Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
ashthor
BRFite
Posts: 383
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 11:35

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by ashthor »

A_Gupta wrote: 18 Feb 2026 08:17 "Haesaseonbong, a prominent naval military analyst, revealed on the Tencent portal in early January that “according to domestic experts’ estimates, the J-35 can operate for only seven minutes at a distance of 900 km from the carrier.” - this per the Chosun newspaper.
So at 500km from carrier it can operate longer.
Cybaru
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3107
Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Cybaru »

7 minutes on station at 900 KMS is pretty awesome! I doubt it wants to hang around and patrol 900 kms from launch base! Thats pretty solid performance numbers. I am not catching what the negative press is? Its a flex designed as negative press i think.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7262
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

ashthor wrote: 18 Feb 2026 10:27
A_Gupta wrote: 18 Feb 2026 08:17 "Haesaseonbong, a prominent naval military analyst, revealed on the Tencent portal in early January that “according to domestic experts’ estimates, the J-35 can operate for only seven minutes at a distance of 900 km from the carrier.” - this per the Chosun newspaper.
So at 500km from carrier it can operate longer.
And with internally carried weapons and fuel.

Now if it's weapons are long ranged, then it could show itself as an effective platform for it's role - as a carrier based multirole fighter.

In any case the chinese are not going to sit still with the current engine. They will pursue improvements aggressively. Convert it into a drone and use the weight savings to carry more fuel. They are certainly not going to just scuttle the product.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15615
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by A_Gupta »

Cybaru wrote: 18 Feb 2026 11:38 7 minutes on station at 900 KMS is pretty awesome! I doubt it wants to hang around and patrol 900 kms from launch base! Thats pretty solid performance numbers. I am not catching what the negative press is? Its a flex designed as negative press i think.
True. Supposedly the same article says that the J-20 has one hour on station after 900 kilometers.

The search engines give me links to the original article in Chinese, but those links don't work for me here in India. IMO, a Chinese article critical of their own hardware already seems implausible, but who knows what internal politics is going on in China?

Aircraft range is important, IMO, because an aircraft carrier group needs to be far enough from shore-based anti-ship missiles to be able to mount an effective missile defense.

Here is the info if anyone feels it necessary to look:

Title: 歼35成航母累赘?性能不够强,中国海军再寻新舰载机
(Has the J-35 become a burden for aircraft carriers? Performance not strong enough, Chinese Navy seeks new carrier-based aircraft)
Publisher: 海事先锋 (Maritime Pioneer)
Date: January 2, 2026
Platforms: Tencent News, Toutiao

and:
Range & Endurance: At ~900 km from the carrier, the J-35 reportedly has only 7 minutes of combat time. By contrast, the J-20 could sustain nearly 1 hour at the same distance. At 600 km, the J-35 can loiter ~45 minutes, while the J-20 can remain ~86 minutes.
Last edited by A_Gupta on 18 Feb 2026 12:13, edited 1 time in total.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7262
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

A_Gupta wrote: 18 Feb 2026 11:50 ... Supposedly the same article says that the J-20 has one hour on station after 900 kilometers...
Isn't that like comparing the on station times of the MiG 29 with the Su 30, at a range favoring the sukhoi.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15615
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by A_Gupta »

Very indirectly, this is supposed to be in the article: "Range & Endurance: At ~900 km from the carrier, the J-35 reportedly has only 7 minutes of combat time. By contrast, the J-20 could sustain nearly 1 hour at the same distance. At 600 km, the J-35 can loiter ~45 minutes, while the J-20 can remain ~86 minutes."

The article is about EM catapult launching of the J-20, supposedly being developed because, per the article, per Chinese military planners, the J-35 is inadequate against the Americans.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7262
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Manish_P »

<OT> Fair points.

Intially, unless i am mistaken, the chinese (or the west) promoted the J-20 and the J-35 as a dynamic duo - supposed to operate in tandem.

If that was truly to be the case then their ranges should have been somewhat closer.

The point about being closer to the enemy shores is very valid. For that the J-35 may well be very inadequate. If the fight is in the pacific. But for now the chinese seem to be more focused on fighting the americans in the china seas. </OT>
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15615
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by A_Gupta »

SCMP article on Chinese scram-jet hypersonic missiles.
How China overtook the US in hypersonic arms and may leave air defences ‘powerless’
A big reason is the long-range CJ-1000, the world’s first and so far only operational land-based scramjet-powered hypersonic missile
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/militar ... e=homepage
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23008
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Rakesh »

Satellite images reveal China is surging manufacturing capacity for military aircraft, including J-20 and J-35 stealth fighters
https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing ... 76.article
17 March 2026
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23008
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Rakesh »

Please use Google Translate to read the article in English.

China's Air Force Operation Concept Seen in Satellite Image Analysis—Based on the source of the old-fashioned fighter jets that appeared on the coast of the strait as a clue
https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/publication/ ... ry425.html
17 March 2026

https://x.com/PaulHuangReport/status/20 ... 83778?s=20 ---> New report by Aita Moriki, of Japan's Institute for Defense Studies @Nids1952 under @ModJapan_jp, shows China has converted en masse outdated J-6 jets into unmanned suicide drones that could exhaust Taiwan's air defense missiles at the beginning of a war.

Image

Image
sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6807
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by sanjaykumar »

This is obvious repurposing but given the price of current drones and the electronic techniques to make appear as manned fighter size radar objects, it is wasteful of these resources. I have previously asked what India is doing with the Toofani and Gnat fleets.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23008
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by Rakesh »

14 J-20 Stealth Fighters: China Just Deployed Its Best Jets 100 Miles From India’s Most Vulnerable Border
https://www.19fortyfive.com/2026/03/chi ... e-buildup/
18 March 2026
China has quietly deployed at least 14 J-20 Mighty Dragon stealth fighters to a Tibetan airbase less than 100 miles from India’s Sikkim border. Armed with PL-15 long-range missiles capable of crossing the Line of Actual Control, the deployment is the largest and most significant PLAAF buildup near Indian territory ever recorded.
bala
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3595
Joined: 02 Sep 1999 11:31
Location: Office Lounge

Re: Chinese Armed Forces: News & Discussion

Post by bala »

Now that we have 14 J-20s on the border, the question being asked:
Did China Fake Its Military Breakthroughs? Scientists Are Being Purged

China is quietly purging its top weapons scientists—including the chief designer of the J-20 stealth fighter. From radar to missiles to nuclear research, key figures are disappearing. What triggered this sweeping crackdown? After real combat failures in Iran and Venezuela, serious questions are emerging about China’s military technology. Is this corruption—or something deeper?

One of the key designers of J-20 Yang Wei has been quietly removed.

Viewing Link
Post Reply