Indian Missile Technology Discussion
SRay wrote:http://www.domain-b.com/aero/mil_avi/mi ... vi_II.html
However, some data released in the statement today does not tally with knowledge about the missile as it rests in the public domain. The statement says that the missile tested today has a range of 350 km and that it reached a peak altitude of 43.5 km. As far as is known the Prithvi-II (SS-250) has a range of 250 km. The missile has been developed for the Indian Air Force and is a single-stage, dual-engine, liquid fuel, road-mobile, short-range, surface-to-surface missile. It is the Prithvi-III (SS-350) which is credited with a range of 350 km.
PIII with 350km range is supposed to be solid fueled. But the picture posted shows a plume consistent with liquid fuel. Also the label is PII. So may be it is an improved 350km liquid fueled PII. Question is which component caused the improved range.The Prithvi-III is a solid fuel, two-stage, road-mobile, short-range, surface-to-surface missile. According to conventional knowledge, Sagarika and Prithvi-III are two different acronyms for the same missile.
BTW that is very true. With its winglets and largely in air trajectory, Prithvi has that Anti-ABM distinction.sivab wrote:http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=39106
Army test fires Prithvi – II, achieves near perfect accuracy
Friday, May 23, 2008
The surface-to-surface Ballistic Missile Prithvi-II was successfully launched from ITR, Chandipur, Balasore off Orissa coast at 10:26 this morning. Prithvi – II has a range of 350 Kms with a flight duration of 483 seconds reaching a peak altitude of 43.5 kms. Prithvi-II is inducted into Army and today’s launch was carried out as part of Army training. Taken from routine production lot, the Missile was launched with an improved Aided Inertial Navigation and achieved single digit accuracy reaching close to zero Circular Error Probability (CEP). The missile has the features to deceive any Anti Ballistic Missiles.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 565
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
- Location: On a roller-coaster.
Yes, the missile flew to its 43 Km apogee in 150 seconds and then stayed literally afloat (courtesy its lift body design and clipped wings) gliding down to target in the upper rarefied reaches of atmosphere for much of balance time to hit target at ~440 seconds.
This time fully using the gliding power per:
Click to enlarge.
I believe this version of missile has slightly better mass fraction.
This time fully using the gliding power per:
Click to enlarge.
I believe this version of missile has slightly better mass fraction.
If the mass fraction is better then why is apogee smaller than old PII? Did it try to glide even during ascent?Arun_S wrote:Yes, the missile flew to its 43 Km apogee in 150 seconds and then stayed literally afloat (courtesy its lift body design and clipped wings) gliding down to target in the upper rarefied reaches of atmosphere for much of balance time to hit target at ~440 seconds.
This time fully using the gliding power per:
I believe this version of missile has slightly better mass fraction.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4668
- Joined: 26 Mar 2002 12:31
- Location: searching for the next al-qaida #3
Nuclear-capable Prithvi-II test-fired successfully
[quote] Nuclear-capable Prithvi-II test-fired successfully
Y. Mallikarjun
HYDERABAD: Nuclear-capable, 350-km range surface-to-surface ballistic missile, Prithvi-II, was successfully test-fired in a “strategic mode in a completely user configurationâ€
[quote] Nuclear-capable Prithvi-II test-fired successfully
Y. Mallikarjun
HYDERABAD: Nuclear-capable, 350-km range surface-to-surface ballistic missile, Prithvi-II, was successfully test-fired in a “strategic mode in a completely user configurationâ€
I suppose when DRDO says a single digit accuracy in CEP was achieved, it means CEP in units of meters, i.e. <10 meters.RaviBg wrote: A DRDO press note said the missile was launched with an improved ‘Aided Inertial Navigation’ and achieved single-digit accuracy reaching close to zero CEP (Circular Error Probable).
The strange thing is they say its a complete user trial from depot to firing yet talk about Aided INS and all that. And the range doesnt match the user trials for if its a P-II it should be 250 km and not 350 km. So two contradictory statements. I know they can say whatever they want but it doesnt do much good.
I would be more impressed if they start saying its no longer on deterrent role as the A series will take over.
I would be more impressed if they start saying its no longer on deterrent role as the A series will take over.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 565
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
- Location: On a roller-coaster.
^^^
If it is traveling too fast, it will be vaporised on impact. Alternatively, if the speed is too slow, it will not penetrate to a sufficient depth to cause damage. At just the right velocity, angle of impact and given the right shape of the penetrator (ogive), the concrete will liquify on impact and flow right over the warhead for optimal depth/detonation.
There was a report recently of some evil yindoo scientist saying RV/MIRV's are being tipped with a substance "... such as Chromium...". But Chromium wont do the job. Instead, if they are working with an alloy of 'Tungsten', we know what they are upto...
If it is traveling too fast, it will be vaporised on impact. Alternatively, if the speed is too slow, it will not penetrate to a sufficient depth to cause damage. At just the right velocity, angle of impact and given the right shape of the penetrator (ogive), the concrete will liquify on impact and flow right over the warhead for optimal depth/detonation.
There was a report recently of some evil yindoo scientist saying RV/MIRV's are being tipped with a substance "... such as Chromium...". But Chromium wont do the job. Instead, if they are working with an alloy of 'Tungsten', we know what they are upto...
Last edited by Rahul Shukla on 24 May 2008 06:38, edited 1 time in total.
It was fired at sub optimal angle that stressed the airframe most.satyarthi wrote:If the mass fraction is better then why is apogee smaller than old PII? Did it try to glide even during ascent?Arun_S wrote:Yes, the missile flew to its 43 Km apogee in 150 seconds and then stayed literally afloat (courtesy its lift body design and clipped wings) gliding down to target in the upper rarefied reaches of atmosphere for much of balance time to hit target at ~440 seconds.
This time fully using the gliding power per:
I believe this version of missile has slightly better mass fraction.
Yes use lifting body when the missile is less inclined to horizon. even during ascent.
Now I just saw payload was 500Kg, so I do not think that requires any better ISP than the Std P-250.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 741
- Joined: 27 Aug 2006 20:46
- Location: Our culture is different and we cannot live together - who said that?
As the gurus here have already noted, all of these refinements to further increase maneouverability (anti-ABM role) and also INS aided single digit CEP accuracy (precision targetting), should throw some light into the thinking of our strategists. In short improved ABM capability and precision targetting with less focus on mega bums.
>>>There was a report recently of some evil yindoo scientist saying RV/MIRV's are being tipped with a substance "... such as Chromium...". But Chromium wont do the job. Instead, if they are working with an alloy of 'Tungsten', we know what they are upto...
The chromium coating is to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the warhead. As per the report, chromium, which gets heated up due to aerodynamic friction reacts with atmospheric oxygen to produce chromium oxide, which is an exothermic reaction - the heat thus produced reduces the aerodynamic friction.
The chromium coating is to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the warhead. As per the report, chromium, which gets heated up due to aerodynamic friction reacts with atmospheric oxygen to produce chromium oxide, which is an exothermic reaction - the heat thus produced reduces the aerodynamic friction.
A solid fuelled prithvi as a ballistic missile does not exist.satyarthi wrote:
PIII with 350km range is supposed to be solid fueled. But the picture posted shows a plume consistent with liquid fuel. Also the label is PII. So may be it is an improved 350km liquid fueled PII. Question is which component caused the improved range.
The closest the Prithvi can come to being solid fuelled is the modified Prithvi with a small second (solid) stage that is the kill vehicle of the PAD.
A solid fuelled version of Prithvi as a BM does not exist. All that was obfiscation fed to the DDM to cover-up the early PAD tests..
h
The explanation does not make much sense
except the coating being highly polished makes a good radar reflector .At reentry temperature many metals will react with atmospheric oxygen and create heat all the reactions are exothermic
By the way at re entry altitude the aprtial pressure of oxygen is very very low so not much reaction any way except when it is close to target
but why specifically chromium there are other cheaper low vaporising metals like zinc and copper and lead .only advantage chromium may have is its ability to take on a good polish and capable of being electro-chamically deposited on a non metallic surface like carbon composite but so can silver ,gold and aluminume chromium coating is to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the warhead. As per the report, chromium, which gets heated up due to aerodynamic friction reacts with atmospheric oxygen to produce chromium oxide, which is an exothermic reaction - the heat thus produced reduces the aerodynamic friction.
The explanation does not make much sense
except the coating being highly polished makes a good radar reflector .At reentry temperature many metals will react with atmospheric oxygen and create heat all the reactions are exothermic
By the way at re entry altitude the aprtial pressure of oxygen is very very low so not much reaction any way except when it is close to target
A
as you can see chromium is highly resistant to oxidization even at elevated temperature as expected in reentry vehicles .So the chromium use is something else not to reduce aerodynamic drag as claimed
composite material suitable for providing insulation for the nozzle structure of the Space Shuttle and other similar surfaces is disclosed which comprises an outer skin layer of nickel chromium and an interleaved inner region comprising a top layer of nickel chromium foil which acts as a primary convective shield, at least two layers of alumina batting adjacent to layers of silicon carbide fabric, and an additional layer of nickel chromium foil to be used as a secondary convective shield. The composite is particularly advantageous for use as nozzle insulation because of its ability to withstand high reentry temperatures, its flexibility, oxidation resistance, low conductivity, and light weight.
as you can see chromium is highly resistant to oxidization even at elevated temperature as expected in reentry vehicles .So the chromium use is something else not to reduce aerodynamic drag as claimed
chromium alloy panels may be used fro heat shield purpose in future and not for drag reductionDespite the advantages of ceramics, the tiles still require heavy maintenance, which adds to the cost of each shuttle flight. Several tiles are shaken loose during each shuttle mission and must be replaced. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is already developing heat shield technology for the next generation of re-entry vehicles. One promising material is a nickel-chromium alloy known as Inconel 617, which was proposed to form the surface panels for the heat shield on the X-33 (an experimental space plane designed to test single-stage-to-orbit technologies; the project was canceled in 2001). Inconel panels for the X-33 were crafted to be highly resistant to corrosion, require only a single waterproofing (unlike shuttle tiles which must be waterproofed frequently), and be more easily removed than ceramic tiles because of a simpler mounting system.
A silly question. In US's NMD, an incoming ballistic missile can be detected by early warning radars, space based infra red satellites and ground based X Band tracking radars in order to lock on the incoming warhead and launch an intercepting missile. My question is, because the "chromium" coated warhead generates heat around it, is it prone to be detected by any of these three "eyes"?? Will that heat increase the chances of getting detected any possible detector??chromium coating is to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the warhead. As per the report, chromium, which gets heated up due to aerodynamic friction reacts with atmospheric oxygen to produce chromium oxide, which is an exothermic reaction - the heat thus produced reduces the aerodynamic friction.
some good US NMD's animation.
http://pbs.gen.in/wgbh/pages/frontline/ ... asics.html
check the animation section on right side of the page
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/
scroll all the way down check some animations
sorry if off track.
http://pbs.gen.in/wgbh/pages/frontline/ ... asics.html
check the animation section on right side of the page
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/
scroll all the way down check some animations
sorry if off track.
sure yes.. but most such infra reds have a range issue and time would not be enough for those abm launchers to even kick start the missile. hence bye bye.Will that heat increase the chances of getting detected any possible detector??
comparing brahmos and p2 from role perspective at similar range or less, i am thinking p2 is mostly for city destructions since it can carry much heavier warhead. having a good precision helps in narrowing any chance of the enemy's 2nd strike.
if p2 is launched, i am expecting mostly paki centric, perhaps be launched from IA's buried launchers and/or mobile along the borders or from them hilltops and mountain ranges. our second strike should rain off all plausible points of attack to finish.
What about uv emissions from the rocket exhaust plume .. any way to mask that.Early warning satellites use detectors for this spectrum
SaiK wrote:sure yes.. but most such infra reds have a range issue and time would not be enough for those abm launchers to even kick start the missile. hence bye bye.Will that heat increase the chances of getting detected any possible detector??
comparing brahmos and p2 from role perspective at similar range or less, i am thinking p2 is mostly for city destructions since it can carry much heavier warhead. having a good precision helps in narrowing any chance of the enemy's 2nd strike.
if p2 is launched, i am expecting mostly paki centric, perhaps be launched from IA's buried launchers and/or mobile along the borders or from them hilltops and mountain ranges. our second strike should rain off all plausible points of attack to finish.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 565
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
- Location: On a roller-coaster.
Btw...
I think we're mixing up MIRV's deployed via ballistic missiles with EPW's (earth penetrating warheads) which, to the best of my knowledge, are deployed via aircraft such as the B-2. IIRC, I have never heard of an earth penetrating MIRV. So, whatever yindoo scientists are upto with something "...such as Chromium..." on the A-III RV/MIRV, it probobly has nothing to do with turning them into EPW/EP-MIRV. Also IIRC, that report said it has something to do with increasing the 'speed'. I am assuming they meant increasing the MIRV capability to withstand higher reentry velocities and corresponding higher heat/drag.
But me no physicist and I only read physics books because they put me to sleep sooner than Tom Clancy. However, there do exist conventionally deployed nuclear EPW's and my last night's bedtime physics reading reveals that:
I think we're mixing up MIRV's deployed via ballistic missiles with EPW's (earth penetrating warheads) which, to the best of my knowledge, are deployed via aircraft such as the B-2. IIRC, I have never heard of an earth penetrating MIRV. So, whatever yindoo scientists are upto with something "...such as Chromium..." on the A-III RV/MIRV, it probobly has nothing to do with turning them into EPW/EP-MIRV. Also IIRC, that report said it has something to do with increasing the 'speed'. I am assuming they meant increasing the MIRV capability to withstand higher reentry velocities and corresponding higher heat/drag.
But me no physicist and I only read physics books because they put me to sleep sooner than Tom Clancy. However, there do exist conventionally deployed nuclear EPW's and my last night's bedtime physics reading reveals that:
A 1,000-kiloton (1-megaton) weapon surface burst has about the same effect on buried targets as a 63, 33, or 25 kiloton weapon detonated at a depth of 1, 5, and 10 meters, respectively.
While an EPW can destroy a buried target with less yield than a surface-burst weapon, increasing the yield increases the radius of damage.
...Precision-guided conventional bombs might defeat deeply buried structures by attacking power supplies, ventilation systems, and exits. The only way to destroy them ...is with a strong shockwave that travels through the ground.
Damage expectancy (DE) is the probability of achieving at least the specified level of target damage, and is the product of two probabilities--probability of arrival and probability of damage.
Probability of arrival (PA) is the probability associated with the weapon successfully arriving and detonating in the target area as planned. PA accounts for pre-launch survivability of the delivery platform, penetration of defenses, weapon system reliability, successful penetration, and other factors depending on the specific delivery platform.
Probability of damage (PD) is the probability of achieving at least the specified level of target damage, assuming arrival and detonation of the weapon in the target area, PD is calculated using a modified version of the mathematics in PDCALC-4 (the official targeting algorithm used by the Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff, JSTPS). The modifications allow for the explicit treatment of target depth, and incorporate the DUGIC-defined iso-stress contour geometry. In order to explicitly treat target depth, the distance damage prediction function (as shown in Figure 7) is defined in terms of the slant range instead of the commonly used ground range. The distance damage prediction function defines the target damage probability when the actual weapon impact location is known. PD is, then, the integral over all potential weapon impact locations of the distance damage prediction function.
Prithvi's fins are articulated and provide traditional attitude and roll control function, thus play central role in missiles aerodynamic cruise/glide phase. At M3-5 the large dia missile body is very effective lifting body the mid section wings help generate stable center of lift during various speed regime.agupta wrote:Hi Arun
Curious remark that ... about the P3 design being a "lifting body" ? Would you mind elaborating on that - or pointing to any reference that I could use to understand better.
My recollection ( dated, hence my enquiry on updating this understanding) was that the missile has a circular cross-section and the fins are fixed geometry as well as non-articulated.
regards
Commentary in the Washington Times
India's missile power lifts off
India's missile power lifts off
Don't know about UV emissions but the space based IR sats can detect the bright plume of an incoming ballistic long range missile in its boost phase, during the first few minutes of flight. these sats have a scanning array of sensors that views a particular location only every 10 seconds. these sats can watch a missile continuously, and will therefore be able to provide considerably better position, orientation, and speed information.kit wrote:What about uv emissions from the rocket exhaust plume .. any way to mask that.Early warning satellites use detectors for this spectrum
I heard that ground based X Band radars does not has the capability of tracking the missile continuously....but the improvised system will have this tracking feature too...
Dude....US has 4 such IR sats above equator and 1 each to monitor south and north poles...so do you think range is a problem?? I don't "think" so....correct me if I am wrong...SaiK wrote:sure yes.. but most such infra reds have a range issue and time would not be enough for those abm launchers to even kick start the missile. hence bye bye.Will that heat increase the chances of getting detected any possible detector??
Copy of Deccan Chronicle Article on May 10 ...
http://syedakbarindia.blogspot.com/2008 ... gni-5.html
http://syedakbarindia.blogspot.com/2008 ... gni-5.html
Agni-5: India plans 5000 km range Agni-5 missile
May 10, 2008
By Syed Akbar
Hyderabad, May 9: India has already attained the capability of developing missiles, which could hit targets beyond 5000 km range, according to Avinash Chander, programme director of Agni missile system.
Avinash Chander, who is also the director of Advanced Systems Laboratory that developed the Agni components, said his lab would now take up the design of the new missile system. "We have the capability of making 5000 km range missiles, but we have to make the designs first. The designing part will be over in two year's time," he said.
Interacting with a select group of reporters here on Friday after the successful test-fire of Agni-3 missile earlier this week, Avinash Chander said the next programme would be Agni-5. There's no need for Agni-4 as it's just an upgradation of the existing Agni-3. "We are looking forward to developing Agni-5 missiles with multiple warheads.
The present missile system carries only one warhead. The advanced stage of Agni-5 will be capable of carrying three warheads that could hit the given target or the set of different targets with precision," he pointed out.
The Agni-3 missile has filled the vital gaps in India's defence capability while Agni-5 will take it a step further. "We are on par with the European nations and China when it comes to possession of missile system capability. Only the USA is ahead of us," he claimed.
The development of Agni-5 will put India on an advantageous position in the region as it could hit any target within the geopolitical system. Only the USA, Russia, France and China have missiles beyond the 3,000 km range. India has
joined the select club with the successful test-firing of Agni-3, which has a range of about 3,500 km. "The Agni-5 technology will be totally indigenous," Avinash Chander said.
Referring to Agni-3, he said it has a state-of-the-art inertial guidance, highly accurate sensors with high immunity from jamming. The ASL is also working on new
warhead technologies that could be used for Agni-3 and Agni-5. The warheads will be capable of hitting the given targets piercing through the anti-ballistic missile defence system of the enemy. They are capable of fooling the radar system.
There will be decoy warheads which will be fired along with the genuine ones. The idea is to divert the attention of the enemy's defence system. The enemy will lose its anti-ballistic missiles firing at the decoy warheads while the real warheads will hit the targets, destroying the enemy's capability. The warheads will also pass through the atmosphere dodging the enemy's missiles.
Energising the normalisation process —Talat Masood
There is also scope for developing additional CBMs in nuclear and conventional fields. Cruise missiles should be included in the Missile Notification regime. Security dialogue should include formal discussion of nuclear doctrines and India’s plans for building anti-ballistic missile defence systems as these have a direct impact on Pakistan’s security.
so pakis are getting worried about PAD and AAD. Gr8 going. India should not stop development of ABM system and should include cruise missiles in its envelop.Gerard wrote:Energising the normalisation process —Talat MasoodThere is also scope for developing additional CBMs in nuclear and conventional fields. Cruise missiles should be included in the Missile Notification regime. Security dialogue should include formal discussion of nuclear doctrines and India’s plans for building anti-ballistic missile defence systems as these have a direct impact on Pakistan’s security.
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 06 Apr 2008 15:25
- Location: Chennai
Another interesting article that I found
Btw interesting year ahead with Nag Trials scheduled in June and two ABM tests, one in July and the other in september.
Agni propels India in big league
Btw interesting year ahead with Nag Trials scheduled in June and two ABM tests, one in July and the other in september.
Agni propels India in big league
Agni propels India in big league
The smooth and flawless test firing of the long range nuclear-capable Agni-III missile capable of hitting targets at a distance of 3,500-km early this month from the Integrated Test range (ITR)on Wheeler Island on the east coast has come as a shot in the arm for India's credible nuclear deterrence capability. According to sources in the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), which designed, developed and tested Agni-III, this firing has cleared the decks for its production and induction.
However, Agni-III would need to be subjected to one more flight before it is declared operational.{I thought that this one was the last AgniIII to be tested, can the gurus confirm this to this agyani} Significantly, the trade embargo imposed by the US in the wake of Pokhran II in 1998 had impeded the pace of development of these missiles. Washington exerted pressure on New Delhi to drop the project as it was a threat to the stability in South Asia region.
Clearly, Agni-III's successful test flight has propelled India into the select group of countries such as Russia , US, France and China which have missiles similar to Agni-III in their arsenal.
Described as a "fire and forget" missile the Agni-III is capable of computing its own trajectory and is immune to all the extraneous forces once it is launched. Perhaps the biggest advantage that India could derive from Agni-III is that this missile has given the country for the first time a clear cut capability to strike deep into the Chinese territory. Defence observers say that Agni-III could easily reach cities like Shanghai and Beijing .
As it stands China 's latest submarine launched ballistic missile JL-2 and its land- based variant DF-31 have been causes of concern for India 's defence establishment. Besides, many short range Indian missiles could easily hit urban centres of Pakistan with ease. Notwithstanding, that Pakistan 's long range Shaheen-II missile could easily hit many cities in the northern and western parts of India .
There is no gainsaying that Agni-III's capability has gone down well with India 's of no-first-use nuclear policy which holds that 'nuclear retaliation to a first strike will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage". The 50-tonne heavy, 1.7 metre tall 100% indigenous all-composite Agni-III is an all solid fuel driven two-stage weapon system. Being rail mobile, it can be launched from any part of India . More than 70 Indian industrial units have contributed to its development vis-Ã -vis technology, systems and subsystems, components and raw materials.
As it is, Agni-III has benefited from the technological elements developed for the short range Agni-I already inducted into the Indian army and Agni-II which after completion of user trials is ready for induction into the services .While Agni-I has a range of 700-kms, Agni-II has a range of 2000-km. The Agni-III is expected to be ready for test flight early next decade.
Spurred on by the unqualified success of Agni-III, the DRDO is now preparing the ground to launch a project aimed at developing longer range Agni-V missile capable of hitting targets at a distance of 5,000-km. "The development process has already begun and in the next two years the design should be ready" quipped a senior official of the DRDO.
The Agni-V would derive most of its sub-systems from Agni-II{???}. But they would need sufficient scaling. Also on the anvil is a plan to develop Agni-IV as an intermediate step between Agni-III and Agni-V{according to other articles there is not going to be an Agni IV but we are directly skipping to Agni V, Is this a case of chankian indian scientists or a well intentioned but inadequately informed journo? }. Besides, the Agni-V would need to be thoroughly evaluated for severe thermal environment and other factors while on flight.
Significantly, the long term goal of the DRDO is to achieve Multiple Independently Retargettable Vehicle (MIRV) capability .But achieving MIRV capability could pose a serious technological challenge in terms of the size and weight of the warheads. The DRDO has also a plan to develop a hypersonic missile, the technology developed for which could have civilian spin offs in the form of a low cost satellite launch vehicle and an ultra fast civilian aircraft.
Asserted another DRDO official, "We have the capability to go in for even longer range missiles but it is for the political leadership to take a decision." As things stand now, developing the ICBMs (Inter Continental Ballistic Missiles) capable of hitting targets beyond the range of 10,000-kms is well within the country's capability. {unnamed source so may be unreliable (I however choose to believe him)} India 's advances in launch vehicle technology as highlighted by the success in pulling off multiple launches and the ground covered in developing heavy lift-off vehicles could smoothen the country's plan to develop a range of ICBMs in the near future.
Yet another feather in the cap of DRDO is the progress, though modest, achieved in giving a shape to India 's nuclear capable submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM). As envisaged, the Indian SLBM whose initial range would be around 750-km, is expected to be ready by early next decade when India 's own nuclear submarine would hit the blue oceans.
Meanwhile, the DRDO is hopeful of testing its EXO Interceptor which forms a part of its BMD (Ballistic Missile Defence) system in July. This would be followed by another test involving both the EXO and ENDO interceptors in tandem in Sept-October. As it is, the Indian BMD system has gone through two successful test flights in Nov 2006 and Dec 2007. In sum, as India 's missile programme progresses from strength to strength, an old adage needs to be recalled: If you are strong in your defence, your adversary will think twice before any misadventure.
Radhakrishna Rao, -INFA