Intelligence & National Security Discussion

Thomas Kolarek · Post by **Thomas Kolarek** » 12 Aug 2011 06:29

Bin Laden Turned in by Informant -- Courier Was Cover Story by R J Hillhouse

Forget the cover story of waterboarding-leads-to-courier-leads-to bin Laden (not to deny the effectiveness of waterboarding, but it’s just not applicable in this case.) Sources in the intelligence community tell me that after years of trying and one bureaucratically insane near-miss in Yemen, the US government killed OBL because a Pakistani intelligence officer came forward to collect the approximately $25 million reward from the State Department's Rewards for Justice program.

The informant was a walk-in.

The ISI officer came forward to claim the substantial reward and to broker US citizenship for his family. My sources tell me that the informant claimed that the Saudis were paying off the Pakistani military and intelligence (ISI) to essentially shelter and keep bin Laden under house arrest in Abbottabad, a city with such a high concentration of military that I'm told there's no equivalent in the US.

The CIA and friends then set about proving that OBL was indeed there. And they did.

Next they approached the chiefs of the Pakistani military and the ISI. The US was going to come in with or without them. The CIA offered them a deal they couldn't refuse: they would double what the Saudis were paying them to keep bin Laden if they cooperated with the US. Or they could refuse the deal and live with the consequences: the Saudis would stop paying and there would be the international embarassment...

The ISI and Pakistani military were cooperating with the US on the raid.
The cooperation was why there were no troops in Abottabad. They were all pulled out. It had always seemed very far-fetched to me that a helicopter could crash and later destroyed in an area with such high military concentration without the Pakistanis noticing. But then it seemed even wilder to believe that a US Navy SEAL (DEVGRU) actually shot a woman who rushed them in the leg. Yeah, right. I know these guys. They only way they'll shoot a woman in the leg is if they are double tapping a head or chest and that leg got in the way.

DEVGRU shoots to kill.

The cover story was going to be a drone strike in Pakistan. Things went south when the helicopter crashed. The White House freaked and the cooperating Pakistanis were thrown under the bus.

Splat.

Does India have something similar listing like this Most Wanted Fugitives

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 14 Aug 2011 08:31

10 Biggest National Security Failures
From India Today, December 2008

1. Operation Bluestar, 1984
2. Indira Gandhi's Assassination, 1984
3. Operation Pawan, 1987
4. Rubaiya Sayeed's Kidnapping, 1989
5. Rajiv Gandhi's Assassination, 1991
6. Babri Masjid's Demolition, 1992
7. Kargil War, 1999
8. IC-814 Hijacking 1999
9. Parliament Attack, 2001
10. Mumbai attacks, 2008

shyamd · Post by **shyamd** » 14 Aug 2011 16:44

India’s new spy agency spooked by ‘internal spies’

Courtesy RTI and the so-called whistleblowers in NTRO, the organisation has suffered major setbacks
Man Mohan
Our Roving Editor

CAUSE FOR ALARM

India’s youngest spy agency NTRO has found many vital targets in Pakistan and China disappearing from its radar. The NTRO is now groping in the dark to retrace the important targets.

New Delhi, August 10
Alarm bells are ringing for India’s youngest spy agency — the National Technical Research Organsation (NTRO) — as many vital “targets” in Pakistan and China under its electronic surveillance have started “disappearing” from its radar.

Thanks to the so-called “whistleblowers” from within the NTRO, and some former officers using the “right to information” weapon, the agency has suffered major setbacks recently.

In the aftermath of the Kargil war, the NTRO was established in 2004 as the top technical intelligence-gathering agency. It is on the pattern of America’s super espionage agency — the National Security Agency.

Said to be more powerful than the CIA, the National Security Agency is a cryptology intelligence agency of the US Department of Defence. It is responsible for the collection and analysis of foreign communications and foreign signals intelligence, as well as protecting American communications and information systems.

Working under the National Security Adviser (NSA) in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), the NTRO is a super-feeder agency for providing technical intelligence to other Indian agencies dealing with security and espionage. The first of its kind in Asia, the NTRO is trying to emerge like America’s National Security Agency. That is why it has become chief target of Pakistan, China and some powerful western spy agencies’ hackers.

Recently, extremely sensitive information and documents surfaced in the “public domain” through the RTI route and a special audit of the NTRO. For unknown reasons, an audit by the Comptroller and Auditor-General was ordered by the PMO, making the NTRO the first Indian spy organisation to be scrutinised by the CAG.

The information and papers that have reached the “public domain” relate to the projects, purchases, equipments, locations, officers of the NTRO and many others things. By analysing them, professionals can read hard intelligence.

So alarming is the situation in the NTRO that the PMO and National Security Adviser Shiv Shankar Menon have been alerted. Highly placed sources told The Tribune that the government was contemplating taking action under the Official Secrets Act against the “whistleblowers” and “the RTI activists within the organisation”.

It is learnt that the top NTRO brass has moved files to the PMO and the National Security Adviser for approval to initiate disciplinary action and penalties against some officers. Major penalty proceedings can result in dismissal or removal from service and stoppage of pension of the indicted officers.

The NTRO has started feeling the heat as it has discovered that “targets” in Pakistan and China have suddenly stopped using the equipment and channels that it was monitoring.

Obviously, sources said, information about the equipment of the NTRO and officers’ location has been analysed by experts across the border and they have zeroed in on their establishments under Indian surveillance.

All of a sudden, Pakistan and China have shifted to other communication equipment and other mediums. The NTRO is now groping in the dark to retrace the important targets. “At present, we are totally blind about some important equipment and channels to which Pakistan and China have shifted to,” disclosed a source in India’s external espionage agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

Besides the NTRO, RAW and its sister organsiation -- the Aviation Research Centre (ARC) -- are working hard to trace the new channels and mediums now being used by Pakistan and Chinese armed forces and their intelligence agencies. Efforts are on to procure compatible equipment to monitor “new systems” across the borders.

“Much to the delight of the enemies across our borders,” a top Intelligence Bureau officer said, “the so-called whistleblowers’ personal vendetta has led to loss of valuable intelligence and done incalculable damage to the country’s espionage and security apparatus.”

The IB is keeping a close watch on several NTRO officers across the country. “We fear the possibility of some disgruntled elements within the organisation being used or backed by powerful vested interests inimical to the state,” the IB officer said. “We are also not ruling out the possibility of some moles that might have crept into the system at the time of recruitment of personnel from other organisations,” he declared.

Several serving as well formers officers of the NTRO have used the “right to information” channel to procure information from allied organsiations like the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). The RTI weapon has turned out be quite lethal as information resourced through it has compromised the NTRO’s vital assets.

Two officers under watch are suspected of having passed some classified information to a former NTRO officer with an aim to settle scores with the current bosses. The former NTRO officer has reportedly filed over 80 RTI applications, and some have come through his “friends” to seek information about equipment purchases, transfers and postings.

Interestingly, the two serving officers under surveillance were inducted into the NTRO by a former Chairman of the agency, who had come under cloud for pushing a French aircraft deal, which however never materialised. Meanwhile, even as investigations are pending against the two officers, one has been transferred to Karnataka and another to Gujarat.

This is the last thing we needed right now... Its going to take a long time to sort out the damage.

Considering that we are TECHINT focused, this is pretty bad. Efforts are probably on with our partners to help us. We work closely with our counterparts around. Lets see what they tell us.

sum · Post by **sum** » 15 Aug 2011 13:19

^^ Isnt this more of a psy-ops by the NTRO to prevent the glaring corruption from being exposed?

shyamd · Post by **shyamd** » 15 Aug 2011 14:54

Could be. yesterday they released that US confronted Pasha about TSP letting PRC boys get access to the OBL operation helicopter. They played a tape of intercepts to Pasha. So I presume Pasha went and rejigged their comms with PRC which had a fall out on India's interception capability.

rohitvats · Post by **rohitvats** » 15 Aug 2011 19:47

That article about NTRO capability being compromised looks like a hit-job by NTRO somehow use the cloak of 'nationalism' to hide the corruption and misdeeds of seniors in NTRO.

wig · Post by **wig** » 20 Aug 2011 07:26

case of Sh Gopal Das in the Supreme Court is referred back to the Govt for expeditious settlement

The Union Government today informed the Supreme Court that Gopal Das, released by Pakistan recently after 26 years of imprisonment, was not a spy of the external intelligence unit, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). Gopal Das, a resident of Punjab, had been convicted in Pakistan on charges of espionage.

Additional Solicitor General PP Malhotra told a Bench comprising Justices Markandey Katju and CK Prasad that “he was not our employee.”

Disputing the government stand, Counsel Arvind Kumar Sharma said his client was working for RAW and as such should be given compensation for his sufferings, besides some job for his livelihood.

The Bench, however, pointed out that such averments by Das would put India’s “international relations in jeopardy.” Nowhere in the petition it had been contended that Das was working for RAW, the court noted.

Nevertheless, the Bench allowed Das to withdraw the petition and pursue his plea directly with the government. Any such plea may be disposed of expeditiously by authorities, the court said.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110820/main7.htm

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 27 Aug 2011 08:59

Wake up to threat

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 31 Aug 2011 05:37

India Needs a Naval Diplomacy

In Monsoon, Robert Kaplan characterizes the area between the Gulf of Aden in the west and Malacca in the east as the center stage of the twenty-first century. If India is to graduate from being a regional power in South Asia to a greater power in the Asia Pacific, it is this pivotal ocean with its vital waterways that it should seek to control—whether directly, through hard power, or indirectly, with a soft power approach. Whatever its choices, India needs a clear naval diplomacy.

dinesha · Post by **dinesha** » 31 Aug 2011 08:43

Navy spots Chinese 'spy' ship near Andamans
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/navy-spots-c ... 030-3.html

Rony · Post by **Rony** » 01 Sep 2011 15:40

Playing with a nation’s choices ! Part 1 : Three funerals and a wedding

Prologue

I was part of various analysis teams of Indian intelligence agencies during the 80’s and 90’s and now live a anonymous life in a distant land. What I am going to propagate over a 3 part series in the next few days might seem very farfetched and even fantastic to most people and many conspiracy theorists might gleefully accept it as vindication for whatever they have been screaming from rooftops for quite some time now. My attempt though is neither to please any one nor to prove someone else wrong or right; it is just to come out with the truth as we perceived it. Most of the theory that I am going to put forward in part 1 is the work of us 5 people in 1991 while analyzing all the intelligence inputs over the years in connection with the assassination of former Prime Minister Mr. Rajiv Gandhi. We in the intelligence parlays termed it as “the Rajiv brief”. Most conclusions that we had come up with were unanimous and unequivocal. I must hasten to add that many parts of this so called “the Rajiv brief” were also part of an earlier analysis done in the mid 80’s by another team investigating the conspiracy angle to Mrs Indira Gandhi’s death. Theoretic overlapping in terms of evidences, intelligence briefings and logical conclusions between these two analysis reports might be common, but there are also significant points of divergence in both of these reports and since I have been privy to both I would suggest that the number of points of convergence between both sets of analysis far outnumber the differences. Sometime in the middle of 1992 we were suddenly asked to debunk the whole theory and change our line of thinking by powers that be, and we had to let go of a “very strong” case that we were building then. Of the core group of 5 analysts who were working on that case, 3 are no more (all died of normal causes) and 2 of us are still living anonymously without being in touch with each other. This is my attempt (after almost 2 decades) to complete “the Rajiv brief” and take it to its logical conclusion with the benefit of hindsight. I must warn though, that this is at the end of the day, just a theory based on intelligence inputs and field analysis built on a very plausible premise. It is an attempt to fill in the blanks between the “if’s” and “buts” of history with the luxury of retrospective intelligence.

The Theory: Five people four scenarios and three events

Mrs Sonia Gandhi is today the most powerful person in India and probably one of the most powerful women on earth. Elections 2009 have only reinforced her power. How did she end up becoming the most powerful person in India? This is the story of that ascendancy. Five people, four scenarios and three events stood between Mrs Sonia Gandhi and her destiny. Over the next few pages I am going to explain those scenarios through the eyes of a former intelligence analyst.

Scenario 1: The Rajiv-Sonia marriage

At the outset there is nothing more than just another love story to Mr Rajiv Gandhi’s romance with Miss Antonia Albina Maino in the mid 1960’s. Any suggestion that there were characters in the Cambridge university campus that not only hooked them up but also nurtured the famous romance is too farfetched. But having said that, let us consider some of the London tabloid reports of that time which variously suggested Rajiv was “constantly influenced” by a couple of students of European origin (I would not take names and let researchers do some hard work) and that at least one of those students was later absorbed by the Vatican’s intelligence wing. It would also be farfetched to speculate on Indian intelligence requesting the help of MI5 to analyze the Rajiv-Sonia romance, at least am not aware of any such report ever being filed. All these rumours and theories have done their rounds in the intelligence quarters of Delhi, especially during 1991-1992, but then we are rushing ahead of time so we shall deal with that later. I would now present as to what intelligence agencies actually did, which was very little, and let people draw their own conclusion.

Background

Post World War 1, Turin was a hub of political activity. Communism was at its peak in Europe and many left leaning socialist organizations were dabbling with the Marxist ideology and as a counter balance to that the fascist forces were emerging as an attractive alternative to many Catholics of Italy, and Turin was no exception. The small village of Orbassano near Turin mainly composed of orthodox Roman Catholic families and they all dreaded the arrival of communists on their shores and decided to join hands with the fascists lead by Mussolini. Paolo Maino was one of them. Indian intelligence gathering techniques are never given their due credit, but we have done some first rate jobs which have never been acknowledged and Mrs Sonia Gandhi’s background check was one of them. It was found that after the end of Second World War when many fascists were purged, Paolo Maino was protected by the church and no less than the Vatican itself intervened in his case and all papers pertaining to him were there by transferred to the Vatican! It was furthermore established that one of the more mysterious uncles of Paolo Maino worked for the super secret intelligence organization of the Vatican, the Opus Dei. Paolo was a construction contractor and had little savings; he could not entirely afford the educational and other expenses of his children. This mysterious uncle; who was working for the Opus Dei and whose name had been deleted from all the intelligence files; sponsored Antonio Albina Maino’s education in Cambridge in the 1960’s.

During her stay in Cambridge Miss Antonio took an “unusually high degree” of interest in the activities of groups concerning students of Indian Diaspora much before she met Rajiv. In fact, their first meeting took place in the presence of other Indian origin students and not in a Greek cafe as widely reported later. But throughout all of this she continued her association with the church and its activities and was in constant touch with “certain sections of the Vatican” which were previously also associated with the fascists. When Indian intelligence officials later questioned one of Miss Antonio’s close associates during her stay in the Cambridge, he described her relationship with the Vatican as akin to “umbilical cord”. All of these titbits were filed by many field officers of various intelligence agencies over a period of years but most analysts in the intelligence parlays of India termed them as “innocent” at worst and “needs evaluation” at best. Of course one can always concede that the analysts of that era lack the luxury of retrospective analysis as we do have now, there was definitely some lax attitude shown by these analysts in trying to decipher these events. Thus one day in 1968, after 3 odd years of courtship Mr. Rajiv Gandhi and Miss Antonio Maino; the daughter of former Fascist soldier, Paolo Maino; were married in Delhi. Miss Maino then became Mrs Sonia Gandhi for all intentions and purposes and the stepping stone to her destiny was covered with roses.

Scenario 2: Event 1, June 23rd 1980

The first player in the political theatre to have been eliminated and also the most important first link to the series of events that led to the present dispensation in the corridors of Delhi. Circumstantial evidence in the June 23rd 1980 Sanjay Gandhi air crash near Safdarjung airport points to foul play but let’s not get sucked into those futile arguments that have been raging ever since. Just suffice it to say that the single-member enquiry commission headed by Mr M L Jain which was formed to study the circumstances that lead to the plane crash has never submitted any report what so ever to the government in 3 decades. Now isn’t that fishy?

Background

Anybody who is aware of the 70’s brand of politics in India would know that Sanjay was the most important political centre, around whom most of the power was concentrated and dispensed with. Many even believed that Sanjay wielded more power than Indira Gandhi herself. It thus became pertinent for most intelligence agencies concerned with India’s affairs to have a thick case file about Sanjay Gandhi and his activities. There were some widely debunked theories of the junior Gandhi leaning towards CIA and Mrs Gandhi not being in agreement with his ideas, I do not know the origin or the veracities of these hypotheses so I would not make any comment either to encourage or discourage them. The 1960’s and 70’s Delhi was a hub of international espionage (like any other capital of any other country) because most intelligence agencies (including CIA & KGB) of that era depended on HUMINT or human intelligence officers to gather intelligence rather than satellites and drones of today. Every other day there would be speculation in the media circles of a certain politician or a certain bureaucrat working in tandem with a certain foreign intelligence agency; I would be lying if I claimed that all these speculations were wrong, in fact there were quite a few surprises in the “official” list that the Indian intelligence agencies maintained, but that is a completely different subject altogether. Coming back to Sanjay Gandhi and the interest that he generated in foreign as well as Indian intelligence circles, one thing is clear, he never worked or had any relationship with any of the foreign intelligence agencies and that much I can vouch for, but the same cannot be said about his continuous indulgence and interference with the local intelligence agencies. He always used and had his men in various wings of Indian intelligence agencies. Amidst all of this originated the “Russian hypothesis”.

There is no agreement as to when the real “Russian hypothesis” came into being, some argue that just prior to emergency in 1975 the Soviets sponsored this study because they had prior intelligence that emergency would be imposed on India, while still others argue that its origin was sometime during the Morarji Desai regime. I for one tend to agree with the former because it is a known fact that Soviets were consulted by Mrs Gandhi about emergency. Another reason to support the 1975 theory is that a secret meeting of the dreaded VKR had taken place in Delhi in the summer of 1975 (VKR = Voennaya Kontra Razvedka) and it had baffled many Indian intelligence officials as to why VKR (Russian counter intelligence wing) would meet in India. After the imposition of emergency and the awareness about Mrs Gandhi’s soviet consultation, intelligence circles widely accepted the theory of VKR meeting in Delhi as a part of that Indo-Soviet collaboration on emergency until the emergence of the “Russian hypothesis” and the eventual demise of Mr. Sanjay Gandhi. KGB had strong presence in Delhi and across India in the 70’s and many left-leaning analysts openly and covertly co-operated with KGB and other Russian intelligence agencies. One such “analyst” was part of the team that had produced the “Russian hypothesis” and he later (in 1979) leaked parts of that document to Indian intelligence and that is how the jigsaw puzzle was cracked. In the hypothesis it was concluded that Mr Sanjay Gandhi was west leaning and a capitalist and would eventually side with the CIA, although there was no universal agreement about these conclusions amongst the team that had produced the “Russian hypothesis” most of them did agree to some extent of those conclusions. It was our belief that the Soviets had decided not to take any action, mainly because of the fact that it was unlikely of KGB and even more unlikely in the case of VKR to remain quiet for more than a few months after having reached a conclusion. This is when Opus Dei comes into picture. It is a well known fact that Opus Dei and parts of Russian intelligence had always collaborated on certain matters. Exactly how or when did Opus Dei come into the possession of “Russian hypothesis” is merely in the realm of speculation but what is incontrovertible is that the Vatican intelligence did have enormous influence on Josef Stavinoha, the man who was heading VKR at that time and thus KGB in active collaboration with Opus Dei decided to act on the “Russian hypothesis” sometime in March 1980. As a direct result of that, June 23rd 1980 happened as an accident.

Continuum

After the sudden demise of Mr Sanjay Gandhi, there was the question of two other people, the very political wife Mrs Maneka Gandhi and son Mr Varun Gandhi which had to be dealt with by the Gandhi family. While there is no denying the fact that Mrs Indira Gandhi and her daughter in law Mrs Maneka Gandhi had a less than cordial relationship (which was more accentuated after the arrival of Rajiv’s family, as per some household sources of the family) and usually had typical “saas-bahu” war of turfs, but what is also irrefutable is the fact that Mr Varun Gandhi was Mrs Gandhi’s favourite grandson and she simply doted on him. What exactly transpired and who facilitated the events are all debates of speculation for the tabloid media, but one thing is certain, both the widowed mother and son were completely sidelined and almost ceased to exist as far as the Gandhi family is concerned after ceremoniously being thrown out of the Prime Minister’s residence.

Scenario 3: 1984, the assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi

It was one of those events in the young life of a nation that can be termed as a defining moment in history. At the outset it was a clear case of Khalistani fundamentalists avenging operation blue-star, but there were many characters at the periphery and many events preceding it which raised many an eyebrow in the intelligence communities of the world. This was also that one colossal event that catapulted the young Mr Rajiv Gandhi, a novice in politics, to the highest seat of power in South Asia and Mrs Sonia Gandhi was now the next in the line of succession by the virtue of being his wife.

Background

It is a historically well known fact that the Khalistan movement was nurtured by ISI and certain elements in Pakistan. Also well recorded are the initial reactions of some western countries like Canada who almost directly hobnobbed with the Sikh separatist leaders only to abandon them when the movement became increasingly violent. Tacit support of US and British intelligence agencies to the Khalistan intelligentsia was also much speculated upon those days. But what was a lesser known fact in the media and a matter of puzzling debates in the intelligence circles was the interest shown by the Vatican in the Khalistan movement. In 1980-81 Vatican had an open channel of discussions with certain groups of the so called “intellectuals” who were known sympathisers of the Sikh separatist movements. This interest and interactions continued well into the early 80’s and were explained as the “right of Vatican to have an interest in other religious organizations”. At the height of Khalistan movement just after operation Blue Star, many reliable Indian intelligence sources had given “definitive” information about Opus Dei funding parts of operations of Sikh separatists outside India!

After operation Blue Star there were many intelligence inputs about the threat to Mrs Gandhi’s life including some specific inputs about people in the core inner circle of Mrs Gandhi’s security system being vulnerable. Yet no action was taken, why? The assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi was a massive intelligence failure to say the least and yet no major enquiry was ordered to decipher the conspiracy theory, why? Sections of KGB and other Russian intelligence agencies had given a specific timeframe regarding “action” and yet their advice went unheeded, why? Soviet sources, in informal briefings had warned about certain western intelligence agencies being in cahoots with Sikh separatists and yet those warnings were disregarded, why?

A part of the answer to those questions can be explained as plain incompetence as usual. May be one can also argue that we now have the power of hindsight which we lacked then. But definitely there is a part of the answer to that question which is more complex and only takes my theory forward to its logical conclusion. It is not as if we did nothing, security experts and Intelligence aficionados gave at least 2 formal specific presentations to Mrs Gandhi on 2 different occasions about the need to re-haul the entire security apparatus around her. But on both these occasions apart from Mrs Gandhi’s nonchalance we met with the biggest resistance from one particular member of her core team. He was a very powerful member of what was then known to the media as “kitchen cabinet” and had also been described as a “power broker of the highest degree” by many media houses and visiting dignitaries. There was no reason to suspect any mal-intentions in him, as he was also known to be very close to Mr Rajiv Gandhi (unlike some members of the “kitchen cabinet” who had a turf war with the junior Gandhi). Post assassination there was a bit of a stir in the media about the same gentleman followed by hush-hush events. We in the intelligence were also surprised to know about his strong linkages with certain Western intelligence agencies. Nothing really happened after that for quite some time and Mr Rajiv Gandhi only restored the same gentleman back in his team with full honours and the whole episode was laid to rest. But the biggest revelation to the intelligence wings came a little later (and was not accorded much importance at that time). Unlike media perceptions that the said gentleman belonged to the Rajiv Gandhi coterie and to the “kitchen cabinet”, he actually owed both his positions and his re-instatement into the inner circles of power after the assassination of Mrs Gandhi to a certain Mrs Sonia Gandhi!

Scenario 4: 1991, the assassination of Mr Rajiv Gandhi

When Mr Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated in Sriperumbudur on 21st May 1991, it did come as a shock to the intelligence community in India but it would be false to suggest that we had absolutely no clue about it. Tamil Tigers animosity towards Mr Rajiv Gandhi was by no means a universally accepted fact in the intelligence circles and yet there were “elements” in the establishment who had assessed the risk factors from time to time. Many analysts had pointed out way back in 1985 (when Rajiv first tried to establish channels to tigers) the unpredictable nature of the leadership of LTTE and their perceived closeness to “certain” European and Western intelligence agencies. Mr Rajiv Gandhi was more influenced by a section of foreign policy analysts and he paid little heed to whatever little reservations the Indian intelligence agencies had vis-à-vis Tamil Tigers. I must confess that intelligence community in India did not really cover themselves in glory in this whole episode, because it might come as a surprise to most readers to know that we had threat perception for Mr Rajiv Gandhi from many other quarters like Sikh separatists, Islamic (Pakistani funded) militant groups, Chinese sponsored mercenaries and even rogue KGB agents, but had very few inputs and analysis about Tamil Tigers! That was a grave error to say the least. Due to myriad intelligence inputs and even more complex analysis the enquiry following the assassination was mired in many ideas and was muddled in too many complexities.

Background

The Rajiv Gandhi era was defined by two major geo-political changes in India and South Asia;

· Pakistan’s involvement with separatist groups in Kashmir and the birth of Islamic terrorism in the valley

· India’s direct mediation in Sri Lanka vis-à-vis Tamil issue

Both these geo-political affairs in South Asia had linkages to Western intelligence agencies at some point or other. It is a well known fact that CIA did help Kashmiri terror outfits in the initial years ostensibly to decrease Soviet influence in the region and also because US intelligence establishments were day dreaming about controlling all forms of Islamic extremist organisations from Afghanistan and Central Asia to the Middle-East and Western Africa. The results of those ill-fated forays have been disastrous as we have seen today, but that is a different story for some other time. Lesser known fact is the support to LTTE by many European intelligence agencies including MI5 & NIS (Norwegian Intelligence Service). Thus, although Mr Rajiv Gandhi considered Mr Vellupali Prabhakaran as a personal friend, the LTTE leader was more under the influence of many other intelligence organisations than India which should have been his natural ally. If the Western intelligence agencies wanted to eliminate Mr Rajiv Gandhi (for whatever myriad reasons) they had 2 very plausible ways to achieve their hit; Islamic Terror outfits in Kashmir and LTTE; apart from many other difficult options. LTTE having assassinated Mr Rajiv Gandhi unilaterally can be ruled out for all practical purposes as it was too much under the influence and control of many agencies and also it would have needed a thorough assurance that its own organization would not be eliminated following the assassination. Mr Prabhakaran, whatever else he was, was a practical man with very sensible ideas to survive for a long term struggle for Tamil Elam. He would have realized at the very outset that eliminating Mr Rajiv Gandhi could become an existential threat to LTTE itself. He had the precedence of the Khalistan movement being crushed following Mrs Indira Gandhi’s assassination and the might of IPKF, which had almost managed to destroy about 80% of LTTE.

Mr Prabhakaran apart from being Tamil was also a catholic and there is a theory that the Vatican had helped LTTE in the initial phases to establish a “catholic” land in the Northern parts of Sri Lanka independent of the “Buddhist” Sinhalese regime. I have many intelligence inputs to confirm these linkages between the Vatican and the LTTE. Norway which had always played a role in the Sri Lankan peace process had a commanding influence over LTTE, especially over the northern faction of LTTE comprising Prabhakaran and co. Norwegian intelligence or NIS had not only given financial assistance but also had provided military training and logistical support to many northern LTTE command groups. I must state here that the western part of LTTE led by Karuna and co was less under the influence of these organisations and was more open to collaboration with India. There was also an unconfirmed report that Karuna was against the whole plot to assassinate Mr Rajiv Gandhi and had even tried in vain to contact Indian intelligence agencies about the impending attack. NIS and other Scandinavian intelligence agencies in the 80’s and early 90’s were also heavily under the influence of Opus Dei and other intelligence establishments of the Vatican. There were many reasons for this, primary being the fact Norway’s borders with Soviet Russia and the Opus Dei’s final plans to liberate the orthodox Russian church from the communists. Finally, we have very strong intelligence inputs about NIS having given the final order of a “hit” on Mr Rajiv Gandhi and also the requisite assurance of “no-attack” from India on LTTE in any eventuality. Thus Prabhakaran decided to assassinate Mr Rajiv Gandhi despite internal opposition and many apprehensions. What is even more curious was the timing of attack (which was also a pre-condition by the Norwegian controllers of LTTE as per many intercepts of Russian intelligence revealed to India much later). It was as if someone wanted to influence the ensuing general elections in India by assassinating a tall leader (they had the precedent of 1985 elections following Mrs Gandhi’s killing). But, they only partly succeeded in that as congress could not get a majority on its own which was partially due to the fact that a part of those elections were held before the event and partially due to the changed political scenario of India in the beginning of the 90’s.

The Analysis

After the assassination many intelligence teams were working on many number of theories and officially SIT (special investigation team) was formed to fast track the whole process and at least theoretically all these intelligence teams were supposed to be working under the aegis of the SIT. We were a group of 5 analysts working on the conspiracy angle (there were other groups of people also working on many conspiracy theories) leading up to the assassination. This is when we first stumbled upon the theory of the Vatican’s interest in India’s 1st family (the Gandhi family), which was earlier researched by a team previously working on the killing of senior Mrs Gandhi. Layer by layer we were gathering all the previous inputs and seemingly farfetched hypothesises put forward by many people in the past. Most of the inputs that I have talked about till now throughout this paper (part 1) were discovered and analysed during those 6 months when we worked together in that team. Mr P. V. Narasimha Rao was the Prime Minister of India then and he had made it a point to get all the reports on the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case delivered to him directly (with no intermediaries) at regular intervals. I remember it correctly, when we had sent our detailed analysis report with all the relevant intelligence inputs to the PMO on a Thursday afternoon. The report contained all the various theories that we had suggested but we had not reached any conclusions.

The first time it’s a chance, the second time it’s a coincidence and the third time it’s a pattern. I guess it was just a matter of time before we would reach the conclusion that the sole beneficiary of all these scenarios and events was the one and only Mrs Sonia Gandhi, the widow of Mr Rajiv Gandhi. How 3 events (assassination & “unnatural” deaths of the three Gandhis) and the 4 scenarios involving 5 people who were either eliminated or completely sidelined leading to the final destiny of Mrs Sonia Gandhi is really a fascinating story. On Monday morning our team was dismantled, we were asked to work on another theory of CIA’s involvement with the LTTE and about understanding the financial structuring of the Tamil Tigers and we were told in no uncertain terms to abandon our “farfetched” theories and to work on more “realistic” aspects that would provide more tangible results.

After that we never mentioned about “the Rajiv brief” or about what had happened in those 6 months. But I have been keeping track of events since then. One important loophole about the theory as explained till now would be the reluctance of Mrs Sonia Gandhi to accept the position of power after the 1991 elections. I would like to deal with the post Rajiv era in part 2 when I will hopefully explain all of those issues. I have formulated my own set of theories and have reached my own conclusions, but they will be elaborated upon in the next 2 parts of this treatise.

... To be continued

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 05 Sep 2011 07:22

Interpreter, monks — US ‘sources’ bared

An Indian interpreter for Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s China visit, a senior MEA official, a ‘spin master’ for the Congress, a top Nepali businessman and Buddhist monks in Tibet are among the hundreds of US ‘sources’ who have been exposed after WikiLeaks published the unedited versions of all the leaked diplomatic cables it held.
The website has come under severe criticism by its four original ‘media partners’ for releasing the unedited version of cables as it would put many protected sources of the US, who could be dubbed as moles or spies by others, in danger.

While nations across the world are now going through the cables with a fine toothed comb to pick up clues to stem leaks, an initial survey points to several Indian nationals and prominent persons in neighbouring countries who were sharing views or information with the US.

One of them is an Indian Chinese language interpreter — also an official at the Indian Embassy in Beijing — who in October 2009 shared details of a meeting between Premier Wen Jiabao and PM Manmohan Singh on the margins of the East Asia Summit in Thailand. While the official has not been named, there are enough clues in the cable to pinpoint his identity. The official whose identity has been marked as ‘strictly protect’ in the cable told the US that contrary to negative media reports, the meeting was productive and the two leaders shared a friendly rapport.

Another cable of December 2005 tells the tale of a senior MEA official sharing details of a secret Indian military base in Tajikistan. Then MEA Joint Secretary (Eurasia) Jaimini Bhagwati told US officials that India was operating a military outpost in Tajikistan that offered a good ‘listening post’. This information was also marked ‘strictly protect’ in the cables.

The cables also reveal the good understanding between US and UK on India affairs, including the sharing of an MEA briefing on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s India visit that was given to London in confidence.

A cable from March 2005 describes a meeting with a protected ‘Sonia loyalist and Congress spin master’ — Rajiv Desai — who shares his opinion that Congress would emerge as the winner in Bihar and Jharkhand polls. “Desai was also confident that Mrs Gandhi would successfully disassociate herself from the more tawdry aspects of recent events, while insisting that Jharkhand Governor Razi was incapable of taking such a dramatic step on his own. Now that the Congress leadership has focused on Jharkhand and Bihar, he maintained, it will end the situation quickly,” the cable reads.

Another cable from November 2009 ‘exposes’ a senior leader of the Communist Party of Nepal-Unified Marxist-Leninist who was in touch with Indian intelligence officials and was trying to ‘moderate’ the Maoists.

The most serious leaks, however, are in the China cables that reveals a plethora of people that were in touch with the US embassy. This included monks in Tibet, businessmen and small time shop owners in Lhasa and Chinese intellectuals who shared their often contrarion view of Beijing with US officials.

RoyG · Post by **RoyG** » 05 Sep 2011 08:47

What is our counter intel doin?

sum · Post by **sum** » 05 Sep 2011 13:59

^^ Could someone please post the article since Indianexpress site itself doesnt seem to be opening ( for me)!

chetak · Post by **chetak** » 05 Sep 2011 14:08

sum wrote:^^ Could someone please post the article since Indianexpress site itself doesnt seem to be opening ( for me)!

There seems to be some issue with the site.

It wouldn't open for me all of last week but suddenly this morning open sesame

sum · Post by **sum** » 05 Sep 2011 14:25

Thanks, Abhishek-ji for posting the article. From that:

Another cable of December 2005 tells the tale of a senior MEA official sharing details of a secret Indian military base in Tajikistan. Then MEA Joint Secretary (Eurasia) Jaimini Bhagwati told US officials that India was operating a military outpost in Tajikistan that offered a good ‘listening post’. This information was also marked ‘strictly protect’ in the cables.

Again seems to be a case of verbal diarrhea in front of Goras rather than genuinly handing over the info...
Cant imagine how many state secrets have been handed over to various countries in diplomatic parties due to the absence of a zip on our netas/babus mouths.

The most serious leaks, however, are in the China cables that reveals a plethora of people that were in touch with the US embassy. This included monks in Tibet, businessmen and small time shop owners in Lhasa and Chinese intellectuals who shared their often contrarion view of Beijing with US officials.

Will be very interesting if a Indian wikileaks happens and we know if we have even 1 source within Tibet working for Desh.

vishvak · Post by **vishvak** » 05 Sep 2011 14:36

The most serious leaks, however, are in the China cables that reveals a plethora of people that were in touch with the US embassy. This included monks in Tibet, businessmen and small time shop owners in Lhasa and Chinese intellectuals who shared their often contrarion view of Beijing with US officials.

It appears a lot of people in India are "in touch with the US embassy".

chiragAS · Post by **chiragAS** » 06 Sep 2011 23:15

Rony wrote:Part 1 : Three funerals and a wedding

The anonymous writer of this article blamed/ involved every intelligence known (at least to me), he just stopped short of involving Martian Intelligence(the little green men from other world )

IMO the anonymous writer is from the land of the pure.

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 07 Sep 2011 04:40

Indian officers warn over defence

At a time when Beijing is unveiling advanced military hardware, including a prototype stealth-fighter jet and its first aircraft carrier, India’s military establishment is increasingly critical of bureaucratic paralysis, as New Delhi has been beset by anti-corruption protests.

Indian commanders say that the government’s reluctance to make decisions is hampering their ability to guard against a “collusive threat” from two nuclear armed neighbours - China and its ally Pakistan.

“Our defence budget is $32bn, China’s is $91.5bn. Their unofficial spending probably takes the total to $150bn. How are we going to match up?” asked P.C. Katoch, a retired lieutenant general.

Prabu · Post by **Prabu** » 09 Sep 2011 15:03

RoyG wrote:What is our counter intel doin?

Sleeping happily !

aditya.agd · Post by **aditya.agd** » 09 Sep 2011 15:50

indian politicians will bring shame to india in the next war.

aditya.agd · Post by **aditya.agd** » 09 Sep 2011 16:05

our counter intelligence will be working under some corrupt bureaucrat or minister. Nowadays i wont even hesitate to doubt our PM. He may compromise through extra-constitutional authorities such as party presidnts.

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 10 Sep 2011 04:37

Help counter cyber threats from China: NATO to India

"The cyber world does not recognise alignments. It only understands switches," said a top NATO official during a briefing to visiting Indian journalists, while making a strong pitch for joint efforts to combat cyber threats.

The NATO official made this remark in context of India's sensitivity against military alliances and its commitment to non-alignment. He suggested this could be a functional alignment in which both sides could give and take.

sum · Post by **sum** » 10 Sep 2011 09:15

^^ Wonder what role our agencies had in shootout on Paresh Barauh in Myanmar ( which all media outlets are reporting today)?

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 10 Sep 2011 18:25

Indian agencies deny ULFA leader injured in Myanmar

shyamd · Post by **shyamd** » 12 Sep 2011 18:15

A R&AW deal for some

The winds of change are blowing in India’s external intelligence agency, the R&AW, with chief Sanjeev Tripathi stressing that the primary job of spies was to collect intelligence and not conduct diplomacy. He has quietly passed on the message that agents going to high voltage parties will be viewed adversely and that Indian spies should remain below the social radar.

As a part of his plans, the R&AW chief has proposed changes in the personnel policy with a plan to set up a core team of young officers who will not only remain under cover but also not be seen at all in the diplomatic cocktail circuit. It’s certainly an intelligent decision.

Vashishtha · Post by **Vashishtha** » 12 Sep 2011 18:34

^^Before this guy was appointed wasn't there criticism against him on brf?

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 13 Sep 2011 08:30

India: A tiger awakes to challenge Chinese military

sum · Post by **sum** » 13 Sep 2011 09:05

shyamd wrote:A R&AW deal for some

The winds of change are blowing in India’s external intelligence agency, the R&AW, with chief Sanjeev Tripathi stressing that the primary job of spies was to collect intelligence and not conduct diplomacy. He has quietly passed on the message that agents going to high voltage parties will be viewed adversely and that Indian spies should remain below the social radar.

As a part of his plans, the R&AW chief has proposed changes in the personnel policy with a plan to set up a core team of young officers who will not only remain under cover but also not be seen at all in the diplomatic cocktail circuit. It’s certainly an intelligent decision.

What about plans for reactivating covert ops etc?

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 13 Sep 2011 20:42

If they are they wont be announced nor hinted at.

sum · Post by **sum** » 13 Sep 2011 21:26

^^ Can hope and pray that something is going on in that front though seeing the current GoI stances, really doubt it.

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 14 Sep 2011 05:23

'Indian intel tried to recruit slain Pak scribe Shahzad'

NEW DELHI: Indian intelligence tried to recruit Syed Saleem Shahzad, the Pakistani journalist killed in May, the New Yorker magazine has said. It also said the order for his killing came from an officer on army chief General Ashfaq Kayani's staff.
:
:

Nikhil T · Post by **Nikhil T** » 14 Sep 2011 05:50

Vashishtha wrote:^^Before this guy was appointed wasn't there criticism against him on brf?

Sanjeev Tripathi is one of the most corrupt and inefficient R&AW chiefs of all time. He was groomed by Ashok Chaturvedi, the tobacco-chewing predecessor who has a laundry list himself. There was also news that the PM severely disliked Ashok Chaturvedi and knew that he was incompetent, but Sonia Gandhi/MK Narayanan scuttled any moves to replace him aftera request by his father-in-law Bajpai , a former RAW chief himself.

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 17 Sep 2011 18:49

India Fears China May Copycat its Military Doctrine

NEW DELHI (IDN) - 'Cold Start' as a military doctrine to deal with Pakistan has occupied a lot of mind space in the media and the strategic studies community. What has been hitherto overlooked is the fact that China could well take a page out of India's Cold Start idea and replicate it along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Given its military presence and the build-up of infrastructure network in the Tibetan Autonomous Region, China appears to have given itself such a capability.
:
:

Height of Copying

Viv S · Post by **Viv S** » 17 Sep 2011 23:37

shyamd wrote:A R&AW deal for some

The winds of change are blowing in India’s external intelligence agency, the R&AW, with chief Sanjeev Tripathi stressing that the primary job of spies was to collect intelligence and not conduct diplomacy. He has quietly passed on the message that agents going to high voltage parties will be viewed adversely and that Indian spies should remain below the social radar.

As a part of his plans, the R&AW chief has proposed changes in the personnel policy with a plan to set up a core team of young officers who will not only remain under cover but also not be seen at all in the diplomatic cocktail circuit. It’s certainly an intelligent decision.

Shouldn't this all have happened without BRF and the rest of the internet coming to know of it (even if it was to approve)? Ah well.

Kanson · Post by **Kanson** » 18 Sep 2011 21:28

VinodTK wrote:India Fears China May Copycat its Military Doctrine
NEW DELHI (IDN) - 'Cold Start' as a military doctrine to deal with Pakistan has occupied a lot of mind space in the media and the strategic studies community. What has been hitherto overlooked is the fact that China could well take a page out of India's Cold Start idea and replicate it along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). Given its military presence and the build-up of infrastructure network in the Tibetan Autonomous Region, China appears to have given itself such a capability.
:
:
Height of Copying

There is already such view.

http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewto ... 81#p946681

best description is China is planning to do 'Cold Start' on us

Surya · Post by **Surya** » 18 Sep 2011 22:08

well its all son in laws and father in laws in the higher echelons of RAw

lot of people getting through influence for foreign postings

some are so idiotic - do not even a cursory idea of history to play any version of the great game.

sighhhhh

manum · Post by **manum** » 18 Sep 2011 22:18

Kanson wrote: There is already such view.

http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/viewto ... 81#p946681
best description is China is planning to do 'Cold Start' on us

But China already did cold start on us...our last war was limited skirmish which ended up China sitting on a territory...What else is cold start...As per my understanding cold start is our crux of what China did in last war...

Correct me if I am wrong...

Kanson · Post by **Kanson** » 20 Sep 2011 18:40

manum wrote:But China already did cold start on us...our last war was limited skirmish which ended up China sitting on a territory...What else is cold start...As per my understanding cold start is our crux of what China did in last war...

Correct me if I am wrong...

Militarily, as far as I could recall, no one who has necessary background, experience and authority, described 62 war in terms of Cold Start. What happened in 62 is typical of attrition warfare where wave after wave of human resources is used until a post in run over.

Cold Start doctrine, to put it in my way, is an Indian maneuver warfare with the flavour of Blitzkrieg and Russian roulette.

prithvi · Post by **prithvi** » 20 Sep 2011 19:25

Former Afgan President Burhanuddin Rabbani killed in Kabul