Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5353
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Cain Marko »

Rakesh wrote: 06 Mar 2024 20:13 IAF Approves Multi-Million Initiative to Enhance MiG-29 Fleet with Improved Engines and Extended Service Life
https://defence.in/threads/iaf-approves ... life.3919/
24 Feb 2024
Wow! Any confirmation of this via other sources?
This is obviously an attempt to show up numbers and prevent catastrophic shortage.
It should easily take the baaz to 2035-40, newer engines equal more thrust and range. Wonder why they didn't go for these in the mlu itself. Also, wonder why no extra frames were picked up?

IAF procurement makes once scratch ones head!
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

Cain Marko wrote: 07 Mar 2024 04:19 Wow! Any confirmation of this via other sources?
This link is a regurgitation of the news reported in the main stream media. See some other sources below...

Official MoD Press Release is there in this link ---> https://x.com/onezero_fIndia/status/176 ... 08072?s=20

Another source: https://x.com/rajatpTOI/status/1763758965496725801?s=20 ---> India inks 5 major capital acquisition contracts for Rs 39,125 crore.

—Over 220 BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles and ship borne systems
—61 “flights” of close-in weapon systems
—12 high-power radars
80 RD-33 aero-engines for MiG-29 fighters

Image
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

Cain Marko wrote: 07 Mar 2024 04:19 This is obviously an attempt to show up numbers and prevent catastrophic shortage.
It should easily take the Baaz to 2035-40, newer engines equal more thrust and range.
This is indeed to keep the current fleet active for as long as possible. Same scenario is occurring with the Mirage 2000, Jaguar IS/IB/IM and Su-30MKI fleets as well. Upgrading whatever needs to be upgraded, is being done, to keep the platforms viable well into the 2030s. Depending on the aircraft, either the engine or the avionics or the airframe is being updated.
Cain Marko wrote: 07 Mar 2024 04:19Wonder why they didn't go for these in the MLU itself.
That is because they expected the MRFA deal to be concluded. But that has yet to happen.
Cain Marko wrote: 07 Mar 2024 04:19Also, wonder why no extra frames were picked up?
Nothing must take away from the precious MRFA contest. The only new build airframes that Air HQ is acquiring presently are the 12 attrition replacement Su-30MKIs. Nothing else has been sanctioned yet. Still waiting for the second tranche of 97 Tejas Mk1As.
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9127
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by nachiket »

Didn't the recent upgrade include new series-3 engines which are supposed to be less smoky? Are they already near end of life and require replacement?
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5353
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Cain Marko »

Thank you Admiral saar. Im guessing they plan to upgrade only a few of the birds. 80 engines will do it for about 2 sqds..
Rakesh wrote: 07 Mar 2024 06:19
Cain Marko wrote: 07 Mar 2024 04:19 Wow! Any confirmation of this via other sources?
This link is a regurgitation of the news reported in the main stream media. See some other sources below...

Official MoD Press Release is there in this link ---> https://x.com/onezero_fIndia/status/176 ... 08072?s=20

Another source: https://x.com/rajatpTOI/status/1763758965496725801?s=20 ---> India inks 5 major capital acquisition contracts for Rs 39,125 crore.

—Over 220 BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles and ship borne systems
—61 “flights” of close-in weapon systems
—12 high-power radars
80 RD-33 aero-engines for MiG-29 fighters
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2016
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by bala »

RD 33 series 3 engines were manufactured in HAL Koraput. In 2008 an upgrade for the Mig-29 engine was signed by HAL and Russia which was completed in 2022. RD 33 MK series, which has some specific things for Naval ops, power the Mig 29 KUB Navy version. HAL has also produced 140 of the RD 33 M engines under license. Meanwhile, advances were made to the RD 33 engine and Russia will provide components made specific for the advancement to HAL in the newly signed deal for upgrading the Airforce Mig 29 squads, at 2 engines per craft.

Sqn Ldr Vijainder Thakur provides sufficient background information but seems to blame HAL for everything. He feels that India should have reversed engineered the Rus engines, little realizing that are specific terms in the deal which preclude such things. In fact, all critical components are supplied by Russia even for license production. HAL is probably the best entity that knows about engines. It is making Helo engines with France's Safran. GTRE can learn from HAL on engines. India is working on Kaveri without any conflict between other partners, and that is the best option. Once the Kaveri is operationalized (don't know when), similar to AESA radar, India might re-engine its fighter aircrafts with Kaveri variants. The Su-30MKI is effectively an Indian aircraft with major critical components all Indian, except for the airframe and engine, the computer, radar, etc are all Indian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AncEl17mlj8
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32449
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by chetak »

According to reports, India is in the process of procuring 21 additional MiG-29s from Russia which would enable replacement of earlier losses and raise another squadron.

These would be developed and upgraded from airframes built earlier but which never entered service.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ9TsraAVnk



Empowering India's MiG-29 Fleet: The RD-33MK Engine Upgrade Story






Mar 6, 2024

Embark on a journey of technological advancement as India unveils its plans to upgrade the formidable MiG-29 fleet with RD-33MK engine technology.

In this video, explore the intricacies of this groundbreaking endeavor, from the collaborative efforts between India and Russia to the enhanced performance and capabilities that the RD-33MK engines promise to deliver.

Witness how this upgrade heralds a new era of air superiority for the Indian Air Force, reinforcing its combat readiness and bolstering national security.

Join us as we delve into the details of this transformative initiative and its significance in shaping the future of India's aerial defense capabilities.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32449
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by chetak »

bala wrote: 09 Mar 2024 11:52 RD 33 series 3 engines were manufactured in HAL Koraput. In 2008 an upgrade for the Mig-29 engine was signed by HAL and Russia which was completed in 2022. RD 33 MK series, which has some specific things for Naval ops, power the Mig 29 KUB Navy version. HAL has also produced 140 of the RD 33 M engines under license. Meanwhile, advances were made to the RD 33 engine and Russia will provide components made specific for the advancement to HAL in the newly signed deal for upgrading the Airforce Mig 29 squads, at 2 engines per craft.

Sqn Ldr Vijainder Thakur provides sufficient background information but seems to blame HAL for everything. He feels that India should have reversed engineered the Rus engines, little realizing that are specific terms in the deal which preclude such things. In fact, all critical components are supplied by Russia even for license production. HAL is probably the best entity that knows about engines. It is making Helo engines with France's Safran. GTRE can learn from HAL on engines. India is working on Kaveri without any conflict between other partners, and that is the best option. Once the Kaveri is operationalized (don't know when), similar to AESA radar, India might re-engine its fighter aircrafts with Kaveri variants. The Su-30MKI is effectively an Indian aircraft with major critical components all Indian, except for the airframe and engine, the computer, radar, etc are all Indian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AncEl17mlj8

bala saar,


the guy is right.

India should have reverse engineered whatever it could get it's hands on in aeroengine terms, and stripped, examined, studied and analysed and laid out a systematic program to duplicate them for research purposes.


instead, "people" waited for "someone" to procure "garam, garam, bana bana" halwa, serve it to them on silver thalis, after inviting them to the feast

to suddenly defend failure by claiming superior technical morals and engineering morality is quixotic, to say the least.

almost everyone who has succeeded in this field has had their share of dirty work at he crossroads, rank skulduggery, not to mention technical "blood" on their hands and they all sleep the better for it


the germans were ahead in the jet engine field and yet they benefitted by the patent applications publicly filed by britshit babooze idiots who were "overseeing" frank whittle's work

there has to be an element of ground reality and realpolitik when dealing with matters of supreme national interest(s). Morals don't come into it, but "specific terms" in the deal actually tell you where to laser focus your efforts to reverse engineer or make serious efforts to get it using almost any means possible..

the goras stole every bit of german aircraft, jet engine, and rocket technology that they could get their hands on during the closing stages of WWII, amriki and soviet space projects were entirely based on stolen german tech, and israel stole from these goras

the pakis and the cheeni stole and continue to steal anything in the way of technology, using sophisticated versions and variations of सैम, दाम, डंडा, and भेदा.


and yet, in 2024, we foolishly speak of "He feels that India should have reversed engineered the Rus engines, little realizing that are specific terms in the deal which preclude such things."

So, we should get back to normal programming and wait for "someone" to "dharmically" procure the ayurvedically prepared "garam, garam, bana bana" halwa, serve it to us on pure silver thalis.

what about the ships that the IN is now building, pray do tell, from where did those basic designs come from and how were they "enlarged, improved, quietened, and optimised" to suit the IN

the dornier company offered us, on a lock, stock, and barrel basis, the complete TOT and design, tooling, jigs and all necessary machinery for the Dornier 328 at a throwaway price and this was in the mid to late 80s. This regional aircraft can be fitted with 32 seats

we could have been building our own regional airliner versions today instead of waiting eternally for that ayurvedically prepared in shudh desi bilona ghee "garam, garam, bana bana" ambrosia being showered on us from on high

Image




did you ever wonder why these two aircraft look like they do, and they were contemporaries during the korean war. The agile MiG gave an excellent account of itself

Both used the stolen swept wing tech that was developed by the german designers and engineers, the wings were swept back in order to reduce transonic drag rise as flight speed approached the sound barrier.

even the general design aspects, the similarity in the fuselages are not just coincidences. The strong german lineage and influence shows through so very clearly. One goes so far as to speculate that even the engines that these two aircraft used may have had a common britshit ancestor... would you have applied "morality" in either of the cases..


Image

Image
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2016
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by bala »

Chetak Saar, many points you make are true. The West tale is one of debauchery, mirrors and more. The Germans were stripped of their original work in rockets, jet engines (the BMW engine in specific, Frank Whittle tried but faced a whole host of issues) and planes by the allied forces of US, Brit, France, USSR after WW-II.

In the Indian context, ISRO is an example, where they applied the techniques you describe for Vikas engine. The French hired ISRO people on a project for their own rocket development. The Indians remembered their work and produced a version of the same design, tis another matter that they solved some tricky issues for the French rocket design. ISRO is independent org and such things can happen. The current MoD, Airforce, HAL troika is beset with all kinds of political issues & foreign lobby/dalals that there is more finger pointing than getting down to actual India oriented programs. Ab initio projects are seeing the light of day like AESA radar, missiles. Kaveri went of in a direction of complete ab initio, disregarding wisdom of the BMW engine example, which RR, Safran, Rus, GE, Pratt&Whitney refined. No one can help the Kaveri program since they don't know much about flat rated engines. The GTRE progam is stifled with old timers plodding along and no one is co-opted easily into the program. Whenever this program achieves production level, until then, India's engine program is in the doldrums.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32449
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by chetak »

bala wrote: 09 Mar 2024 21:44 Chetak Saar, many points you make are true. The West tale is one of debauchery, mirrors and more. The Germans were stripped of their original work in rockets, jet engines (the BMW engine in specific, Frank Whittle tried but faced a whole host of issues) and planes by the allied forces of US, Brit, France, USSR after WW-II.

In the Indian context, ISRO is an example, where they applied the techniques you describe for Vikas engine. The French hired ISRO people on a project for their own rocket development. The Indians remembered their work and produced a version of the same design, tis another matter that they solved some tricky issues for the French rocket design. ISRO is independent org and such things can happen. The current MoD, Airforce, HAL troika is beset with all kinds of political issues & foreign lobby/dalals that there is more finger pointing than getting down to actual India oriented programs. Ab initio projects are seeing the light of day like AESA radar, missiles. Kaveri went of in a direction of complete ab initio, disregarding wisdom of the BMW engine example, which RR, Safran, Rus, GE, Pratt&Whitney refined. No one can help the Kaveri program since they don't know much about flat rated engines. The GTRE progam is stifled with old timers plodding along and no one is co-opted easily into the program. Whenever this program achieves production level, until then, India's engine program is in the doldrums.


bala saar,


the vikas engine story is quite interesting and has many twists and turns.


some day, some ISRO gentleman may open up, and spill the beans, and that tale should make for a very riveting read and the frenchies are not all that they have made themselves out to be in the rafale deal. They are just another ex colonial power who have yet to forget their past and like all ex colonial imperialistic masters, they are racist as hell, but that is only to be expected, especially where India is concerned.

All imperialists are simply unable to digest India's rise, and that is why they have cartelised themselves to deny us engine and other vital tech

the germans literally crap themselves every time they are forced to deal with India and much prefer their old allies of the desert cult
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

Russia to deliver last two squadrons of S-400 air defence missiles by 2026
https://aninews.in/news/world/asia/russ ... 320192200/
20 March 2024
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

Indian Air Force activates another road stretch as an emergency airstrip
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ind ... 626643.cms
19 March 2024
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5309
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by srai »

^^^
Good to optimize LCA Tejas for such highway ELF akin to Gripen PR.

With minimal trained personnel,
Re-fuel
Re-arm
Light field servicing (i.e. some LRU)

Second tier capability from ELF,
As above plus
“Overnight” facilities
Medium field servicing (i.e. engine change, LRUs)

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by srai on 21 Mar 2024 09:27, edited 1 time in total.
srai
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5309
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by srai »

^^^

Will make an excellent demo during Vayu Shakti

Tejas flys in
1. drops a LGB;
2. then fires a CCM;
3. after that lands on the small airstrip in front of the audience;
4. small mobile ground crew hot re-fuels and re-arms;
5. takes-off;
6. drops new payload on targets;
7. finally, does a victory roll in front of the audience and flys-off supersonic into the sunset!

8)
srin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2525
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:13

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by srin »

Rakesh wrote: 21 Mar 2024 00:36 Indian Air Force activates another road stretch as an emergency airstrip
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ind ... 626643.cms
19 March 2024
Road stretches are fine, but I was looking at the number of domestic airports - and it's quite large and wondered if we can't put them in use.

We *should* be capable of using these airports for fighter ops. But it'd require strengthening runways (many are ATR-class: <6000 ft long), and maybe a small but permanent defense enclave with spares stocked, air defense etc.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

srai wrote: 21 Mar 2024 07:37 ^^^
Good to optimize LCA Tejas for such highway ELF akin to Gripen PR.
Please put links for these images...
ArjunPandit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4056
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by ArjunPandit »

Rakesh wrote: 21 Mar 2024 00:36 Indian Air Force activates another road stretch as an emergency airstrip
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ind ... 626643.cms
19 March 2024
Su 30, Andhra,
Such roads in Assam, WB, Guj, Raj
prashantsharma
BRFite
Posts: 106
Joined: 14 Dec 2010 23:17

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by prashantsharma »

A very unusual scene spotted at an IAF base in 2024.
(Nothing sensitive about it)
https://x.com/surplusk/status/1772116933464166858?s=20
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12275
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Pratyush »

^^^

Are those jets Gnat or something else?
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

Rakesh wrote: 20 Mar 2024 20:14 Russia to deliver last two squadrons of S-400 air defence missiles by 2026
https://aninews.in/news/world/asia/russ ... 320192200/
20 March 2024
Ouch :)

https://x.com/vkthakur/status/1772257576891171275?s=20 ---> S-400 Delivery to IAF Pushback - The Whole Truth. Western leaning defense analysts, who are rabble rousing over the reported delay in the supply by Russia of the remaining two S-400 squadrons, might want to keep in mind that the US is delaying delivery of Patriot systems to NATO allies Germany and Poland, as well as Morocco, in order to supply the systems to Ukraine. Officially, the US is not at war, Russia is!
prashantsharma
BRFite
Posts: 106
Joined: 14 Dec 2010 23:17

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by prashantsharma »

Turns out that they are Mystere mockups for a bollywood movie called Sky Watch being shot in Hakimpet, as clarified by zone5aviation in one of the comments in X. Lucky to have been caught on Google Earth.
Pratyush wrote: 25 Mar 2024 13:48 ^^^

Are those jets Gnat or something else?
VinodTK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3005
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by VinodTK »

From: ThePrint

Successful Agni-5 test just one step. India needs to prepare an airborne command post
India’s recent successful test of MIRVs, Multiple Independently Targeted Re-entry Vehicles, delivered by the AGNI-5 missiles marks the success of its efforts to counter the Ballistic Missile Defense Systems of potential adversaries, China and Pakistan. The implications of MIRVs being included in the existing nuclear arsenal were covered earlier in ThePrint. This article attempts to utilise the limelight of the MIRV success, to highlight a critical issue that requires to be addressed post-haste. It relates to the survivability of India’s Nuclear Command and Control System.

The apex body of the NCCS is the Nuclear Command Authority (NCA). The NCA consists of the prime minister and ministers of defence, home, external affairs and finance. The composition is the same as the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) and the National Security Council (NSC).

According to a Press Information Bureau press note from 4 January 2003, the NCA comprised a Political Council, chaired by the prime minister, and an Executive Council, chaired by the national security advisor. Only the PC can authorise the use of nuclear weapons. The EC provides inputs for decision-making and executes the directives given to it by the PC. No official indication has been given of the composition of the EC. It can be expected to have at least the chief of defence staff, chiefs of the armed forces, the commander-in-chief of the Strategic Forces Command and Heads of Departments of Defence, Atomic Energy and DRDO.

Alternative chain of command

The 2003 press note also said that the CCS had reviewed and approved the arrangements for an alternative chain of command for retaliatory nuclear strikes under all eventualities. Understandably, beyond the fact that arrangements exist, nothing is public about the composition of them. One chain for sure would be headed by the prime minister and the head of the other could vary depending on the political party in power.

An alternative chain of command arises from accepting a critical vulnerability that needs to be addressed by nuclear strategy. The vulnerability pertains to two interconnected issues. Both arise from doctrinal prescriptions. One is about the fact that only the PC headed by the PM can authorise the use of nuclear weapons. Therefore, the PC can be a key target for the adversary and if neutralised successfully in the initial stages of a nuclear war, it could paralyse India’s ability to retaliate. This vulnerability is further exacerbated because India is a No First Use nuclear power. Nuclear strategy has to cater to the ability to absorb a nuclear strike and then retaliate.

But creating an alternative chain of command does not solve the problem. Their protection during periods of heightened nuclear alerts and war is also an imperative need. Protection could be provided by moving the alternative PC to secret shelters underground, underwater or in the air. These facilities would also have to be equipped with communication facilities to exercise command and control and have logistic facilities to support their stay.

For good reason, the arrangements that exist to protect the PCs are not publicly known, except in some studies and journalistic reporting. It would be reasonable to assume that underground facilities located in different parts of the country are the main protection arrangements. It is unlikely that there are any protected facilities created underwater. Importantly, there are no indications that an airborne command post has been sanctioned and created. While efforts could be underway to create airborne command posts, it should be done on priority.

Airborne command is better

Two specially modified Boeing-777 aircraft for use by VVIPs have been available from 2020 onwards. They can counter some types of missile threats and are equipped with Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM) and Self-Protection Suites (SPS). This acquisition cannot be considered the equivalent of a command post during war, where the requirements are much more demanding and include advanced communication systems, command and control facilities that are linked to leaders on the ground and integrated with the broader communication of the military. The airborne command post should also be hardened against Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) and has to be available 24/7, at extremely short notice.

The case for an airborne command post is strong. First, with the sharpening of satellite-based geospatial monitoring technologies, it is difficult to conceal the existence of underground facilities. Moreover, once located, communications could be jammed. Second, the airborne command post could potentially provide a greater degree of survivability to the PC as it is not fixed in terms of location, has an extensive air space to operate from, and facilitates room for deception through decoys and other measures. However, unlike an underground facility, its endurance is limited to its fuel-carrying capacity. This is mostly offset by the advantages gained in terms of protection. Preferably, one command chain could operate from an underground facility and the other could be airborne.

Survivability of the nuclear command authority is paramount and the airborne command post provides additional redundancy which strengthens survivability and deterrence. Moreover, as India modernises and upgrades its nuclear retaliation capabilities through MIRVs and other land and sea-based delivery platforms, it should be accompanied by complementary efforts to strengthen the survivability of the critical command and control elements. Without it, the executive end of the arsenal will keep waiting for orders that may never reach them.
titash
BRFite
Posts: 619
Joined: 26 Aug 2011 18:44

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by titash »

Question for all mujahids,

Is the IAF's fighter gap (30 vs. 42 squadrons) a genuine concern? More is always better, but in terms of deterrence value, does it make a difference?

The reason I ask is based on 2 observations:

1) Most of the 300 odd Israeli losses in 1973 were based on mobile SA-6 units denying them the high/medium altitudes, and high density AAA flak picking off many aircraft at low altitudes. Arab fighters claimed less than 20 IAF aircraft

2) In Vietnam, a similar story unfolded, USAF losses were heavy and directly correlated with the usage and deployment of high altitude soviet SAMs and low altitude AAA flak

If we have indeed achieved missile proficiency - clearly the DRDO's IGMDP has borne fruit with dozens of projects about to materialize - would this not be the logical way to move forward with our investments?

That is to say, what prevents us from investing in long / medium / short / last ditch SAMs by the tens of thousands, alongside with dense overlapping radar/ELOP coverage thereby building the world's strongest IADS? This would have the capability to take on all PLA/PLAAF strike assets and their rocket force SRBMs. Even when it comes to stealth aircraft, once they kick the door down, their presence is known to all downstream SAM units.

This would free up the 30 squadrons of IAF fighters purely for offensive strike missions. Thoughts?
vcsekhar
BRFite
Posts: 156
Joined: 01 Aug 2009 13:27
Location: Hyderabad, India

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by vcsekhar »

titash wrote: 29 Mar 2024 13:39 Question for all mujahids,
Is the IAF's fighter gap (30 vs. 42 squadrons) a genuine concern? More is always better, but in terms of deterrence value, does it make a difference?
That is to say, what prevents us from investing in long / medium / short / last ditch SAMs by the tens of thousands, alongside with dense overlapping radar/ELOP coverage thereby building the world's strongest IADS? This would have the capability to take on all PLA/PLAAF strike assets and their rocket force SRBMs. Even when it comes to stealth aircraft, once they kick the door down, their presence is known to all downstream SAM units.
This would free up the 30 squadrons of IAF fighters purely for offensive strike missions. Thoughts?
The simple answer is that SAM's are defensive weapons. If you want to take the fight to the enemy, you need to have aircraft that can do so.
If you remember the first gulf war, Iraq had what was acknowledged as the best AD for a city anywhere in the world apart from Moscow. But, it was taken apart in the first few days by the coalition forces. You need an IADS and you also need a well trained air force to repel enemy forces and to take the fight to their land.
You say that once the stealth aircraft kick the door down, their presence is known to all downstream SAM, but, what will the SAM's do if they are unable to track them to get a firing solution.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12275
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Pratyush »

Titash,

Excellent question. It's one that has animated me as well. However, I kept it to myself.

I believe that there is a mathematical reason why the IAF was approved this number. That reason for the numbers is the force required for the accomplishment of certain numbers of missions in terms of deep strike, battlefield support and air defence.

Over the last several decades, as the composition of the IAF charged. As has it's capabilities. As under 30 years ago more than 50% of the fleet was mig 21. The SU 30 in terms of its physical payload is equal to 4 mig 21s. In terms of EW and radar capacity, it's heads and shoulders above even the upgraded mig 21.

Similarly they're more capable than the Mig 23 and 27. One on one, the fleet of Su 30s is equal to 4 times their numbers in terms of mig 21s and 2 times their numbers of Mig 23 and Mig 27.

Looking at it simplistically today, the IAF is short by 15 squadrons. However, in terms of raw capabilities, it's much more capable than the 45 squadrons fleet. Where 60 % of the fleet consists of the of mig 21, 23, 27 etc.

Now is this fleet sufficient for the future challenges that combined PRC and TSP will present by 2045 to 50. I don't think so.

We require a plan to increase our fleet size to 180 to 200 squadrons. I am not seeing any urgency in the brass for it.
Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14362
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Aditya_V »

But our enemies are also evolving, we will never be safe as long Pakistan exists as a full country, China will not attack unless they see us in a 1962 type rudderless country or thier probability of victory is near certain.

The truth is unless we have a large powerful indigenous Airforce it's too tempting for powerful outside forces to keep needling us 2ith Pakistan and neighbours.

There is no fixed number , they more capabilities we have the safer we are.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

prashantsharma wrote: 26 Mar 2024 08:57 Turns out that they are Mystere mockups for a bollywood movie called Sky Watch being shot in Hakimpet, as clarified by zone5aviation in one of the comments in X. Lucky to have been caught on Google Earth.
Movie's name is Sky Force. Pause the video below at 1:06. Unless my eyes are playing tricks on me, I am seeing green roundels, so F-86 Sabres of the PAF.

Also Mirage IIIs on the right side. So if you are seeing Mysteres, then this is the 1965 Indo-Pak War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_Force_(film)

mody
BRFite
Posts: 1372
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by mody »

@Titash I have said this many times that though the IAF fighter squadron strength has gone down over the years, the capability of the fighter aircrafts and much more importantly the the air defense network and the SAM coverage that India has, has gone up many folds. Yet IAF fighter jocks keep talking about the 42 squadron number and taking the fight to the enemy. For the western front it makes some sense, but given the SAM coverage that the Chinese are likely to have, it would make life very difficult.

No need to go back to the days of Vietnam war. The current Russia Ukraine war is sufficient. Having a very good ISR and AWACS capacity, along with space based surveillance and communication is much more important. Most of the losses of fighter aircrafts on both side have been due to SAMs or on the ground due to drones. Very few air to air combat losses for either side.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12275
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Pratyush »

https://m.economictimes.com/news/defenc ... 884019.cms

The IAF discloses reasons behind the accidental Brahmos firing into Pakistan.

Published on 30th March 24.
basant
BRFite
Posts: 916
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 20:58

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by basant »

FWIW
Parthu Potluri @Parthu_Potluri
So it seems an agreement has been reached to transfer 6 of the USAF's 🇺🇸 B-1B Lancer bombers to the IAF 🇮🇳 beginning sometime in 2026. These would be from the 17 that were retired from USAF in 2021. Refurbishment will take up to 18 months.

Stay tuned for official release.

Image
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9127
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by nachiket »

^^Today is April 1st.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 18431
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Rakesh »

This author was the same guy who said that the F-18SH was going to win the MRCBF contest.
basant
BRFite
Posts: 916
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 20:58

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by basant »

nachiket wrote: 01 Apr 2024 11:47 ^^Today is April 1st.
Very much possible. Esp given that we have an interim government. But who knows! If we can buy 6 Apaches for 1B USD, we can do anything.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Karan M »

April 1st claim.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Karan M »

mody wrote: 29 Mar 2024 17:29 @Titash I have said this many times that though the IAF fighter squadron strength has gone down over the years, the capability of the fighter aircrafts and much more importantly the the air defense network and the SAM coverage that India has, has gone up many folds. Yet IAF fighter jocks keep talking about the 42 squadron number and taking the fight to the enemy. For the western front it makes some sense, but given the SAM coverage that the Chinese are likely to have, it would make life very difficult.

No need to go back to the days of Vietnam war. The current Russia Ukraine war is sufficient. Having a very good ISR and AWACS capacity, along with space based surveillance and communication is much more important. Most of the losses of fighter aircrafts on both side have been due to SAMs or on the ground due to drones. Very few air to air combat losses for either side.
I am sorry you're completely mistaken here.
The quantum of threat faced by the IAF has increased multifold and the number of aircraft it has are absolutely unsuitable to the task. Both due to its own cussedness regarding the Tejas and the GOIs miserly allocations, they are in a bad state. The inductions they've done barely allow them to hold parity versus the combined PAF and PLAAF threat. What is saving them (and India) is the PRC focus on Taiwan. If that stops and infra devpt vs us picks up we will be in deep trouble.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20782
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Karan M »

titash wrote: 29 Mar 2024 13:39 Question for all mujahids,

Is the IAF's fighter gap (30 vs. 42 squadrons) a genuine concern? More is always better, but in terms of deterrence value, does it make a difference?

The reason I ask is based on 2 observations:

1) Most of the 300 odd Israeli losses in 1973 were based on mobile SA-6 units denying them the high/medium altitudes, and high density AAA flak picking off many aircraft at low altitudes. Arab fighters claimed less than 20 IAF aircraft

2) In Vietnam, a similar story unfolded, USAF losses were heavy and directly correlated with the usage and deployment of high altitude soviet SAMs and low altitude AAA flak

If we have indeed achieved missile proficiency - clearly the DRDO's IGMDP has borne fruit with dozens of projects about to materialize - would this not be the logical way to move forward with our investments?

That is to say, what prevents us from investing in long / medium / short / last ditch SAMs by the tens of thousands, alongside with dense overlapping radar/ELOP coverage thereby building the world's strongest IADS? This would have the capability to take on all PLA/PLAAF strike assets and their rocket force SRBMs. Even when it comes to stealth aircraft, once they kick the door down, their presence is known to all downstream SAM units.

This would free up the 30 squadrons of IAF fighters purely for offensive strike missions. Thoughts?
The issue is that modern SAMs of the kind you envisage are not cheap either. The aircraft on the other hand is flexible but can range into enemy airspace and defend it's own. However it has lower availability. As always it's a tradeoff. Yes more and more AF are now seeking cheaper options to deal with constant intrusions by PLAAF type fighters including SAMs but the SAMs themselves need to be mobile and highly capable to address 5G aircraft.
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9127
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by nachiket »

Karan M wrote: 01 Apr 2024 20:00 ....
What is saving them (and India) is the PRC focus on Taiwan. If that stops and infra devpt vs us picks up we will be in deep trouble.
It already has picked up. Airfields in Tibet seeing a lot of expansion including lengthening of runways. You combine that with large scale induction of aerial refuellers and even the old security blanket of "Their airfields are at high altitude so we have the advantage" will not last long.
Karan M wrote: 01 Apr 2024 20:04 The issue is that modern SAMs of the kind you envisage are not cheap either. The aircraft on the other hand is flexible but can range into enemy airspace and defend it's own. However it has lower availability. As always it's a tradeoff. Yes more and more AF are now seeking cheaper options to deal with constant intrusions by PLAAF type fighters including SAMs but the SAMs themselves need to be mobile and highly capable to address 5G aircraft.
Not to mention that SAM sites can get saturated by large numbers of cruise missiles (which PLA has plenty of) plus decoys and drones. Chinese EW capability has also gotten an upgrade. They have their own Growler equivalent with the J-16D now which can be used to degrade performance of SAM radars.
titash wrote: 29 Mar 2024 13:39 1) Most of the 300 odd Israeli losses in 1973 were based on mobile SA-6 units denying them the high/medium altitudes, and high density AAA flak picking off many aircraft at low altitudes. Arab fighters claimed less than 20 IAF aircraft

2) In Vietnam, a similar story unfolded, USAF losses were heavy and directly correlated with the usage and deployment of high altitude soviet SAMs and low altitude AAA flak
You looked at the Israeli and US experience in the 1970's but please look at what the Israeli's did to Syrian SAMs in the Bekaa valley in 1982 (Operation Mole Cricket 19). They had learned from their experience and developed counters. Same with USAF experience in Iraq in GW1 and 2. Iraq had a decent AD network.
Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5353
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Cain Marko »

Problem with fighters is that they are truly big ticket items even though they offer the most options to any fighting force. Problem with Sams is that they have very little offensive value.
What India needs to resolve this conundrum is cheap and effective multirole fighter that provides effective point and area defence, but also decent offensive firepower over short-medium ranges. This will free up the long legged birds like rafale and mki to strike deep.

Iows, the answer is a really large number of Tejas, like 20sqds.
Pratyush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12275
Joined: 05 Mar 2010 15:13

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by Pratyush »

The problem with the IAF is not it's inability to understand the problem. Or even the Indian industries ability to diliver on the solution. The problem is the order quantities that are deliberately designed to prevent mass production of indigenous equipment.
nachiket
Forum Moderator
Posts: 9127
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 10:49

Re: Indian Air Force News & Discussion - 23 March 2021

Post by nachiket »

Cain Marko wrote: 02 Apr 2024 07:21 Problem with fighters is that they are truly big ticket items even though they offer the most options to any fighting force. Problem with Sams is that they have very little offensive value.
Every country which expects a war with a peer or superior adversary needs enough of both. A shortfall in one cannot be truly made up by an excess of the other.
Post Reply