Challenge of China_ Political, Economic & Military Responses

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25483
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Challenge of China_ Political, Economic & Military Responses

Post by SSridhar »

^ The fake combat capabilities refers to the corruption in PLARF which led to discovery of the older-model DF-5 ICBM silos being fake.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14692
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Challenge of China_ Political, Economic & Military Responses

Post by A_Gupta »

:eek:

Missing ICBM silos???
drnayar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2222
Joined: 29 Jan 2023 18:38

Re: Challenge of China_ Political, Economic & Military Responses

Post by drnayar »

SSridhar wrote: 03 Dec 2025 20:18 ^ The fake combat capabilities refers to the corruption in PLARF which led to discovery of the older-model DF-5 ICBM silos being fake.
in addition to water fuelled ballistic missiles :mrgreen:

the military is always a highway for corruption with lots of opportunities in corruption , procurements, contracts etc etc.. same everywhere
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3303
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Challenge of China_ Political, Economic & Military Responses

Post by bala »

Not just military, but the entire system is quite corrupt. Some years back the Guy in charge of China HSR stole billions and ran to Kanada for good. Most CCP & PLA blokes have a second family parked in places like the US, Kanada, Europe and funnel their loot to them. Most of the chinese are in some low end jobs/or self appointed jobs but they drive expensive cars, live in expensive neighborhoods, dress all designer stuff and they sport the latest and greatest in gadgets. If the US wants to sqeeze China, all it has to do is sqeeze the second family of CCP/PLA and things will automatically fall in line.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14692
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Challenge of China_ Political, Economic & Military Responses

Post by A_Gupta »

China unlikely to aid Maduro if US acts in Venezuela, but could gain from fallout: experts
Beijing condemns US pressure on Caracas but offers limited support, prioritising its economic interests and long-term gains
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article ... e=homepage
Beijing is unlikely to offer military help to Venezuela if the United States moves against President Nicolas Maduro, analysts say, but it could still benefit from a shift in Washington’s global posture that revives old notions of spheres of influence, including one that might one day favour its ambitions towards Taiwan.

....
....
Beijing’s caution follows a familiar pattern, as it rarely defends partners under military pressure, instead focusing on safeguarding economic interests and political access, experts heard by the Post said.

...
For China, which prizes stability in oil-producing nations, the prospect of another US intervention in its main Latin American partner is a source of both frustration and calculation.

“They will condemn US bullying, but they will not lift a finger to help Maduro,” Ellis said. “For China, it is about positioning for the aftermath, not defending the present.”
Post Reply