LCA News and Discussions
Re: LCA News and Discussions
What is happening in the Sea level trials happening in GOA? are they also doing some weapons testing? any news on that side?
Re: LCA News and Discussions
A disastrous decision long term in my view.I can only suggest that the long gestation period of the LCA with a GE engine tipped the scales in its favour.That is if there was no political interferenceinthe decision.However,MMS's statements about AKA delaying defence decisionsin his press conference indicates that he is trying most energetically to tie up a host of defence deals for Obama whatever the cost to Indian indigenisation,sanctions,etc.We are fast becomning a US satellite.If there is no worthwhile TOT,then we will have been shafted.This engine deal is to facilitate the awarding of the MMRCA to the F-18.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Initial F404-j were 78kn
Then Swedish F404 were 80kn
Thereafter Indian F404 IN20 were 83-84kn
So I am assuming that as Swedish F414 are 96-98kn, then Indian F414 would be around 99-105kn or so. This may also be a major reason for its victory as 414s are clearly more powerful and available immediately
Then Swedish F404 were 80kn
Thereafter Indian F404 IN20 were 83-84kn
So I am assuming that as Swedish F414 are 96-98kn, then Indian F414 would be around 99-105kn or so. This may also be a major reason for its victory as 414s are clearly more powerful and available immediately
Re: LCA News and Discussions
This may also be a major reason for its victory as 414s are clearly more powerful and available immediately
plus single engine clearance plus commitment for next couple of decades
meanwhile the euros are shrinking fast
alas all this is not commonsense
Re: LCA News and Discussions
MMS will not succeed in his misadventures. Please note that GE has to demonstrate how it is going to transfer technology and also get clearances from US Govt. I think, this is just a ploy to go with EADS after denial of crucial technology. Americans do not have a "nut" of their own. So, they will be easily out-manouvered by AKA and Pranab Mukerjee. Take the case of nuclear deal, who will benefit more from nuclear contracts France + Russians or US ?Philip wrote:A disastrous decision long term in my view.I can only suggest that the long gestation period of the LCA with a GE engine tipped the scales in its favour.That is if there was no political interferenceinthe decision.However,MMS's statements about AKA delaying defence decisionsin his press conference indicates that he is trying most energetically to tie up a host of defence deals for Obama whatever the cost to Indian indigenisation,sanctions,etc.We are fast becomning a US satellite.If there is no worthwhile TOT,then we will have been shafted.This engine deal is to facilitate the awarding of the MMRCA to the F-18.
This is how it is going to play. Also, Congress will never want to be seen openly supporting American agenda given the possible "naraazgi" as pseudo-secularists say of "muslims" after "secular" Ayodhya verdict. So, the deal goes to European Consortium.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
I, for one, am very glad to hear (on BR Only!!) that MMS has delivered the LCA MkII engine to the US. A PhD in economics from the LSE is not enough now a days to do business. That, from here:
More out of curiosity, I was googling for research funds for EADS and came across this article. Seems like EADS has just about the same R&D budget that GE alone has!!!! A US $Billion. And with the US armed forces a lot more active WRT R&D, and the partners within EADS sinking rather rapidly ........................ do not know, but, to me GE seems a lot more stable from a R&D PoV. ?????????
____________________________________
A few observations of note:
Never mind .............................Eurojet sources also said that the EJ 200 is a new generation and better engine, and indeed after ToT and other aspects, it could be more expensive than the competition but worth the futuristic technology.
From the same article:Initial F404-j were 78kn
...........................
So I am assuming that as Swedish F414 are 96-98kn, then Indian F414 would be around 99-105kn or so. This may also be a major reason for its victory as 414s are clearly more powerful and available immediately
____________________________________the requirement of 95 to 100 kilo newtons, being offered by the GE 414.
More out of curiosity, I was googling for research funds for EADS and came across this article. Seems like EADS has just about the same R&D budget that GE alone has!!!! A US $Billion. And with the US armed forces a lot more active WRT R&D, and the partners within EADS sinking rather rapidly ........................ do not know, but, to me GE seems a lot more stable from a R&D PoV. ?????????
____________________________________
A few observations of note:
The US Government will also have to lift some more restrictions to facilitate the flow of engine technology to India, but given the recent statements coming from the US Administration in the buildup to President Barack Obama’s visit to New Delhi in November, there should be no problem.
Notably, GE has offered to upgrade the engine in future with newer innovations for better thrust and optimum fuel utilization also for the US Navy, which has just placed a new US$ 5.297 billion order with Boeing for 66 F 18 E/F Super Hornets and 58 E/A 18 G (Electronic Attack Super Hornets designated Growlers) for delivery from 2012 through 2015.
Thanks.The final price for the GE 414 for LCA (Mk-II) and the roadmap for technology transfer is yet to be worked out. It may be noted that it is a general practice to seek the best possible rates or technical advantages even after a winner has been declared the lowest bidder to fine-tune requirement and supply arrangements.
An official statement issued Sep 30 said that the Government would finalize the contract with GE after “further price negotiations.”
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Technically and Financially GE414 is a good deal they would have wealth of experience working with ADA/DRDO for LCA Mk1 and 404 engine. Life is much simpler if you work with known people whom you have been working for more than a decade.
The only caveat is sanctions which is better handled at political level and is outside the mandate of ADA/DRDO.
I think we should be all happy that finally they have selected an engine and what they think is the right one for Mk2.
The only caveat is sanctions which is better handled at political level and is outside the mandate of ADA/DRDO.
I think we should be all happy that finally they have selected an engine and what they think is the right one for Mk2.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
I am not sure if anyone thinks this is the "right" engine.
Seems to me that the decision - supposedly - is based on "L1".
There were some rules. And, we have to believe that the rules were followed - MMS notwithstanding or until someone writes a book in 10 years time.
However, good that they made a decision.
Let us ALL move on.
Seems to me that the decision - supposedly - is based on "L1".
There were some rules. And, we have to believe that the rules were followed - MMS notwithstanding or until someone writes a book in 10 years time.
However, good that they made a decision.
Let us ALL move on.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
In competitive bidding in India for GOI projects L1 is the way to choose thing if it meets the criteria laid down , GE engine met the criteria laid down by ADA/DRDO which is what matters and proved to be less costlier then rivals.
Without L1 it opens it self to charges of corruption , underhand dealing etc etc . L1 is the straight forward way to put a lid on it.
Without L1 it opens it self to charges of corruption , underhand dealing etc etc . L1 is the straight forward way to put a lid on it.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Hornets flying over my house every morning at 7 am are my morning alarm. They are impressive looking aircraft. Only thing is Typhoons and Rafales will be equally good..in looks and performance..I haven't seen them though.
Saw a C17 flying over the other day at 6pm on the way back from work...this machine was truely impressive, so smooth that it looked like it was standing still in the glow from the evening sun.
The N-LCA will most likely follow the career path of the superbly designed single engine Super Etendard which gave nightmares to Western fleets (in Iran-Iraq wars) and during the Falkland conflict.
Saw a C17 flying over the other day at 6pm on the way back from work...this machine was truely impressive, so smooth that it looked like it was standing still in the glow from the evening sun.
The N-LCA will most likely follow the career path of the superbly designed single engine Super Etendard which gave nightmares to Western fleets (in Iran-Iraq wars) and during the Falkland conflict.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Does anyone here know if the LCA's are still flight testing in Goa?
I am going there this weekend and was hoping to catch them flying there
chandrasekhar
I am going there this weekend and was hoping to catch them flying there
chandrasekhar
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Come the MMRCA decision and if either the F18 or the Gripen dont win, everyone will be clapping and saying what a great decision it was to go in for the 414 as now there will be access to tech from two engines. If either of the two win then we all will cry bloody murder
Re: LCA News and Discussions
I am very glad that there are some Indians that are not living in the 1970s:
India's fighter-jet program soars past Japan's
(I did not give this article too much weight until I saw who wrote it. It should actually go in the MRCA thread too.)
India's fighter-jet program soars past Japan's
(I did not give this article too much weight until I saw who wrote it. It should actually go in the MRCA thread too.)
On the face of it, India has strong political reasons to favor one of the two US suppliers - Boeing and Lockheed Martin - as ties between Washington and New Delhi continue to warm. President Barack Obama will stress these political incentives when he doorsteps India, model planes in his briefcase, in November. Yet sources close to the competition suggest that the American aircraft did not shine in the Indian Air Force's technical evaluation, that they compare poorly on cost, and that their promised level of technology transfer is underwhelming. ''We need to get full technology transfer: India will not budge on that issue,'' says Arun Sahgal, of India's United Services Institute. ''Some of the bidders need to bring their prices down and offer a lot more than license manufacturing''.
America's rivals are fighting hard. Sahgal describes Swedish company Saab's offering of full technology transfer as ''phenomenal''; the Eurofighter Typhoon is understood to be highly rated by Indian decision-makers; and Russia, a long-time Indian defense partner, is also seen as a safe backup option with its MiG-35. The point is that the US - just like other hopefuls - must offer India a genuinely excellent deal if it wants to secure this contract, not merely hold out vague prospects of American friendship.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
X-post
India to spend over $25 billion to induct 250 5th-gen stealth fighters
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 685002.cms
India to spend over $25 billion to induct 250 5th-gen stealth fighters
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 685002.cms
Along with 126 medium multi-role combat aircraft, which India plans to acquire in a $10.4 billion project, 270 Sukhoi-30MKIs contracted from Russia for around $12 billion and 120 indigenous Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, the FGFA will be the mainstay of India's air combat fleet for the foreseeable future.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 30 Aug 2004 08:09
Re: LCA News and Discussions
I wouldn’t worry too much about the 120 figure. LCA will form the lo part of hi-lo mix and it is bound to increase, maybe cross the 200 mark.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
$25 billion (+ $ 6 billion ) is a huge amount to spend on 5th Gen Fighter , they can cut that number and funding to half and fund the MCA , we can get better numbers with MCA with the same amountdinesha wrote:India to spend over $25 billion to induct 250 5th-gen stealth fighters
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 685002.cms
Re: LCA News and Discussions
It is a carrot dangled not to feel disgruntled over MRCA deal.Austin wrote:$25 billion (+ $ 6 billion ) is a huge amount to spend on 5th Gen Fighter , they can cut that number and funding to half and fund the MCA , we can get better numbers with MCA with the same amountdinesha wrote:India to spend over $25 billion to induct 250 5th-gen stealth fighters
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 685002.cms
It is also reported that AMCA will get ~250 a/c. By 2025 or 2030 we will be looking at 60 Sqd strength.JMT.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Where is the AMCA? All that we've seen so far is a wind tunnel model at the last air show,wheras the 5th-gen PAK-FA fighter is already flying and is undergoing its flight testing regime so that by 2015 at least production will start for the Russian variant.The IAF is faced with a unique problem in that it has to have a qualitative edge over both China and Pak,as well as having enough numbers to deal with both nations simultaneously.China's numbers cannot be matched and as they deliver even more advanced versions of their homebuilt aircraft,the tech gap between the IAF and PAF/PLAF as far as the multi-role medium sized aircraft goes will get narrower.Just 120 LCAs delivered by the end of the decade will not provide the IAF with a really worthwhile capability.The need is for larger aircraft than that of the LCA with greater range,endurance and heavier paylaod with LR stand-off ASMs in the light of more modern SAM and other air defence systems ,plus MANPADs making it even more difficult for aircraft to conduct air strikes in enemy airspace. The existing Flankers,MMRCA and the 5th-gen fighter will hopefully provide us with the required firepower to dela with the Sino-Pak thread.I only hope that in the light of the threat,we choose the best all-rounder "with a view to a future" tech-wise of the lot for the MMRCA.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 30 Aug 2004 08:09
Re: LCA News and Discussions
We will have to build the AMCA and give it equal importance, if not more, if we want to ever compete with panda.
PAK-FA may provide us with a 5th gen fighter but the way panda is building it's capabilities being dependent on Russia may not be good enough. We will be kept out of critical/cutting edge area anyway. There will be nothing that we contribute and Russia will not be able to replace and export to panda. We are merely subsidizing their cost of building the a/c. One wouldn’t mind it but there is absolutely no substitute to AMCA.
The sooner we start with it, the better it is.
PAK-FA may provide us with a 5th gen fighter but the way panda is building it's capabilities being dependent on Russia may not be good enough. We will be kept out of critical/cutting edge area anyway. There will be nothing that we contribute and Russia will not be able to replace and export to panda. We are merely subsidizing their cost of building the a/c. One wouldn’t mind it but there is absolutely no substitute to AMCA.
The sooner we start with it, the better it is.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Says who? The "huge" part that is.$25 billion (+ $ 6 billion ) is a huge amount to spend on 5th Gen Fighter , they can cut that number and funding to half and fund the MCA , we can get better numbers with MCA with the same amount
First of all that should be over some years (5-10). And, if one were to compute it as a %age of the economy it does not matter.
All A/C start at the wind tunnel model stage!!!!! The PAK-FA started there too 10+ years ago.
And, just BTW, the FGFA has not flown yet. It is not even on the drawing board. IIRC they still have to nail the details on paper.
Since I have not kept track - which other AF has the MKI class of air crafts in the strength that the IAF has and plans on having?
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Eurojet pays dearly for engine re-bid delay
http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_eu ... ay_1448246
http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_eu ... ay_1448246
European aerospace firm Eurojet missed being declared the lowest bidder — L1 — by a whisker for the engine deal of the indigenous light combat aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mark-II being developed by Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA).
The European consortium is engaged in a fierce battle with the American GE Aviation for providing technology and consultancy for the manufacture of 99 engines for the LCA Tejas Mark-II.
An official with knowledge about the bid, on the condition of anonymity, said Eurojet had submitted its revised bid on September 28 and it reached the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) on September 29.
“Eurojet marred its chance by submitting its bid a day before the announcement (of L1 biddder) was made — September 30. And so their revised bid was not considered,” he said.
He said Eurojet’s revised quotation for manufacturing of its EJ200 indigenously is lower than GE’s F-414 by $80-100 million.
According to sources, after reworking the bid and providing the details soughtby the price negotiation committee, the European consortium’s tender price is around $900 million while that of GE is $980 million. In the initial round, Eurojet’s bid was reportedly lower at $666 million compared with GE’s $822 million. It is learnt Eurojet’s price had shot up because it had not clearly specified certain items in its bid.
One of them was the $65 million cost of tools, which it is giving on ‘free on loan’ - meaning the tools would be returned on completion of the project.
GE, on the other hand, is providing the tools totally free.
“This and other costs, which were specified more clearly in response to queries from the price negotiation panel has closed the gap between Eurojet and GE but European engine maker’s bid is still lower than GE,” said a source.
Though, another source, who did not want to be named, said initially Eurojet’s bid had shot up to over $1000 million after they clarified certain expenses in the tender.
“They rushed to correct that (their bid climbing higher than GE’s) but by the time they came back with a revised bid, it was too late,” he said.
Price negotiation committee chairman and chief controller - R&D - of DRDO Dr CK Prahlada could not be reached for comments.
The LCA Tejas Mark-II is an upgraded version of the current Mark-I, which uses GE’s F404 engine.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Lifafa journalism is alive and well
Re: LCA News and Discussions
I think that EJ wanted to do a Gorky on us after the deal was signed but were stopped by Negotiating committee. Just imagine that they had kept almost US$ 400 million dollars of cost hidden :-( Now they are being cry babies. Honest negotiations will have lot of benefit in future contracts. US will have to stick to its cost and schedule as they know that EJ is waiting in the wings
Re: LCA News and Discussions
For some time I have been following the comments about F414 being much heavier than F404, and different in dimensions, requiring major rework, etc. etc.
F414 was and is a next generation F404. It was developed specifically with that in mind. F414 dimensions are near exactly same as F404. Its weight is closer to 404 than EJ200. In fact, it is only 100 lbs more (<50 kg) than 404!! So much for ill-informed panic "OMG! We will have to start design all over".
In fact it would do well to study the history of 414 development. The paper shows cross-section of the two engines in comparison, and you will how misinformed are the opinions about it being a completely different animal than F404
History of 414 Development:
http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFull ... 008-46.pdf
F414 bid - if it is the F414-GE-EPE, its weight might actually be similar to F404. In the EPE, the thrust has been increased, and one compressor stage reduced.
The major element that would rework on LCA would be intakes. But that would have to be done irrespective of the choice of EJ200 or F414. If you want more thrust, you need more air flow, and so you need intakes designed according the air flow.
The F414 is identical in dimensions to F404, and 50kg heavier (the EPE would be less).
Please produce relevant hard data about the factors in your arguments.
NOTE: corrected the Air Flow Rate for EJ200
F414 was and is a next generation F404. It was developed specifically with that in mind. F414 dimensions are near exactly same as F404. Its weight is closer to 404 than EJ200. In fact, it is only 100 lbs more (<50 kg) than 404!! So much for ill-informed panic "OMG! We will have to start design all over".
In fact it would do well to study the history of 414 development. The paper shows cross-section of the two engines in comparison, and you will how misinformed are the opinions about it being a completely different animal than F404
History of 414 Development:
http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFull ... 008-46.pdf
F414 bid - if it is the F414-GE-EPE, its weight might actually be similar to F404. In the EPE, the thrust has been increased, and one compressor stage reduced.
The major element that would rework on LCA would be intakes. But that would have to be done irrespective of the choice of EJ200 or F414. If you want more thrust, you need more air flow, and so you need intakes designed according the air flow.
The F414 is identical in dimensions to F404, and 50kg heavier (the EPE would be less).
F404-GE-IN20:
Length: 154 inches;
Inlet Diameter: 31 inches;
Max Dia: 35 inches;
Weight: 2335 lbs;
Thrust: 10,250 lbf dry / 19,250 lbf (84kN) with reheat
Air Flow Rate: 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec)
Specific Fuel Consumption at Max Power: 0.81 dry; 1.8 w/reheat
F414:
Length: 154 inches;
Inlet Diameter: 32 inches;
Max Dia: 35 inches;
Weight: 2445 lbs (http://www.voodoo-world.cz/hornet/info.html -- hard to come by the number)
Thrust: 14,770 lbf dry / 22,000 lbf (98 kN) with reheat
Air Flow Rate: 170 lbs/sec (77.1 kg/sec)
Specific Fuel Consumption at Max Power:
Compressor:
Axial Compressor with 3 Fan and 7 compressor stages (F414-GE-400)
Axial Compressor with 3 Fan and 6 compressor stages (F414-GE-EPE)
The EPE is also lighter, and has greater thrust the the F414-GE-400
Compare the cross-sections of cutaways in the PDF publication posted above
From all indications -- F414 actually minimizes the risk for MK-II than increase it.EJ200
Length: 157 inches;
Inlet Dia: ?
Max Diameter: 29 inches;
Weight: 2200 lbs (Approx)
Thrust: 13,500 lbf (60kN) dry thrust / 20,000 lbf (89 kN (reheat);
Air Flow Rate: 170 lbs/sec (77 kg/sec) (source: http://typhoon.starstreak.net/Eurofighter/engines.html)
Specific Fuel Consumption at Max Power: 0.75 dry / 1.65 with reheat
Compressor: 3-Stage LP; 5-Stage HP
Please produce relevant hard data about the factors in your arguments.
NOTE: corrected the Air Flow Rate for EJ200
Last edited by Avid on 08 Oct 2010 20:33, edited 1 time in total.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Avid, as some of BRF's members would like to have it, it isn't about hard facts anymore. F-414 is a product of evil Americans, hence a sell-out by MMS and AKA. The fact that the first 2 squadrons of Tejas Mk1s were going to fly with the F-404 IN20 engine was lost on those who were critical of the decision to go with the F-414 purely because it was an American engine.Avid wrote:For some time I have been following the comments about F414 being much heavier than F404, and different in dimensions, requiring major rework, etc. etc.
F414 was and is a next generation F404. It was developed specifically with that in mind. F414 dimensions are near exactly same as F404. Its weight is closer to 404 than EJ200. In fact, it is only 100 lbs more (<50 kg) than 404!! So much for ill-informed panic "OMG! We will have to start design all over".
In fact it would do well to study the history of 414 development. The paper shows cross-section of the two engines in comparison, and you will how misinformed are the opinions about it being a completely different animal than F404
History of 414 Development:
http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFull ... 008-46.pdf
F414 bid - if it is the F414-GE-EPE, its weight might actually be similar to F404. In the EPE, the thrust has been increased, and one compressor stage reduced.
The major element that would rework on LCA would be intakes. But that would have to be done irrespective of the choice of EJ200 or F414. If you want more thrust, you need more air flow, and so you need intakes designed according the air flow.
The F414 is identical in dimensions to F404, and 50kg heavier (the EPE would be less).
F404-GE-IN20:
Length: 154 inches;
Inlet Diameter: 31 inches;
Max Dia: 35 inches;
Weight: 2335 lbs;
Thrust: 10,250 lbf dry / 19,250 lbf (84kN) with reheat
Air Flow Rate: 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec)
Specific Fuel Consumption at Max Power: 0.81 dry; 1.8 w/reheatF414:
Length: 154 inches;
Inlet Diameter: 32 inches;
Max Dia: 35 inches;
Weight: 2445 lbs (http://www.voodoo-world.cz/hornet/info.html -- hard to come by the number)
Thrust: 14,770 lbf dry / 22,000 lbf (98 kN) with reheat
Air Flow Rate: 170 lbs/sec (77.1 kg/sec)
Specific Fuel Consumption at Max Power:
Compressor:
Axial Compressor with 3 Fan and 7 compressor stages (F414-GE-400)
Axial Compressor with 3 Fan and 6 compressor stages (F414-GE-EPE)
The EPE is also lighter, and has greater thrust the the F414-GE-400
Compare the cross-sections of cutaways in the PDF publication posted aboveFrom all indications -- F414 actually minimizes the risk for MK-II than increase it.EJ200
Length: 157 inches;
Inlet Dia: ?
Max Diameter: 29 inches;
Weight: 2200 lbs (Approx)
Thrust: 13,500 lbf (60kN) dry thrust / 20,000 lbf (89 kN (reheat);
Air Flow Rate: 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec)
Specific Fuel Consumption at Max Power: 0.75 dry / 1.65 with reheat
Compressor: 3-Stage LP; 5-Stage HP
Please produce relevant hard data about the factors in your arguments.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Just looking at the "Air Flow Rate" from what you posted about the 3 engines, F-404 and EJ200 are exactly the same at 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec). So would this have meant no air-intake changes necessary if EJ200 was selected?Avid wrote:For some time I have been following the comments about F414 being much heavier than F404, and different in dimensions, requiring major rework, etc. etc.
...
The major element that would rework on LCA would be intakes. But that would have to be done irrespective of the choice of EJ200 or F414. If you want more thrust, you need more air flow, and so you need intakes designed according the air flow.
...
F404-GE-IN20:
...
Air Flow Rate: 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec)
...F414:
...
Air Flow Rate: 170 lbs/sec (77.1 kg/sec)
...From all indications -- F414 actually minimizes the risk for MK-II than increase it.EJ200
...
Air Flow Rate: 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec)
...
...
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Re Avid
We are NOT getting EPE as press reports does give the model no. But more interestingly if you notice that press reports say that EJ cost went up when we added the cost of "extra" technology transfer (read transfer of single crystal technology) but GE cost did not go up as much. This means that cost of "lot of technology transfer (perhaps) including single crystal is tied up with GE.
Second GE is more powerful than EJ, My guess 100-105kn. Vs 90-93kn
Perhaps with wider inlet ii may be more suitable for high altitude take offs/landings ?? (layman alert!!)
GE is available here and now, and work for integration of GE will/can start immediately unlike EJ where wait of 2 years is warranted for optimizing it for single engine operations.
I believe that US is ahead by 10 years compared to Europe in military engine tech. Lets us EJ is 20 years later design. Again lets us say that GE is massively upgraded. We land up with +10-20+5, so say only max 5 years tech difference between EJ & GE with better future potential for GE (layman alert!!). We must not forget that GE is a big engine and in future it will be way more powerful and perhaps lighter.
Also regarding weight there is issue of dry weight vs wet weight and weight of related items like Gearbox, fuel injection system, etc which are also relevant but we don’t know the figures to compare them.
I think that a decision has been taken and it seems like a reasonable decision. Though I hope that there might be formal and informal understanding that GE will help with Kaveri also. Snecma deals smacks of being dishonest.
We are NOT getting EPE as press reports does give the model no. But more interestingly if you notice that press reports say that EJ cost went up when we added the cost of "extra" technology transfer (read transfer of single crystal technology) but GE cost did not go up as much. This means that cost of "lot of technology transfer (perhaps) including single crystal is tied up with GE.
Second GE is more powerful than EJ, My guess 100-105kn. Vs 90-93kn
Perhaps with wider inlet ii may be more suitable for high altitude take offs/landings ?? (layman alert!!)
GE is available here and now, and work for integration of GE will/can start immediately unlike EJ where wait of 2 years is warranted for optimizing it for single engine operations.
I believe that US is ahead by 10 years compared to Europe in military engine tech. Lets us EJ is 20 years later design. Again lets us say that GE is massively upgraded. We land up with +10-20+5, so say only max 5 years tech difference between EJ & GE with better future potential for GE (layman alert!!). We must not forget that GE is a big engine and in future it will be way more powerful and perhaps lighter.
Also regarding weight there is issue of dry weight vs wet weight and weight of related items like Gearbox, fuel injection system, etc which are also relevant but we don’t know the figures to compare them.
I think that a decision has been taken and it seems like a reasonable decision. Though I hope that there might be formal and informal understanding that GE will help with Kaveri also. Snecma deals smacks of being dishonest.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 355
- Joined: 30 Aug 2004 08:09
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Snecma deal is a desperate attempt to get Kaveri into LCA. Needless to say, it wont work and we will simply be throwing away money to the French with zero benefit arising out of it.
On another note, what structural changes are expected in the MK-II?
1. Inlets
2. Wings (What kind of changes )
On another note, what structural changes are expected in the MK-II?
1. Inlets
2. Wings (What kind of changes )
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4104
- Joined: 30 Jul 2004 15:05
- Location: Spectator in the dossier diplomacy tennis match
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Kartik,
Thank you for the last post.
Thank you for the last post.
-
- BRFite -Trainee
- Posts: 81
- Joined: 05 Jul 2005 15:51
- Location: London, United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: LCA News and Discussions
It has been speculated in the Aviation week article quoting Prominent defense Analyst that US government will definately not give permission for single crystal blade tech to be transferred to India.vic wrote:Re Avid
We are NOT getting EPE as press reports does give the model no. But more interestingly if you notice that press reports say that EJ cost went up when we added the cost of "extra" technology transfer (read transfer of single crystal technology) but GE cost did not go up as much. This means that cost of "lot of technology transfer (perhaps) including single crystal is tied up with GE.
Second GE is more powerful than EJ, My guess 100-105kn. Vs 90-93kn
Perhaps with wider inlet ii may be more suitable for high altitude take offs/landings ?? (layman alert!!)
GE is available here and now, and work for integration of GE will/can start immediately unlike EJ where wait of 2 years is warranted for optimizing it for single engine operations.
I believe that US is ahead by 10 years compared to Europe in military engine tech. Lets us EJ is 20 years later design. Again lets us say that GE is massively upgraded. We land up with +10-20+5, so say only max 5 years tech difference between EJ & GE with better future potential for GE (layman alert!!). We must not forget that GE is a big engine and in future it will be way more powerful and perhaps lighter.
Also regarding weight there is issue of dry weight vs wet weight and weight of related items like Gearbox, fuel injection system, etc which are also relevant but we don’t know the figures to compare them.
I think that a decision has been taken and it seems like a reasonable decision. Though I hope that there might be formal and informal understanding that GE will help with Kaveri also. Snecma deals smacks of being dishonest.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
We have had so much of delay in decision making that we could've developed two prototypes flying with a different engine.It would've been an interesting learning curve for us.Commercial aircraft of same type fly with European and US engines depending upon the airlines choice.Both US and European def. manufacturers have in the past studied engine alternatives,so do the Russians.From details being made public,it appears that EJ shot itself in the foot with its late bid and were outmanoeuvred by GE.Had both engines been flying ,it would've also given us some input into the engine requirements for the AMCA.
I wonder whether this precedent-going in for the same manufacturer who provided the original engine,will hold good for the Jaguar upgrade too,where Honywell and RR are contesting the same.
I wonder whether this precedent-going in for the same manufacturer who provided the original engine,will hold good for the Jaguar upgrade too,where Honywell and RR are contesting the same.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
P Chitkara wrote:Snecma deal is a desperate attempt to get Kaveri into LCA..
This comment somehow stirred a thought which had been brewing in my mind for quite sometime, so I would invite members to confirm/dismiss my line of thought... I suspect that the attempt to get the Kaveri into the LCA is purely an export-oriented gamble. I mean, think of how uncle will frown on us trying to export a GE-engined LCA. Also, will the IAF ever fully trust a kaveri-engined LCA? In that case isn't it much easier/better to palm off a kaveri-engined LCA to the Latin Americans and Africans and try to recover our investment?
If we are throwing some money now in the hope of others throwing money back at us in the future, I think we should go for it don't you think?P Chitkara wrote:we will simply be throwing away money to the French with zero benefit arising out of it.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Thanks for pointing it out. I have corrected the error.srai wrote:
Just looking at the "Air Flow Rate" from what you posted about the 3 engines, F-404 and EJ200 are exactly the same at 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec). So would this have meant no air-intake changes necessary if EJ200 was selected?
EJ200 the air flow rate for max thrust is identical to F414.
From my perspective,F404-GE-IN20:
Air Flow Rate: 146 lbs/sec (66 kg/sec)
F414-GE-400:
Air Flow Rate: 170 lbs/sec (77kg/sec)
EJ200:
Air Flow Rate: 170 lbs/sec (77kg/sec)
F414 is near identical in dimensions, marginally higher in weight (max of 50kgs). Produces 19.5kN more thrust (dry) and 15kN more thrust (reheat). Thus requires redesign of air intake, and very likely no redesign of the fuselage. The thrust numbers for EPE would be higher (and lower specific fuel consumption).
EJ200 is 3 inches longer, 3 inches less in dia, weighs 61 kgs less. Produces 16kN more thrust (dry), and 5-6 kN more with reheat. The design requires redesign of air intake, and and likely redesign of fuselage because of the engine dimension changes.
The thrust numbers with reheat are not entirely as critical as the dry thrust.
So the question is with 3.5kN additional dry thrust, and near identical dimensions of the engine, 50kg more of weight - is F414 worth it?
Re: LCA News and Discussions
We are getting modified version of 414 (F414-GE-INS6), just like the 404-IN20vic wrote:Re Avid
We are NOT getting EPE as press reports does give the model no.
....
Their press release says it is the highest thrust version of 414, and so it likely the EPE variant. The EPE is claimed to have 20% higher thrust than the 414-400, and with focus on greater durability. The most significant part of the EPE (according to my 2c worth opinion) is the reduced specific fuel consumption. This would yield greater range.
The thrust number is definitely in favor of the 414, and I completely agree that GE poses significantly less risk in development of MKII.Second GE is more powerful than EJ, My guess 100-105kn. Vs 90-93kn
...
GE is available here and now, and work for integration of GE will/can start immediately unlike EJ where wait of 2 years is warranted for optimizing it for single engine operations.
...
Also regarding weight there is issue of dry weight vs wet weight and weight of related items like Gearbox, fuel injection system, etc which are also relevant but we don’t know the figures to compare them.
Last edited by Avid on 08 Oct 2010 21:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
The Gripen is being marketed globally with a GE engine. I doubt if the US would actively try to restrict India from re-exporting the GE engine, unless we were selling the Tejas to the likes of Iran, Myanmar or Zimbabwe.saje wrote:P Chitkara wrote:Snecma deal is a desperate attempt to get Kaveri into LCA..
This comment somehow stirred a thought which had been brewing in my mind for quite sometime, so I would invite members to confirm/dismiss my line of thought... I suspect that the attempt to get the Kaveri into the LCA is purely an export-oriented gamble. I mean, think of how uncle will frown on us trying to export a GE-engined LCA. Also, will the IAF ever fully trust a kaveri-engined LCA? In that case isn't it much easier/better to palm off a kaveri-engined LCA to the Latin Americans and Africans and try to recover our investment?
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Or a Volvo Aero engine...Whatever. This is so OT, but has´nt India exported helicopters to Myanmar? If the LCA comes up for export discussion I am however sure that India will gladly not export any military arms to such countries if it favors the export of LCA.Viv S wrote: The Gripen is being marketed globally with a GE engine. I doubt if the US would actively try to restrict India from re-exporting the GE engine, unless we were selling the Tejas to the likes of Iran, Myanmar or Zimbabwe.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 150
- Joined: 30 Jan 2009 18:49
Re: LCA News and Discussions
India to develop its own futuristic computer operating system
http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/n ... 96216.html
http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/n ... 96216.html
Meanwhile, Saraswat said many countries have evinced interest in buying Akash, Nag missiles and light combat aircraft 'Tejas' developed by India.There is possibility of export of many things, including the LCA whose performance and capability matches with the best aircraft in the world in that category[/b]."Many countries are approaching us for Akash missiles, Nag missiles and LCA," he said but declined to name them, saying "it's premature".Saraswat, however, stressed that DRDO's main role is to meet the indigenous requirements of the armed forces."Export is only incidental," he added.
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Any Chaiwala news on LSP-5 flight ?
On a different note, according to data provided by Avid EJ200 actually consumes lesser fuel compared to 404 while producing more thrust.
As mentioned in the aviation week article, GE would not provide tot for single crystal blades. And this is not in the scope of the RFP as said by the Eurojet official in this link:
http://www.8ak.in/8ak_india_defence_new ... india.html
On a different note, according to data provided by Avid EJ200 actually consumes lesser fuel compared to 404 while producing more thrust.
As mentioned in the aviation week article, GE would not provide tot for single crystal blades. And this is not in the scope of the RFP as said by the Eurojet official in this link:
http://www.8ak.in/8ak_india_defence_new ... india.html
Though fairly OT, GE winning this bid could actually be a pointer towards Eurofighter winning the MMRCA (India could get single crystal TOT and all other TOT through that route also). And GE is made happy with this order, Boeing with c17 and additional P-8, LM with c-130, Russia with numerous stuff, France with Insanely overpriced Mirage deal (plus Kaveri development). That only leaves the Eurofighter (Excluding Gripen for lack of political clout).Eurojet management today confirmed that if required they are willing to transfer single crystal turbine blade technology. This is currently not under the scope of the LCA engine RFP and a separate commercial agreement would have to be signed.
Last edited by archan on 12 Oct 2010 19:55, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: username changed from GSJ to Gyanesh. If unacceptable, send email to gentleman.cadet at gmail
Reason: username changed from GSJ to Gyanesh. If unacceptable, send email to gentleman.cadet at gmail
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Regarding the "insanely overpriced" Mirage upgrade, please check the latest F-16 Block 15 upgrade price for Thailand. 18 F-16 Block 15s upgraded at $39 million per unit. No weapons included in the upgrade.