Is it the job of the educated to do this? By which rule? By which authority in absence of Govt. as intermediary? Are these people not willing to listen to ministers and want educated scientists to spend time learning public relations? What is then the Govt good for as an intermediary?Theo_Fidel wrote:If the educated told the elders that they are more comfortable with the safety aspects and have seen dramatic sincere changes and improvements to safety, the elder may rethink their position.
It is the Govt.'s job as an interface & intermediary to communicated & convince each side. When the Govt at center has given up its job, it has come to others to do as much, without any authority. Where is the central Govt here, in fact a central minister did visit and he was ignored (link). Now there is a 15-member committee of experts (link) doing the job of Govt.
Now does this mean that a new set of rules will be made especially for this, burdening the educated after the central Govt. abdicated its responsibilities? How will educated convince others and what type of authority do the educated have here, besides explaining everyone intricacies and what would happen if they are ignored? Why take such a twisted way when Govt. could have avoided the whole protests right from the beginning by good emissaries for convincing each side?
Why should the educated take any blame for this communication gap, especially when the Govt.s at center & state are busy playing favorites & throwing tantrums?