The Idea of India

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
PrasadZ
BRFite
Posts: 122
Joined: 11 Apr 2010 08:42

Re: The Idea of India

Post by PrasadZ »

What is the idea of Belgium?
From here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgium, you get
Based on the four language areas defined in 1962–63 (the Dutch, bilingual, French and German language areas), consecutive revisions of the country's constitution in 1970, 1980, 1988 and 1993 established a unique federal state with segregated political power into three levels:

The federal government, based in Brussels.
The three language communities:
the Flemish Community (Dutch-speaking);
the French Community (French-speaking);
the German-speaking Community.
The three regions:
the Flemish Region, subdivided into five provinces;
the Walloon Region, subdivided into five provinces;
the Brussels-Capital Region.

The constitutional language areas determine the official languages in their municipalities, as well as the geographical limits of the empowered institutions for specific matters. Although this would allow for seven parliaments and governments, when the Communities and Regions were created in 1980, Flemish politicians decided to merge both. Thus the Flemings just have one single institutional body of parliament and government is empowered for all except federal and specific municipal matters.
What is the idea of Indonesia?
From here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesia
Most Indonesians are descended from Austronesian-speaking peoples whose languages can be traced to Proto Austronesian (PAn), which likely originated on Taiwan. The other major grouping are Melanesians, who inhabit eastern Indonesia. There are around 300 distinct native ethnicities in Indonesia, and 742 different languages and dialects. The largest ethnic group is the Javanese, who comprise 42% of the population, and are politically and culturally dominant. The Sundanese, ethnic Malays, and Madurese are the largest non-Javanese groups. A sense of Indonesian nationhood exists alongside strong regional identities. Society is largely harmonious, although social, religious and ethnic tensions have triggered horrendous violence. Chinese Indonesians are an influential ethnic minority comprising 3-4% of the population. Much of the country's privately owned commerce and wealth is Chinese-Indonesian-controlled, which has contributed to considerable resentment, and even anti-Chinese violence.
Heck, What is the idea of China?!!
From here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China you get this one liner right at the start !!
China is seen variously as an ancient civilization extending over a large area in East Asia, a nation and/or a multinational entity.
A country is a political union, an idea is an abstract principle. Does a political union need one common underlying idea to make it a union? Heck, no ! China is not bound by the idea of Chinese-ness. Its bound by the organisational abilities of the CPC and its army. If Chinese ness bound China, Taiwan would view joining up as destiny, Hong Kong would love the Chinese constitution, Tibet and Xinjiang ? - nuff said.

Why should culture and civilisation determine political boundaries? Culturally and civilisationally, its clear that Pakistan is Indic, but its not India. Apart from a fringe element event on BRF, no one argues they should be part of India. Culture and civilisation dont make a country; but hey, they do make up a people. Ask the Chinese !

A country is the willingness of its people to engage in a coherent political union. No idea needs to bind India today apart from this willingness. Of course, modern China gets by on the willingness of its army - no one asks its people !

I would propose that we discuss "what the heck is China?!"
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9373
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Hari Seldon »

This thread is IB4TL, IMVHO. Esp started as it is by suspicious characters with doubtful intent.
Stan_Savljevic
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3522
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 15:40

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Stan_Savljevic »

How is china a country? Kissinger puts china this way: a bunch of tribes speaking various dialects and forced to write in Mandarin by the CPC.
Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3513
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Rony »

BTW, the word "China" is derived from the Sanskrit word 'Cina' .
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: The Idea of India

Post by shiv »

IB4TL
brihaspati
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12410
Joined: 19 Nov 2008 03:25

Re: The Idea of India

Post by brihaspati »

Rahul M ji,
your basic purpose in letting this thread start - I estimate - can be continued in the the thread on "artificiality of China-Pak" thread. Already the confusion that exists in Indian minds about the "idea" of India has surfaced there, so I think we will be able to deal with both confusions - about the false beliefs of existence of "China" and non-existence of "India" at the same time when we analyze the conditions for China and Pak.

Those interested are requested to follow up on that thread - if you wish!
negi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13112
Joined: 27 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Ban se dar nahin lagta , chootiyon se lagta hai .

Re: The Idea of India

Post by negi »

I for one would like to have this thread remain open just to know what everyone's idea of India is, as for drones from Cheena and Pak leave them for us cubs . :mrgreen:
Rahul M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17169
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Location: Skies over BRFATA
Contact:

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Rahul M »

Hari Seldon wrote:This thread is IB4TL, IMVHO. Esp started as it is by suspicious characters with doubtful intent.
calling me a suspicious character now, hainjee ? :eek:

this thread remains open for now. I'll post my thoughts tomorrow.

p.s. just in case anyone thinks wrdos started this thread, he did not (perhaps now I understand the comments about reacting to others etc better. it didn't happen that way)
I think it is amply clear from the opening post that I created this thread. I just used wrdos' post as a starting point. his post appeared in one of the economy threads, some members replied to it and I split those to create this thread.
Pulikeshi
BRFite
Posts: 1513
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 12:31
Location: Badami

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Pulikeshi »

Rahul,

My two paisa -
The thread is needed to discuss the future looking 'Idea of India' that is beyond 'bollywood' etc.
If it means exercising a few ghosts - ala British brought unity, railways, democracy and poverty, so be it.
I'll try to post some thoughts along those lines as well as time permits.
You could consider weeding out the 'obfuscating' posts to help someone who just tuned in.
SwamyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16268
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 09:22

Re: The Idea of India

Post by SwamyG »

Stan_Savljevic wrote:How is china a country? Kissinger puts china this way: a bunch of tribes speaking various dialects and forced to write in Mandarin by the CPC.
Those are not sufficient parameters to rule out if an "entity" is a country or not. Why cannot people speaking different languages and dialect be part of one country?
asprinzl
BRFite
Posts: 408
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 05:00

Re: The Idea of India

Post by asprinzl »

I thought the idea was to have a piece of land that would be the personal fiefdom of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty and in two or three hundred years of continuos PM-ship of the N-G descendants the land can then be declared a Kingdom under the rule of N-G monarchy.

After that everyone can sit down and watch the circus of one prince slugging out with another prince for the throne and the country and people be damned. Ooops....isn't that how the Mughal's rule in India turned out to be? Same old cycle of misrule, plunder and conquest?

So folks...be brave and stand up and make the change to break this cycle that could very well happen. Then the real Idea of India can be defined.
Happy Divali / Deepavali / Happy Beshakee.
Shalom.
Stan_Savljevic
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3522
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 15:40

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Stan_Savljevic »

SwamyG wrote: Those are not sufficient parameters to rule out if an "entity" is a country or not. Why cannot people speaking different languages and dialect be part of one country?
Yes boss, but when you hear the word china, do you get the image of a hundred tribes speaking different languages but using mandarin to write, or do you get the image of a unified han race speaking "mandarin"? What is spoken in the Yunnan side is hardly intelligible to the Shanghai wannabes and the less said about Hebei or Wuhan, the better. There is reality and there is what you believe things are. It is not just India that has fissures that can be exploited to divide and rule, china too has the same fissures we think of as afflicting just us. Just that in our wisdom, we choose to ignore and make a big deal of a chota mota country. I have perfect disdain for china and most things chinese, now if a fraction of that disdain rubbed off on India at large, we would invent ways to fck the chinese in their own game instead of crying hoarse about this and that.
Murugan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4191
Joined: 03 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: Smoking Piskobidis

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Murugan »

Ombaba Uvacha in Bhartiya Sansad
Instead of succumbing to division, you have shown that the strength of India—the very idea of India—is its embrace of all colors, castes and creeds. It’s the diversity represented in this chamber today. It’s the richness of faiths celebrated by a visitor to my hometown of Chicago more than a century ago—the renowned Swami Vivekananda. He said that, “holiness, purity and charity are not the exclusive possessions of any church in the world, and that every system has produced men and women of the most exalted character.”
And we believe that when countries and cultures put aside old habits and attitudes that keep people apart, when we recognize our common humanity, then we can begin to fulfill the aspirations we share. It’s a simple lesson contained in that collection of stories which has guided Indians for centuries—the Panchtantra. And it’s the spirit of the inscription seen by all who enter this great hall: ‘That one is mine and the other a stranger is the concept of little minds. But to the large-hearted, the world itself is their family.”
India not only opened our minds, she expanded our moral imagination. With religious texts that still summon the faithful to lives of dignity and discipline. With poets who imagined a future “where the mind is without fear and the head is held high.” And with a man whose message of love and justice endures—the Father of your Nation, Mahatma Gandhi.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: The Idea of India

Post by RajeshA »

SwamyG wrote:
Stan_Savljevic wrote:How is china a country? Kissinger puts china this way: a bunch of tribes speaking various dialects and forced to write in Mandarin by the CPC.
Those are not sufficient parameters to rule out if an "entity" is a country or not. Why cannot people speaking different languages and dialect be part of one country?
Sure they can, but the people would feel so, only if the nation belongs to none and belongs to all - A Nation of Minorities, perhaps with some (plural) minorities more equal than others to build the core.

Example: There is the "United Federation of Planets" model, there is the Empire model and then there is the Borg model.
SwamyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16268
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 09:22

Re: The Idea of India

Post by SwamyG »

An old essay (October 2010)...good one: People are the nation
Written by: MG Vaidya - who is a leading RSS ideologue and its former spokerperson
In my piece titled ‘Take the Blame for Babri Demolition’, published in Open of 29 October, I hinted at the distinction between a state and a nation. I was prompted to write about this when I read Hartosh Singh Bal’s article, titled ‘Who Says We Can Move On’, published in Open (15 October). The learned writer says: ‘The Sangh Parivar prescribes a nationality based on the notion of a motherland; my nationality is based on the values enshrined in the Constitution. The Sangh Parivar prescribes a nationhood based on a shared history of millennia, my loyalty lies with the India created on 15August 1947.’

My question: what was newly created on 15August 1947? A new ‘State’ or a new ‘Nation’? I quote from Ernest Barker’s Principles of Social and Political Theory: ‘The State is a legal association: a ‘juridically organised nation, or a nation organised for action under legal rules.’ It exists for law: it exists in and through law: we may even say that it exists as law, if by law we mean not only a sum of legal rules, but also, and in addition, an operative system of effective rules which are actually valid and regularly enforced. The essence of the State is a living body of effective rules; and in that sense the State is law.’

Now I want to take my readers back at least 5,000 years to the time of The Mahabharata. King Yudhisthira asks his grandfather Bheeshma whether the king, the kingdom, punishment, the agency of punishment were in existence at the beginning of the world. Bheeshma’s answer is well known. He says, “No, in the beginning, there was neither the king nor the State; neither the law of punishment, nor the Government. People used to follow Dharma (i.e., a fixed moral code) and through that they protected one another.” Yudhisthira again asked, “How then did that system collapse?” Bheeshma replied, “Dharma became feeble. The strong started tormenting the weak. So the people went to the Lord of Creation and requested him to send them a king.” But no one was prepared to take on that responsibility. After much persuasion, Manu agreed to become the king and the people promised him that they would honour and follow his decrees and accept any punishment for violations. Thus the State, that is the king and his rule, came into being. In short, the State means a system of laws, in support of which the Government with all its force stands. The Constitution is the primary law of the State. I will even say it is the fundamental law, but, after all, it is a law validated by the exercise of State power.

This is not to deny that our Constitution enshrines a certain value system. But that value system is a reflection of our national character and ethos. Why is it that our neighbour Pakistan or Afghanistan or Iraq do not have such a constitution? Simply because their idea of a ‘nation’ does not cherish such values. So, then, what is a ‘nation’?

I quote French thinker Ernest Renan: ‘It is not soil any more than the race which makes a nation. The soil provides the substratum, the field for struggle and labour: man provides the soul. Man is everything in the formation of this sacred thing that we call a people. Nothing that is material suffices here. A nation is a spiritual principle, the result of the intricate workings of history; a spiritual family and not a group determined by the configuration of the earth.’ He adds, ‘A nation is a soul, a spiritual principle. Two things which are really only one go to make this principle. One of these things lies in the past, the other in the present. The one is the possession in common of a rich heritage of memories, the other is actual agreement; the desire to live together, and the will to continue to make the most of the joint inheritance. Man cannot be improvised. The Nation, like the individual, is the fruit of a long past, spent in toil, sacrifice and devotion.’ (Ernest Renan: What Is a Nation, quoted in Modern Political Thought by William Ebenstein.)

In short, a nation is not a system. People are the nation. What sort of people constitute a nation? There are three major requirements. One is their sentiment about the country in which they live, the country that has been the substratum for their struggle and labour. Any piece of land is simple matter, and therefore inert; it becomes a living entity when it becomes a motherland, as adorable and sacred as one’s birth-giving mother. And, therefore, revered Bankimchandra can say ‘Vande Mataram’, which inspired the millions who fought for our Independence. True, it is a notion, but it is a valued notion, required to hold together people of different hues, perceptions, faiths and persuasions.

The second condition is a shared history. Is it a drawback that it is a millennium old? And the third is a shared value system, i.e., culture. The third requirement is the most important of all the three. We adopted a value system that appreciates plurality, tolerates differences of opinion, and values different modes of worship. These are our national values and they are enshrined in our Constitution.

Ram is one such historical personality that embodied these values. I said people are the Nation. Who are the people who fulfill these three conditions? They are Hindus; therefore, this is a Hindu nation. It has nothing to do with whether you are an idol-worshipper or not, whether you believe in the ultimate authority of the Vedas or not, whether you put a mark on your forehead or not. In pre-Independence India, the word Hindu had no notoriety attached to it.

Look at the writings of Vivekananda or Mahatma Gandhi. A nationalist paper, started 125 years ago, was named The Hindu. Hindustan was a common name for our country. It is post-Independence vote-bank politics that has showered abuses on ‘Hindu’. Let us be proud of our nation, our value-system, our name Hindu, whose cultural heritage was instrumental in determining the character of our Constitution.
Last edited by SwamyG on 01 Feb 2011 23:07, edited 1 time in total.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Idea of India

Post by ramana »

Thanks SwamyG.

BTW Under N Ram the paper "The Hindu" might be tempted to change its name to "The Secularist"! or "The Indian"
Abhibhushan
BRFite
Posts: 210
Joined: 28 Sep 2005 20:56
Location: Chennai

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Abhibhushan »

How we choose to govern ourselves has a huge impact on the Idea of India. I offer https://tkstales.wordpress.com/2022/02/ ... overnance/ as an idea for a national debate. If Bradmis desire a new thread could be launched.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Manish_Sharma »

When Hindus retaliated against Jinnah direct action day and how Calcutta was kept in India by Brahmin Gopal Patha (Gopal Mukherjee) :

https://twitter.com/Infinity_Tarun/stat ... jPIxw&s=19
@InfinityTarun:

Direct Action Day (Part 2)
Revenge of Hindus

This thread is the sequel of Direct Action Day. Those who have not read this thread. Pl read this thread first Jinnah chose Kolkata (Calcutta) for his Direct Action day coz he wanted to have Kolkata in Pakistan. Kolkata was major business city of India that time n Jinnah didn’t want to lose Kolkata. Making Kolkata Hindu free was given to Suhrawardy who was CM of Bengal n Loyal to Jinnah.

That time Calcutta had 64 per cent Hindus and 33 per cent Muslims in 1946.
Suhrawardy’s started to execute plan on 16th August a strike was declared by him n all Muslims closed their shops n gathered in maschid. It was Friday n 18th day of Ramzan.and after namaz Muslim mob started to butcher Hindus. and as Suhrawardy expected Hindu didn’t show any resistance and easily succumbed to Muslim mob. Suhrawardy assured the Muslim mob, that he has instructed the police to not come in the way of their mission.

Mob of lakhs of Muslims armed with iron rods, swords and other dangerous weapons spread to several parts of Calcutta and neighboring areas. A Hindu shop of arms and weapons near the Muslim League office was attacked first. it was looted and burnt to ashes.

Owner and his employees were beheaded. Hindus were chopped like vegetables. Many Hindu women and young girls were kidnapped and taken away as sex slaves. On 16th August thousands of Hindu were killed n Hindu women were raped.

Killing kept going on 17th August also.

600 Hindu labors mostly from Orissa at Kesoram Cotton Mills Lichubagan were beheaded. Dance of massacre was going on in Kolkata. Hindus were running from Kolkata, Suhrawardy was assure abt his victory by 19th August. Thousands of Hindu had been killed till 17th August

But on 18th August, A Hindu decided to resist. He was a Bengali Brahmin n his name was Gopal Mukherjee. His friends used to call him Patha coz he used to run a meat shop. He used to live at Malanga Lane in the Bowbazar area of Kolkata.

Gopal was 33 year old that time n a staunch nationalist and firm follower of Subash Chandra Bose n critique of Gandhi’s principle of non-violence. Gopal use to run a street organization Bharat Jatiya Bahini. He had 500 - 700 people in his team all were well-trained wrestlers.

On 18th Aug Gopal decided that they will not run n will counter attack on Muslims. He called his wrestlers gave them weapons. Marwari decided to finance him n gave him money. His plan was first secure Hindu area by counter attack.
His words were “Kill 10 Muslim for 1 Hindu”

ML was having lacs of jihadi while Gopal was having only few hundred fighters but they made the plan n decided to fight till end to save Kolkata becoming Muslim city. They made the rules that unlike Muslims they will not touch any enemy women n children.

Gopal himself was having 2 pistols that he got from Azad Hind Fauz. From afternoon of 18th Aug, Hindus in leadership to Gopal started to fight back. On 18th when Muslims came in Hindu colony to kill Hindus they were greeted by Gopal’s team.

Gopal’s team killed each n every Muslim mob who came to kill Hindus n by 19th they had secured all Hindu colonies. It was complete surprise for Suhrawardy. He didn’t think that Hindu will resist in this way.

When By 19th August they have secured Hindu area their revenge started from 20th August. They marked all Jehadis who killed Hindus on 16th and 17th August n attacked them on 20th August.
By 19th Msg was reached to all Hindus that Hindus in leadership of Gopal were fighting

So by 21st August lot of Hindus had joined him now started the revenge of Hindu. They killed so many Muslims in 2 days that by 21st deaths of Muslims outnumbered to deaths of Hindus. Game had changed by 22nd August now Muslims were running from Kolkata.

Suhrawardy accepted his defeat n rushed to congress leaders to request to stop Gopal Panda who had become Yamraj for Muslims. Gopal got ready on the conditions that all Muslim surrender their weapon to him that Suhrawardy accepted.

Jinnah plan to capture Kolkata was shattered by 22nd August. Bhagwa flag was waving in Kolkata.
After Kolkata Gopal did not dissolve his organization and kept saving Hindus of Bengal. When everything had been over, As police comes at the end of Film, Gandhi met to Gopal with his lessons of non violence and Hindu muslim unity and asked him to surrender his shastra (weapons).

Gopal’s words were “Gandhi called me twice, I didn’t go. third time, some local Congi leaders told me that I should at least deposit some of my arms. I went there. I saw people coming and depositing weapons which were of no use to anyone, out-of-order pistols, that sort of thing Then Gandhi’s secretary said to me: ‘Gopal, why don’t you surrender your arms to Gandhiji?’ I replied, `With these arms, I saved the women of my area, I saved the people. I will not surrender them. Where was Gandhiji, I said, during the Great Calcutta Killing?

Where was he then? Even if I’ve used a nail to kill someone, I won’t surrender even that nail.”

Suhrawardy said “When Hindus make up their minds to fight back, they r the most deadly and lethal race in the world”

Gopal Patha and Syama Prasad Mukherjee were the two legendary hero who save Hindus of Bengal from Jehadi but before reading this thread how many of u were aware of Gopal Patha. https://t.co/sHUuuCNt0J

Since Gopal did not follow Gandhi’s principal, his name was removed from books of history. But He is the unsung Hero of India who saved lives of lacs of people. Only due to him Kolkata is part of India today.

Never forget this name – Gopal Patha. https://t.co/udSiXyNFY3

The Direct Action Day - 2

Revenge of Hindus

A thread from @Infinity_Tarun
End of Thread https://t.co/frG5HVR3Mx




Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5491
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Cyrano »

https://scroll.in/article/1021985/in-au ... -institute

Some academics and researchers want to perpetuate a certain coloniser's view of India. Good our High Commissioner intervened.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: The Idea of India

Post by Manish_Sharma »

Angst of Anglo block and their attempts toTarnish India :

India now has an opportunity to buy oil and gas in Indian Rupee. Once in a lifetime opportunity. Sign a 50 year agreement with Russia for oil and gas in Indian Rupees. I am not sure whether Indian Government is thinking that far ahead. But it should.

2. India's export of vaccines was the tipping point in the violent coverage of Covid in India. Western reporters were live telecasting scenes of dead, dying and crying people outside hospitals, catching people at their weakest moment. They never do such vulture reporting in West.

3. Equally abhorrent were Indian reporters like Danish Siddiqui, Barkha Dutt, Aaj Tak and gang who barged into hospitals and crematoria, to broadcast people's sufferings. They are goons and pimps, who are not fit to be called journalists.

4. Calling these reporters vultures would be an insult to a nonviolent bird that is nature's incinerator and cleans our environment. Vultures don't harm the living. But these reporters are the lowest of the low. Karma will get them soon. It got the Harmful real quick.

Ends
https://twitter.com/ByRakeshSimha/statu ... QusTg&s=19
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59810
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: The Idea of India

Post by ramana »

Jaishankar gave a speech at St Stephens College his Alma mater.

https://t.co/V5qh7C4Gm6
10. Now let me explore what foreign policy could mean for you personally. As an Indian student, for example, it may be the ease of getting visas, the ability to travel during times of Covid, and perhaps even employment after studies. If you are a businessperson, it could help access to foreign markets, receiving information about regulations and practices, and where circumstances demand, assistance to solve problems. For the professionals and workers, this may be visible in ensuring fair employment contracts, a stronger sense of protection and welfare measures in times of difficulties. And for a stranded tourist, a sympathetic Embassy provides much-needed succour and support, and in more threatening circumstances, examples of which I gave you, even evacuation. But you do not have to be abroad to need foreign policy; it matters at home just as much.

11. When it comes to security, external or internal, diplomacy could be a preventive, a mitigator or a problem-solver. It can help raise awareness of a shared threat, just as it can find partners against common dangers. So, if you are a soldier guarding our frontiers or a policeman grappling with terrorism, a good foreign policy makes your life a little safer. And then there is the economy, with its search for investment, technology and best practices. In each of these sectors, foreign relationships can accelerate India’s progress. And cumulatively, what they do is to expand employment and improve your quality of life. Whether it is the cooking oil or pulses that are imported or a smart phone that is produced collaboratively, a larger policy decision has just made some difference to your purse. And bear in mind this is the era of globalization. So, whether it is oil, coal or fertilizer, or many other daily necessities, foreign policy can actually serve to ensure affordable access.

12. But also think for a moment how much the big issues of our times – pandemics, terrorism, climate change – how much they impact your very existence. And ask yourself whether we should not have a greater say in the search for solutions. It also matters to all of us what other nations think of India, our culture and our way of life. So, should we not then shape our image and influence the narrative? These are but a sample of how in an increasingly inter-connected world, the attitude, perceptions and interests of others are so relevant. If they have to be managed, if they have to be leveraged, then it is all the more necessary for a sharper realization at home that foreign policy really matters.

13. Now for all societies, security ranks foremost in their priorities. The reasons are very obvious: it affects the very nature of our collective. India faces more than its fair share of external challenges, in part because so many of our boundaries have not been settled. Given the serious repercussions, diplomacy is also very relevant to ensuring peace and tranquillity, if not more. In that sense, it is a critical support for defence. Most of the time, it is, in fact, the first line as a preventive; on occasion, it is also the back-up as a mitigator. Indeed, the achievements of foreign policy in stabilizing the neighbourhood are very much the basis for progress and development at home.

14. The world being what it is, self-interest and convergence cannot be fully counted upon, especially with neighbours. Their ambitions and emotions are not always predictable, nor indeed their risk-taking propensity. Few would have anticipated, for example, the turn that India’s relations with China have taken in the last two years. Any prudent policy therefore backs its posture with capabilities and deterrence. A big responsibility of Indian diplomacy, therefore, is to create the widest set of options for such contingencies. This could mean acquisition of defence capabilities and other supportive measures or securing the understanding for our policies and actions from the international community. And for that matter, in managing or resolving more fraught situations. So, let us look at how all of that has worked in the last few years.

15. A notable achievement of the Modi Government was to implement in 2015 the Land Boundary Agreement with Bangladesh. In conjunction with the resolution of maritime differences, this has had a positive impact on the security situation in the East. More than that, it has opened up possibilities for economic cooperation and connectivity for the entire sub-region. The beneficiaries are not just India-Bangladesh trade and travel and that involving even Nepal and Bhutan, but also the North Eastern States of India.

16. A very different challenge is being faced on our Western boundary vis-a-vis Pakistan. On that front, the initial goal of diplomacy was to expose and de-legitimize Pakistan’s cross-border terrorism. When counter-actions were required such as in Uri in 2016 and Balakot in 2019, effective diplomacy ensured global understanding of India’s actions. Where China was concerned, the diplomatic interactions that are going on in parallel to the military stand-off since May 2020 illustrate that foreign and defence policies are really joined at the hip. Here too, the value of global support and understanding is self-evident.

17. The leveraging of a multi-polar world has been particularly visible in terms of weapons and technologies needed by our defence forces. That a Rafale aircraft acquisition from France can take place at the same time as that of an MH-60R helicopter or P-8 aircraft from the US, the S-400 missile system from Russia or the Spice bombs from Israel speaks volumes of our nimbleness. These are typically accompanied by military exercises and policy exchanges that bring about greater strategic comfort. In short, diplomacy supports, empowers and facilitates the national security effort.

18. Some of this happens on the domestic side as well, even if it is less obvious. Peace at home has often been troubled by insurgent groups operating in the neighbourhood. Adept diplomacy, however, has effectively discouraged neighbours from providing shelter or support, with one notable exception of course. Separatism and fundamentalism have also been propagated from destinations afar, just as violence is sometimes rationalized. The protections of free speech are misused, usually in the name of democratic rights. So when arguments and persuasion reach limits, other forms of displeasure sometimes need to be expressed. Our overall posture does radiate the message that India will no longer be a soft target and diplomacy in that sense is not always a pleasant business.

19. Now since the quest for prosperity is a constant endeavour for all societies, it is also natural that policy-making is devoted to this goal. The most obvious expression of that is the promotion of trade and investments. Markets rarely work by themselves; in reality, in fact, everybody utilizes governmental encouragement and facilitation. Those with historical handicaps like us have an even stronger reason to do so. We are playing today catch-up on industrialization, on technology acquisition and on competitiveness. Just building capabilities at home, however, may not be adequate. Securing business abroad needs the information, networking and access. There is a virtuous cycle at work here, whereby greater trade and economic activity strengthens skills, capabilities and employment at home. And that, in turn, constantly updates and tests our mettle. In many ways, foreign policy is an exercise in competitiveness; its economic facets are merely a reflection in a particular domain. If we have just crossed an export record, which we have by the way this year, foreign policy too has made its contribution in that record.

20. Increasingly, foreign policy facilitates the creation of new capacities at home. In Asia, all modernizing economies have single-mindedly focused their external interactions on obtaining capital, technology and best practices from abroad. Japan was the pioneer in this regard during the Meiji era, while China after Deng Xiaoping the most successful in terms of scale. In recent years, India too has embraced this mindset. We have noted examples, whether at the enterprise level or in national projects. It may be information technology or auto manufacturing, food production or food processing, metros or bullet trains, space capabilities or nuclear energy; the fruits of foreign collaboration are there today for all of us to see. Newer challenges like green growth and climate action have started to open up still more possibilities. Partners have grown from the older industrialized economies to the more innovative ones. All this happens because of our ability to identify, engage, negotiate and leverage opportunities of interest abroad across many many domains. The most effective foreign policy is one that delivers on development.

21. Thanks to political changes, we have now awoken to the realization that mantras about globalization, when mindlessly applied, can actually cause real damage. Not just that, if economic choices are divorced from a strategic context, it could lead the country down a very dangerous path. At the end of the day, the real debate is not whether we should be an open or a protected economy. It is whether we are an employment-centric and a capability-driven one or just a profit-obsessed society content to be a market. Along with vulnerabilities, a dependent mind-set has also been rationalized, masquerading often as globalized thinking. But I believe that India’s destiny is bigger than just to be a small part of the future of others. Real growth is not only about GDP increase and business earnings; it is equally about infrastructure, about supply chains, skills, finance and even socio-economic progress. When we sacrifice one for the other, our long-term prospects stand imperilled. And we could slide into strategic lock-ins without even being aware. Foreign policy is surely an instrument to advance our strategic course; but it is equally an insurance that our big picture is the right one.

22. In an era of more inter-dependence and even inter-penetration, it is also to be expected that all nations would seek to expand their zones of deep influence beyond their national boundaries. In the past, trade, finance, military activities and migration were some of the means to do so. Nowadays, the role of connectivity and socio-economic collaboration has become much more salient. This is important for a nation like India, whose reach was constrained by the Partition. As we grow in different dimensions, strategic sense dictates that our prosperity serves as a larger lifting tide for the entire region. Realizing this, the Modi Government has significantly expanded connectivity and collaborative initiatives with our neighbours. Its results are evident in new road and rail connections, water ways, port access and transit rights, power grids and fuel flows, and especially in the movement of people. South Asia has undergone a real transformation by encouraging win-win outcomes and buy-ins by partners. The Neighbourhood First outlook addresses this challenge in the immediate vicinity, just as parallel policies do so in our extended neighbourhood. India’s support to neighbours during the Covid period also reflected this very thinking.

23. Inter-dependence, however, has its own downside and can be leveraged unfairly when global norms are cast aside. Exposure to competitive polities, therefore, needs constant monitoring. We cannot always assume that others will play by our rules. For that reason, as an interpreter of the world, diplomacy is also the voice of caution. It informs people of the risks and pitfalls, even as it explains opportunities. And doing so in a systemic and organized manner is actually very much a part of formulating strategy. By its very nature, foreign policy develops a 360o outlook and can actually guide all other sectors. It could be trade and technology, or education and tourism. But current era really requires a holistic approach to important relationships.

24. At a time when demographic constraints are impacting the developed world, there is a real prospect of Indians gaining significantly in the global workplace. Till now, that has been largely self-driven with policymakers and the government mostly agnostic on this happening. However, a conscious effort at bringing our human capital into play on the world stage can actually create a very different set of outcomes. Employment prospects of Indian students studying in the US, in Canada, Australia or Europe are now very prominent in our agenda in interacting with these countries. Migration and mobility partnerships have been concluded with France, UK and Portugal, many more of them are on the way. And in fact, in this period of Covid-induced uncertainties, the educational interests of students have become very much a subject of focus for foreign policy. In terms of skills, we strive to ensure that Indian talent is treated in a non-discriminatory manner in the developed world – in US, in Canada and in Europe.

25. Where they already reside, community welfare and cultural concerns too are a subject of our attention. The largest numbers with the greatest need are, of course, in the Gulf. Their well-being is of the utmost priority and that has been fully reflected in our policy-making. The liberal usage of the Indian Community Welfare Fund speaks of a strong sense of responsibility towards them, as do programmes for job training and creating facilities for those in distress. The agreement on rights of domestic workers that we concluded quite recently with Kuwait is a very good illustration of our commitment to ensuring a better workplace abroad for our people. Endeavours to get back social security payments made abroad is another example. Indeed, making it easier to get work visas has become much more central to our diplomats’ efforts.

26. This mindset, in fact, goes much further up the chain, starting from how much easier it is now to get passports at home. By expanding the issuance-centres four-fold and by simplifying the verification process, the ability to travel and therefore to work abroad, that has undergone a sea change. Today, new prospects are opening up for Indian skills as a result of negotiated agreements, be it with Russia, Europe, the Gulf or Japan. Foreign policy is helping to make the world much more accessible to the average Indian. And they set out much more confidently than before, knowing that we have their back in times of difficulty.

27. But let us not forget that contemporary migrants join historically established communities to create a large diaspora. It is natural that their welfare and interest is connected deeply with foreign policy. In a more globalized world, they inevitably emerged as a more effective bridge for us to the outside. At the same time, a confident India has also taken pride in their successes and not shied away from a visible relationship. The 2014 event, which many of you would remember, at the Madison Square Garden, marks a new era in our diaspora connectivity. The role of the diaspora has acquired a greater value at both ends of the chain. For foreign policy, this may mean some additional responsibilities but surely it creates many more sources of support.

28. Sensible foreign policies obviously have to address bread and butter issues. But, especially for large nations, there are bigger questions for us to consider as well. Three contemporary examples of urgent global concerns, I mentioned them in terms of big issues, are terrorism, climate change and pandemics. For a nation like India, quite apart from their direct consequences, there is also the need to shape the direction of the global debate. It has, therefore, been a major influence on global deliberations regarding the countering of terrorism. If the awareness of those threats is more today or if the tolerance is less, our efforts have made no small difference. On climate change, India not only helped forge a consensus at Paris but, in contrast to many others, has actually stayed true to its commitments. And at Glasgow, where I had the privilege of accompanying the Prime Minister, these were taken to a still higher level. The International Solar Alliance and the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure are two notable examples of leadership in climate action. On pandemics, India’s supply of medicines and vaccines and deployment of teams abroad spoke volumes about our internationalism. The Vaccine Maitri has earned us great goodwill across geographies.

29. The cumulative impact of eight years of an ambitious yet practical foreign policy is now there for all of you to see. It is evident in our say in the big issues of our times, whether they are global challenges or strategic concerns. It is manifest too in the immediate neighbourhood and the extended one. As India wins elections in international organizations and bodies, that testifies to a larger constituency of support. Appreciation of India’s heritage, culture and tradition is broader, visible and not least reflected in the global observance of the International Day of Yoga. A more culturally assured India has also been more internationalist in its actions, affirming its own traditions rather than complying with the dichotomy put forward by others. The Covid experience reinforced the reputation that India has built up as a First Responder in humanitarian situations in the Indo-Pacific. The coming generations must therefore appreciate that even as we are accorded greater respect, the world will have higher expectations of us.

30. To appreciate the full extent of this change, the profound consequences of 2014 have to be understood. A different world view propelled a comprehensive review of our foreign policy. There was a conscious effort towards a ‘whole of the Government’ approach and more effective budgeting to back that up. The oversight of initiatives and projects – it’s called Pragati within the government – has became a regular occurrence. The six broad objectives that were spelt out to the policy-makers and implementers were very very clear. One, we must bring about a change of thinking in the world about us. Two, the partnerships we should create should be on more equal terms, and with smaller countries, more generous. Three, the global agenda and the big issues of our times should be shaped by India as much as possible. Counter-terrorism, climate action and black money were the immediate concerns, to which, of course, were later added maritime security, connectivity and pandemics. Four, foreign relationships should be actively explored and leveraged for domestic development and progress. Five, the very conceptualization of foreign policy should be more people-centric. It should look at the world as a global work-place, and I spoke at some length about that, not just as a marketplace. In parallel, there should be a greater focus on the Indian diaspora as an effective bridge. And six, our culture, traditions and thoughts should percolate our own articulation as well as influence international debates and initiatives. Yoga and Ayurveda were obvious examples in this regard.

31. In the years that have passed, the progress report on this transformation has actually been quite encouraging. The new energy in India’s endeavours is evident, notably in Prime Minister Modi’s own engagements. Some of India’s neighbours had not bilaterally hosted an Indian Prime Minister for years on end. Even a proximate region like the Gulf, leave alone those much further off, had seen a want of high-level attention for decades. Smaller nations, whether they are in the Caribbean or the Pacific, had actually been completely neglected. And to be very honest with you, Nations of Africa and Latin America had found their reach-out to be inadequately reciprocated. Now all of this has changed, and you can see that in terms of visits - bilateral visits, in terms of collective summits, in development partnerships and in fact opening of more Indian Embassies abroad. In our immediate region, the message of Neighbourhood First began to resonate, in fact, from the swearing-in ceremony in 2014. Its successor in 2019 further reinforced that impression. But this was not just symbolism; discernible progress in projects and activities have also lent it credibility.

32. So, what then of grand strategy, which is a concept, which is so closely associated with international relations? What I have presented you today are the building blocks which are dissected in a manner that their impact on your lives are discernible. Do connect the dots and look at the picture that emerges. A stronger and more capable India – one that is truer to its roots and culture – is a key factor in the larger rebalancing that characterizes our contemporary world. At a time when there are many more power centres, our place in a multi-polar order is clearly more assured. In an era that is more globalized, our talents, capabilities and contribution have a growing value for the rest of the world. As we mark 75 years of independence, Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, there is good cause to be confident about our prospects. But to be so, it is equally important that all of you be fully aware of the opportunities and challenges that the world currently presents. And surely, we can be so once we appreciate how much foreign policy really matters.

Thank you very much for your attention.

Post Reply