Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Locked
JayS
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4567
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by JayS »

Indranil wrote:
Key points from the presentation.

***Clearances and Certification
- HTT-40 Specifications:
# Length = 11.3m
# Span = 11m
# Height = 3.7m
# Take-off Weight = 2800kg
# Internal Fuel = 450kg
# TO roll at SL = 1000m
# Landing roll at SL = 1000m
# Max speed CAS at SL = 400kmph
# Stall speed = 140kmph
# Service ceiling = 6000m
# Ferry Range = 1000km

- Certification Challenges for HTT-40
# Stringent timelines to meet user requirements
# Emphasize on Analysis and Simulation for System Clearance
# Evaluation of Stall and Spin characteristics using mathematical models
# Non-availability of Certification documents from (LRU) OEMs due to IPR issues or high documentation costs.

- LRU Certification: Total 80 Indian LRUs and 65 imported LRUs were certified. LRU Certification was challenge since for some Qualification Testing documentation was not available or OEM were not willing to share. In some cases, if same LRUs were on other certifies systems performance from those was considered for certification for HTT-40.

- Aircraft System Certification: Total of 13 Aircraft systems to be certified. Lot of challenges here as well. Static Test specimen was not available, thus actual prototype wings were used for testing and then fitted to the prototype (proposal accepted with certain envelop restrictions). Unacceptable neck loaded for front seat during ejection for smaller pilots, thus restriction imposed for than <70 percentile pilots.
# Aerodynamics
# Avionics
# Environmental Control System
# Electric System
# Escape System
# Flight Control System
# Fuel system
# Hydraulics system
# Landing Gear System
# Life Support System
# Power plant
# Structures
# Communication and navigation System

-Aircraft First Flight Clearance: On 15th May 2016, First flight clearance was issued and on 31st May 2016, the First flight was conducted.

***Design and Development
-Till date, no proactive steps from HAL on BTA development. HAL used to wait for approvals and funding. HTT-40 was a different case, where HAL went ahead with the development by putting money from onw pocket and without any commitment from IAF whatsoever.

- Completion of Design to First Flight - within 11 months

- Confirmed order of ~70 BTA from IAF now

- CEMILAC was more of a Design partner than just a Certification Agency

- With typical approach it would have taken 10yrs for entire development, which is a worldwide norm. But with CEMILAC onboard right from proposal writing stage, the time for certification reduced considerably.

-Preliminary Design took ~6months. HAL waited for formal approval from IAF for 2yrs, but it never came. Thats when HAL decided to go ahead on its own in May 2013 by investing 300Cr from own pocket. Detail design took 2yrs i.e. till May 2015. And within 11month thereon, first flight took place. Now certification is expected by end of 2018 and starting of deliveries to IAF are expected by 2019.

- HTT-40 betters PC-7 by good margin on many parameters. This is mainly due to more powerful engine which was selected keeping weaponization in mind.

- Within first 50 flights, 6 major PSQR requirements are already achieved.

- Preliminary Design resulted in 4705 drawings. The engine had to be changed midway from PW to Honeywell (PW excused itself from the program for some reasons). This resulted in rework on engine part with 2000 modified drawings.

- Close 300 electrical drawings were generated.

- Close to 700 WT tests for initial configuration design. Learning from IJT experience, a mathematical model for the aircraft was developed early into the design cycle. Not that its very critical but absence of it might be an impediment.

- Early focus on Spin tests, starting from Aug 2015, learning from the IJT Sitara experience. The WT tests done in France show very promising results on spin characteristics.

- Weight reduction program has already commenced for HTT-40 to make more room for weaponisation.

- Digital Mock-up (DMU): Fully functional (systems' functionalities can be simulated) DMU was made which gave a very good picture of everything to all the concerned teams. Production team was involved right in the design phase, again resulting in shorter design cycle with less modification needed on the account of manufacturability. DMU also expedited assembly process since position of all parts was known ahead of time.

- CEMILAC had full access to the DMU..!!

- CAT-1 crash on IJT-36 due to FCS circuit issues, which was taken care of in HTT-40 already.

- Since IAF was not onboard for HTT-40, they never issued any RFA (Request for Action) for maintainability of HTT-40. HAL took RFAs issued for IJT-36 and LCA and incorporated them in HTT-40, to remain ahead in the game.

- Almost 70% of LRUs in HTT-40 are borrowed from IJT-36, LCA and even from Dornier and ALH. (due to time and cost contraints). This not only reduced development time but also System testing time.

- The prototypes were built using production level jigs (Would result in quick productionization of HTT-40)

- Huge participation from Local MSMEs. The target set by the RM of 60% involvement of privet players was met with ease.

- Total of 4900 parts. Most critical/special components were made in HAL. Close to 3000 parts from private companies. Divided into categories and about 150 critical parts were sent to CEMILAC for clearances. Rest of the parts were cleared by HAL itself with the delegated authority from CEMILAC.

- Wiring looms (total 180 nos) done on the bench right from prototype manufacturing, reducing wiring time from 2-3 months to 2 days.

- Wings were outsourced to Taneja Aerospace, but the company went into financial troubles. HAL had to take over the wing production, setting back the program by 2months. This is the reason there was no STS specimen in time. CEMILAC allowed prototype wings to be used for testing upto 100%. Later new set of wings were available for ultimate load testing of 150%.

- Total 65 EGR (Engine Ground Run) before the first flight, out of which 40 EGR were done ny HAL on its own. Instead of 3days per EGR, HAL could do 8 EGR per day to finish all EGR tesing in 15 days. This followed by the LSTT, HSTT, FRRB etc followed by the first flight.

- Interesting information - HAL always blamed to have too much FoS on wing design (upto 200%). Ideally wing should break at 151%. For HTT-40, wing broke at 161% in the ultimate testing. This shows the level of optimization. HAL previously has had ultimate failures at >190% for similar wing structures, indicating over design, resulting in overweight.

- By allowing restricted testing for the first flight clearance, CEMILAC could cut down time by 1-1.5yrs.

- Fuel system certification using jigs take 1yr typically. But CEMILAC took different approach for HTT-40 based on analysis and simulation, cutting down a significant time of fuel system certification.

***Flight Testing
- Decision on Flight test points. Test point repository was made.

- Total 490 test points identified. 44 flights taken place and 3 design modification done already, resulting from the flight tests - Rudder design was modified, Fuel tanks were pressurised and Aileron balance tabs were introduced.

This shows that when SDRE Evil Yindoos come together, they can prepare and execute their dark, nasty plans very well.
nam
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4712
Joined: 05 Jan 2017 20:48

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by nam »

A true Agile development!

Now time to apply the same to AMCA and get the prototype out.

It would be interesting to see how they go about for AMCA
Lilo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4080
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Lilo »

Thanks for the detailed write up JayS ji.

HTT was fructified in record time by a young group as if it was a war time effort.
Even CEMILAC (a testing & certifying agency) got involved from the beginning.

Wonder what was holding back IAF from getting involved ? Eyes set on the pilatus deal ?
This has been the recurrent thing since LCA .

I think DRDO/Hal (the respective premier agencies) should also have a say in deciding who rises to the topmost position in the triforces from the shortlist - then maybe, just maybe we will get our equivalent of a Rickover .
Only when its tied to their promotion prospects the import pasand outlook will finally be exorcised from the forces.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5282
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by srai »

Indian aviation has come of age!
Neshant
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4852
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Neshant »

Very sad to see how poorly HAL performs on delivering product.
This despite years of effort.

--------------------------

India's HJT-36 Sitara remains 'unfit' for use as intermediate jet trainer

http://www.janes.com/article/68386/indi ... et-trainer

India's Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) HJT-36 Sitara remains "unfit" for service as an intermediate jet trainer (IJT) as a result of "unresolvable" technological problems with the aircraft, senior Indian officials associated with the programme have told Jane's.

"There has been no marked progress in the IJT programme," a senior HAL official said at Aero India 2017 show held in mid-February Bangalore.

However, he added, efforts are still underway to try and re-design the HJT-36's tail to resolve issues linked to the platform's critical stall and spin characteristics to provide trainee pilots with greater manoeuvrability of the aircraft.

Senior Indian Air Force (IAF) officials said that until these issues are rectified, the HJT-36 would remain "unfit" for use as an IJT for fighter pilots.
Neshant
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4852
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Neshant »

Tragic.

But the ratio of loss is still not too bad for the Su-30s given the environment in which they operate.

It illustrates one of the benefits of twin engine aircraft not factored into the cost when comparing single vs twin engined planes. The ability to land in an emergency on one engine in the event of an engine failure saves numerous planes.

------------------

India loses Su-30, Chetak on same day

http://www.janes.com/article/68780/indi ... n-same-day
An Indian Air Force (IAF) Sukhoi Su-30MKI ('Flanker-H') fighter crashed in India's western Rajasthan state during a routine training flight on 15 March, injuring three people on the ground.

The IAF said both crewmembers ejected safely from the twin-engined fighter, which had taken off from Uttarlai airbase, near the Pakistan border. An inquiry has been ordered into the accident.

Senior IAF officers said the force's 240-strong Su-30MKI fleet, constituting the backbone of its fighter inventory, was being grounded for 'precautionary' checks before being cleared to resume flying.

The IAF has lost seven Su-30MKIs since 2009 and in May 2016 former defence minister Manohar Parrikar told parliament that the Su-30MKI fleet had suffered 34 mid-air engine failures over the past two years, forcing the aircraft affected to land on just one engine.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19236
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by NRao »

Very inteersting talk on "Improving Situational Awareness and Quality of Servicew using 3 Dimensional Audio Warning System (3DAWS)"

abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3090
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by abhik »

The engine failure rate is still too much. If it were a single engine fighter with the same engine we would see 8-9 crashes every year.
JayS
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4567
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by JayS »

NRao wrote:Very inteersting talk on "Improving Situational Awareness and Quality of Servicew using 3 Dimensional Audio Warning System (3DAWS)"

Haven't seen the video but I saw 3D Audio warning system in HAL stall in Aero India 2017. They had a small demo kit also.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Austin »

https://twitter.com/delhidefence/status ... 48/photo/1

Import Content of various HAL products as released by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence.


Image
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5282
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by srai »

Austin wrote:https://twitter.com/delhidefence/status ... 48/photo/1

Import Content of various HAL products as released by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence.


Image
Aero engines and Radars are the main import content. Those are expensive, especially with foreign currency conversions.

Other than that, it seems India has achieved 70% indigenization (by number). For import by value reduction, the INR would need to be higher than USD or EUR. Even one imported part/component from USA or Europe would skew up the value percentage points.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by shiv »

Austin wrote:https://twitter.com/delhidefence/status ... 48/photo/1

Import Content of various HAL products as released by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence.


Image
Someone archive this please. The question comes up so often it should be tattooed on every BRFites wrist for easy reference
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Austin »

srai wrote:Other than that, it seems India has achieved 70% indigenization (by number). For import by value reduction, the INR would need to be higher than USD or EUR. Even one imported part/component from USA or Europe would skew up the value percentage points.
The word indiginisation has a broad meaning in Indian context , many of lic produced foreign componets like Radar for Naval Ships , Engines etc made by BEL,BDL etc are termed as indiginised although it could just be lic building in India.
nam
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4712
Joined: 05 Jan 2017 20:48

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by nam »

abhik wrote:The engine failure rate is still too much. If it were a single engine fighter with the same engine we would see 8-9 crashes every year.
Wonder if the J10 has an interesting time with the engine.

It is funny how TFTA PLAAF & PAF have frontline single engine jet, engine which we consider unreliable! They want us to believe it is all hunky dory.

on the other hand a SDRE LCA has a outstanding engine history!
Rishi_Tri
BRFite
Posts: 520
Joined: 13 Feb 2017 14:49

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Rishi_Tri »

What might this be? Some testing going on over skies of Bangalore. Picked it up late night on FlightRadar.

https://twitter.com/RishiTri76/status/8 ... 0066312192
Bala Vignesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2131
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 02:02
Location: Standing at the edge of the cliff
Contact:

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Bala Vignesh »

Rishi_Tri wrote:What might this be? Some testing going on over skies of Bangalore. Picked it up late night on FlightRadar.

https://twitter.com/RishiTri76/status/8 ... 0066312192
This is rookie pilots getting touch and go trainings for their certification and currency..
Rishi_Tri
BRFite
Posts: 520
Joined: 13 Feb 2017 14:49

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Rishi_Tri »

Thanks.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by shiv »

MiG 27s rotary 30 mm demolisher on display at Shillon Air Force Museum
Image
jamwal
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5727
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 21:28
Location: Somewhere Else
Contact:

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by jamwal »

I was there last year. Interesting place.
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5722
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Kartik »

India keen to buy MiG-29Ns from Malaysia

NEW DELHI --- India has stated its keenness to buy the MiG-29 aircraft from Malaysia and upgrade them for use by its air force.


Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said the proposal was among the aspects of military cooperation agreed to by Malaysia and India.

In this matter, he said the Ministry of Defence and the Royal Malaysian Air Force (TUDM) would look at the form of cooperation, including handling the Sukhoi aircraft and spare parts.

"There is a possibility too that they will buy our MiG 29 aircraft for refit. We reciprocate by accepting spare parts for our Sukhoi aircraft programme," he told a media conference at the end of a six-day visit to India which started on March 30 in Chennai.


According to leading military aviation magazine, 'Air Forces Monthly', the Royal Malaysian Air Force in 1995 procured 18 MiG-29N from Russia, and presently has 10 MiG-29N and 2 MiG-29NU (trainers) in its fleet.
..
Looks like a pragmatic move by India. the Malaysian MiG-29Ns could be run through the UPG upgrade program, allowing the IAF to allocate additional MiG-29UPGs to the existing 3 squadrons, or raise a 4th squadron that will be at 3/4th strength.
Khalsa
BRFite
Posts: 1776
Joined: 12 Nov 2000 12:31
Location: NZL

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Khalsa »

shiv wrote:MiG 27s rotary 30 mm demolisher on display at Shillon Air Force Museum
Image
I am having evil thoughts at thought of repurposing this baby (by the Army).
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5722
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Kartik »

Latest Ghatak configuration - from ADA's annual report 2015-16

Image
fanne
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4290
Joined: 11 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by fanne »

I hope we learn LO tech in this
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Austin »

Austin wrote:https://twitter.com/delhidefence/status ... 48/photo/1

Import Content of various HAL products as released by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence.


Image
I am wondering why ALH and Do228 has such high import content by % and number since HAL has been making Do228 for 3 decade now and ALH for almost 1.5 decade , same goes for AJT thats been under work since more than a decade.

The Tejas and MKI are still late entrant in manf for HAL and still have lower import content then the rest.
Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7793
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Prasad »

fanne wrote:I hope we learn LO tech in this
We're doing RCS testing on a metal model per latest news.

That version doesn't look very different from this https://twitter.com/delhidefence/status ... 0871055363
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Indranil »

They will soon send models and actual planes in LCA's case to Orange.
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5722
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Kartik »

Indranil wrote:They will soon send models and actual planes in LCA's case to Orange.
Orange?
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Indranil »

It is RCI's Outdoor RCS Test Facility at Dundigal.
Bala Vignesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2131
Joined: 30 Apr 2009 02:02
Location: Standing at the edge of the cliff
Contact:

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Bala Vignesh »

Indranil wrote:They will soon send models and actual planes in LCA's case to Orange.
LCA TD2 is already doing it..
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Singha »

Indranil wrote:It is RCI's Outdoor RCS Test Facility at Dundigal.
http://www.oneindia.com/india/orange-to ... 10653.html

http://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/English/ind ... ility-drdo
Hyderabad Region

RCI

4 Ton Electro Dynamic Shaker
500 Kgs Shock Machine
Acoustic vibration facility
Centrifuge test facility
Centrifuge test facility
Combined Altitude Temperature Humidity
Combined Vibration and Climatic Test System
Electro dynamic vibration test facility (16 ton )
Electro dynamic vibration test facility (7 ton)
EMI-EMC & EMP Measurement & Compatibility
Establishment of Radar Seeker Test and Evaluation Facility
Free Fall Drop Test Facility
High altitude chamber 8)
Icing / rain chamber (admin:#likebutton)
Icing Chamber

Kinetic Heating Test Facility
Pendulum Shock Machine
Rapid Temperature Cycling
RCS Measurement Technology
Salt spray chamber
Thermal shock chamber
Transportation test rig
Walk-in-chambers
Walk-in-chambers


DLRL


Automated Radiated Susceptibility Test System (ARSTS)
Automated Emission Data Collection and Measurement System (AEDCMS)
Automated Emi Susceptibility Measurement System (AESMS)
Altitude Low & High Temperature Chamber
Bump Test Machine
Combined Altitude Temperature Humidity (CATH) Chamber
DUST Chamber
Electro-Static Discharge ( ESD ) Test, 25 KV
ESS Chamber
Low and High Temperature Chamber
Low, High Temperature & Humidity Chamber
Modulation domain Analyzer set-up
Noise Figure Analyzer set-up
Rain Chamber :twisted:
Scalar Network Analyzer set-up
Thermal Shock Chamber
Transit Drop Test Machine
Vector Network Analyzer set-up
Vibration- Shock Test System
Vibration Test System
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Indranil »

Bala Vignesh wrote:
Indranil wrote:They will soon send models and actual planes in LCA's case to Orange.
LCA TD2 is already doing it..
Yes. I had hinted about it earlier. They found that the RCS is much much lower than Mig-21.
Zynda
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2310
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 00:37
Location: J4

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Zynda »

In which config Indranil saar? Clean config? Or with carrying tanks + A2G weapons?
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5722
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Kartik »

Indranil wrote:
Bala Vignesh wrote: LCA TD2 is already doing it..
Yes. I had hinted about it earlier. They found that the RCS is much much lower than Mig-21.
As would be expected, thanks to the difference in their construction- composites vs alloys. But good to get the confirmation. Coupled with SPJ and a Unified EW Suite, should make it difficult to spot and target.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Indranil »

Zynda wrote:In which config Indranil saar? Clean config? Or with carrying tanks + A2G weapons?
They told me what I can afford to know. I did not seek to know more because it is a burden to know and then keep quiet. They are doing that admirably. I am happy with that.

Kartik, it is more than gains from use of composites.
fanne
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4290
Joined: 11 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by fanne »

Sahi hai
malushahi
BRFite
Posts: 351
Joined: 16 Jul 2008 03:08
Location: South of Berkshires

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by malushahi »

Indranil wrote:It is RCI's Outdoor RCS Test Facility at Dundigal.
so what goes on at jodhpur if lca testing has moved to dundigal?
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8428
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Indranil »

AFAIK, testing on TD2 actually happened at Jodhpur. I don't know what is happening there now.
malushahi
BRFite
Posts: 351
Joined: 16 Jul 2008 03:08
Location: South of Berkshires

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by malushahi »

that was my understanding as well (TD2 tested at jodhpur, and not dundigal).

this may give an idea of what may be going on at jodhpur.
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5722
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Kartik »

LCA TD2 was sent to AFS Dundigal for RCS testing. From ADA's annual report
Tejas (TD2) aircraft is being utilized for RCS studies at AFS Dundigal.
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5722
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: Indian Military Aviation - 21 Sept 2015

Post by Kartik »

Indranil wrote:
Zynda wrote:In which config Indranil saar? Clean config? Or with carrying tanks + A2G weapons?
They told me what I can afford to know. I did not seek to know more because it is a burden to know and then keep quiet. They are doing that admirably. I am happy with that.

Kartik, it is more than gains from use of composites.
Did they quote any number, as to what orders lower than the MiG-21's RCS? Anyway, we knew that the MiG-21 itself has a small RCS and is hard to pick up visually as well. Remember the USAF reports on the Bisons that surprised F-15 pilots? Now with an even small RCS and ability to shoot a BVR missile while nose cold (not transmitting the radar), Tejas' cued by Su-30MKIs providing targeting info could take enemy fighters by surprise.

added later:

From the Annual report, there is mention of Development of improved RAM for the Tejas- perhaps this is also being tested at Orange facility Dundigal with the TD2 airframe.
Locked