Narendra Modi vs the Dynasty: Contrasting Ideas of India

Sagrawal · Post by **Sagrawal** » 30 Apr 2014 15:15

I am very sure that It was a delibrate act by Shri Modi just to get more attention and go for the maximum seats.

krishnan · Post by **krishnan** » 30 Apr 2014 15:16

the langugae and wording in that notice shows they are C-team of congi ,

sum · Post by **sum** » 30 Apr 2014 15:16

Interesting details:
EXCLUSIVE: What the 'Modi Sarkar' will do

According to a source, Modi does not believe in an Empowered Group of Ministers or a Group of Ministers to work out solutions to existing problems.

Modi feels that during the United Progressive Alliance's rule, there was a dual power centre, and ministries never had solutions. He is determined to set a new working environment in South Block.

According to the new mandate, bureaucrats will get complete authority and power to deal with the policies enunciated in the BJP's election manifesto.

Highlights:

Mergers and de-mergers of at least top eight Union ministries are on the cards.
A new look is being considered for the Union ministries of finance, commerce, home, tourism and railways.
A three-page report by the think-tank suggests merging of certain Union ministries and creating a new department and abolishing certain older versions.
The Directorate General of Foreign Trade to be withdrawn from the Union ministry of commerce and merged with the ministry of external affairs.
The ministry of corporate affairs to be absorbed by the ministry of finance.
The Railway Board to monitor a new department under the Union ministry of railways to prepare a blueprint for six bullet trains like those in China. These trains to be introduced in four years, with collaboration from Indian Railways and foreign investments.
Tourism to get prime position in the new government.
A new department in the Union home ministry to monitor the day-to-day coordination between the PMO and offices of the chief ministers of the 29 states. There would be a chief secretary-level official to coordinate and present a daily report to the prime minister.
The ministry of water resources to get a new name and an additional department carved out from the ministry of agriculture and rural development.
Modi's strategy is to involve chief ministers of borders states like Rajasthan, Gujarat, Punjab etc, whenever there is a discussion of the Cabinet Committee on Security. If there is a resolution, special invitee status will be considered for the chief minister of the concerned state. For example, on a discussion on the issue of fishermen would have chief ministers of Kerala and Tamil Nadu as special invitees.
Chief ministers of states to have weekly interaction with national security agencies.
Popular programmes of the United Progressive Alliance like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, to be reviewed and revamped.

Bahut hi kraantikari!

member_28352 · Post by **member_28352** » 30 Apr 2014 15:17

^^^^Maybe. Who knows, Team Modi may have done a cost benefit analysis and acted accordingly.

sum · Post by **sum** » 30 Apr 2014 15:17

^^ Who is the Gujarat CM from 17th May onwards?

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 30 Apr 2014 15:18

harbans wrote:
Section 126 in The Representation Of The People (Amendment) Act, 1996
126. Prohibition of public meetings during period of forty- eight hours ending with four fixed for conclusion of poll.
(1) No person shall-
(a) convene, hold, attend, join or address any public meeting or procession in connection with an election; or
(b) display to the public any election matter by means of cinematograph, television or other similar apparatus; or
(c) propagate any election matter to the public by holding, or by arranging the holding of, any musical concert or any theatrical performance or any other entertainment or amusement with a view to attracting the members of the public thereto, in any polling area during the period of forty- eight hours ending with the hour fixed for the conclusion of the poll for any election in that polling area.
(2) Any person who contravenes the provisions of sub- section (1) shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) In this section, the expression" election matter" means any matter intended or calculated to influence or affect the result of an election.'.
Was it a 'public meeting' or procession?

It was neither 'public meeting' or procession nor was it a 'press conference' as is being called by the media. While he was leaving the polling station he was approached by media for sound bites. Instead of giving a 'one liner' as most do he answered all questions posed by media spending 20 mins in the process. That is all there is to it.

Dilbu · Post by **Dilbu** » 30 Apr 2014 15:18

sum wrote:^^ Who is the Gujarat CM from 17th May onwards?

Must be Anandi Ben Patel

krishnan · Post by **krishnan** » 30 Apr 2014 15:19

i dont think we need o dhoti shiver, when they couldnt do about shah's revenge mark, this is nothing

rohitv · Post by **rohitv** » 30 Apr 2014 15:21

harbans wrote:
Section 126 in The Representation Of The People (Amendment) Act, 1996
126. Prohibition of public meetings during period of forty- eight hours ending with four fixed for conclusion of poll.
(1) No person shall-
(a) convene, hold, attend, join or address any public meeting or procession in connection with an election; or
(b) display to the public any election matter by means of cinematograph, television or other similar apparatus; or
(c) propagate any election matter to the public by holding, or by arranging the holding of, any musical concert or any theatrical performance or any other entertainment or amusement with a view to attracting the members of the public thereto, in any polling area during the period of forty- eight hours ending with the hour fixed for the conclusion of the poll for any election in that polling area.
(2) Any person who contravenes the provisions of sub- section (1) shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
(3) In this section, the expression" election matter" means any matter intended or calculated to influence or affect the result of an election.'.
Was it a 'public meeting' or procession?

They are trying to get him not for the selfie but for the press conference in which NaMo had the lotus symbol in his hands. I wonder whether he was simply rubbing it in to the congis by displaying the lotus symbol in such way, he could have pinned it to his kurta as well.
In any case I dont think a Press-conf would qualify for a "Public Meeting". In the worst catse ECI will fine him/reprimand him and Arnab can outrage for one more day.

harbans · Post by **harbans** » 30 Apr 2014 15:24

On the Lotus issue do read this, very interesting:

https://storify.com/KartikeyaTanna/on-e ... ok-narendr

anchal · Post by **anchal** » 30 Apr 2014 15:25

The EC dude is really on to something. Selectively targeting BJP leaders, will there be a peaceful transition is the question

Virupaksha · Post by **Virupaksha** » 30 Apr 2014 15:29

Singha wrote:well atleast he showed some class and didnt make any excuses here.

he was caught redhanded with another man's wife while hurling accusations against a marriage which split more than 40 years ago.

Tell me what is his "class"? After the photo leaks what option did he have?

Karan M · Post by **Karan M** » 30 Apr 2014 15:30

I hope the massive voter fraud under ECs watch gets investigated and they are brought to book.
A lot of these types have subverted the system completely.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 30 Apr 2014 15:33

pankajs wrote:This guy is returning the favor to CON no doubt but his larger concern is protecting his business empire built exclusively on the coal allocation. To protect his 40,000 cr empire from collapse I would bet his willingness to spend 1000-2000 cr. Jindal baba faces the maximum setback if BJP was to come to power and is the reason for his massive support for sAAP.

My figures where just my recollection but here are the likely figures for Jindal baba's growth.

VikasSaboo ‏@SabooVikas 54m

वोट क्यों ?? इसलिये करें वोट। 10 साल में 469Cr के CongiMP व Industrialist NaveenJindal 50,946Cr के हो गये । . pic.twitter.com/Pdyvapob2A

Singha · Post by **Singha** » 30 Apr 2014 15:40

Virupaksha wrote:
Singha wrote:well atleast he showed some class and didnt make any excuses here.
he was caught redhanded with another man's wife while hurling accusations against a marriage which split more than 40 years ago.

Tell me what is his "class"? After the photo leaks what option did he have?

just trying to do some quick cya for the great leader.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 30 Apr 2014 15:45

The usual suspects are going to create a drama around Modi

CNN-IBN News ‏@ibnlive 2m

Tonight on #Indiaat9 with @sardesairajdeep: Is @narendramodi violating the code of conduct on poll days? Tweet us your views here.

Yogi_G · Post by **Yogi_G** » 30 Apr 2014 15:47

The 3 part series on faking news for selection of C++ programmer is very good. The one line by Modi was awesome --> "Write once, run anywhere"

:D:D

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 30 Apr 2014 15:58

Minhaz Merchant ‏@minhazmerchant 42m

CEC served as secy to late YSR, Cong's principal fund-raiser. YSR's dedication to probity must have rubbed off on him

member_22539 · Post by **member_22539** » 30 Apr 2014 16:01

^These scums must be made aware of the consequences of pursuing their filthy loyalties. It will not end well for them if they indulge in subverting the EC.

vic · Post by **vic** » 30 Apr 2014 16:18

krishnan wrote:Interviewer: Why should I appoint you the Operations Manager for this factory?

Candidate: Sir, in my childhood, my grandmother was murdered by our trusted servant and I was angry at this.
Later, my father also murdered by a Rowdy. I became more angry. So, please give me this job.

Interviewer: Are you nuts! How can you ask for a manager's job on the basis of your grandmother and
father's sufferings?

Candidate: Sir, if Rahul Gandhi can ask for PM's post for same reasons, can't I ask for manager's job!!!

Interviewer: Well, tell me what is 2 plus 2?

Candidate: Mummy! RTI and Women Empowerment!

Interviewer: Why have you picked up my pen from table and put it in your pocket?

Candidate: Because I am secular Christian only.

Interviewer: What are your educational qualifications?

Candidate: Mafia girl friend, drugs and bisexual relationship with Foreign Diplomats, Hawala, Cow Meat processing.

Interviewer: What the Hell do you want here?

Candidate: Am just wasting your time to let my Jijaji steal your car for you are a bloody rat only.

Interviewer: Get out!

Candidate: I will tie up with your Trade Unions and scr*w your happiness.

SwamyG · Post by **SwamyG** » 30 Apr 2014 16:46

sum wrote:^^ Who is the Gujarat CM from 17th May onwards?

Why be counting chickens before fertilization.

RajeshA · Post by **RajeshA** » 30 Apr 2014 16:55

sivab wrote:

Narendra Modi takes a selfie after casting his vote

Rahul Gandhi also tries to click a selfie [Tweet]

Sanku · Post by **Sanku** » 30 Apr 2014 17:20

I am really confused/worried/hassled about the interview with Kamal episode.

What is NaMo trying to do ? Why open a ch*nk in the armor in a fell run, completely focussed campaign by allowing for focus on redundant issues ? Plus if this can result in model code violation and arrest (potentially) -- this is a biggie. Why risk the entire campaign on a small item ?

Anantha · Post by **Anantha** » 30 Apr 2014 17:24

Sanku
AAP candidates were wearing topis to the election booth. A senior BJP leader came just now on Headlines today, and said this issue is absolutely nothing

Sanku · Post by **Sanku** » 30 Apr 2014 17:26

Anantha wrote:Sanku
AAP candidates were wearing topis to the election booth. A senior BJP leader came just now on Headlines today, and said this issue is absolutely nothing

This provides an opening, sure AAP candidates are breaking the law. But then, they are not NaMo who have the entire AIF looking to kill him by which ever means possible.

Anantha · Post by **Anantha** » 30 Apr 2014 17:40

The point is EC (enthusiastic clowns) has not done anything to even Khujli and Meera Sanya who wore caps to the booth on 16th and 24th. They have no case, Modi deliberately did a show on poll day just like he did on 24th

Sanku · Post by **Sanku** » 30 Apr 2014 17:44

Anantha wrote:The point is EC (enthusiastic clowns) has not done anything to even Khujli and Meera Sanya who wore caps to the booth on 16th and 24th. They have no case, Modi deliberately did a show on poll day just like he did on 24th

Well

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/ ... -his-vote/

munna · Post by **munna** » 30 Apr 2014 17:46

Sanku wrote:
Anantha wrote:The point is EC (enthusiastic clowns) has not done anything to even Khujli and Meera Sanya who wore caps to the booth on 16th and 24th. They have no case, Modi deliberately did a show on poll day just like he did on 24th
Well

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/ ... -his-vote/

Merely a case for violation of Section 144. Almost all politicians in India have one or multiple cases under this one. Meh..

Raja · Post by **Raja** » 30 Apr 2014 17:49

AAP party symbol is not a cap. Also, a red herring is not going to help NAMO's case.

I agree with Sanku. Carlessness and maybe a tad overconfident.

(Just get through the last mile, for the love of god!)

Sanku · Post by **Sanku** » 30 Apr 2014 17:51

munna wrote:Merely a case for violation of Section 144. Almost all politicians in India have one or multiple cases under this one. Meh..

Are you sure about this ? Which section has been used ? Is it 126 I ?

Arjun · Post by **Arjun** » 30 Apr 2014 17:55

Anantha wrote: They have no case, Modi deliberately did a show on poll day just like he did on 24th

Would be better to abide by the letter and spirit of the EC rules unless he is proving a point by highlighting some other party's violations.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 30 Apr 2014 17:55

ANI ‏@ANI_news 27m

They asked for FIR against media for asking questns,if thats the situation then legality is a serious issue:Arun Jaitley on EC order on Modi

Rahul M · Post by **Rahul M** » 30 Apr 2014 17:57

munna ji, it says a case under Rep. Of People's Act, 144 is under IPC.

member_28025 · Post by **member_28025** » 30 Apr 2014 17:58

I know it is a mere technicality but isn't an orange lotus the party symbol? What I see in Modiji's hands is a white lotus.

vivek.rao · Post by **vivek.rao** » 30 Apr 2014 18:00

The EVM is showing white lotus. BJP is showing it to people to avoid confusion. If ask RMji, it is MNC-missionary conspiracy.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 30 Apr 2014 18:00

Anantha · Post by **Anantha** » 30 Apr 2014 18:04

https://twitter.com/Mehta_Mitul/status/ ... 48/photo/1

check this on others showing their symbols deliberately

member_28025 · Post by **member_28025** » 30 Apr 2014 18:05

vivek.rao wrote:The EVM is showing white lotus. BJP is showing it to people to avoid confusion. If ask RMji, it is MNC-missionary conspiracy.

True. However I meant it as an argument to counter the EC directive against using party symbols.

munna · Post by **munna** » 30 Apr 2014 18:05

Sanku wrote:
munna wrote:Merely a case for violation of Section 144. Almost all politicians in India have one or multiple cases under this one. Meh..
Are you sure about this ? Which section has been used ? Is it 126 I ?

Donning my constitution specialist cap for once and using your link onlee

FIR lodged against Narendra Modi for political speech after casting his vote

“Therefore, the Commission directs under Article 324 of the Constitution and all other legal provisions enabling it in this behalf that complaints/ FIR as the case may be, should be filed against Sh. Narendra Modi and all Others who were involved in the convening and holding of the said meeting, under the provisions of Sections 126 (l) (a) and 126 (1) (b). Further, if any restrictions have been imposed by the competent authority in Ahmadabad under Section 144 of CrPC, then complaints/FlR should also be made under Section 188 of IPC,” the EC said.

The whole fiasco is for the optics only and babooz know how to leave the backdoor open. So state administration was directed to file either complaint or FIR, so they have dutifully filed an FIR under CrPC 144 (188 IPC) and filed a mere complaint against NM and channels BOTH under 126. This will go in cool bag, no babu fights to finish, no babu is that loyal!

amdavadi · Post by **amdavadi** » 30 Apr 2014 18:06

EC again proves my point........EC=Elect Congis