There was another Youtube AV which had more details about this. I am not able to search for it as the title was in Hindi.nash wrote:This might be the youtube link:Karan M wrote:We don't have any info yet..Vips can you post which link at least.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpNe-yP4vsc
Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
AdityaM & Mukesh.Kumar ji: Glad to reconnect.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Don't get time to do that now days. Last I wrote on Indian Defense Review ~8 yrs ago was because no one else could have written on the subject. A private PPT presentation on BGRV & MARV was shared by Ramana ji few years ago.Lisa wrote:Haridasji
Thank you for explanation. Any graphics from you soon, missed seeing them for comparative purposes when discussing missiles and launch platforms.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 23 Oct 2006 04:14
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Haridas wrote:Don't get time to do that now days. Last I wrote on Indian Defense Review ~8 yrs ago was because no one else could have written on the subject. A private PPT presentation on BGRV & MARV was shared by Ramana ji few years ago.Lisa wrote:Haridasji
Thank you for explanation. Any graphics from you soon, missed seeing them for comparative purposes when discussing missiles and launch platforms.
Haridasji, my pranam's and delighted to see you back. I am one of those who learned a lot about our progress and prowess in the field of N deterrence through your posts and images. I still recall your posts on health impact to Indian sailors who would be patrolling the sea portion of deterrence. I would love to hear your thoughts on now that we have multiple of those boats in water and patrolling the oceans for N. detterence and have things improved or are much bad ( same as you had earlier quoted). Would appreciate to see your inputs if you can.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
BRF'ites wrote a brief write up on HGV program with inputs from brar_w for US system ( Thanks brar_w )and few others , Comments and Suggestions welcome.
https://austinstalk.blogspot.com/2018/1 ... hical.html
https://austinstalk.blogspot.com/2018/1 ... hical.html
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
I am hoping any one visiting Aero India this time would ask DRDO on HGV program , I am sure they must be having multiple program including glide vehicle ,hoping to hear more from them this time around.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
We need to test our HSTDV as soon as possible. Otherwise it is going to be the NPT drama all over again.
RAND’s New Hypersonic Non-Proliferation Study
RAND’s New Hypersonic Non-Proliferation Study
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Just to clarify, I'm looking for publicly available info only. I fully understand that confidential data cannot be shared here. I know for e.g. the no of missiles a regiment should have in theory and how many regiments we are expected to raise. There is conflicting and sometimes dated info so I was hoping if someone would have more upto date info.mody wrote:This is operational details. No one will be having this kind of info and anyone having the information, should not be disclosing it on public forums.Deans wrote:For a paper I'm writing (for a think tank with the same kind of orientation as BRF) can Missile gurus here help me understand what quantity of the following missiles we should have deployed by the end of 2022. This is in a `best case scenario' assuming no delays in trials/ procurement etc.
Thanks.
SRBMs - Prithvi & Brahmos regiments or approx. no of missiles.
SAM's - Akash, Barak & QRSAM.
You can check publically available information about the orders placed for the various missiles and then estimate. Order details for missiles like Prithvi and Land based Brahmos will not be available. For Brahmos you might find the number of regiments raised, same also maybe for Prithvi, but it will not have absolute number of missiles. Also, for Prithvi no info about the version.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Namaskaar bandhu. Let us do actions that serves Bharat maata, not limited to passing time in forums.krishna_krishna wrote:Haridasji, my pranam's and delighted to see you back. ....
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 23 Oct 2006 04:14
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Goes without saying haridasji, rest is all Maya only.Haridas wrote: Namaskaar bandhu. Let us do actions that serves Bharat maata, not limited to passing time in forums.
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1214
- Joined: 15 Aug 2016 00:22
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Any news wrt the test notified by the NOTAM for 4-6Jan ?
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Deans That is compilation.of data to get insight into classified information. Don't go there.
When time come GOI may or may not publish it.
When time come GOI may or may not publish it.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
indeed hypersonics is the new nuke .. the US Russia and china seem to want to keep it for themselvessouravB wrote:We need to test our HSTDV as soon as possible. Otherwise it is going to be the NPT drama all over again.
RAND’s New Hypersonic Non-Proliferation Study
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
NPT and it's likes are dead and buried for good.
Like lion being scared of dead jackal.
Like lion being scared of dead jackal.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
First the Pralay test got put off twice and its further testing status is still not clear and now the K5 test has also not happened. Not feeling good about this.prasannasimha wrote:Any news wrt the test notified by the NOTAM for 4-6Jan ?
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1214
- Joined: 15 Aug 2016 00:22
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Details of SLBM tests are often npt announced
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
May be because of another cyclone in Andaman area.Vips wrote:First the Pralay test got put off twice and its further testing status is still not clear and now the K5 test has also not happened. Not feeling good about this.prasannasimha wrote:Any news wrt the test notified by the NOTAM for 4-6Jan ?
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... A5BhJ.html
ndia is exploring the possibility of selling the BrahMos cruise missile to Indonesia, and a team from the Indo-Russian joint venture that makes the weapon system visited a state-run shipyard in Surabaya last year to assess the fitting of the missile on Indonesian warships, people familiar with developments said.Besides the BrahMos, India has offered to supply coastal defence radars and marine grade steel to Indonesia and to service the Russian-made Su-30 combat jets flown by the Indonesian air force as part of efforts to deepen bilateral defence and military cooperation, the people said.India has earlier held talks with the Vietnam government for the sale of the BrahMos, a supersonic cruise missile developed by an Indo-Russian joint venture set up in 1998. The Indian Navy inducted the missile on its frontline warships in 2005.Though India and Indonesia have not reached a final agreement on the sale of the BrahMos, the visit of the a team from the Indo-Russian company to the state-run PT PAL shipyard on the sidelines of the Indo Defence 2018 expo late last year was a significant step forward in efforts to sell the weapon system to a foreign country.“The BrahMos team was invited to visit the state-run ship-building enterprise and had a look at the Indonesian platform,” a person said. The inspection of the warships was focused on fitting the BrahMos system on them, the people cited above said.Though there has been “some traction” in India’s offer of coastal defence radars to Indonesia, matters were “more advanced in considering” the BrahMos system, the people added.
A group of MPs from the commission on defence, foreign and information affairs of Indonesia’s lower house of parliament had visited the BrahMos headquarters last year, the people said.“It is a good proposition to have deeper defence cooperation with India because it has advanced technology that it is both functional and economical,” the first person cited above said. “Indian technology is not as complicated as technology from the West as it is of good value for regional countries,” the person added.Commodore (retired) C Uday Bhaskar, director of the Society for Policy Studies, said: “It is significant if India is offering the BrahMos missile to Indonesia. It enhances the relevance of India’s military profile as a credible exporter of cruise missile technology.”
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
http://bdl-india.in/
08 Jan 2019
BHARAT DYNAMICS LIMITED (BDL) signs contract for supply of Anti-Tank Guided Missiles to Indian Army
http://bdl-india.in/sites/default/files ... %20Rel.pdf
08 Jan 2019
BHARAT DYNAMICS LIMITED (BDL) signs contract for supply of Anti-Tank Guided Missiles to Indian Army
http://bdl-india.in/sites/default/files ... %20Rel.pdf
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Konkurs-M. Going by the price and previous contracts I estimated 3500-4000 missiles.jaysimha wrote:http://bdl-india.in/
08 Jan 2019
BHARAT DYNAMICS LIMITED (BDL) signs contract for supply of Anti-Tank Guided Missiles to Indian Army
http://bdl-india.in/sites/default/files ... %20Rel.pdf
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
thing is we have 20x good quality ATGMs *today* than cheen has tanks and golf carts for tibet.
not the sexy kit like FnF man portable but good rugged kit that just works.
cheen is not a war time threat. its peacetime where they slide in to nibble pieces of land where they are most dangerous
not the sexy kit like FnF man portable but good rugged kit that just works.
cheen is not a war time threat. its peacetime where they slide in to nibble pieces of land where they are most dangerous
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
India exploring sale of BrahMos cruise missile to Indonesia
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... A5BhJ.html
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... A5BhJ.html
India has earlier held talks with the Vietnam government for the sale of the BrahMos, a supersonic cruise missile developed by an Indo-Russian joint venture set up in 1998. The Indian Navy inducted the missile on its frontline warships in 2005.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Website is not allowing me to cut-and-paste. Be warned when clicking link, advertisements for unmentionables pop up
Swordfish radar: Key to India's multi-layered air defence system
https://www.oneindia.com/india/swordfis ... 33294.html
Swordfish radar: Key to India's multi-layered air defence system
https://www.oneindia.com/india/swordfis ... 33294.html
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
South Korean Air Defence System Beat Russian Tunguska-M1, Pantsir In Indian Trials
http://www.defenseworld.net/news/24016/ ... ian_Trials
South Korean K30 Biho short range air defence system
Moscow is lobbying against a South Korean anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense system, the K30 Biho which beat two Russian competitors, the Tunguska-M1 and Pantsir in trials for an Indian procurement program. A South Korean publication, Joongang Daily reported last week that the bidding was first officially announced in 2013, and the candidate weapons were evaluated throughout 2015 and tested in 2017. The contract involves exporting 104 Biho systems, 97 ammunition carriers, 39 command vehicles, 4,928 missiles and 172,260 rounds of ammunition, bringing the contract’s total value to 3 trillion won ($2.66 billion). The K30 Biho was developed by Korea’s Agency for Defense Development in 2013 as a short range anti-aircraft and anti-missile system. In the bidding process, it beat out an upgraded Tunguska-M1 model built by the Russian state-owned defense company Almaz-Antey and the Pantsir missile system from the Russian KPB Instrument Design Bureau.
The K30 Biho was judged the most capable of dual purpose use as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense system, the publication said quoting unnamed sources in the Korean government. The report said that Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu expressed dissatisfaction with the decision on the sidelines of a military conference between the two countries Dec. 18. Shoygu reportedly told the Indians that the Indian military had not properly tested the weapon in a deliberate attempt to not buy arms from Russia, according to a source in the Korean government quoted by the publication. The Russians followed this up by sending an official request to the Indian Defense Ministry asking it to re-evaluate the bidding process. “The fact that its weapons were outgunned in the bidding must have come at a major shock to Russia, which prides itself as the leading manufacturer of combined defense systems,” the Korean official said. “We expect them to attempt to block this deal to the end.”
“Various pro-Russian forces within the Indian government are also throwing their weight behind a re-evaluation of the bidding process,” the unnamed source told the Korean publication. The Korean Defense Ministry and defense contractors have sent their own letters to the Indian Defense Ministry requesting that it streamline the contract negotiation process. The Korean government is also considering dispatching one of its officials to New Delhi to apply some pressure, the report added.
http://www.defenseworld.net/news/24016/ ... ian_Trials
South Korean K30 Biho short range air defence system
Moscow is lobbying against a South Korean anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense system, the K30 Biho which beat two Russian competitors, the Tunguska-M1 and Pantsir in trials for an Indian procurement program. A South Korean publication, Joongang Daily reported last week that the bidding was first officially announced in 2013, and the candidate weapons were evaluated throughout 2015 and tested in 2017. The contract involves exporting 104 Biho systems, 97 ammunition carriers, 39 command vehicles, 4,928 missiles and 172,260 rounds of ammunition, bringing the contract’s total value to 3 trillion won ($2.66 billion). The K30 Biho was developed by Korea’s Agency for Defense Development in 2013 as a short range anti-aircraft and anti-missile system. In the bidding process, it beat out an upgraded Tunguska-M1 model built by the Russian state-owned defense company Almaz-Antey and the Pantsir missile system from the Russian KPB Instrument Design Bureau.
The K30 Biho was judged the most capable of dual purpose use as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense system, the publication said quoting unnamed sources in the Korean government. The report said that Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu expressed dissatisfaction with the decision on the sidelines of a military conference between the two countries Dec. 18. Shoygu reportedly told the Indians that the Indian military had not properly tested the weapon in a deliberate attempt to not buy arms from Russia, according to a source in the Korean government quoted by the publication. The Russians followed this up by sending an official request to the Indian Defense Ministry asking it to re-evaluate the bidding process. “The fact that its weapons were outgunned in the bidding must have come at a major shock to Russia, which prides itself as the leading manufacturer of combined defense systems,” the Korean official said. “We expect them to attempt to block this deal to the end.”
“Various pro-Russian forces within the Indian government are also throwing their weight behind a re-evaluation of the bidding process,” the unnamed source told the Korean publication. The Korean Defense Ministry and defense contractors have sent their own letters to the Indian Defense Ministry requesting that it streamline the contract negotiation process. The Korean government is also considering dispatching one of its officials to New Delhi to apply some pressure, the report added.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
has the biho undergone evaluation in any other country ?? also the Shin-Gung Man-portable air-defence systems might be more capable than the Iglas as well ???Rakesh wrote:South Korean Air Defence System Beat Russian Tunguska-M1, Pantsir In Indian Trials
http://www.defenseworld.net/news/24016/ ... ian_Trials
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
I wonder if the body of BIHO is the same as K-9 or has similarities. It might reduce the logistics.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Considering we wrote a blank check to Russia for S-400 with no extensive trials and testing I love how they are complaining about this. Perhaps we should acknowledge and do the same for S-400 & Grigorivich deals.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Any comparative tests must be done in Indian conditions.Winner on technical merit should be given the first peck.
Often more than one system meets min. parameters required by the service in Q.There may be a much lower almost equiv. system which may be favoured on cost grounds.
Often more than one system meets min. parameters required by the service in Q.There may be a much lower almost equiv. system which may be favoured on cost grounds.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
It was evaluated by the US Army at White Sands Missile Range in late 2017 along with a bunch of other options for its interim Mobile SHORAD and SHORAD requirements.kit wrote:
has the biho undergone evaluation in any other country ??
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Is this a standard import-giri deal with 30% offsets, or is there some local assembly? why not have a Make-1 or even strategic partnership for this?
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4056
- Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
On some twitter threads, it was mentioned that India secretly operationalized K4. There was an image posted, but not posting either to avoid posting anything that should not be
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
ArjunPandit wrote:On some twitter threads, it was mentioned that India secretly operationalized K4. There was an image posted, but not posting either to avoid posting anything that should not be
What secret? I said that in the Arihant thread after PM declared the deterrent patrol.
Now its true no one but Indians want to know all details of deterrent patrol as they are brought up to believe pappu logic.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
150 km range missile test on 17 January from ITR ,
https://twitter.com/kurup89/status/1085081596145750016
https://twitter.com/kurup89/status/1085081596145750016
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
350 km range missile test from ITR on 18 January ..... Pralay ?
https://twitter.com/kurup89/status/1085083173115985921
https://twitter.com/kurup89/status/1085083173115985921
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4056
- Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
The pics, of course I do remember that you clarified at that time.ramana wrote: What secret?
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Another 150 km range missile test scheduled from ITR on 19 January ,
https://twitter.com/kurup89/status/1085126116837187585
https://twitter.com/kurup89/status/1085126116837187585
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
No updates on all the 3 test scheduled on Jan, 17, Jan 18 and Jan 19. No news is good news?
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 527
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
^ I have searched Twitter for the K4 pic.
It's the same old rehashed pic from last year, and even displayed on brf, IIRC.
The poster claims open hatch supposedly shows only single missile, so must be K4, as 3 X K-15 fit together.
Problem is, with the magnification and pixels together, cannot make out nuthin. No overwhelming proof.
We still don't know:
- wat K 4 looks like
- shape of nose cone
- whether it has been tested. ( This I speculate has been done, as the project leader has got an award from Drdo. India Today speculated on 10 tests, but they are not the best source. They got the shape of Arihant wrong, showing some graphic looking like an Akula SSN. They were also totally blind on Arighat. Their K-4 graphic looks like Tintin's Moon Rocket. So, who knows?)
Our best guess estimates are the old 2005 ppt slides from Drdo, and Haridas ji's analysis on the smaller K-15 warhead shape extrapolated to the K-4. This is most logical / sensible info to think abt.
We still don't know jack.
It's the same old rehashed pic from last year, and even displayed on brf, IIRC.
The poster claims open hatch supposedly shows only single missile, so must be K4, as 3 X K-15 fit together.
Problem is, with the magnification and pixels together, cannot make out nuthin. No overwhelming proof.
We still don't know:
- wat K 4 looks like
- shape of nose cone
- whether it has been tested. ( This I speculate has been done, as the project leader has got an award from Drdo. India Today speculated on 10 tests, but they are not the best source. They got the shape of Arihant wrong, showing some graphic looking like an Akula SSN. They were also totally blind on Arighat. Their K-4 graphic looks like Tintin's Moon Rocket. So, who knows?)
Our best guess estimates are the old 2005 ppt slides from Drdo, and Haridas ji's analysis on the smaller K-15 warhead shape extrapolated to the K-4. This is most logical / sensible info to think abt.
We still don't know jack.
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
K-15 test
K-4 test
Quite obviously two very different missiles.
K-4 test
Quite obviously two very different missiles.
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1214
- Joined: 15 Aug 2016 00:22
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Tarmak007 Retweeted
✈Anantha Krishnan M ✈
@writetake
3h3 hours ago
More
Just In
#LRSAM successfully test-fired. Details awaited.
✈Anantha Krishnan M ✈
@writetake
3h3 hours ago
More
Just In
#LRSAM successfully test-fired. Details awaited.