PRC Economy and Industry: News and Discussions

The Technology & Economic Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to Technological and Economic developments in India. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by vsudhir »

x-post

Zero Hedge expresses cautious skepticism on the china growth story. Worthwhile read if only for the perspective a some fresh insights brought into why. Interestingly, he does draw parallels between the 90s Japan and China today which kinda confirms, more or less, that the balance-sheet recession and the odds of a debt-deflation spiral have heightened in the middle kingdom.

China - Economic Catastrophe Unfolding

First, here's somethng BRFites might've long suspected having faced off with repeated barrages from chini drones on this board
That is one thing I noticed immediately about China: there is a constant barrage everywhere you turn—-TV, advertisements, magazines, newspapers, billboards, etc.—-that essentially suggests that everything is wonderful and getting more wonderful all the time, and everybody is just happy, happy, happy, and China is getting better and better and stronger and stronger. I was really struck by this. It was like living in a never-ending infomercial. Maybe some go to China and are not very aware of this, but to me it was like a constant din.

Actually, at least some of this data is readily available on the mainland. But it requires digging. The official news agencies like Xinhua and the People’s Daily just keep repeating the same mindless mantra in endlessly varying ways every day: “Everything is good, there are only a few small little problems, but the Motherland is unstoppable and will just get mightier and mightier and mightier.” If the Falun Gong would just chant that mantra, they would get to keep their organs and they would have no more problems in China.
Abt the balance sheet recession looming in the people's republic.
The news here is actually worse than I realized. One very alarming thing is that the Chinese banks have avoided writing down bad debt. I should have assumed this would happen, since it is hard to see how it could be avoided, given the nature of the Chinese culture. This is NOT a good idea. It is like pretending that defaults and bad debt simply don’t exist, and this is very bad for the financial sector in the long run.
Abt why it is potentially deadly onlee
And that is exactly what the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets are looking at, since you have the exact same lethal combination in 1989 Japan as you do now in China: dual bubbles in real estate and stocks (one has imploded), and a decided reluctance to face facts and write down bad debt and defaults. In contrast, in the US in March 2000, we had a bubble in the stock market but not the real estate sector. And even though 7 trillion dollars in stock equity disappeared after March 2000, there was an increase in value of the real estate markets of 8 trillion dollars that more than offset those losses. That is a major factor that allowed the economy to expand in subsequent years, but that is not possible in China, just as it was not possible in 1989 Japan.
And what that might imply (with apologies to doubters and naysayers and green-shoot optimists bellowing abt why the sjy won't fall tomorrow:
This is a singularly ominous combination that makes China’s economic future outlook over the next 25 years very grim. And that, in turn, will lead to acceleration of civil unrest. In fact, that has already happened: incidents of violent civil unrest have accelerated markedly all across China over the past year or two. But I think this could well get far more noticeable and disruptive. Some economists have said that in order to avoid disruptive amounts of civil unrest (as opposed to the more manageable baseline levels of unrest that are a constant), China’s economy must grow by 8.5% per year or more, just to keep enough people quiet. I suspect that is probably more or less approximately true in principle, although I don’t know where they came up with that number. But regardless of what that magic number might be, when that economy gets really bad—–watch out. That’s the seeds of civil war, if you ask me. If you have a very large group of desperate people coupled with an extreme polarization of wealth, you have a classic “haves” vs. “have nots” Marxian confrontation that is the underpinning of most if not all major revolutions. Then, the only missing ingredient is a charismatic leader (like Mao, for example…..).
A tad alarmist, if you ask me. But, but doesn't pay to play ostrich aajkal . Might as well be aware of some extreme possibilities. The cardiac arrest lasting a a few hours that rocked the US financial system in Sept 2008 seemed mighty extreme in July 2008.

In any case, PRC unrest means trouble for India. military misadventurism and a kargil redux in NEFA can't be ruled out onlee.

More chini propagandus and their modus operandees:
Look at this one - http://www.moneymorning.com/2008/01/09/ ... -projects/, dated January 9, 2008…..

They talk about a book that was “just published” by some hedge fund whiz by the name of Rogers who lives in China now. The book is about as bullish as you can get on China. He says that “even if China’s stock market were to plummet, that country’s economy would remain healthy, and would continue to advance unchecked.” He calls China “the world’s greatest market.”

I don’t know if this is a pump-and-dump scheme, but it sure sounds like one to me. Somebody ought to inform Mr. Rogers that even as his book was being published, the Shanghai and Shenzhen bubbles had already burst, had plummeted 15% in a few months, and were destined to drop far more over the remainder of 2008. And despite the fact that these bubbles lost over 70% in a year, they have NOT seen the bottom yet. And, they won’t see those lofty 6000+ levels again in real dollar (or real RMB) terms for another 30 years at least.

If you ask me, there’s no better short in the world than China. The problem is that the vehicles for shorting anything in China are very limited and not ideal. Well-heeled investors in China can short those markets, but this is a relatively recent development (maybe 2 years ago they changed the regulations). The average retail investor in China still can not short anything in those markets, because there are very stiff capital maintenance requirements with brokers there. And, the average retail investor elsewhere has only a couple of choices.
Now, now...might as well *hdge* positions and hburry to submit that PRC should not and cannot be underestimated onlee, that the super-efficient RPC system will beat the cryap outta everyone else in asia and beyond etc.

Bottomline?
Well, I think you’ve got the equivalent in China, because both real estate and equity markets have formed frightening bubbles. And, just to add to things, an increasing proportion of both commercial and residential real estate lies vacant, building continues nonetheless, the banking sector’s fortunes are strongly tied to the construction and real estate markets, there is virtually no secondary market for real estate to speak of, and Chinese banks are notoriously reluctant to write down bad debt. Sounds to me a lot like Japan in the late 80s—only worse. The Nikkei even today is trading about 75% below where it was trading at the peak in late 1989. And that doesn’t even consider the change in buying power of the yen over that time. This is a devastating loss that takes at least a full generation to repair.

I think China will recapitulate what happened in Japan, and for all the same reasons. You’ve got precisely the same prerequisites for disaster in China, so why would it be any different this time? Plus, there are some additional reasons why things will be particularly bad there over then next 25 or 30 years. One thing we have learned about bubbles—-once they are fully formed, there is no way to tame them, just like a fully-formed wave at the Wedge when it’s really firing. They just have to expend their explosive energy, and anybody with the common sense God gave gravel will just get out of the way. There is no way to suppress or regulate these things once they begin to gather momentum. No government or regulatory body has ever succeeded in doing so, to the best of my knowledge, and few if any have any motivation to even try. Why would anybody mess with a cash cow that is driving an economy at breakneck speed, after all?

We have not seen the full force of the implosion yet. That is still probably months away. In the meantime, the bull trap sucker’s rally that the Chinese stock market have been in for several months now rather predictably out-suckers even the US sucker’s rally. The Shanghai market is up almost 70% from the lows in November. That one has gone about as far as it can go now, and is really gonna crash and burn.
Scary onlee. Sri Antony is very right to rush in to rebuild, repair and renovate the ramparts. No saying what may come our way when the next big crash comes around.
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by vsudhir »

Yogi_G
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2414
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 04:10
Location: Punya Bhoomi -- Jambu Dweepam

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Yogi_G »

The 1.4 Trillion $ question

Dated article, but still relevant...

EDIT: Fixed URL, thanks Ashwin...
Last edited by Yogi_G on 07 Jul 2009 21:45, edited 1 time in total.
Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Katare »

kmkraoind wrote:http://blogs.wsj.com/chinajournal/2009/ ... rly-intact

Image

Probably Chinese economy is also built on weak base.
Something appears wrong with this picture, a tall building can't fall like this. It almost appears like a godzilla like creature has carefully plucked it out and than laid it on the ground.

Buildings collapse, trees would fall like that.
paramu
BRFite
Posts: 669
Joined: 20 May 2008 11:38

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by paramu »

^^^
Good find. Wall Street Journal bloggers are now into photoshop business... :rotfl:
Ashwin B
BRFite
Posts: 137
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Ashwin B »

Yogi, can you please check the URL you've posted?
It points to: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Ship ... Class.html
enqyoob
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2658
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 20:25

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by enqyoob »

Wonder what will happen to rest of the buildings, built by the same builder. Would not want to move in there
This is just the Sleeper Skyscraper. During the daytime it stands erect because everyone inside is awake and up, and at night the building lies down, so that people can do to sleep. For efficiency, there is only enough space for each person to stand or lie down in a tube. People's Paradise.
Yogi_G
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2414
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 04:10
Location: Punya Bhoomi -- Jambu Dweepam

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Yogi_G »

Ashwin B wrote:Yogi, can you please check the URL you've posted?
It points to: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Ship ... Class.html
Thanks for pointing out Ashwin, fixed the URL...
Rishirishi
BRFite
Posts: 1409
Joined: 12 Mar 2005 02:30

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Rishirishi »

It is actually a great idea. Boeing is working on a design that has new designs of stols where you kind of "half stand". You can push approximately 35% more people into the AC. If you remove the allowance for hand bag, it is possible to fit even more people into the plane.

It is a great alternative in India, for travel less then 1,5 hours (1200 km). I am sure people will willingly fly this for up to 3 hours in the India-middle east and domestic routs.
Bade
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7212
Joined: 23 May 2002 11:31
Location: badenberg in US administered part of America

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Bade »

Most people who can afford an air ticket even if deeply discounted, cannot stand for more than ten minutes at a stretch. This idea is a flop, dunno why you are giving it undue attention.

What happens when there are delays on the tarmac ? The wait could be as long as 4 hours or more on rare occasions. Passengers are easily comforted and relaxed when seated rather than when standing. It is human nature. Any emergency declared on board or even for any normal day, you will get more passengers running for the nearest exit point to be the first to get out after landing. :eek:
Purush
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2445
Joined: 26 Oct 2001 11:31
Location: Loc Muinne

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Purush »

Standing air travel? Must be one of the stupidest ideas ever thought of by the yem bee aays to improve profits. :roll:
What's next? Sitting on top of the plane and the wings, Bharatiya Rail eshtyle? :rotfl:
Chinmayanand
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2585
Joined: 05 Oct 2008 16:01
Location: Mansarovar
Contact:

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Chinmayanand »

Fake drugs reach Kenya now
The supply of fake drugs from China to the African sub-continent is not limited to Nigeria, it now appears. The Kenyan government has
seized two container loads of medicines shipped from Shanghai bearing a 'government of Kenya' label falsely indicating that it was manufactured in Kenya, a communication from the Indian High Commission in Nairobi to the Indian government has indicated.
Surya
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5034
Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Surya »

Not sure where to post this

But could not have come at a better time For Rudd and Co :)

Sometime in the afternoon of Sunday, July 5, agents from the Shanghai State Security bureau — the agency that pursues cases of espionage within China — arrested and detained Stern Hu, an Australian citizen and senior Shanghai-based executive for Anglo Australian mining giant Rio Tinto. Three of Hu's deputies, who are Chinese, were also detained on the same day. On Wednesday, Rio confirmed that Hu and his colleagues had been detained on suspicion of selling "state secrets."

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/ ... 92,00.html
paramu
BRFite
Posts: 669
Joined: 20 May 2008 11:38

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by paramu »

Above news may be connected to following issue
Rio Tinto Scuttles Its Deal With Chinalco
Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto walked away from a proposed $19.5 billion deal with Aluminum Corp. of China, dealing a blow to China's ambitions to buy access to raw materials crucial for its economic growth.

The proposed deal would have given state-owned Aluminium Corp., known as Chinalco, an 18% stake in Rio Tinto, the world's third-largest miner and owner of rich iron-ore and copper mines in Australia and elsewhere. It also would have given the Chinese company direct stakes in some mining assets.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59840
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by ramana »

Werent three Rio Tinto employees accused of spying in PRC? The Aussie minster was told not to escalate the issues.

I think its related to that.
Surya
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5034
Joined: 05 Mar 2001 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Surya »

ramana

1 Aussie citizen (of chinese origin) plus 3 chinese citizens have been arrested

looks payback or strong arm tactics for loss of face on Rio tinot deal

or trying to get lower rates of iron ore etc.

They are reported paying spot prices for this and have not been happy

either way the typical crude Chicom behaviour
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by vsudhir »

Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Katare »

Wow! I never thought it'll happen so soon!
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Singha »

police stormtrooper makes a urumqi arrest

http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ ... 00467.html
shynee
BRFite
Posts: 550
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 11:31
Location: US

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by shynee »

China’s Exports Slide for Eighth Month as Import Decline Slows
July 10 (Bloomberg) -- China’s exports fell for an eighth month as the global recession cut demand, highlighting the economy’s dependence on stimulus spending to revive growth.

Overseas sales slid 21.4 percent in June from a year earlier, the customs bureau said today on its Web site, after a record 26.4 percent drop in May.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32591
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by chetak »

Purush wrote:Standing air travel? Must be one of the stupidest ideas ever thought of by the yem bee aays to improve profits. :roll:
What's next? Sitting on top of the plane and the wings, Bharatiya Rail eshtyle? :rotfl:

The main reason that regulatory authorities object to extra passengers being carried on board is that the aircraft passenger seat is a crash survival system.

Once the passenger is correctly strapped into the seat , the seat is by design capable of withstanding a certain amount of G forces and protecting the passenger by preventing the person from being thrown about. This reduces the chances of injury.

By permitting (?) standing passengers, the word Airbus acquires a new meaning. :)
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by vsudhir »

China’s Detention of Mining Executives Rattles Its Global Industrial Partnerships

There are consequences. PRC may yet learn that the hard way.

Heck, even the sole hyper-power, no less drunk on the Full spectrum dominance kool-aid knew better than to clothe its iron claws inside velvet gloves. Not because it couldn't take on the world alone if it had to, but because it figured it didn't really have to. Indiscretion of the chini variety only serves to unite adversaries - past, present and potential as well as alienate neutrals and allies.

Of course, can never write off PRC. Like the great Yogi Berra once said "It ain't over till its over."
ashi
BRFite
Posts: 456
Joined: 19 Feb 2009 13:30

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by ashi »

A fine balancing act
http://www.economist.com/world/asia/dis ... s_box_main
CHINESE growth was already the envy of the world. Now recession-stricken countries will be turning an even brighter green. On Thursday July 16th new figures showed China’s GDP growth quickened to 7.9% in the year to the second quarter. That is healthy enough by anyone’s standards but the headline number conceals a more astonishing rebound. Goldman Sachs estimates that GDP grew at an annualised rate of 16.5% in the second quarter compared with the previous three months. Over the same period, America’s economy probably contracted again. China’s economic stimulus has clearly been hugely effective. So effective, indeed, that some economists are now worrying it may be working rather too well.
One reason why the economy has rebounded so quickly is that much of the slowdown was self-inflicted, rather than the result of America’s economic collapse. In 2007 concerns about overheating prompted the government to curb the flow of credit for construction and home buying. This caused China’s economy to slow sharply even before the global financial crisis.
g.sarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4383
Joined: 09 Jul 2005 12:22
Location: MERCED, California

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by g.sarkar »

ashi wrote:A fine balancing act
http://www.economist.com/world/asia/dis ... s_box_main
CHINESE growth was already the envy of the world. Now recession-stricken countries will be turning an even brighter green.
Is this true? or is it true that China's exports and imports are tumbling as the Bloomberg articles stated? Is China over the hump while the rest of the world is floundering? or is China getting desperate and arresting Aussies while the natives are getting restless? Both can not be true at the same time. I have a feeling Himalayan effort is being made to white wash the facts. The Lizard is very good at that.
Gautam
bart
BRFite
Posts: 712
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 21:33

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by bart »

g.sarkar wrote: I have a feeling Himalayan effort is being made to white wash the facts. The Lizard is very good at that.
Gautam

So is the Economist.
rsingh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4451
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 01:05
Location: Pindi
Contact:

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by rsingh »

Cet rien........ expolts fell for June bacause all expolters were busy in listning news from East-Turkistan onree.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14223
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by svinayak »

http://tgs.nationalinterest.in/2009/07/ ... -on-china/

Recent media commentary on China
Come to think of it, the entire edition of 16th July of WSJ could be labelled a China special. Check out the following:

‘China growth brings risks’ (here); Sinopec’s ex-chief convicted of graft (here), U.S. urges China to improve business climate (here), Quarterly foreign exchange reserves surge (here), Follow China on copper (here) and Chinese upstart Geely expands to take on Detroit (here). Some of them may require subscription. If so, I apologise for the inconvenience caused.

Some charts in these news articles are telling. Notwithstanding the acknowledgement at the intellectual level, China’s ability to shed the old growth model that, among other things, leads to a surge in foreign exchange reserves, is questionable at best and non-existent at worst.

Richard McGregor, it appears, is back to writing about and from China for the FT. He writes his usual cryptic piece on the boom in State lending. Consider this sentence:

The economic rebound has been driven by a simple but effective mechanism still controlled by the ruling Communist party: a surge in lending by state banks. In the first half of this year Chinese banks, all but a handful of which are owned by the government, lent Rmb7,370bn ($1,079bn, €765bn, £656bn), nearly double the total loans extended in the whole of 2008. [More here]

For a ‘political economy’ take on the China lending surge, this earlier piece by him is a MUST READ:

The way the Chinese political system is constructed, however, the state banks, which account for about two-thirds of lending, had no choice but to comply. The heads of large state banks are appointed directly by the Communist party’s personnel department and rank as vice-governors in the broader government system.

Four of the five chiefs of the big banks sit on the central committee, the Soviet-inspired body with about 370 members which acts like an enlarged board of directors for the party. In short, if the Politburo issues an order, it doesn’t really matter what the Chinese banks’ foreign shareholders think. The bank chiefs are required by party discipline - the highest law of the land - to obey.

Not only that, and herein lies part of the beauty of the Chinese system, the heads of the banks compete to obey their political masters, in this case, by lending out as much money as they can as quickly as possible.

Like provincial governors, the bankers are as much politicians as businessmen. As such, fulfilling the Politburo’s orders is a task on which their future promotions will be judged. [More here]

It is hard to reproduce the chart (No. 5 - ‘Exploding New Loan Extension’ on page 3) that Standard Chartered Bank’s Stephen Green had made on China’s bank loans. But, if you can, take a look at it. The report is labelled ‘China - June data’ dated June 16, 2009. Surprisingly, barring Fitch - the credit rating agency, not many sell-side economists and analysts are voicing concerns on this.

It is good to see ‘Economist’ finally acknowledging the need for Yuan revaluation/appreciation:

But China’s real problem is that it is running a persistent current-account surplus; in order to keep the yuan closely tied to the dollar it has to keep buying more dollar assets. If China really wants to reduce its exposure to the greenback it must allow the yuan to rise. It would incur a loss on its existing reserves but stem future losses. But so long as China maintains its current exchange-rate policy, it is, ironically, helping keep the dollar dominant. [More here]

Separately, not too many in the research community are voicing concerns at China’s handling of the Rio Tinto executives in China or its handling of the protests in Xinjiang province.

As for the private sector research community, history is set to be repeated here as it did with the technology boom: don’t see, don’t hear and don’t comment on negatives until it is reality. Then, one could always point to a stray sentence here and there to claim that we told you so.
Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Katare »

It was widely expected in western world that world economy would rebound led by Asia in general and China in particular. If reality unfolds as per the Wall Street script, Indian economic rebound should be the next scene of the play called “world economic recovery-2010”.
shyam
BRFite
Posts: 1453
Joined: 29 Jul 2003 11:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by shyam »

Do you still trust such reports that come from wall street experts?

If recovery happens soon, we should try to identify the new rigging that must be happening. Asian countries better watch out.
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by vsudhir »

Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Katare »

shyam wrote:Do you still trust such reports that come from wall street experts?

If recovery happens soon, we should try to identify the new rigging that must be happening. Asian countries better watch out.
Anyone trying to predict future is employed in a very riskey business :lol:
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by RamaY »

Any idea where I could have gone wrong?

Data Source: http://www.ier.hit-u.ac.jp/COE/Japanese ... ablea1.htm

Image
kmkraoind
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3908
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 00:24

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by kmkraoind »

Report: 30,000 China steelworkers in deadly clash
Angry Tonghua employees attacked Jianlong general manager Chen Guojun during the protest and beat him to death, the center said. It said friends of Chen confirmed he was dead.

Workers were angry that Chen was paid some 3 million yuan ($438,000) last year while some retirees received as little as 200 yuan ($29) a month, the center said.
Seems to be Chinese economic inequalities are worse than capitalist and democratic nations. If China does not invent a new way to appease its masses with secured jobs and other basic amenities, we are not faraway seeing another true revolution.
KarthikSan
BRFite
Posts: 667
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 21:16
Location: Middle of Nowhere

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by KarthikSan »

Happy Tonghua employees praised Jianlong general manager Chen Guojun during the celebration and sent him off to an intellectual discussion with Chairman Mao, the center said. It said friends of Chen confirmed he indeed met the Super than Supreme Leader.

Workers were happy that Chen was paid only 3 million yuan ($438,000) last year while some retirees received as much as 200 yuan ($29) a month, the center said.
There...I fixed it for ya :wink:
Chinmayanand
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2585
Joined: 05 Oct 2008 16:01
Location: Mansarovar
Contact:

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Chinmayanand »

What Can China Get For Its $2 Trillion?
Eswar Prasad and Isaac Sorkin note in a new piece for the Brookings Institution, $2 trillion is equivalent to:

* all the land and property in New York City, Los Angeles and Boston
* 73% of the market capitalization of the Dow Jones Industrial Average at the end of June
* 25% percent of the market capitalization of the S&P 500 at the end of June
But the sheer size of the reserves is increasingly a handicap for China, which would find it impossible in practice to actually buy any of the above assets. It is restricted to markets large enough to absorb the enormous amount of funds it has to work with. “China has begun to diversify into gold and other commodities, and has also agreed to buy some SDR-denominated IMF bonds. But the amounts involved pale in comparison to either the stock or even the monthly pace of reserve accumulation,” Prasad and Sorkin write.
They think there’s no real likelihood that China is going to be able to do anything different with the reserves than what it is already doing: parking a very large percentage of them in U.S. government debt. And the latest figures from the U.S. Treasury show that China continues to buy US Treasury bills and bonds on a massive scale.
ArmenT
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4239
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 05:57
Location: Loud, Proud, Ugly American

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by ArmenT »

Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9373
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: PRC Economy News and Discussions

Post by Hari Seldon »

China: Buildings to Nowhere Looking Increasingly Shaky
While the real estate market appears to be is in the midst of a boom, defaults among developers are also beginning to rise. Small and medium developers are resorting to faking sales to get bank loans to relieve their funding pressure.

Statistics show that from May 1 to July 24, which seemed to be good days for Shanghai's real estate market, many housing projects were seeing over 30% cancellations, and the cancellation rate of some projects was as high as 125%. Behind the "boom" of the housing market are irregular behaviors such as getting bank loans by cheating and making fake housing purchasing contracts.

Among the top ten housing projects with the highest cancellation rates, 60% are developments by small and medium real estate companies. "In fact, it is still difficult for small and medium developer to get credit support from banks," said a sales manager of a medium real estate company.

Now it is common for developers to sell an apartment to an employee as a "reward" and then secure a loan from a bank with the housing purchasing contract signed by the employee. "There's a window between the sale and the issuance of housing ownership certificate, during which employees can decide whether to keep or cancel the contract," the sales manager added.

In 2008, when credit was tight, many small and medium developers sought to gather money in this way. "Every developer is doing this. The only differences are scale and method," said the sales manager.

The high housing contract cancellation rate has also occurred in Nanjing.
...

According to figures from Centaline China Property Research, between January and June new residential housing sales in six key cities totaled 55 million square meters, up 88% over the second half of 2008. However...in June, housing sales in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Tianjin all saw a decline, but Beijng and Shanghai were still seeing month-on-month growth. Housing sales in Shanghai in June reached 2.84 million square meters, up 6%, month on month, the highest among all the six cities.

Yin Bocheng, director of the Real Estate Research Center of Fudan University, thinks the boom is a mirage. "This is only fake prosperity." This ploy has been used before to simulate growth in the real estate market. Developers getting bank loans with fake deals will add to credit risk in a long run
Post Reply