Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
Prem Ji, regret i wont open the link and read it. But my comments are based on the above: The last part obviously indicates the retard links Visionary Statesmanship with Pappi Jhappi sentiments. But if he really looks into what our Psecs have been doing all along it is exactly what he has recommended in the above. Many of those initiatives have been rebuffed by the Pak establishement, but there is certainly no dearth of Indian left liberals salivating and partaking in the aftermath of the bloody rituals of goat and cow slaughter that Eid entails.I wish, as a Pakistani and a political analyst, that the Indian Prime Minister had asked his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, to prepare for a permanent “No War Pact” with Pakistan. I wish Modi had proposed a “No military or political hostilities” MOU between the two nations. I wish Modi had recommended a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission for Conflict Resolution.” I wish Modi had suggested a “Joint Indo-Pak Military Command Structure,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for a Non-Alignment Movement,” or a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for Global Political Coordination.”However, above and beyond all of these proposals, I wish Modi had accepted the Pakistani Prime Minister’s invitation to visit Pakistan. I wish Modi had agreed and given an exact date for his Pakistani visit. I wish Modi had physically embraced Nawaz Sharif and said to him that he would be in Islamabad during the coming Eid celebrations to be part of the most sacred Muslim religious celebrations. Imagine the impact of such an act of visionary statesmanship: the entire Pakistani nation would be overwhelmed by such an act of humanitarian generosity. Modi’s stature as an outstanding statesman in the entire Muslim world would have been established and, last but not least, Indian Muslims, 175 million of them (as well as the other minorities), would finally put to rest the fear that Modi’s BJP India will be the Hindu majoritarian domination era.My thesis is that there has to be a fundamental paradigm shift from a “Real Politik” approach to conflict-resolution – to a humanistic-ethical discourse.
This is a desperate Paki plea for shitistan to be recognized as India's equal so we do things jointly. Stupid buffoon.Jhujar wrote:Simply Retard Wise Crack
I wish Modi had recommended a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission for Conflict Resolution.” I wish Modi had suggested a “Joint Indo-Pak Military Command Structure,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for a Non-Alignment Movement,” or a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for Global Political Coordination.
The author was on a bob marley-joint at the time of writing this article.Jhujar wrote:Simply Retard Wise Crack
Where Narendra Modi erred
Jhujar wrote:Simply Retard Wise Crack
Where Narendra Modi erredI wish, as a Pakistani and a political analyst, that the Indian Prime Minister had asked his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, to prepare for a permanent “No War Pact” with Pakistan. I wish Modi had proposed a “No military or political hostilities” MOU between the two nations. I wish Modi had recommended a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission for Conflict Resolution.” I wish Modi had suggested a “Joint Indo-Pak Military Command Structure,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for a Non-Alignment Movement,” or a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for Global Political Coordination.”However, above and beyond all of these proposals, I wish Modi had accepted the Pakistani Prime Minister’s invitation to visit Pakistan. I wish Modi had agreed and given an exact date for his Pakistani visit. I wish Modi had physically embraced Nawaz Sharif and said to him that he would be in Islamabad during the coming Eid celebrations to be part of the most sacred Muslim religious celebrations. Imagine the impact of such an act of visionary statesmanship: the entire Pakistani nation would be overwhelmed by such an act of humanitarian generosity. Modi’s stature as an outstanding statesman in the entire Muslim world would have been established and, last but not least, Indian Muslims, 175 million of them (as well as the other minorities), would finally put to rest the fear that Modi’s BJP India will be the Hindu majoritarian domination era.My thesis is that there has to be a fundamental paradigm shift from a “Real Politik” approach to conflict-resolution – to a humanistic-ethical discourse. Both India and Pakistan are faith-based societies with focused spiritual and humanistic devotion to community life. Modi is not wrong when he attributes spiritually to his faith - but he will have to prove that his ideals are consistent with his beliefs. Can Modi give a strategic moral-ethical dimension to India’s foreign policy, particularly its approach to Pakistan, the Kashmir issue and the non-majoritarian dimension to its domestic politics safeguarding 175 million Indian Muslims and other minorities such as Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and so on?And why not - that is what will make Modi the political “Devta” (deity) that he wishes and deserves to beIn the end, the larger battle for the hearts and minds of the people, on both sides of the divide, will be won by the ideas of justice, solidarity, public compassion, reason and adherence to spirituality of one’s faith - both for Hinduism and for the faithful in Pakistan. That’s where Modi can make his mark in modern Indian politics as a statesman. Will he stand up to the task?
harbans wrote:[ The last part obviously indicates the retard links Visionary Statesmanship with Pappi Jhappi sentiments. But if he really looks into what our Psecs have been doing all along it is exactly what he has recommended in the above. Many of those initiatives have been rebuffed by the Pak establishement, but there is certainly no dearth of Indian left liberals salivating and partaking in the aftermath of the bloody rituals of goat and cow slaughter that Eid entails.
Peregrine wrote:Gen Sharif told Fan that the East Turkistan Islamic Movement, an al-Qaida backed militant outfit which has staged major violent attacks in Xinjiang and other parts of China, is a common enemy of the two countries and Pakistan will spare no efforts to crack down on it.
These Pakistanis have their heads in so deep they can do a colonoscopy without benefit of an endoscope.
Just simply Brilliant!!!+108.harbans wrote:These Pakistanis have their heads in so deep they can do a colonoscopy without benefit of an endoscope.
Every paki moron thinks that Modi has won a majority just so that he can "quietly" hand over cashmere to them despite the parliamentary resolution and the determined wishes of an overwhelming majority of the country.shiv wrote:{quote="Jhujar"}Simply Retard Wise Crack
{/quote}I wish Modi had recommended a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission for Conflict Resolution.” I wish Modi had suggested a “Joint Indo-Pak Military Command Structure,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Commission,” a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for a Non-Alignment Movement,” or a “Joint Indo-Pak Initiative for Global Political Coordination.
This is a desperate Paki plea for shitistan to be recognized as India's equal so we do things jointly. Stupid buffoon.
Paki oisealues used to arrogantly assert their superiority over India. Later they adamantly claimed equality. Now they are begging to be acknowledged as equals. Reality has not yet dawned on them.chetak wrote: Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme..... Ad nauseam
We also had and continue to have have Indian oisealues, too well known to be named again, who gave incessantly when it was not required to keep unrealistic and unreasonable paki expectations always sky high.shiv wrote:Paki oisealues used to arrogantly assert their superiority over India. Later they adamantly claimed equality. Now they are begging to be acknowledged as equals. Reality has not yet dawned on them.chetak wrote: Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme, Gimme..... Ad nauseam
shiv wrote: Paki oisealues used to arrogantly assert their superiority over India. Later they adamantly claimed equality. Now they are begging to be acknowledged as equals. Reality has not yet dawned on them.
LAHORE: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is not too happy at his reception in India during his visit there to attend the oath-taking ceremony of Narendra Modi, say his party colleagues.
A senior PML-N member told Dawn on Thursday that Islamabad felt belittled when there was no joint press conference after the one-on-one meeting between the two prime ministers. Short of that Prime Minister Sharif's delegation was expecting a joint communiqué, but none was issued.
Instead New Delhi unilaterally released a press statement which did not carry Islamabad's stance. It had only a passing reference to Mr Sharif and didn't appropriately acknowledge the importance of his presence, the PML-N member said.
The abrupt and inadequate release by New Delhi, he claimed, forced Mr Sharif to hold a press conference of his own - where he read out a carefully-worded statement so that "whatever was achieved by the visit might not go waste".
The PML-N member said the government was now pinning hopes on secretary-level talks - agreed upon by Pakistan and India during Mr Sharif's visit -- for some breakthrough in improving relations with India.
Published in Dawn, June 6th, 2014
A "joint press conference" is not mandated even during a state visit. Nice, yes but not necessary.ramana wrote:It was not a state visit. Hence no joint statement.
A Pakistani High Court has ordered police to charge ex-CIA station chief Jonathan Banks for the murder of civilians in a 2009 drone strike. Prosecutors say he issued ordered the deadly strike and was directly responsible for the deaths.
Judge Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui issued the ruling after hearing a petition from drone activist Kareem Khan, whose son and brother were killed in the 2009 strike in the North Waziristan tribal district.
"Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui of Islamabad High Court ordered today registration of a criminal case for offenses of murder, conspiracy, waging war against Pakistan and offenses under the provisions of Terrorism Act 1997," against Banks, a statement by Khan's lawyers said.
Banks’ cover as CIA Pakistan station chief was blown in 2010 after he was named in court papers. As a result he was forced to flee the country.
"Today's order is a victory for all those innocent civilians that have been killed in US-led drone strikes in Pakistan," said Mirza Shahzad Akbar, lawyer for Khan. He added that the ruling may pave the way for a host of other court cases against the US for its drone program in Pakistan.
Khan has been battling for the last four years to get his case heard and has been provided assistance by the Foundation for Fundamental Rights. Earlier this year, prior to a trip to Europe to speak with British, German and Dutch parliamentarians about his ordeal, Khan was kidnapped.
He was released four days later, amid suspicions that Pakistani intelligence agencies orchestrated the kidnapping.
Washington’s drone program has been a significant bone of contention in US-Pakistani relations over the past few years. However, the program is going through a drawdown at present because of diplomatic sensibilities and the changing situation in Pakistan.
US officials say they have eliminated most of Al-Qaeda’s more important leaders and the ones remaining are more difficult to target, unnamed officials told The Associated Press.
Over 2,000 people have been killed so far in the targeted killing in Pakistan since they began in 2008, according to statistics by AFP. Critics of the program believe it causes far too many civilian casualties, while the Obama administration argues the strikes are an effective way of eliminating wanted terrorists.
Let’s face it. Pakistan has to deal with a hostile Afghanistan, backed by India, on its own. The Indian hand, already visible fanning the insurgency in Balochistan is now suspected of backing TTP raids across the Pak-Afghan border. If these raids continue and evidence of Indian complicity is confirmed then, I imagine, it’s only a matter of time before a flareup occurs. Anti-India lashkars and jaishes are straining at the leash to pay India back in the same coin, and although Islamabad is doing its best to restrain them, there’s really no incentive for Pakistan to continue policing the actions of these groups and risk soldiers’ lives if TTP bandits and murderers continue to receive Indian support and encouragement to attack Pakistan. It’s sad that instead of discovering common interests in a post-conflict Afghanistan, India is adding another layer of mistrust to our enduring rivalry.
Can't believe that this foul mouthed creepy guy is an ex diplomat.James B wrote:Paki Zafar Hila-li spouting the bile
Let’s face it. Pakistan has to deal with a hostile Afghanistan, backed by India, on its own. The Indian hand, already visible fanning the insurgency in Balochistan is now suspected of backing TTP raids across the Pak-Afghan border. If these raids continue and evidence of Indian complicity is confirmed then, I imagine, it’s only a matter of time before a flareup occurs. Anti-India lashkars and jaishes are straining at the leash to pay India back in the same coin, and although Islamabad is doing its best to restrain them, there’s really no incentive for Pakistan to continue policing the actions of these groups and risk soldiers’ lives if TTP bandits and murderers continue to receive Indian support and encouragement to attack Pakistan. It’s sad that instead of discovering common interests in a post-conflict Afghanistan, India is adding another layer of mistrust to our enduring rivalry.
After the slight by the bania, kafir Hindus and after the proof that India is behind BLA & TTP, why should Pakistan 'pin hopes' on India? What are they pinning & pining for?chetak wrote: Nawaz ‘not too happy’ over India visitThe PML-N member said the government was now pinning hopes on secretary-level talks - agreed upon by Pakistan and India during Mr Sharif's visit -- for some breakthrough in improving relations with India.
nothing much, onlee a few small things to foster people to people contacts and aman.SSridhar wrote:{quote="chetak"} Nawaz ‘not too happy’ over India visitAfter the slight by the bania, kafir Hindus and after the proof that India is behind BLA & TTP, why should Pakistan 'pin hopes' on India? What are they pinning & pining for?The PML-N member said the government was now pinning hopes on secretary-level talks - agreed upon by Pakistan and India during Mr Sharif's visit -- for some breakthrough in improving relations with India.{/quote}
This is unheard of, especially after being browbeaten by the ISI first and the mullahs and extremists next and with the dangerous blasphemy cases pending against the bigwigs and the anchor of the channel. Is it a case of nothing more to lose or PML-N supporting GEO from behind the scenes?Nandu wrote:Meanwhile Geo tamasha is a guf that keeps on giving. Latest is that Geo has sued the ISI for defamation and is demanding a public apology.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/ ... PG20140606
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (ZEEL), which is about to launch its premium Hindi general entertainment channel Zindagi later this month, will have content produced overseas in Pakistan. The channel will be launched on June 23 with four Pakistani shows acquired by the network.
If something gets banned - it will only be this channelamit wrote:^^^^^^^
This IMO is a very bad idea and should be shot down by the Govt. It's not that I have any issues with airing Pakistani TV programmes, but why do you need a separate channel to do that? IMO what is being left unsaid is that Zee thinks that there is an audience out there who is "different" and so need a "different" channel to view "different" content. Two Nation theory being played out via TV soaps.
Yuck!
