Terroristan - March 31, 2022

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
saip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4440
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by saip »

Not just in! It is dated Oct 22nd.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

That is October 21st news.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

Is there any confirmation about Bagram?

What happened to “strategic depth”?
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6669
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by sanjaykumar »

That was a comment on POTUS’s expressed desire to retake Bagram. Last week.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

The TLP is Barelvi and is hardly well-disposed towards the Pakistani Army right now. The TTP is Deobandi, as are the Afghan Taliban. Those are the two major Sunni sects in the Indian subcontinent, I believe.

Whom else has the Islamic State of Pakistan angered, in terms of sects of Islam?
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

If India does get a lease on Bagram, will a Paki air assault on Kabul provoke air defense by India from Bagram?
kancha
BRFite
Posts: 1070
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 19:13

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by kancha »

SSridhar wrote: 28 Oct 2025 18:38 A new live frontier emerges in India-Pakistan tensions - ET
Studies estimate that Pakistan could lose around 2,246 square kilometres of EEZ if India’s interpretation that the boundary follows the midstream is accepted.
They cannot 'lose' what was never theirs to begin with.
Indian claim of the boundary in the middle of the channel is the most logical and legally defensible one. But more than that, it is also enforceable by the Indian military and diplomacy at this point in our history.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by Hriday »

https://x.com/OsintUpdates/status/19841 ... EYfnw&s=19
⚡ Alleged footage of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist Sheikh Moeez Mujahid, a close aide of terrorist Hafiz Saeed, being shot dead by unknown gunmen outside his home in Pakistan.

He was accused of multiple terrorist attacks in India.
Unknown Gunmen shot dead Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist Sheikh Moeez Mujahid outside his house in Kot Radha Kishan, Kasur district, Punjab province, Pakistan.
One 31 second video and 3 photos in the link above.

Now have to confirm from known news agencies. Forum member Deans had a detailed blog on the topic. He said that if these killings continue it may affect the recruitments of terrorists. It is also a bad publicity for Pakistan. If these photos are spreading through OSINT handles, then somebody really want to publicize it and it must Indian agencies, isn't it?
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

When should we begin to worry about Pakistan?

Perhaps when the women take over (which with Pakistan's Islami nazara will never happen).

I'm listening to 5 Pakistani economists, 3 men and 2 women.

The men - IMF this and IMF that. The women - we had a liquidity problem, IMF lent us money. How are we going to use the money effectively? Don't blame the IMF, it is our job not their job to figure this out.

The men - private sector this and private sector that. The women - as long as you have businessmen who don't want to expand to international markets because it will require hiring a CEO more capable than their son-in-law (or son), private sector is not going to work.

The men - we need lower corporate taxes, less regulations, blah, blah. The women - nobody in Pakistan disagrees with these, and the agreement is longstanding. You guys have an in with the government, have you discussed this with the Finance Minister? (The men, hmmm, ummm, and one man outright- but we don't know what to say).

IMO, the men are "circles must be round"; the women are "here's how to draw a circle" - simply more practical.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

I missed this news from June - was it discussed here?

The Pakistani Government announced on June 6, 2025, through its official X account, the signing of a $4.6 billion defense agreement with Azerbaijan for the sale of 40 JF-17 Thunder fighter jets, accompanied by a $2 billion investment package.

---
Per AI, this is what Pakistan manufactures:
Pakistan manufactures 58% of the JF-17's airframe, including the front fuselage, wings, and vertical stabilizer, with final assembly and serial production also occurring in Pakistan. Pakistan's manufacturing capabilities extend to other components like some avionics, and for the latest Block 3 variant, Pakistan also intends to produce the radar system locally.

Pakistan's manufacturing roles

Airframe: Pakistan produces the majority of the physical structure, such as the front fuselage, wings, and vertical stabilizer.

Sub-assemblies and integration: At the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, sub-assemblies are built and integrated into the final aircraft during the final assembly process.

Avionics: Pakistan also manufactures various avionics and cockpit displays.

Production facilities: Serial production takes place in Pakistan at the Aircraft Manufacturing Factory (AMF) in Kamra.

Chinese and Russian contributions

China: Provides the remaining 42% of the airframe components and other subsystems like avionics and flight controls.

Russia: Supplies the Klimov RD-93MA engine, which is used in the latest JF-17 Block 3 version.
gakakkad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5237
Joined: 24 May 2011 08:16

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by gakakkad »

the azeris later denied making such a purchase
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

Via the Dawn:
Pakistan nurtured and supported mujahideen groups during the 1980s and 1990s, and later the Taliban, aiming to create prototypes of madressah graduates and even non-religiously educated cadres through public education channels who would think like Pakistanis and share its anti-Indian outlook. The project was strategic: to limit Indian influence in Afghanistan and to secure a friendly government on Pakistan’s western flank.

The project failed because the religious dogma embraced by the Taliban, many Pakistani madressahs, and religious elites presents a different vision of the state. They view Pakistan as a polity with weak ideological credentials that ought to be replaced by a ‘proper’ Islamic system. For that transformation, they regard political and armed struggle as necessary.


They interpret alliances and support during wartime as instruments of divine providence rather than acts of friendship. Assistance from states like Pakistan is thus viewed as part of God’s plan, not a favour that demands reciprocity.
gakakkad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5237
Joined: 24 May 2011 08:16

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by gakakkad »

https://www.google.com/amp/s/tribune.co ... ns%3famp=1

Karachi

Because of asmani bijli 100s of homes and several factories have been burning for days now because of separate unrelated incidents that coincidentally happened all at the same time .
ritesh
BRFite
Posts: 596
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 17:48
Location: Mumbai

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by ritesh »

A_Gupta wrote: 01 Nov 2025 08:31 When should we begin to worry about Pakistan?

Perhaps when the women take over (which with Pakistan's Islami nazara will never happen).

I'm listening to 5 Pakistani economists, 3 men and 2 women.

The men - IMF this and IMF that. The women - we had a liquidity problem, IMF lent us money. How are we going to use the money effectively? Don't blame the IMF, it is our job not their job to figure this out.

The men - private sector this and private sector that. The women - as long as you have businessmen who don't want to expand to international markets because it will require hiring a CEO more capable than their son-in-law (or son), private sector is not going to work.

The men - we need lower corporate taxes, less regulations, blah, blah. The women - nobody in Pakistan disagrees with these, and the agreement is longstanding. You guys have an in with the government, have you discussed this with the Finance Minister? (The men, hmmm, ummm, and one man outright- but we don't know what to say).

IMO, the men are "circles must be round"; the women are "here's how to draw a circle" - simply more practical.
Can you pls post the link??
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14489
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by A_Gupta »

gakakkad wrote: 02 Nov 2025 04:51 the azeris later denied making such a purchase
Thanks! I was unable to find any Azeri official statement either confirming or denying. But such a large deal ($4.6 billion) almost always get some official comment or comment by an anonymous official.

So yes, likely the Pakis are lying as usual.
williams
BRFite
Posts: 1661
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 20:55

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by williams »

How can they offer such a cheap price for a terrorist soldier :rotfl: Given what Israel knows I doubt they will even consider TSP soldiers for half a cent. It sounds more like TSP Faujs wet dream to earn some bucksees sending mercenary cannon fodder around the world.
Rudradev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4480
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by Rudradev »

For about $100 they could get a realistically-proportioned mannequin (the kind you find in garment stores), clothe it with full combat gear and stand it up at a post. It will be as useful as any Pakistani soldier in a combat situation and as an added incentive, it won't shoot/stab you in the back yelling AOA.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7909
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by Anujan »

Israel should pay at least $800. UN Peacekeeping records mention that one Pakistani soldier can typically do what about 8 soldiers from other countries can do.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7004
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by Manish_P »

Don't forget the JST component.

Jizya Service Tax
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25464
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terroristan - March 31, 2022

Post by SSridhar »

Anujan wrote: 04 Nov 2025 08:57Israel should pay at least $800. UN Peacekeeping records mention that one Pakistani soldier can typically do what about 8 soldiers from other countries can do.
Oh, 1:10 is only against the Hanuds then?
Post Reply