Sushupti wrote:Ishrat case: Home Ministry not convinced CBI has proof against IB officer
http://www.ddinews.gov.in/National/Nati ... an+CBI.htm
So CBI is an independent free agent that is targetting IB? Under whose direction is it acting?
Sushupti wrote:Ishrat case: Home Ministry not convinced CBI has proof against IB officer
http://www.ddinews.gov.in/National/Nati ... an+CBI.htm
Was just kidding, sir.sudarshan wrote:I tried starting a little email fire. We'll see how it goes. Ashok saar, mail went out before I saw your ack request. Hope you don't mind.
+108.chaanakya wrote:If from 18 June to 28 th June UK Govt evacuated 1,00,000 stranded persons that amounts to 10,000 persons per day. So evacuating 15,000 is not a big task, esp. for those who specialise in DM. It may not mean taking all of them to their home in Gujrat. It means taking them to safety and providing basic relief. There was an announcement by NR that UK Disaster Victims can board trains at Dehradun and go anywhere in country free of cost, presumably after NaMo wrote to them. I have not seen any statement/claim from NaMo or from Gujrat Govt that they evacuated only Gujratis or that they indeed evacuated 15,000 people. But it need not be from Kedarnath alone, wide area was affected and people from several places could have been brought to safety.
But one needs to question how come UK govt did evacuation of 10,000 per day with less than 40 Heli and no helipad at their command in disaster area and had to be constructed and victims had to trek to reach helipads in difficult circumstances. This is while their incompetence has been demonstrably established. So if that figure is not doubted then I see no reason to doubt earlier claim when effectiveness of GA is well known. Do we have figures how many buses or other means of transport such as Car /truck/Bullock-kart /tricycles/Bicycles etc were engaged on nonexistent roads excluding Helis by UK Govt to transport 1,00,000 people. Most of them were seen taking Bus No. 11 with perosnalised self propulsion.
But the whole debate is a cruel joke on Victims going by the eyewitness account and statements of poor hapless victims. Any help would have been better if delivered quickly.
Saar,Ashok Sarraff wrote:^And kindly credit Ashok Sarraff for igniting the fire
Massive conspiracy and future coverup based activity is being cooked. It all has to backfire but it is a real kaliyug and only divinity has to come and save if it does not backfire.ramana wrote:Sushupti wrote:Ishrat case: Home Ministry not convinced CBI has proof against IB officer
http://www.ddinews.gov.in/National/Nati ... an+CBI.htm
So CBI is an independent free agent that is targetting IB? Under whose direction is it acting?
You mean gupt tour of Guptkashi?Then, pappu goes on a carefully sanitized and guided tour of Guptkashi.
In a tit-for-tat response to a warning from his ex-boss, former deputy chief minister Sushil Kumar Modi, on Friday, dared chief minister Nitish Kumar to 'open' his mouth on ‘transgressions’ of BJP leaders.
“We are waiting for him to open his mouth. We, too, have much to reveal (about him)”, Modi said, when asked about Kumar’s warning Monday many BJP leaders would be in trouble if he opened his mouth.
Modi, given to tom-tomming the Nitish regime’s 'good governance' till the chief minister sacked him and 10 other BJP ministers on June 16, reiterated governance in Bihar had become the “first casualty” since the BJP’s exit.
“The chief minister, holding 18 portfolios, is so pre-occupied with preserving his wafer thin majority in the state assembly that governance is on a ventilator”, Modi said, after a daylong sit over the Bagaha police firing.
“There’s complete paralysis in government functioning, thanks to the political uncertainty”, he said, in a reference to 126 votes secured by Kumar in a house of 243 during a floor test on June 18.
This was well short of the government’s three-fourths majority (209 in 243), when the 91-member BJP was a part of the Nitish-led coalition regime till the JD (U) broke off from the NDA following a scrap over Narendra Modi.
Asked whether the BJP was trying to appease Muslims by bringing out a vision document on issues concerning them, Modi said no government could ignore the genuine claim of any group - minority, backward caste or dalit. “The BJP ruled states have an excellent record of taking care of all sections of society and have not discriminated against any section of the society”, he said.
As for whether the BJP might consider projecting a Muslim as its chief ministerial candidate during the coming assembly elections, Modi said the party would take an appropriate decision at an appropriate time.
“At this point of time, this question is premature,” he said.
Yup, paranoid.SwamyG wrote:Call me paranoid, but Madhu Kishwar might spring some nasty googly at Modi just before elections - intentionally or unintentionally. And there will be no time to respond. I hope that is not the case.
So, that is the qualification all madrassis should be shooting for, I guess.Pranav wrote:Very good Hindi too.
I also feel sorry, that you have chosen that Kali Dadhi...Ashok Sarraff wrote:Sorry, but at first glance my corrupted mind registered it as:Murugan wrote:^ Mein Use Le Kar Hi Rahunga
Modi: Mein Uski (Rahul ki) Le Kar Rahunga.
When Mahmood accepted the invite, his conditions were he would say what he wished to and Modi should be present when he spoke, an organiser said. The Gujarat chief minister agreed to his terms. Mahmood’s theme is “Ek Bharat” (One India).
'An organiser', 'An Aide' etc are pulled out of mushy of kali dadhi by telegraph. Telegraph is lying. Still paiting modi as pariah and untouchable. It is like Though Modi is Untouchable and a Pariah. PM sat with Him, why not Mahmood the Great, the impeccable X man from PMO and Sachar's kingpin etc. Mahmood is also other high-caste personality doing a favour to modi by sitting with him or inviting him or setting terms for Modi. Super DDM.An aide said: “There is nothing wrong if he shares a platform with Modiji. The Prime Minister is often seen on a dais with Modiji. We have the right to present our point of view before anyone, whether he is from the Congress or the BJP. One party cannot claim to monopolise our thoughts and our loyalty. Kalam sahab will also be there, so what’s the big deal?
Is this event over? I dont see the video on youtube yet?Murugan wrote:Modi, Mahmood, Abdul Kalam Live
http://www.narendramodi.in/liveevent/social/index.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... VMxVav3SiU
Why Modi’s rescue act backfired, and why it needn’t have
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.co ... n=TOIBlogs
Sushupti wrote:After retraction on Ishrat comes this.Why Modi’s rescue act backfired, and why it needn’t have
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.co ... n=TOIBlogs
This page has been removed from the ddinews.Sushupti wrote:Ishrat case: Home Ministry not convinced CBI has proof against IB officer
http://www.ddinews.gov.in/National/Nati ... an+CBI.htm