Gagan wrote:To all the people who are saying that China or USA or Russia laid a condition that India must talk to Pakistan.
I wonder who and how would they have conveyed this to India hain ji?
What language would have been used hain ji?
Would some leadel/babu in cheena have called up a babu of India and said "Joo guys had bettel talk to Bajisa-tan or else @#**@##" "Folget about SCO othelwise"
Really!!!???
Or would it have been said by a massa, or cheeni or roosi ambassador thus, "Our government looks forward towards the Indian PM's visit to roos for the BRICS and SCO meet, yada yada yada"
If an Indian delegation is going overseas, and a Pakistani delegation is there, it is impolite if they don't meet. Not meeting would have made news and have sent wrong signals. So my thinking is that the Indian side must have said, "WTF, lets get this thing out of the way so that we can concentrate on the real meetings, with roos and cheen"
And what groundbreaking talks can an Indian PM expect to do with a civilian PM of pakistan, everyone knows.
First, Pakistan being Pakistan, it released Lakhvi. Bhaarath warned that such a move was unacceptable. But, Pakistan simply cared two hoots.
Bhaarath decided that it was useless to deal with Pakistan directly and decided to raise the whole issue internationally.
Bhaarath has a very strong case on 26/11. 26/11 is an international issue because Bhaarath claims that Pakistani citizens planned and attacked Bhaarath. Pakistan initially said that they were 'non-state actors'. When Bhaarath asked for either punishing those pakistani citizens in pakistan or deporting them to Bhaarath, Pakistan started its treacherous games. On the other hand, US has already sentenced, David Headley. Bhaarath has already hanged Kasab. UN has already agreed that Hafiz Sayeed is a terrorist. And banned LeT and JuD. But, Hafiz Sayeed continues to function freely in Pakistan. All this shows that Pakistan is sponsoring terrorism on Bhaarath.
Bhaarath put this case in global forums demanding punishment on Pakistan.
Then, China came to Pakistan's rescue in most forums.
China blocked India's move at UN for action against Pakistan over Lakhvi's release
June 23, 2015.
Now, after this move by china, Bhaarath was loudly critcizing China and the whole 'international community' about their ineptness and hypocrisy in dealing with state sponsored terrorism like 26/11.
Then, after a few weeks, there was meet of Pakistan PM and Bhaarath's PM. One could clearly see that the pakistani delegation were very dejected and unhappy. It looked as if they were being forced into this meeting.
Then, the joint communique was solely focused on terrorism with special emphasis on 26/11. Many pakistani commentators have criticized this as a failure of pakistan. Pakistanis were wondering why the Pakistani delegation surrendered to Bhaarath so abjectly.
The pakistani delegation are not idiots. They would be well trained in all the usual pakistani tricks. So, what happened? Why did they simply accept Bhaarath's terms on terrorism and fail to raise the issue of Kashmir, siachin, balochistan, karachi, MQM, ghazwa-e-hind, ...etc.?
I think the following the happened behind the doors:
[Speculation]
Once Pakistan was saved by China on the global forums, Bhaarath started loudly critcizing China and the whole 'international community' about their ineptness and hypocrisy in dealing with state sponsored terrorism like 26/11.
So, china, russia and US(particularly China) must have conveyed to Bhaarath that they will put pressure on Pakistan and make it deliver on 26/11 in particular and terrorism in general. But, please no more, sanctions talk. Because, I don't think China would want to be get the stain of being a pakistan terrorist supporter.
Bhaarath would have agreed for this particular round on the pre-condition that if Pakistan fails to deliver again on 26/11, then there must be some punishment from the international community on Pakistan. The 'global community' must have assured Bhaarath that they will make sure Pakistan will deliver.
Then, the international community(particularly china) would have then put pressure on Pakistan to talk to Bhaarath about terrorism(particularly 26/11) and clear up the matter. They might have told Pakistan that they cannot go on saving Pakistan's a$$ everytime if they continue to act like idiots.
[/Speculation End]
Now, Bhaarath would step up pressure on Pakistan and ask for deliverance on 26/11. If there is nothing to show after some time, say 6 months, then Bhaarath will go back to these 'global forums' and again raise ruckus.
One could say that there is no point in trusting pakistan or its four-fathers. But, I don't think Bhaarath is trusting anyone. Bhaarath is putting pressure on pakistan and its four-fathers.
----
Why can't pakistan just punish Lakhvi and be done with it?
Maybe because that would hamper their home grown terror cottage industry if the terrorists feel that pakistan army cannot protect them anymore. And if the Lakhvi gets deported to any country other than pakistan, then the state of pakistan itself could be implicated by interrogating Lakhvi. And that would place pakistan in bigger problems.
So, its seems like Bhaarath is simply tightening the noose around Pakistan's neck.
----
Treachery of kongis:
What did the kongis do. The kongis tried to save the bakis in 26/11 by raising the false case of Samjautha. They were trying to weaken the case of dhesh. And give an equal equal to bakis.
This shows that kongis were actually conniving with the bakis in weakening the dhesh.
----
That Nayyar guy seems to be a paid agent of bakis. Nothing wrong with that. But, he should not pretend to be a neutral objective commentator.