Karan M wrote:Schrodingers MIRV. Let it remain as such.
LOL
Karan M wrote:Schrodingers MIRV. Let it remain as such.
SAF is fully excercised. Warhead using non fissile core. So it disintegrates due to fission explosives lenses and the very high > 15 Mach speed.vera_k wrote:In this kind of test, is the nuclear payload recovered from the ocean?
https://www.iasgyan.in/daily-current-affairs/agni-primersingh wrote:Allah to be praised, was it Agni V or Agni VI ?
Saar, don't believe "published" rangesRakesh wrote:Chetak-ji, can you please provide the source of this image?
All of China now comes under the aegis of Agni V and that is the *PUBLISHED* range released by DRDO. So much for the threat to the Dibrugarh refinery, Barauni refinery or Haldia petrochemical complex
100%chetak wrote:Saar, don't believe "published" ranges
It is much more than what is usually stated, mainly as a conversation starter to help the hans focus better when they arrive for polite drawing room tête-à-têtes
Saar,Rakesh wrote:100%chetak wrote:Saar, don't believe "published" ranges
It is much more than what is usually stated, mainly as a conversation starter to help the hans focus better when they arrive for polite drawing room tête-à-têtes
How does it help us to hide this capability if we do possess it? This is our deterrent isn't it? The stronger/more sophisticated it seems the more it deters.Karan M wrote:Schrodingers MIRV. Let it remain as such.
We have limited resources so unlike the US it's harder for us to constantly iterate our systems. Strategic ambiguity serves us at times by allowing our opponents to believe they have systems that can counter ours while ours are more sophisticated than they've invested in developing countermeasures for.nachiket wrote:How does it help us to hide this capability if we do possess it? This is our deterrent isn't it? The stronger/more sophisticated it seems the more it deters.Karan M wrote:Schrodingers MIRV. Let it remain as such.
Cyrano wrote:5 figure distance and mirv were solved before asat test itself. Whatever comes in the press doesn't matter. Those who need to know what India can do know it as well and have wet their pants. Revived Quad participation etc happened not out of love but out of respect. Nuff said.
GOVERNMENT FEELS THE PINCH OF HIGH PETROL PRICES, REDUCES MISSILE RANGE BY 500 KM
"At ₹100/litre, tera baap paise dega kya be?", a spokesperson told our channel
Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Sevadal@SevadalMH · 27 Oct
अग्नि-5 का पहला सफल परीक्षण 19 अप्रैल 2012 को 5500 किलोमीटर की मारक क्षमता के साथ किया गया था।
मोदी सरकार ने इसकी रेंज 500 KM कम कर दी।
#agni5
#agni twitter.com/ndtv/status/14…
Ha! I like it.Karan M wrote:Schrodingers MIRV. Let it remain as such.
Also, Dr. AC mentioned CEP less than 10 metres. (where's the Thumbs Up emoji when you need it? ).dinesha wrote:All the answers is in this interview... 180 degree global coverage, MIRV..
Rakesh wrote: https://twitter.com/TheHemantRout/statu ... 22661?s=20 ---> India conducts 1st night trial of its most potent longest range nuke capable intercontinental range ballistic missile Agni-V from a defence facility off Odisha coast. The successful launch was in line with its commitment to ‘No First Use’ policy.
we already have the tech, the means, and one agency has demonstrated this process multiple times alreadykit wrote:Scenario: India does an openly advertised MaRV test
The thing about worrying about whether the opponents go for reciprocal measures would be good in Indias case. India can force a military polarisation against the Paki China combine. Imagine Pakis testing MIRVs, you can very imagine what western powers would do in that context!!
Comments/opinions ?
if the paki have long range missiles in their arsenal, who is/are the target(s)Aditya_V wrote:Nothing, Wonder why Paki Missiles are capped at around 1000KM instead of the best of Paki claims, cause nobody from UAE to SAUDI are going to tolerate it.
When the M-9/M-11 missile were exported it was expected India did not have a Nuke and Delivery capability. Pakistan could split India like the USSR collapsed and against Mujahids- the whole story went south slowly.
Pakistan is supported as long as it is Anti India- it will not be given tools to Blackmail anyone else.
chetak wrote: for the other agency, it's a little more than screwdriver giri and adaption
True. Run silent, run deep.why invite trouble needlessly. what do you stand to gain and what soooper doooper tech are you demonstrating that others already don't know about
hold your cards close to the chest and watch your opponents like a hawk
Does it need to be on a ship ?jamwal wrote:Nearly all of Indian ships don't even have enough SAMs and cruise missiles on them. Which ship we have can carry more than one ballistic missile if it is somehow given approval?
Of course it doesn't, except in movies. That's what I am saying. Only naval ballistic missiles we will have, will be carried by SSBNs, atleast for next few decades. Ship based ballistic missiles are perhaps possible on ships of displacement 10 t or more. Not even the largest ships we have now like the Kolkata class can carry them.kit wrote:
Does it need to be on a ship ?
It covers most of the IOR and into SC sea from the land mass
The twitter handle seems to be erroneously conflating atmospheric reentry velocity (20K - 25K ft/sec as an estimate with certain assumptions) of a long range ICBM with the velocity of impact (on target) of a maneuvering, guided, networked warhead of a MRBM ranged (2,000 km) ASBM. Something like a DF-21 with its MRBM range is going to re-enter closer to Mach 12 range and then will decelerate need to slow down for networking (if present), maneuvering, and to give time for a non horizon seeker to detect and solve for any errors. You are probably looking at a Mach 7-9 terminal speed with perfect guidance, with perfect networking and persistent ISR. If you have to design a more maneuverable vehicle with a different guidance concept and ISR then you may need to go slower (use a H-BGV for example which allows you more terminal maneuverability and more precise seekers that can be used at lower altitudes for longer).Rakesh wrote: https://twitter.com/DfIlite/status/1453 ... 01281?s=20 ---> I think Mach 22 will cause more damage than that video clip in the movie shows. We have seen what Brahmos Mach 2 could do to a ship, it goes from one side and comes out from the other. Mach 22 will break AC into two or more parts.