Bharat Rakshak

g.sarkar wrote:Long ago, I had a Pakistani co-worker who had named his eldest son Al-Saud. He told me very earnestly the King of Saudi Arabia is the protector of Makkah Sharif! His eyes grew round and large in awe. I think this is a case of mental enslavement.
Gautam

Anindya wrote:Veena Malik: People tell me that have become Indian

RajeshA wrote:

Anindya wrote:Veena Malik: People tell me that have become Indian

She should use the word 'Hindu'!

habal wrote:="ArmenT"]

habal wrote:Does anybody know about the latest gossip on pakistani ghee/vanaspati ?
Is this an euphemism for something Do tellsomething to feed your worst enemies. why go to hell, when you have pakistan right here.dead animals found on the streets, and the remains of slaughtered animals. blood, internals/viscera, roadkill. dead dogs, cats, rats, crows etc go into this giant boiling cauldron from which emerges 'pure pakistani vanaspati'. With brands like Savera, Prime banaspati ghee etc which every pakistani household consumes in copious quantities. from now on .. instead of ma-behn gaali .. it would suffice to say .. tere muh mein pakistani ghee/banaspati/quote]

g.sarkar wrote:Long ago, I had a Pakistani co-worker who had named his eldest son Al-Saud. He told me very earnestly the King of Saudi Arabia is the protector of Makkah Sharif! His eyes grew round and large in awe. I think this is a case of mental enslavement.
Gautam

akashganga wrote:

g.sarkar wrote:Long ago, I had a Pakistani co-worker who had named his eldest son Al-Saud. He told me very earnestly the King of Saudi Arabia is the protector of Makkah Sharif! His eyes grew round and large in awe. I think this is a case of mental enslavement.
Gautam

All non-arab muslims are metally enslaved by saudi arabia. All of them act in such a way it benefits arabism at the cost of their own culture and heritage. They live in a fantasy world built around 7th century arabia.

shiv wrote:But Americans are not Muslims. So there.

shiv wrote:"Long ago, I had a Pakistani co-worker who had named his eldest son Al-Saud. He told me very earnestly the King of Saudi Arabia is the protector of Makkah Sharif! His eyes grew round and large in awe. I think this is a case of mental enslavement."
Gautam
"All non-arab muslims are metally enslaved by saudi arabia. All of them act in such a way it benefits arabism at the cost of their own culture and heritage. They live in a fantasy world built around 7th century arabia."
"I agree that a lot of Pakstanis are enslaved, but I wonder if the Taliban are enslaved? Do they even get to do Haj and do they ecstatically lick Saudi ass like Pakistanis?"

shiv wrote:

akashganga wrote: All non-arab muslims are metally enslaved by saudi arabia. All of them act in such a way it benefits arabism at the cost of their own culture and heritage. They live in a fantasy world built around 7th century arabia.

I agree that a lot of Pakstanis are enslaved, but I wonder if the Taliban are enslaved? Do they even get to do Haj and do they ecstatically lick Saudi ass like Pakistanis?

RajeshA wrote:

Anindya wrote:Veena Malik: People tell me that have become Indian

She should use the word 'Hindu'!

nageshks wrote:

RajeshA wrote: She should use the word 'Hindu'!

Saar - that might be detrimental to her health. She could be Qadrified.

akashganga wrote:Her name Veena Malik sounds like a hindu punjabi name.

akashganga wrote:Taliban is the closest to 7th century true islam/arabism in the subcontinent. Arabs know it and that is why KSA was one of the only 3 states to recognize taliban when it was ruling afganisthan. Officially KSA may not support Taliban now but behind the scenes I have no doubt taliban enjoys full support of KSA. KSA needs taliban and their types to launch offensive jehad against kafirs of the subcontinent and to eradicate pre-islamic icons.

Remember Bamyam budhdhas which survived for 1500 years were blown to pieces by taliban using modern kafir weapons.

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan, seen as critical to efforts to stabilise Afghanistan, is finding it difficult to work with President Hamid Karzai due to mistrust and is reaching out to others to advance the peace process, senior Pakistani Foreign Ministry officials say.“Right now, Karzai is the biggest impediment to the peace process,” a top Pakistani Foreign Ministry official told Reuters. “In trying to look like a savior, he is taking Afghanistan straight to hell.”Karzai has said he wants peace on his own terms and could also be worried that the United States might cut a quick and risky deal with the Taliban, eager to get the bulk of its forces out of the country by the end of next year.The stakes are also high for Pakistan, a strategic US ally seen as vital to Washington’s global war on militancy. It fears turmoil in Afghanistan could spill over the border and energize homegrown militants seeking to topple the government.“I have absolutely no doubt that there will be complete chaos in Afghanistan if a settlement is not reached by 2014,” said the Foreign Ministry official. “Afghanistan will erupt. And when that happens, Pakistan will have to pay.”
“There is no other option but reconciliation – with or without Karzai,” said the top Foreign Ministry official. “If he continues to be this stubborn, him and his High Peace Council will naturally be sidelined.”A second senior Pakistani Foreign Ministry official cited several examples of how Karzai has blocked peace efforts. At a conference in January, for example, Karzai insisted there would be no more “back door” peace contacts.Analysts say Pakistan has a long-standing fear of an Afghan government close to its old foe, India. Karzai has said “no foreign elements or entities should attempt to own Afghan peace efforts”. He also warned: “I am not going to allow other attempts to succeed.”So far, Karzai has failed to secure direct talks with the Taliban. He has repeatedly asked for Pakistan’s support. Pakistan has helped Taliban representatives to travel to Qatar to make contacts with US officials.At the same time, Pakistan has been building bridges with the Northern Alliance, a constellation of anti-Taliban figures who have traditionally been implacable critics of Islamabad, and close to India.But Kabul wants Pakistan to hand over top Afghan Taliban leaders which could prove useful in the peace process.
“All Taliban leadership are sitting in Pakistan. We need full cooperation of Pakistan in order for them to be allowed to travel and be allowed to talk,” Afghan Foreign Minister Zalmay Rassoul told a news conference in Sydney.Karzai’s remarks during interviews and in meetings with Pakistani officials have led Islamabad to conclude he has become too inflexible. They cite Karzai’s recent accusation that the United States was colluding with the Taliban.“What does Karzai have to show for his effort to bring insurgents to the table? We’ve released prisoners. We’ve facilitated talks,” said another senior Foreign Ministry official.Late last year, Pakistan released more than two dozen Taliban prisoners who could help promote peace. It was the clearest signal ever that Pakistan had put its weight behind the Afghan reconciliation process.Pakistan’s army chief has also made reconciling warring Afghan factions a priority, military sources say.After the prisoner releases, Afghan officials said Pakistan shared Kabul’s goal of transforming the insurgency into a political movement. Such remarks signaled unprecedented optimism from Kabul.

“JOKER IN THE PACK”
But despite that, old suspicions that Pakistan uses Afghan insurgents as proxies to counter the influence of India have not been laid to rest.Some Afghan officials believe Pakistan may still be hedging its bets and that even the prisoner releases were just a way to retain influence over the Taliban.“The key fact here is that Pakistan has been investing in this dirty game of trying to control Afghanistan for the last thirty years through terrorist proxies,” said a senior Afghan government official.“It is now trying to reap the harvest of its investments by waiting for what they see as the inevitable complete departure of the international community from Afghanistan and keeping their proxy assets, primarily the Taliban, for the post-2014 period.”Another Pakistani Foreign Ministry official said the government was incensed by an interview Karzai gave to the British press after the Chequers meeting in which he said the peace process was being impeded by “external forces acting in the name of the Taliban”, a veiled reference to Islamabad.
So exasperated was Pakistan with Karzai that at a meeting this month between Zardari, the army chief and senior officials, one top leader described Karzai as “the joker in the pack”, according to an official who attended.“He is trying to act as if he has many cards in his hands,” said the first Foreign Ministry official. “But he should realize he is only hurting his country.”

Brad Goodman wrote:

akashganga wrote:Her name Veena Malik sounds like a hindu punjabi name.

No Sir all paki actresses have hindu sounding names since pious islamic names cannot be used for performing lowly acts like dancing and singing
her real name is Zahida Malik

shiv wrote:"Brad Goodman"]

akashganga wrote:Her name V eena Malik sounds like a hindu punjabi name.]No Sir all paki actresses have hindu sounding names since pious islamic names cannot be used for performing lowly acts like dancing and singingher real name is Zahida Malik
Imagine the number of mullas who will have apopleptic fits if you have an actress called Khadija or Ayesha?

Mr Khan’s speech was dotted with party songs that were played almost after every promise he made.

He continued using religious jargons and said that he had always looked upon the life of Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH), whenever he faced difficulty in his life.

He urged the youth to keep struggling, have faith and Allah almighty would help them survive in all situations.

shiv wrote: Imagine the number of mullas who will have apopleptic fits if you have an actress called Khadija or Ayesha?

Gagan wrote:Anyway, the powerful people who order killings of the people (in the name of religion, jihad, islam etc etc) are probably her clients.

saip wrote:^^^ So the good Paki count has gone up to 22!

Both discussed reconciliation process in Afghanistan and security issues concerning South Asian Region.

SSridhar wrote: I expect KSA to support Taliban very overtly in the coming months as the Americans led legitimacy to that organization by engaging them in talks (which is already happening) and assigning to them a preeminent position in power sharing. With the elimination of OBL and most of the Arab jihadists of Al Qaeda, KSA is more comfortably off now than ever before. They have successfully warded off an Arab Spring in their country, eliminated Saudi wahhabi/salafi/takfiri jihadists of Al Qaeda who could have been attractive to the jobless youth bulge in that country. The Taliban, now wedded to the Al Qaeda ideology but without the Arab jihadist component within it, would be the ideal Janissary that the KSA royalty was looking forward to. They may even think that if the TTP and the PA merge, then they will have the mahdi's army at KSA's beck and call.

Just add "with the assistance of the TSP Army engineers" to your above statement.

Jhujar wrote:Snake Bites Again

Bakistan sees Afghanistan’s Karzai as obstacle to peace with Taliban

Sushupti wrote:

There also appears to be a cultural clash between non-Arab Muslims from Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Balkans and Chechnya on the one hand, and Arabs from Syria, Libya, Tunisia and Jordan on the other, over the exploitation of sex slaves.

Some Islamists consider these women to be spoils of war, especially the wives and daughters of regime supporters, but local fighters are more apprehensive about the issue. Dozens of women have reportedly been sexually assaulted.

Others within the movement have firmly stood up to these groups and rejected such practices. For one thing, they believe that this will turn sympathetic Syrians against them.