International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Post Reply
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by ramana »

Gerard wrote:Company Calls New Small Nuclear Reactor a 'Game Changer'
Babcock & Wilcox Co.'s 125-megawatt reactor would be significantly smaller than the average 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactor and is aimed at plugging a major "market gap," CEO Brandon Bethards said at a Washington press conference. The new reactor might come online as early as 2018.
Wahrewah! Its back to future only! B&W used to have small 250 MW PWRs when it started.

However if you look at operating costs and licensing cost 1000Mw plants are best ROI. The reason is cost of ctmt bldg , operating procedures etc are quite high for even 125MW. So they are incremental when one goes for 1000MW.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

Nuclear blasts’ toll lingers for one man
At the time, Robertson said, military brass believed a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets was likely. They were intent on developing a group of troops hardened by repeated exposure to radiation. They thought exposure to radiation was like sunning on the beach: First you burn, then you tan.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

North Korea in plutonium threat
The North Korean foreign ministry statement said: "Firstly, all plutonium to be extracted will be weaponised. One third of used fuel rods have so far been reprocessed.
"Secondly, we will start uranium enrichment," the statement added.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

U.S. Nuclear Policies and Forces by 2025 - N° 2 – Séminaire Stratégique du 5 December 08
George Perkovich, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, D.C.

http://www.ceri-sciences-po.org/ressour ... 122008.pdf
Sanjay M
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4892
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 14:57

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Sanjay M »

Babcock & Wilcox's new portable nuclear reactor:

http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22867/
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19332
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by NRao »

Sanjay M
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4892
Joined: 02 Nov 2005 14:57

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Sanjay M »

India should offer to host it, as this would undoubtedly save costs, while benefitting our local infrastructure and scientific community
Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11155
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Amber G. »

Bit of "local" news, after decades, first 'new generation' power plant in Ohio, US.
Sources: Duke Energy To Build Nuclear Plant In Piketon
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

Trident nuclear deterrent should be scrapped, says Nick Clegg
He said that Britain still needs a deterrent but that a "like for like" replacement for the submarine-based missile system was not necessary in the post-cold war world.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International nuclear watch & discussion

Post by Gerard »

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

Obama-backed nuclear fuel bank plan stalls at IAEA
Diplomats in the boardroom said India led the objections. "A large number of delegations do not want to proceed," the Indian chief delegate said.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

Ending a dream, or nightmare
Should the province select either of two rivals—a French consortium headed by Areva or an American consortium headed by Westinghouse, both of which use different reactor technology—the new CANDU design will probably be aborted. AECL’s business would be limited to servicing the 48 nuclear-power plants around the world that use its technology. And Canada’s nuclear dream would have died.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19332
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by NRao »

Russia ready for deep nuclear arms cuts
Russia is ready to dramatically cut its nuclear stockpiles in a new arms pact with the United States if Washington meets Russia’s concerns over missile defence, President Dmitry Medvedev said on Saturday.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

New US nuclear weapons plant advances
A replacement for the nuclear weapons plant at the Bannister Federal Complex moved closer to a fall groundbreaking after winning another round of support from a development agency.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

Scientists plea to MPs: Don't let MAPLE reactors be another Avro Arrow
Some reactors around the world operate with a positive PCR, some are operated with a negative PCR. The AECL physicists did their math and predicted that the MAPLEs would operate with a negative PCR. Then they turned them on and, whoops, there was a slightly positive PCR.

That much we know. As to the causes and consequences of this mismatch between theory and reality, there is much debate. But at the end of the day, the regulator has the hammer and the regulator, believing this mismatch represented an unsafe condition, refused to let the MAPLEs get licensed.
Jean Koclas, Professor, Nuclear Engineering Institute, Engineering Physics Department, École polytechnique Montréal: If you don't know how the nuclear industry works: usually, when you modify something in a nuclear reactor, when you bring forth a new type of reactor, most of the time you have unforeseen difficulties. You can think of the Darlington reactor, which was just an increment in size of a standard design, and engineering problems arose which took more than a year to solve. So I think the MAPLE reactors, MAPLE-1 and MAPLE-2, do not escape these sort of engineer constants.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19332
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by NRao »

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International Nuclear Watch & Discussion

Post by Gerard »

http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Docume ... irc759.pdf
The Secretariat has received a communication dated 12 June 2009 from the Permanent Missions of Germany and the Russian Federation, with the text of the working paper "Principles of fuel supply guarantees and the multilateralization of fuel cycle authorities" submitted by Germany and the Russian Federation to the Preparatory Committee for the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons..
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Docume ... irc758.pdf
The Secretariat has received a communication dated 10 June 2009 from the Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, with a note from the United Kingdom and the final remarks of the Chairman of the International Nuclear Fuel Supply Conference: Securing Safe Access to Peaceful Power, held in London on 17 and 18 March 2009
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Docume ... irc755.pdf
The Secretariat has received a communication dated 26 May 2009 from the Permanent Mission of Austria, transmitting a working paper entitled Multilateralisation of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Increasing Transparency and Sustainable Security
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Docume ... irc753.pdf
The Secretariat has received a communication dated 18 May 2009 from the Permanent Mission of Kazakhstan, transmitting a position paper of Kazakhstan regarding the establishment of IAEA nuclear fuel banks
Post Reply