Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Locked
jamwal
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5727
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 21:28
Location: Somewhere Else
Contact:

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by jamwal »

Let us not analyse his tweets here. This is proving to be way too much noise. He was also using tweets by troll accounts like that Alikhatna to claim that he was correct.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Singha »

sudeepj
BRFite
Posts: 1976
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 11:25

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by sudeepj »

Mihir wrote:
sudeepj wrote:
The camera is potato quality...

What you are seeing as a contrail is really fuel and smoke from the hit fighter.
That is one possible explanation. Doesn't prove anything definitively. You expect a fighter that has taken a hit to spew smoke and possibly hurtle towards the ground. This one isn't doing anything of the sort.
Mihir, I am not sure if you understand Punjabi/Hindi.. but listen to the audio from the eye witnesses. 56 seconds into the video, there is a boom, followed by Alla-Snackbar chants, and commentary saying.. second boom, one more boom. The second one is down.

Therefore its reasonable to conclude that before Abdul whipped out his potato camera, there was a boom, which took down the jet that is clearly going down.

The size of the 'now you see it, now you dont' second 'contrail' is large enough to be comparable to the plume of the first fighter going down, and that one is clearly streaming smoke, kerosene and flames. Therefore what you are seeing is not a contrail, but a plume.

There is a gap of roughly 30 seconds between the second plume and the boom. Simple calculation puts the distance between the second plume and the camera to be around 20kms. Which sounds about right.. The label of the video says Mirpur, and Horran, where the Mig21 came down, is about that distance from Mirpur, POK.

Finally, there is no parachute visible in the video.. Where are the parachutes from the first plane, that is clearly shown to be crashing..? We know Abhinandana ejected quite high up.. If the Mig21 was the only plane that went down, we should be able to see the parachute.. Therefore, the first plane is the F16.. The second boom is the Mig21 'injesting debris', that flew on a few more seconds and perhaps 10 kms more before Abhinandana ejected.

I think, this proves conclusively, that two planes went down that day, one pilot survived, and the pilot(s) in the other one did not.
Last edited by sudeepj on 27 Mar 2019 22:43, edited 5 times in total.
anishns
BRFite
Posts: 1382
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 09:43
Location: being victim onlee...

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by anishns »

https://thewire.in/security/balakot-air ... te-imagery

The WIRE up to its usual antics. Nothing new :wink:
Regurgigating the same old debunked tripe. No original content
Some militaries, such as those of the US and Australia, have spent years developing the technologies and systems that enable precision strike and employing the skills required in actual operations. But proficiency should not be taken for granted. It takes more than the weapon itself to launch a successful precision strike.
Haanji Australia has so much more experience fighting wars in its neighborhood.
sudeepj
BRFite
Posts: 1976
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 11:25

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by sudeepj »

anishns wrote:https://thewire.in/security/balakot-air ... te-imagery
Some militaries, such as those of the US and Australia, have spent years developing the technologies and systems that enable precision strike and employing the skills required in actual operations. But proficiency should not be taken for granted. It takes more than the weapon itself to launch a successful precision strike.
Haanji Australia has so much more experience fighting wars in its neighborhood.
Australian experience in war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu_War
The Emu War, also known as the Great Emu War,[1] was a nuisance wildlife management military operation undertaken in Australia over the latter part of 1932 to address public concern over the number of emus said to be running amok in the Campion district of Western Australia. The unsuccessful attempts to curb the population of emus, a large flightless bird indigenous to Australia, employed soldiers armed with Lewis guns.

Following World War I, large numbers of ex-soldiers from Australia, along with a number of British veterans, were given land by the Australian government to take up farming within Western Australia, often in marginal areas. The difficulties facing farmers were increased by the arrival of as many as 20,000 emus.[3] Emus regularly migrate after their breeding season, heading to the coast from the inland regions. With the cleared land and additional water supplies being made available for livestock by the West Australian farmers, the emus found that the cultivated lands were good habitat, and they began to foray into farm territory—in particular the marginal farming land around Chandler and Walgoolan.[2] The emus consumed and spoiled the crops, as well as leaving large gaps in fences where rabbits could enter and cause further problems.[4]

Farmers relayed their concerns about the birds ravaging their crops, and a deputation of ex-soldiers were sent to meet with the Minister of Defence, Sir George Pearce. Having served in World War I, the soldier-settlers were well aware of the effectiveness of machine guns, and they requested their deployment. The minister readily agreed, although with conditions attached: the guns were to be used by military personnel, and troop transport was to be financed by the Western Australian government, and the farmers would provide food, accommodation, and payment for the ammunition.

On 2 November the men travelled to Campion, where some 50 emus were sighted.[2] As the birds were out of range of the guns, the local settlers attempted to herd the emus into an ambush, but the birds split into small groups and ran so that they were difficult to target.[6] Nevertheless, while the first fusillade from the machine guns was ineffective due to the range, a second round of gunfire was able to kill "a number" of birds. Later the same day a small flock was encountered, and "perhaps a dozen" birds were killed.[2]

The next significant event was on 4 November. Meredith had established an ambush near a local dam, and more than 1,000 emus were spotted heading towards their position. This time the gunners waited until the birds were in close proximity before opening fire. The gun jammed after only twelve birds were killed and the remainder scattered before any more could be shot.[8] No more birds were sighted that day.[2]

In the days that followed, Meredith chose to move further south, where the birds were "reported to be fairly tame",[11] but there was only limited success in spite of his efforts.[2] By the fourth day of the campaign, army observers noted that "each pack seems to have its own leader now – a big black-plumed bird which stands fully six feet high and keeps watch while his mates carry out their work of destruction and warns them of our approach."[12] At one stage Meredith even went so far as to mount one of the guns on a truck: a move that proved to be ineffective, as the truck was unable to gain on the birds, and the ride was so rough that the gunner was unable to fire any shots.[2] By 8 November, six days after the first engagement, 2,500 rounds of ammunition had been fired.[6] The number of birds killed is uncertain: one account estimates that it was 50 birds,[6] but other accounts range from 200 to 500—the latter figure being provided by the settlers. Meredith's official report noted that his men had suffered no casualties.

Summarising the culls, ornithologist Dominic Serventy commented:

The machine-gunners' dreams of point blank fire into serried masses of Emus were soon dissipated. The Emu command had evidently ordered guerrilla tactics, and its unwieldy army soon split up into innumerable small units that made use of the military equipment uneconomic. A crestfallen field force therefore withdrew from the combat area after about a month.[13]


On 8 November, representatives in the Australian House of Representatives discussed the operation.[6] Following the negative coverage of the events in the local media,[14] that included claims that "only a few" emus had died,[4] Pearce withdrew the military personnel and the guns on 8 November.[4][6][15][16]

After the withdrawal, Major Meredith compared the emus to Zulus and commented on the striking manoeuvrability of the emus, even while badly wounded.

If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds it would face any army in the world... They can face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks. They are like Zulus whom even dum-dum bullets could not stop.[12]
Are the Emus under control yet? No one knows. :rotfl:
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Lalmohan »

australia built up vast expertise in eliminating its native population... maybe they meant Austria...? no wait... they eagerly participated in wiping out vast numbers of their own citizens with a neighbourhood psycopath... no wait...
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by shyamd »

The sustained pressure by GoI of drills close to border is causing shivers in TSP. It’s exhausting TSP in multiple domains - financial and others.

GoI wants to see real crackdown before it reduces the pressure.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Singha »

afghans and the US ambassador in kabul are also displeased with paks posture wrt to the taliban and calling them out.
see amrullah saleh's tweet I posted in terroristan thread. it was in response to shireen mazari rant.
flat out calls them a deranged beggar
Ravi Karumanchiri
BRFite
Posts: 723
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 06:40
Location: www.ravikarumanchiri.com
Contact:

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Ravi Karumanchiri »

Pakistan: No links found in probe of Indian Pulwama dossier

Islamabad says the allegation that Pakistani groups were involved in Kashmir suicide attack was unsubstantiated.
by Asad Hashim
4 hours ago



Islamabad, Pakistan - Pakistan says it has conducted initial investigations into a dossier provided by neighbouring India on the Pulwama suicide attack in Kashmir, concluding that so far no links can be drawn between Pakistan and the bombing, the foreign office said. :evil:
sudeepj
BRFite
Posts: 1976
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 11:25

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by sudeepj »

Singha wrote:afghans and the US ambassador in kabul are also displeased with paks posture wrt to the taliban and calling them out.
see amrullah saleh's tweet I posted in terroristan thread. it was in response to shireen mazari rant.
flat out calls them a deranged beggar
Amrullah Saleh is an especially clear eyed person. One day, he will make the Pakistanis pay for what they are doing to his country.
anishns
BRFite
Posts: 1382
Joined: 16 Dec 2007 09:43
Location: being victim onlee...

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by anishns »

And the Iranians & the Balochi's Insha*Ganesha* :twisted:
sudeepj wrote:
Singha wrote:afghans and the US ambassador in kabul are also displeased with paks posture wrt to the taliban and calling them out.
see amrullah saleh's tweet I posted in terroristan thread. it was in response to shireen mazari rant.
flat out calls them a deranged beggar
Amrullah Saleh is an especially clear eyed person. One day, he will make the Pakistanis pay for what they are doing to his country.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2206
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by shravan »

Budgam: Indian missile fired before Mi17 V5 chopper crash
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ne ... 623744.cms
Hari Nair
BRFite
Posts: 338
Joined: 20 Aug 2010 17:37
Location: Bangalore

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Hari Nair »

shravan wrote:Budgam: Indian missile fired before Mi17 V5 chopper crash
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ne ... 623744.cms
- An extremely unfortunate case of fratricide.
mmasand
BRFite
Posts: 742
Joined: 19 May 2009 23:46

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by mmasand »

Hari Nair wrote:
shravan wrote:Budgam: Indian missile fired before Mi17 V5 chopper crash
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ne ... 623744.cms
- An extremely unfortunate case of fratricide.
This is the difference between the IAF and PAF, one is professional as you would expect. The other indulges in state induced propaganda.
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2404
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Thakur_B »

shravan wrote:Budgam: Indian missile fired before Mi17 V5 chopper crash
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ne ... 623744.cms
Sounds like a case of IFF failure. Considering the very short distance of helicopter and reaction time of SpyDer the missile couldn't have been aborted in time :cry:
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Singha »

its news to me that IFF systems are kept switched off in peacetime. I wonder why? its a passive device that responds only if a missile/aircraft/ground station interrogates it right and does not emit any other time?

anyway they need to run fleetwide realistic tests to ensure ALL of our myriad SAM & AAM systems from igla up to akash are able to work properly with ALL of our myriad a.c types. if needed use banshee drones to carry the IFF and fire various missiles at it. I dont think we can rely on datasheets anymore
Hari Nair
BRFite
Posts: 338
Joined: 20 Aug 2010 17:37
Location: Bangalore

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Hari Nair »

Singha wrote:its news to me that IFF systems are kept switched off in peacetime. I wonder why? ….. I dont think we can rely on datasheets anymore
IFF is not kept OFF in peacetime. Transponders are kept ON with discrete code allotted for each flight and in fact are even extensively used for civil air traffic separation. Safety systems such as Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TACS) use Transponders as one of its inputs to calculate and display Resolution Advisories (RA). There are military modes of IFF . In military, there are also other flight procedural safeties built in in addition to just depending on IFF. So, there is more to this very unfortunate 'Blue-on-Blue' accident than just IFF. I am sure the chain of errors that happened will be identified and corrected.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6919
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by habal »

Maybe the SAM that hit the chopper was fired from an army base/perimeter protection unit. The IA SAM system may not compatibility with IAF IFF or must be some glitch on that day.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Singha »

habal, i dont think IA has spyder....its all owned by iaf for airbase protection only.
syam
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 31 Jan 2017 00:13

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by syam »

Also why these reports coming out now? Don't we know the missile fired when it was fired?

Better use some heavy mental filters while processing any news now. Quick reaction won't do any good to us.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12252
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

The report talks of missile being fire but it doesn't say that it killed the mi 17.

So let's wait for the coi report to come out and then decide on the cause of loss.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7101
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by shyamd »

If you reanalyse the pictures you will see a missile contrail and a whole in the tail of the aircraft similar to a missile hit.
Abhibhushan
BRFite
Posts: 210
Joined: 28 Sep 2005 20:56
Location: Chennai

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Abhibhushan »

Habal wrote:
Maybe the SAM that hit the chopper was fired from an army base/perimeter protection unit. The IA SAM system may not compatibility with IAF IFF or must be some glitch on that day.
That my dear is a ver serious charge. Perhaps you may like to delete the post?
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12252
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Pratyush »

shyamd wrote:If you reanalyse the pictures you will see a missile contrail and a whole in the tail of the aircraft similar to a missile hit.
I say that we don't know what caused the hole in the tail of the aircraft.

It will be determined by the COI and until then I would not want to comment on this painful episode.
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Lalmohan »

the hole in the tail is not due to something hitting it

1. the hole is too neat and is coming out and not going in (Look at the metal around the hole)
2. the hole is in a narrow part of the airframe - a missile if radar guided will head for the main aircraft, if IR will head for the exhaust
3. if it had entered the tail - the missile would also explode - destroying much of the tail area

the most likely cause is something being wrenched out of the tail, like moving mechanical parts, could be post impact with the ground also

there is NO evidence that the Mi17 was HIT by a missile at this time
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Singha »

under the tail boom is a tripod like structure about where the so called hole was.
it probably hit a tree or the ground and got wrenched off, creating the hole.
Mukesh.Kumar
BRFite
Posts: 1244
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 14:09

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Mukesh.Kumar »

Finally journos allowed into Balakot.
The journalists were taken on the tour on Thursday (29 March) and they proceeded to capture videos of the site. The report claimed that currently 300 students are present at the site which purportedly operated under the guise of a Madrasa. The zone is said to be protected by the frontier army of the Pakistani paramilitary force.

This guided tour by Pakistani authorities a month after the air strikes led many social media users to question whether the repair work at the site was finally complete.
Apologies if posted earlier.
dinesh_kimar
BRFite
Posts: 527
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by dinesh_kimar »

Apparently 2 Airstrikes carried out when Parrikar was DefMin.

The man had guts....
sudhan
BRFite
Posts: 1157
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 17:53
Location: Timbuktoo..

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by sudhan »

Mukesh.Kumar wrote:Finally journos allowed into Balakot.



Apologies if posted earlier.
I guess the govt has been waiting for this, to release the proof it has been holding on to. The Govt pics will be the 'before' and journos pics would be the 'after repairs' pic.. Let's see what happens
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6110
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by sanjaykumar »

They must think white people are also inbred.
Hari Nair
BRFite
Posts: 338
Joined: 20 Aug 2010 17:37
Location: Bangalore

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Hari Nair »

Our Old Man just quoted Bob Dylan !! 8)
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/newsindi ... spartanntp


-Thanks for posting the link! Good article by Gen Shankar:
VikasM
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 27
Joined: 23 Sep 2016 12:12

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by VikasM »

Hari Nair wrote:Our Old Man just quoted Bob Dylan !! 8)
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/newsindi ... spartanntp


-Thanks for posting the link! Good article by Gen Shankar:

OMG .. Like literally "Balakot proof is ‘blowin in the wind’" :rotfl:
yensoy
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2494
Joined: 29 May 2002 11:31
Location: USA

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by yensoy »

sudhan wrote:
Mukesh.Kumar wrote:Finally journos allowed into Balakot.
Apologies if posted earlier.
I guess the govt has been waiting for this, to release the proof it has been holding on to. The Govt pics will be the 'before' and journos pics would be the 'after repairs' pic.. Let's see what happens
I hope some journalist carried a blacklight/forensic light source. I am sure there will be a lot of tell-tale signs in the UV wavelengths.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32377
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by chetak »

Black box of Mi-17 chopper that crashed in Srinagar, goes missing

Mar 30, 2019,



New Delhi: The crucial black box, flight data recorder, of the Mi-17 helicopter that crashed near Budgam on February 27 killing six personnel on board, is missing and the Indian Air Force is searching for it.

“The black box has gone missing after the crash and we are trying to locate it. It is possible that it has been taken away by the hostile locals, who have taken away many other parts as well,” sources in the Air Force said.
manjgu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2615
Joined: 11 Aug 2006 10:33

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by manjgu »

blast targetting CRPF convoy at Banihal pass !! another round
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32377
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by chetak »

Lalmohan wrote:the hole in the tail is not due to something hitting it

1. the hole is too neat and is coming out and not going in (Look at the metal around the hole)
2. the hole is in a narrow part of the airframe - a missile if radar guided will head for the main aircraft, if IR will head for the exhaust
3. if it had entered the tail - the missile would also explode - destroying much of the tail area

the most likely cause is something being wrenched out of the tail, like moving mechanical parts, could be post impact with the ground also

there is NO evidence that the Mi17 was HIT by a missile at this time

Tail guard


Image
Last edited by chetak on 30 Mar 2019 12:34, edited 1 time in total.
manjgu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2615
Joined: 11 Aug 2006 10:33

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by manjgu »

looks like a cylinder blast in a car !!
Shivaji
BRFite
Posts: 117
Joined: 19 Sep 2016 09:39

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by Shivaji »

manjgu wrote:blast targetting CRPF convoy at Banihal pass !! another round
No casualties:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ahmedalifayy ... 1322188800

Today at 1040 hrs a Bus of CRPF 54 Bn( No. HR 66 8067) In Down convoy, was hit by a Santro from back. Car driver escaped. Santro was blown up. CRPF noticed uria, oil bottle, 1 LPG cylinder in Santro. 1 cylinder blasted. Rear windshield of the bus broken but no casualty
VikasM
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 27
Joined: 23 Sep 2016 12:12

Re: Operation Balakot: News & Discussion

Post by VikasM »

I pray someone says Jaish. Needs an even bigger nail in its coffin.
Last edited by VikasM on 30 Mar 2019 13:05, edited 1 time in total.
Locked