CRamS wrote:pankajs wrote:You are unhappy when Trump tries to inserts himself in Kashmir BUT you can't stop yourself from inserting TSP on matters internal to India!
Tough rubbish talk. TSP controls the terror pigLeTs, can attack India with impunity, we have lost 1000s of troops, 1000s of civilians, and we have a humongous army arrayed to control this.
And TSP is not a factor? Give me a break. Don't tell me you are delusional.
We are not enemies, you may feel good attacking me, just as libtards do attacking ModiJi, but real enemy is TSP and 'friendly enemies' like its 3.5
.
What rubbish! Let me quote your original original again
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7240&start=2640#p2368609
CRamS wrote:^^^ Not sure what that will achieve. I am sure under normal circumstances, a move like that for administrative efficiency is warranted, but with TSP-led Muslim secessionist war raging, and the central strategy of TSP is to wrest the Muslim-majority Kashmir valley from India, how is separating Jammu and Laddak going to solve the TSP problem? <snip>
TSP is a factor in J&K and beyond BUT not in the trifurcation. Its core agenda wrt Kashmir or India will not change with or without trifurcation but you had to insert it into the debate.
However to the ORIGINAL point, trifurcation is about solving ONE of Jammu and Ladakh's problem, that of their oppression at the hands of the valley and not about solving our TSP problem. I don't understand why you had to bring TSP into this too. Don't tell me you are delusional.
I can't read your heart but your insertion of TSP into an internal administrative decision of India does not look good. You may feel good at mocking Modi in the style of your favorite rNDTV but don't attack India on the sly. I will continue to point you TSP pasand narrative every time you try to pull such stunts. You seem to have learned quite a lot from rNDTV.
CRamS wrote:pankajs wrote:BTW, who all are part of this "huge opposition to it within India" on trifurcation apart from yourself? With such flimsy excuse, looks more like you don't want any movement on Kashmir. Why would you do that?
I don't want trifuraction because its a bad idea.
NRN: no reply necessary
Why dodge the question? Let me quote your original original again
CRamS wrote:< snip> On the contrary, it will spark off a huge firstrom within India on this 'communal' move by ModiJi, and suddenly all the Paki pasand opposition in India will become 'nationalists' berating ModiJi for helping TSP's agenda of 'communalizing' Kashmir.
You can choose NRN but the highlighted part makes it clear you either had no idea what you were talking about or you were emulating rNDTV style of analysis on Kashmir/TSP issues.
Not you or anyone else has to answer any of my questions. That is understood but I had to highlight your strange analysis. We can leave it at that if you want ... or continue.