indiamart.comnam wrote:Is there a Alibaba equivalent in India for Indian companies?
justdial.com
udaan.com
indiamart.comnam wrote:Is there a Alibaba equivalent in India for Indian companies?
3000 items, Rs 1 lakh crore target – The most powerful body of traders in India prepares to jolt China
Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), the apex body of trader’s union, has decided to boycott Chinese goods worth more than 1 lakh crore rupees- 13 billion dollars approximately- by December 2021. CAIT has already prepared a list of 3,000 items which includes toys, gifts, FMCG products, confectionery products, cloths and watches, as good indigenously manufactured alternatives of these items are available.
“In the year 2001, the import of Chinese goods into India was only $2 billion, which has now increased to $70 billion, meaning that imports from China increased by 3500 per cent in only 20 years. This clearly shows that under a well thought out strategy, China is trying to gain control over India’s retail market, which Indian businessmen and citizens will not allow to succeed in any case,” said Praveen Khandelwal. Secretary General, CAIT, a body which represents 4,000 trader bodies and more than 7 crore traders across the country.
India imported goods and services worth 65.26 billion dollars from China in FY 20 while the total trade volume stood at 81.6 billion dollars, registering trade deficit of 48.66 billion dollars. This was despite the fact Modi government increased custom on many Chinese good like steel, toys, scooters, and tricycles.
“I must admit it was an error on the part of business community, traders as also the government that we did not look at alternatives earlier which allowed China to become this big. It is high time now and corrective measures are needed,” added Khandelwal.
India has seen repeated calls for boycott of Chinese goods whenever there are border skirmishes, and in the festive seasons like Diwali. But once things are back to normal, it is business as usual, and people become dependent on Chinese goods.
When asked about whether things will go back to normal once the pandemic is over, Khandelwal responded optimistically and said, “It is not the same this time. We know each year during Diwali, the lights that are bought to decorate our homes are made in China. This year, all these lights will be made in India because we will not stock them from across the border at all,” Khandelwal said. “It will not be a Chinese Diwali anymore.”
According to Khandelwal, consumer behavior is already changing due to patriotism and fear, and this will drive the change. “Even in January, much before the lockdown, when the first news of the virus started trickling in, we saw a shift in the purchase decisions of Indian consumers. Chinese goods have an advantage of low cost but they are also low on quality. Consumers today want reliable products and are willing to pay extra for it,” Khandelwal said.
In the last few weeks, tension across the Line of Actual Control (LAC) has also built up, especially in Ladakh. The traders across the country want to make their contribution to national cause by boycotting Chinese goods, and therefore, weakening the country.“They (traders) know that the profits from the products they buy here are used to pay for the Army in China or to support Pakistan which then intrude into our country. So indirectly by buying Chinese goods we are only harming ourselves. The mood is against it today and we as responsible traders need to educate ourselves and the consumers about this,”Khandelwal added.
The boycott of Chinese goods worth 13 billion dollars by December 2020, if successful, would bring down the trade deficit of 48 billion dollars significantly down. The synchronized effort of Indian government and traders would benefit the Indian manufacturers and harm Chinese economy, which is dependent on exports.
Monthly trade deficit contracting at much faster clip - $1.86 billion in March far cry from all-time high of $5.86 billion in January, 2018
Likely contraction of Indian economy in FY21 may have an even deeper impact on business with China as government pushes for Atma Nirbhar Bharat
China's role in the spread of coronavirus across the world and the economic distress to global economy has caused backlash among business communities and consumers across India
Trade deficit with mainland China now under $50 billion mark for the first time in 5 years. Mainland China was India's largest trade partner until US overtook in FY19
Calls for complete boycott of Chinese products that have risen in India from time to time in the past have become shriller
Traders' body Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has called for boycott of 3,000 Chinese products for local substitution
Yes, I agree. The goremint should start with a list of (say) 100 goods for which import from PBP Republic is banned, and ensure substitution by local production or other imports. Start with low-hanging fruit and keep moving up the chain. Every month expand the list. The "Atmanirbhar Bharat" mission should have an office doing this.chola wrote:^^^ This is as good a time as any to kick the habit. Replace all the disposable goods first and then work out domestic or non-chini supply chains for important stuff (to our industries) like API and electronic parts.
Sicanta'ji, I agree with you on the cheque bounce part. Cheques were used as in instrument to stave out creditors.Sicanta wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.economic ... 302412.cms
The Finance Ministry has proposed to decriminalise a host of minor offences, including those relating to cheque bounce and repayment of loans, in as many as 19 legislations to help businesses tide over the crisis caused by the coronavirus outbreak.
Very bad idea, as far as cheque bounce is concerned. If ministry goes ahead with it, they may as well do away with cheques altogether. They wont be worth anything, if the contract between drawer and payee is not sacrosanct anymore.
I recall reading a court ruling that where post-dated cheques are obtained at the time of a transaction (loan/purchase of durables) and there is a default then criminal liability is not attracted. On a broader note, the imprisonment penalty was imposed because negotiation of instruments is at the heart of commerce and growth in commerce promotes economic welfare within the society. So it was some kind of trade off between individual liberty and common good.Yagnasri wrote:As far as Guarantor is concerned ( or even the borrower) mere default does not amount to a crime. Something else which is actually a crime under the law shall be committed. That is the law.
Suspension of Criminal liability under 138 of the NI Act (Check dishonour cases) is required for the time being. The reason is this crime does not require proof of criminal intent ( mens rea in Latin) for conviction. Added to that the burden of proof in respect of some aspect of the case is also with the issuer as per the provisions. Many checks will be now dishonoured due to the reasons which are beyond the control of the issuer due to present i.e COVID 19 conditions. So it would be better to suspend the provisions, for the time being, would be good.
Code: Select all
1 China 3,101,692
2 Japan 1,378,239
3 Switzerland 848,398
4 Russia 565,200
5 India 501,703
6 Taiwan 484,520
7 Saudi Arabia 448,150
8 Hong Kong 442,300
9 South Korea 407,300
10 Brazil 345,700
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Indian gold is kept in England? What are the benefits, India getting from there? GoI, must bring this gold back to India as of yesterday. Our precious is used by England for its pride and economic growth.Vips wrote:Explained: Why India’s forex reserves are rising, what this means for the economy.
India also held 653.01 tonnes of gold as of March 2020, with 360.71 tonnes being held overseas in safe custody with the Bank of England and the Bank for International Settlements, while the remaining gold is held domestically. In value terms (USD), the share of gold in the total foreign exchange reserves increased from about 6.14 per cent as at end-September 2019 to about 6.40 per cent as at end-March 2020.
.
Suraj wrote:So Indian forex reserves finally cross the $500 billion mark , finishing at close to $502 billion for the latest reported week (all forex data is reported with a 1 week lag). Feels as momentous as when it first crossed $100 billion, but less celebratory and more a sense of significant power status.
There are only 5 countries in the >$500 billion group - China, Japan, Switzerland, Russia and India. Only 6 countries have ever had reserves of at least $500 billion at any time historically - Saudi Arabia had $740 billion at the peak of the petroleum price rise, but are now down to the mid $400 billion level.
Unlike China and Japan we are not major exporters. Unlike Russia and KSA, we have no hydrocarbons surfeit. Unlike Switzerland, we aren’t a wealth and tax shelter. We are the one that make people go “India ?? They have half a trillion in hard currency reserves ? What the cluck ?” By 2025 I expect we will be the third country ever to breach $1000 billion in forex reserves.
Code: Select all
1 China 3,101,692 2 Japan 1,378,239 3 Switzerland 848,398 4 Russia 565,200 5 India 501,703 6 Taiwan 484,520 7 Saudi Arabia 448,150 8 Hong Kong 442,300 9 South Korea 407,300 10 Brazil 345,700
^^anmol wrote:indiamart.comnam wrote:Is there a Alibaba equivalent in India for Indian companies?
justdial.com
udaan.com
Maybe, but that’s not a helpful response. What enabled Alibaba to become the entity it is ? How did all the pieces come together in that case ? What are the specific pieces missing in the Indian context ? If you can articulate that at length in an informative manner, then that would be more useful .csaurabh wrote:^^
I agree that these websites exist and fulfil some purpose. But please they are not equivalent to Alibaba.
It is like saying a college football team is equivalent to Manchester United.
This is about an industry where China has been beaten by India. It has been shown that it’s not the government, neither the people; it’s really the companies that compete.
In 2005, Chinese motorcycles attacked India with products which were 30 percent cheaper. Many dealers started selling them. Press predicted demise of Indian manufacturers. But within six months they went broke. Their quality was no match to Indian motorcycles. They never came back again.
In 2018 India became the largest manufacturer of two wheelers in the world (producing twice more than China). Indian companies have started buying out European brands. The market leader of motorcycles in Europe is not BMW, its KTM, which is part-owned by Bajaj. China is slipping fast not only in the manufacturing of bikes, but also in the manufacturing of components. Indian suppliers are beating them hands down. Between three Indian companies—Hero, Bajaj and TVS—India today dominates the world motorcycle market.
https://www.cnbctv18.com/views/how-one- ... 135001.htmSo who is responsible for the Chinese dominance—the government, people or the corporates?
I think it’s all the three. When even ITI-trained turners and fitters refuse to work in a shop floor, when a stock broker is paid more than an engineer, when typing code is mistaken for technology, when governments refuse to amend antique labour and land laws, when corporates think local and not global, and finally when you, yes you the reader, will not send your son or daughter to work on the shop floor, each one of these factors is as responsible for the Chinese dominance as as their “ethical corruption”. We have been looted because we left our doors and windows open.
No, this article is not supporting the Chinese. How dare they work so hard? And how dare they obey a communist government? We should stop buying all their goods and we will make everything in our country. But we will work nine to five with a three-day weekend. We will overcome. One day.
Would we be subject to punitive damages running into billions in that case?Suraj wrote:They can challenge it, and we are free to lose the case... years of challenges and obfuscation from us later.
Example of details of 8517 code (mostly smart phones)
http://www.indiatradedata.com/
A Provider of Business intelligence Report based on India Import & Export Trade
IndiaTradeData.com is the trustworthy platform to track every shipment, which comes in or goes out from India via sea, air or road. We provide the latest and most accurate India import export data that are based on Trade Bills, Bill of Entry, Shipping Bills, Bill of Lading, Invoices and other import export customs documents. Through our India trade data, we create business intelligence reports that are helpful for any kind of businesses to always be ahead from competitors.
Since you asked..Suraj wrote:
Maybe, but that’s not a helpful response. What enabled Alibaba to become the entity it is ? How did all the pieces come together in that case ? What are the specific pieces missing in the Indian context ? If you can articulate that at length in an informative manner, then that would be more useful .
Alibaba/Aliexpress is both B2B and B2C. Technically Alibaba is for B2B and Aliexpress is for B2C but unless you are ordering very expensive things or in large numbers, Aliexpress does B2B just fine.anmol wrote:Why are you comparing Indiamart (B2B) to Aliexpress (B2C) ?
Or really heavy or big things, anything which may require dealing with customs, anything requiring after sales support (training, installation activities, maintenance, etc.), also there are no proper invoices for any order...csaurabh wrote:Technically Alibaba is for B2B and Aliexpress is for B2C but unless you are ordering very expensive things or in large numbers, Aliexpress does B2B just fine.
Please visit --> https://paywith.indiamart.com/csaurabh wrote:The 'ecommerce' facility on Indiamart is minimal. All it does really is list products and companies with phone numbers. After this you can contact these companies, get quotes, select one , raise a purchase order, receive proforma invoice. GST filing and accounting has to be taken care of by both sides. Shipment is done by commercial courier, and you and the company are responsible for taking care of it. Bank transaction has to be done by depositing money into the respective account. There is no oversight on any of this and nowhere to open a grievance if anything goes wrong. Really quite primitive.
And you do not need any ecommerce website for that. You contact the company in question and make a deal with them directly.anmol wrote:
Or really heavy or big things, anything which may require dealing with customs, anything requiring after sales support (training, installation activities, maintenance, etc.), also there are no proper invoices for any order...
Aliexpress Taobao Wishstore etc. and other online stores should not be compared to Indiamart.
Udaan is a retailer platform. That does not qualify as B2B in my opinion. Does look rather good though.ankitash wrote:Udaan is India's premier B2B platform. Not indiamart
It's by ex-Flipkart people. Has a slick UI etc
Well if I am looking for a vendor who can supply me X, IndiaMart (and Alibaba) can get me in touch with all the listed vendors who can supply X to my business, are meeting my specification and price range. It would be far easier to do this on Indiamart or similar platform.csaurabh wrote:And you do not need any ecommerce website for that.
You contact the company in question and make a deal with them directly.
Yes we should compare Alibaba to Indiamart. Aliexpress should be compared to other stores like Taobao WishStore Gearbest Banggood etc.csaurabh wrote:In any case what's your argument here? We can compare Alibaba to Indiamart. Even though I have not used Alibaba I can assure you that it is far far far ahead of Indiamart.
What is lousy about the payment system ?csaurabh wrote:Indiamart's payment options are quite lousy. I see no sense in using them and frankly I don't trust them.