PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
looking at the beastly power of this bird, I wonder why people work themselves into a froth about the A2A capabilities of the typhoon - which anyways awaits the full evolution of the captor-E radar, pirate IRST and meteor, plus a successor to the somewhat dated Asraam aim132 (will it be aim9Xv2 ?). this thing with side looking radars etc , internal weapons in considerable number and long loiter time, plus better top speed and low drag is clearly in the f22 class and a tier above the EF. and we are getting 250 to start with.
the indian official quoting 0.5m2 rcs target vs 20m2 for MKI is quite telling comparison. I wonder how EF with external weapons can claim similar figures...seem to recall EF supporters quoting 0.1m2 or some such figure...
methinks if we can upg the MKI using elements of the pakfa program, a EPE engine, a better missile and a downscaled pakfa aesa radar + PAKFA itself, the air to air arena will be taken care of.
we need a high quality semi-stealthy DPSA bird to replace and supplement the Mirages and Jags and Rafale is probably it. eventually when AMCA enters service around 2025 it can supplement and replace....
the indian official quoting 0.5m2 rcs target vs 20m2 for MKI is quite telling comparison. I wonder how EF with external weapons can claim similar figures...seem to recall EF supporters quoting 0.1m2 or some such figure...
methinks if we can upg the MKI using elements of the pakfa program, a EPE engine, a better missile and a downscaled pakfa aesa radar + PAKFA itself, the air to air arena will be taken care of.
we need a high quality semi-stealthy DPSA bird to replace and supplement the Mirages and Jags and Rafale is probably it. eventually when AMCA enters service around 2025 it can supplement and replace....
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
I don't know what the problem is, but I get a message saying "Sorry! This document is not publicly available." when I try to view either the embedded document. On clicking the link, I get the msg "The document 'De-constructing the Sukhoi PAK-FA (Su-50)' has been deleted ".Austin wrote:Gaur , check the link its out there , I can read the article , you can always use full screen for better viewing.
Anyway, will try to search for another link afterwards.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 353
- Joined: 16 May 2009 15:24
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Thanks a lot arunsrinivasan. Much appreciated.arunsrinivasan wrote:^^ Found this link & just downloaded the PDF.
IDA's Unclassified Analysis Download Link
At first glance, the article doesn't seem to be an "analysis" by any standards. It is a compilation of info and diagrams from various sources. A very interesting and exhaustive compilation, but a compilation nevertheless. So, if someone was paid to do this job, they could have just searched Paralay or keypubs instead. I am willing to bet that even Austin would have seen majority of the diagrams in the pdf.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
The compilation is entirely a copy-paste from keypubs (where a lot of info came from Paralay).. Not a single word of independant analysisGaur wrote:Thanks a lot arunsrinivasan. Much appreciated.arunsrinivasan wrote:^^ Found this link & just downloaded the PDF.
IDA's Unclassified Analysis Download Link
At first glance, the article doesn't seem to be an "analysis" by any standards. It is a compilation of info and diagrams from various sources. A very interesting and exhaustive compilation, but a compilation nevertheless. So, if someone was paid to do this job, they could have just searched Paralay or keypubs instead. I am willing to bet that even Austin would have seen majority of the diagrams in the pdf.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2196
- Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
- Location: Gateway Arch
- Contact:
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
I am able to download from this link.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55728898/Russ ... esentation
User - Luptonga
Njoy...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55728898/Russ ... esentation
User - Luptonga
Njoy...
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
some pak-fa pictures ( via mp.net )
http://imageshack.us/m/845/755/130606999112004470.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/43/7545/13060699989400536.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/863/7332/130606999224008271.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/233/7157/130606999322003186.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/593/7679/130606999422008878.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/840/1817/130606999521006225.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/135/761/130606999625008852.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/849/2313/130606999722007611.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/42/7442/130607007204002259.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/717/6803/130607007385007885.jpg
Pics posted by Xitrion, taken by Jurij Stepanov
http://imageshack.us/m/845/755/130606999112004470.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/43/7545/13060699989400536.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/863/7332/130606999224008271.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/233/7157/130606999322003186.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/593/7679/130606999422008878.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/840/1817/130606999521006225.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/135/761/130606999625008852.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/849/2313/130606999722007611.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/42/7442/130607007204002259.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/717/6803/130607007385007885.jpg
Pics posted by Xitrion, taken by Jurij Stepanov
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Singha wrote:looking at the beastly power of this bird, I wonder why people work themselves into a froth about the A2A capabilities of the typhoon - which anyways awaits the full evolution of the captor-E radar, pirate IRST and meteor, plus a successor to the somewhat dated Asraam aim132 (will it be aim9Xv2 ?). this thing with side looking radars etc , internal weapons in considerable number and long loiter time, plus better top speed and low drag is clearly in the f22 class and a tier above the EF. and we are getting 250 to start with.
the indian official quoting 0.5m2 rcs target vs 20m2 for MKI is quite telling comparison. I wonder how EF with external weapons can claim similar figures...seem to recall EF supporters quoting 0.1m2 or some such figure...
methinks if we can upg the MKI using elements of the pakfa program, a EPE engine, a better missile and a downscaled pakfa aesa radar + PAKFA itself, the air to air arena will be taken care of.
we need a high quality semi-stealthy DPSA bird to replace and supplement the Mirages and Jags and Rafale is probably it. eventually when AMCA enters service around 2025 it can supplement and replace....
Where is the like button ?? We need mud movers.. Heavy duty mud movers.. Rafale is probably better than EF in this regard..
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2196
- Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
- Location: Gateway Arch
- Contact:
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Hope they also start working on a Bomber version of the PAK-FA. We need a dedicated bomber for taking out entrenched ground targets and large armoured columns / trains etc.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Sorry The words "mud movers" make me see red.Cybaru wrote: Where is the like button ?? We need mud movers.. Heavy duty mud movers.. Rafale is probably better than EF in this regard..
Mud moving is both outdated and ineffective overall. Damage per kilo of explosive is not good enough. We need PGM delivery platforms and earth penetrating and bunker busting precision munitions. Like dogs with Titanium teeth - the business of mud moving has caught the imagination of a lot of people but I have serious reasons to disagree with that.
One 250 kg bomb that can explode after penetrating 10 meters of earth is better than 50 X 250 kg bombs that will merely scratch the surface and move some mud.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Cheenum, Rus has started conceptual work on a replacement stealth bomber for tu22/tu160 dubbed the PAKDA. it will certainly borrow from the PAKFA project, but no CG drawings released yet of what its size and shape will be. I suspect it will be much smaller than the blackjack...probablt tu22 size at most but feature new cruise missiles and internal bays.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
http://imageshack.us/m/840/1817/130606999521006225.jpg
fantastic-o!
but, high RCS there, and high Infra.
fantastic-o!
but, high RCS there, and high Infra.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Dr. Sahib, the first post on Dogs with metal teeth was made on the military humour forum along with a joke. Looks like you missed the sarcasm of the post !shiv wrote:Cybaru wrote:
Like dogs with Titanium teeth - the business of mud moving has caught the imagination of a lot of people but I have serious reasons to disagree with that.
I am amazed that so many people have taken this one seriously
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Interview with Saturn GD V Chepkin
link
link
On Military Aircraft Engine
For military aircraft, we have created two engines - one for the aircraft, the Su-35 ", the second - for the Russian aircraft 5 th generation of T-50". The first - "117C" - is mainly intended for export. it is easier in terms of aerodynamics, and most importantly - targeted for aircraft with conventional arms, suspended on pylons outside the fuselage, with no strong constraints on dimensions. Such schemes are used on aircraft 4-th generation, exported to India and Malaysia.
The second engine - "117" - though only differ by one letter in the title, is much more advanced engine - this is a real engine of the 5-th generation. we sometimes hear from competitors the engine of 5-th generation should have such a blade, such and such materials, high-speed rotors, and you do not have this ... None of this is all just ways of achieving the goal. A single goal - increasing specific thrust, ie the ratio of thrust to its weight. For example, the first jet engine Arkhip Mikhailovich Cradles weighed 1350 kg and had the same cravings, that is, its specific thrust is equal to 1. The engine is the 4 th generation, "AL-31F, has already managed to achieve specific thrust of 8.7, and car 5 th generation, the figure is 10.
- What are the new challenges encountered when creating the plane 5 th generation?
Problems have to solve a thousand. Say, for reducing the radar visibility "T-50 has a scheme with an internal arrangement of weapons, so is becoming increasingly important problem of reducing its size. And that means we have to be develop and put into service a new weapon, but since it is low volume, it must be highly accurate. It therefore necessarily needs a fully functional GLONASS.
The American GPS, for obvious reasons is not suitable, since in times of crisis they will disable it, and both during the Ossetian-Georgian war, they impose an artificial shift in the coordinates of 300 km. Also need to know exactly, not just to shoot, but how do you shoot, so should be a modern mapping system. The missile itself should be unobtrusive. Such weapons are now manufactured, and all this affects the design of the engine. Work is proceeding according to plan ... In general, in my opinion, the plane turns out good, no worse than the American "F-22".
By the way, if we compare the T-50 "with the" F-22 ", Western sources say that the T-50" loses much of the last parameters such as infrared engine visibility in the rear hemisphere ?
We're working very intensely, and to reduce the infrared and radar visibility, and were twice as better performance in comparison with the "F-22" (at least for those data that are published and which I have).
Today, the Chinese have copied our Su-27 "and are ready to sell it on world markets at dumping prices. ?
We do not lose, because such an aircraft as we do, the Chinese have no time soon will be! They say that the plane made is 5-th generation, but you can say anything ... They are the best engine copied from our "AL-31F. We also do engine 5-th generation, and it is in all of its parameters on traction, in specific fuel consumption corresponds to the 5-th generation.
I open a secret and say that we actually already have two motors 5-th generation. The second, which is now conventionally called the "Type 30", has already been tested in flight on the fighter T-50 "According to its parameters it a 15-25 percent greater than "117 ".
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Very positive news!Austin wrote:Interview with Saturn GD V Chepkin
I open a secret and say that we actually already have two motors 5-th generation. The second, which is now conventionally called the "Type 30", has already been tested in flight on the fighter T-50 "According to its parameters it a 15-25 percent greater than "117 ".
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
yah baby yah....the type30 sounds like a meaty beast to me.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
AOA! They were only recently saying that the second 5gen engine was 10 years away! Craftly Russians!
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Indian Delegation at PAK-FA demonstration.
From keypubs.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Can any body identify the gentleman in the cockpit ?
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
said to be delegation of indian MOD and industry officials. the gents in the pic look like grizzled old IAF types to me though...
these two pics bring out the size and shape diffs between su30 and pakfa quite well - hugely smaller vertical tails for eg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2781/443 ... f758_z.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2751/443 ... c147_z.jpg
we could perhaps save a few 100kg more in weight for PAKFA-I by changing the wheels and supports to a thinner design as operating from super-cold and gravelly siberian airbases is not on our agenda...the F15 for example has a truly sdre thin legged look vs pakfa/rafale...and it still operates with big payloads hung on every rack down to the tailpipes. F15E is worthy of a case study in how to increase pylons and fuel on a existing platform - side pylons, tail pylons it has them all.
the saved weight could reduce fuel consumption to extend endurance kinda like deleting the 1400kg of MAD on P8A for USN
these two pics bring out the size and shape diffs between su30 and pakfa quite well - hugely smaller vertical tails for eg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2781/443 ... f758_z.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2751/443 ... c147_z.jpg
we could perhaps save a few 100kg more in weight for PAKFA-I by changing the wheels and supports to a thinner design as operating from super-cold and gravelly siberian airbases is not on our agenda...the F15 for example has a truly sdre thin legged look vs pakfa/rafale...and it still operates with big payloads hung on every rack down to the tailpipes. F15E is worthy of a case study in how to increase pylons and fuel on a existing platform - side pylons, tail pylons it has them all.
the saved weight could reduce fuel consumption to extend endurance kinda like deleting the 1400kg of MAD on P8A for USN
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
The higher thrust would be some what offseted by uses of rectangular nozzle , so a 17 to 18 Ton thrust might see a 3 to 5 % reduction if they opt for such nozzle for greater rear stealth.
What would matter too is beyond raw thrust does the new engine has better T/W ratio and better fuel consumption figures compared to 117.
If they can keep the weight similar to 117 and achieve a 2-3 T higher thrust that would improve the T/W ratio
What would matter too is beyond raw thrust does the new engine has better T/W ratio and better fuel consumption figures compared to 117.
If they can keep the weight similar to 117 and achieve a 2-3 T higher thrust that would improve the T/W ratio
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Slight OT; but at first glance was not able to recognize Indian Air Chief PV Naik as eyes are accustomed to see him in Uniform... though he still has no nonsense look in that formal suit
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Gaur wrote:
...
Indian Delegation at PAK-FA demonstration.
From keypubs.
One looks like the retiring ACM Naik in suit.Singha wrote:said to be delegation of indian MOD and industry officials. the gents in the pic look like grizzled old IAF types to me though...
...
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
ha hah I knew it...the person in the foreground looks like a hard man too. probably a air commodore/AVM type in charge of IAF reqs for the project.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
^^^
The one in the cockpit seems to be test pilot Mr Kothiyal.
The one in the cockpit seems to be test pilot Mr Kothiyal.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Yeah he could be Mr Kothiyal , he certainly is a defence breed not the MOD types.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
^^
Wg Cdr Kothiyal has not been attached to any deffence related field for a long time (Tarmak007 had posted an interview with him a few months back). He serves in Civil Aviation sector and there is no reason why he would be part of a MOD delegation. Anyway, I don't see much resemblance in any case.
Wg Cdr Kothiyal has not been attached to any deffence related field for a long time (Tarmak007 had posted an interview with him a few months back). He serves in Civil Aviation sector and there is no reason why he would be part of a MOD delegation. Anyway, I don't see much resemblance in any case.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 348
- Joined: 13 Sep 2008 22:04
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Slight OT; but at first glance was not able to recognize Indian Air Chief PV Naik as eyes are accustomed to see him in Uniform... though he still has no nonsense look in that formal suit
MIG 21+++ look
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels ... -visit-117Besides the common heavier platform, Russia has also agreed to jointly develop a lighter fifth generation fighter tailored to meet the specific requirements of the IAF.
Light 5th Gen???
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
^^^ Surprising and if this does not get confirmed by many other sources should be taken as journo error
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.BENNY wrote:http://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels ... -visit-117Besides the common heavier platform, Russia has also agreed to jointly develop a lighter fifth generation fighter tailored to meet the specific requirements of the IAF.
Light 5th Gen???
There goes my AMCA.
Whom does Naik work for?
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
SELF DELETED. Wrong information.
Last edited by Gaur on 25 May 2011 16:28, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
The UAV or twin-seat version?Gaur wrote:That may not be an error. I am pretty sure that I have seen another news report that FGFA will be a little lighter than PAK-FA. I know that this is contrary to the popular belief, but I distinctly remember reading such a news report. I will post the link if I manage to find it.Austin wrote:^^^ Surprising and if this does not get confirmed by many other sources should be taken as journo error
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
aviator sunglass == military, in this case IAF, right ?Austin wrote:Can any body identify the gentleman in the cockpit ?
probably someone from air HQ in charge of plans waghera.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Could be but the ghost of light fighter keeps coming and dies quickly , let us wait for more confirmation from other sources.NRao wrote:The UAV or twin-seat version?
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Was just searching for the report of lighter FGFA news I was talking about. It seems that I have totally made a total fool of myself. I had just seen some stupid fanboy posts in some forums on how FGFA would be lighter because it would use even more super duper composites. In short, there is no such news report but only my muddled memory. Next time, will definitely search before posting.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
Yes he certainly has the flare and style of a defence officerRahul M wrote:aviator sunglass == military, in this case IAF, right ?Austin wrote:Can any body identify the gentleman in the cockpit ?
probably someone from air HQ in charge of plans waghera.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
the third gent behind the ACM , wearing aviator glasses also is definitely a IAF looking type. which makes sense - ACM would have taken some high level planning officers there...but wonder why all are in civil dress....usually serving officers seem to go on foreign trips in service dress for official occasions.
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
You mean Mikhail Pogosyan ?Singha wrote:the third gent behind the ACM , wearing aviator glasses also is definitely a IAF looking type.