA), but they are institutionally messed up & suffer from poor leadership (again, like the IA). They don't come across as a serious warfighting sword arm of an emerging superpower. They sound more like petulant children

War is too important to be left to our Chiefs
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2741
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion

Post by SRajesh »

^^^
Prem Kji
This is what flummox's me!!
All our retired War Lords come on this TV or that TV and pontificate about this achievement or the other.
Be it a Land-Lubber or Ocean-goer or a Air Warrior!!
Yet during their watch they let these happen and have no qualms about the mess that has been left behind for the poor fighters to make do with what they have.
And then we scramble to fight the PR war that the jihadis unleash!!
I defintely feel that RM is a bit ineffective in getting both the Defence Personnel and the Baboos to fall in line.
Late Mr Parrikarji had he been alive and controlled the R ministry for 10 yrs things would have been lot better
And Op Sindoor would have had lot more impact!!
Post Reply