Mukesh.Kumar wrote:Interesting that you spoke of FB harassment. One of my friends posted this on FB today-
On Khujliwal, and when I suggested that he look at the recent NITICENTRAL Article on AAP funding, I was instantly flamed by this lady who comes out with the following quote:
Unbelievable...! last thing any 8.5 pointer IItian would want to become is a CIA agent or terrorist or naxal or last but not the least a Pakistani agent. Biggest problem in India is its insiders not outsiders. US will not get even an iota of thing by destroying India .. we are already a bhikari country .. not like oil rich Arabs
What do you say to people like this?
And then again I had a running 6 post battle with a former classmate who is an appointee on some EU committee about Modi, US control over India, and AAP. Finally had to put data in front before I could get him to shut up. +1 for Team Indics. But what surprised me is how this chap who went to the same school as me, stays outside the country has so different an attitude and view of all things Indian. What's even worrisome is that in our cluster of friends on FB, he is listened to with great deference because he is doing so well in Europe.
Sometimes I feel that we at BRF are fighting a losing battle, and the world has gone a different way. Now I am even worried whether actually NDA (pre-poll) will touch 230.
Most of what you said is right, except that BRites were never "fighting" any battle AFAIK, except posting posts that too in a section which only 20000-50000 registered users can see.
===
People like AK make pacts with MNC-owners because neither leaders nor activists ever supported them. Most leaders never support talented newcomers, unless there is serious shortage. And most activists in India are leader bhagats and so never support a newcomer. In fact, leader-bhagats have tendency to ridicule every newcomer by saying "your size is small" etc etc. You may have noticed that on many internet forums.
So finally a newcomer has two choices
1. make pact with MNC-owners who will project them as tall leaders and this enable them to get activists and voters
2. live a loooong life as micro-dwarf , put with all mocks and ridiculing but stay away from foreigners.
Some take track-1 and some take track-2. AK took track-1. A leader-bhagat would never know people who took track-2 as leader-bhagat has brain-washed himself to notice his leader , faces which come in paid-media and no one else.
So AK must have tried to gain support from activists across India. But most leader-bhagats rejected him simply because he was a dwarf. And so made pact with MNC-owners, Missionaries etc
Moral of my story is --- if activists remain "focused" on leader-bhakti, more and more AK-like people will join MNC-owners and work to enslave India. Solution I propose is that activists should dump leader-bhakti and focus on law-drafts that can fix India. That will force all senior activists and leaders to support law-drafts that improve India. And it will give chance to new-comers to come up simply supporting good law-drafts. All this is IMO.
====
RajeshA,
Yes. You answered why BJP-leaders did a "good" thing by supporting Congress in supporting census-2011 data. I also want others to give their take on why BJP leaders supported Congress's decision to suppress census-2011 religion/language data