brar_w wrote:
So the AAASM can be as much as 4x the cost of a JDAM, or 2X the cost of the GBU-49 assuming that the company managed to get the unit cost down to 80,000 Euros (and keep it there).
Acquisition strategies can accommodate both so there is on one right answer.
You're right,but the correct comparision really should be the cost of purchase of the new hammer vs cost of purchase of spice kit. Because that's more pertinent to the Indian acquisition strategy . (and historical blended price of JDAM won't any case factor in for India)
Unfortunately, I was still looking at a spice kit cost that I coud be comfortable with and for any info on whether spice had been certified on the rafael (the hammer has been tested on both mirage and rafael)
https://www.businesstoday.in/current/ec ... 54255.html
(INR 300 crore for as much as 100 spice bombs - wanted a second datum point or better clarity)
And of course India's acquisition strategy often has other elements unclear
Livefist article on why the IAF has chosen hammer,in addition to the earlier spice order adds a couple of points
https://www.livefistdefence.com/2020/07 ... afale.html
1. Hammer is already certified on Rafale and mirage. Spice is yet to be certified on the rafael, and thus those one time costs get added
2. Time factor. Time to certify spice on rafael vs hammer
3. At time of Rafale purchase, spice won on cost .
4. IAF pilots in France on training likely got a better look at hammer or had informal discussions with the french and may have provided input
Thus hammer got purchased, even though in the long run, spice might still wind up cheaper. (hammer's a bit more capable with that rocket)
I assume India'll still go through with spice integration and use spice and hammer interchangeably on the rafael and mirage in the longer run, but I could be wrong.
tsarkar wrote: Its the only GPS+INS bomb that can be carried by the Rafale
See above. The more appropriate comparison ought to be to SPICE, which after, all was the plan at the time of Rafale purchase