Geopolitics fully described in a single image.

source is in Japanese though

Naah Putin just added 10M people to Russia along with land the size of Austria."Is Russia afraid of disappearing?" was the question asked in the weekly Le Point by Bruno Tertrais, the scholar author of the book Le choc démographique and vice-president of the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris. "Behind the conflict over Ukraine loom Russian demographic anxieties about the increase in Muslim immigration".
We see a similar situation now in the 2020 decade:The years between the world wars represent an era of broken balances: the retreat of the United States from global geopolitics, the weakening of Great Britain and France, Russian isolation following the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, the resurgence of German power in Europe, and the rise of Japan in East Asia. All these factors complicated great-power politics. This book brings together historians and political scientists to revisit the conventional wisdom on the grand strategies pursued between the World Wars, drawing on theoretical innovations and new primary sources. The contributors suggest that all the great powers pursued policies that, while in retrospect suboptimal, represented conscious, rational attempts to secure their national interests under conditions of extreme uncertainty and intense domestic and international political, economic, and strategic constraints.
The West uses the power of finance and technology to enforce its will on other nations. To this end the West destabilises countries, creates terrorist enclaves and most of all seeks to deprive other countries of sovereignty.
emphasis mine. Putin is identifying Russia with it's ancient civilization instead of being one of xian country. i think.The rules-based order the West goes on about is "nonsense". Who made these rules? Who agreed to them? Russia is an ancient country and civilization and we will not play by these "rigged" rules.
snipThey colonised, started the global slave trade, genocided native Americans, pillaged India and Africa, forced China to buy opium through war.
snipThey flattened German cities without "any military need to do so". There was no need for this except to scare us and the rest of the world. Korea, Vietnam. To this day they "occupy" Japan, South Korea and Germany and other countries while cynically calling them "allies".
snipThey solved the problems at the start of 20c with WW1 and the US established dominance of the world via the dollar as a result of WW2.
all-in-all even though West will call him hypocrite and ask him to look in a mirror, this speech will have massive resonance in every country that was colonized and beyond. He actually called to dismantle the Colonial West more-or-less.A multipolar world offers nations freedom to develop as they wish and they make up the majority of the world.
Nothing will happen. Royal Bank of Scotland was nationalized by the British Government when it went bankrupt. The Swiss and the German governments can bailout their respective national leaders in the banking industry.vinod wrote:European banks in trouble?
https://www.forexlive.com/news/there-ar ... -20221002/
US currently wants Russia to do a tactical nuclear strike in Ukraine and it seems the plan is for a full scale NATO strike on Russian troops in uke in retaliation , the gamble being putin won't escalate further, follow on threat being direct attacks on Russia.ramana wrote:Colonial West is in devolution since 1776 American War of Independence.
In 19th century South America freed itself from Portuguese and Spanish colonization.
20th century saw Asia and Africa de-colonized.
Decolonization process was slow to move to rest of the world.
Only thing is the US got the Empire bug after WWII even though it's no cut out for Imperial program.
Ukraine folly might hasten it.
Niall Fergusson states the proposition Is the US is an empire? And thinks so.
However, the two large empires Roman and British were 2000 years apart and power was short-lived.
Han China was powerful but its population at that time could not support the idea for long.
Led to four centuries of instability till Tang.
President Biden is kicking off a process of reevaluating, and potentially altering, the U.S. relationship with Saudi Arabia following the announcement by a Saudi-led coalition that it would slash oil production, the White House said Tuesday.
That move by OPEC Plus last week to cut its oil output by 2 million barrels a day could boost oil prices in the United States and worldwide, potentially hurting consumers during a tough winter, and its timing a month before the midterm elections was a political blow to Biden that some in the president’s circle saw as a personal shot at the president.
Since then, calls to revisit America’s support for Saudi Arabia have emerged in Congress and elsewhere. Officials said Tuesday that Biden is doing so, but they offered no details on how the relationship might shift or what policies the president is considering.
In an interview on CNN Tuesday, Biden said that “there will be consequences” for Saudi Arabia, but he declined to specify what they might be.
“There’s going to be some consequences for what they’ve done, with Russia,” Biden said, adding, “I’m not going to get into what I’d consider and what I have in mind. But there will be -- there will be consequences.”
Kirby said Biden was open to discussing proposals put forward by Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Robert Menendez (N.J.), Richard J. Durbin (Ill.) and Chris Murphy (Conn.). Those senators have proposed various changes to the U.S.-Saudi relationship, including limiting security cooperation; reducing arms sales; and removing OPEC Plus’s exemption from U.S. antitrust laws.
U.S. officials have worked to press Saudi Arabia to produce more oil to compensate for the global shortage and price increase caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The president personally visited Saudi leaders in Jiddah in July, taking part in a two-hour meeting that included Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the country’s de facto ruler.
“Clearly the Biden administration made an attempt to try to repair the relationship. I supported that effort but it failed,” Murphy said in an interview. “The whole point of looking the other way when it comes to the Saudi war in Yemen and their awful human rights record was to make sure they would pick us in the middle of an international crisis, and instead they chose the Russians.”
“For a long time, Saudi Arabia was a really imperfect ally. Now, there’s a question as to whether they’re an ally at all,” Murphy added.
With last week’s announcement, however, Saudi Arabia appeared to signal a rejection of the overture, at least in part. During the campaign, Biden had promised to make the kingdom a “pariah,” a comment that seemed to deeply anger the crown prince and other Saudi leaders.
The administration, like many before it, has been trying to persuade Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Persian Gulf to invest in a coordinated surface-to-air missile system to fend off any potential attack from Iran. American officials would like such a system to be purchased from the United States, which has tens of thousands of troops in the region, and to be interoperable with its systems.
This month, the State Department approved a $3 billion sale of the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System to Kuwait — the same system it now plans to send to Ukraine to protect against Russian missile attacks.
But other gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, have been more reticent about committing to similar purchases, even as they separately have discussed sophisticated arms purchases with Russia and other suppliers.
If they are following such fuzzy illogic, they won't ask - if Russia cannot defeat Ukraine and has to resort to tactical nukes, what will it do in response to a full scale NATO attack having used nukes once already ? Will it become even more of a pariah for using them a second time using MIRV ICBMs and hypersonic missiles from subs hiding in any ocean of the world ?kit wrote: US currently wants Russia to do a tactical nuclear strike in Ukraine and it seems the plan is for a full scale NATO strike on Russian troops in uke in retaliation , the gamble being putin won't escalate further, follow on threat being direct attacks on Russia.
NATO is not as committed as it may have been once upon a time.Cyrano wrote:If they are following such fuzzy illogic, they won't ask - if Russia cannot defeat Ukraine and has to resort to tactical nukes, what will it do in response to a full scale NATO attack having used nukes once already ? Will it become even more of a pariah for using them a second time using MIRV ICBMs and hypersonic missiles from subs hiding in any ocean of the world ?kit wrote: US currently wants Russia to do a tactical nuclear strike in Ukraine and it seems the plan is for a full scale NATO strike on Russian troops in uke in retaliation , the gamble being putin won't escalate further, follow on threat being direct attacks on Russia.
I think this whole nuclear talk by the western leaders and media is total BS to distract from the fact that they are losing massively in Ukraine. No amount of bigger and bigger lies are able to hide this fact on the ground. NATO's equipment reserves have dwindled, they dont have the capacity, skilled people and the money to produce more. Just replenishing what they gave to Ukraine will take years. Their forces and officers have no battle experience. Any call for mobilisation will fail miserably. Their economies are facing disaster. How can they afford a war with a nuclear super power who shows no signs of fatigue after six months ? So much bluster and nonsense they keep spewing !
BERLIN, Oct 8 (Reuters) - Cables vital for the rail network were intentionally cut in two places causing a near three-hour halt to all rail traffic in northern Germany on Saturday morning, in what authorities called an act of sabotage without identifying who might be responsible.
The federal police are investigating the incident, Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said, adding the motive for it was unclear.
The disruption raised alarm bells after NATO and the European Union last month stressed the need to protect critical infrastructure after what they called acts of sabotage on the Nord Stream gas pipelines.
"It is clear that this was a targeted and malicious action," Transport Minister Volker Wissing told a news conference.
A security source said there were a variety of possible causes, ranging from cable theft - which is frequent - to a targeted attack.
Omid Nouripour, leader of the Greens party, which is part of Chancellor Olaf Scholz's federal coalition, said anyone who attacked the country's critical infrastructure would receive a "decisive response".
"Due to sabotage on cables that are indispensable for rail traffic, Deutsche Bahn had to stop rail traffic in the north this morning for nearly three hours," the state rail operator said in a statement.
Ramana garu,
It isn't crumbling. It is shifting strategy and withdrawing from the world due to technology and devolving of power to regional powers. Similar to what the British did but retains power projection capability.Dilbu wrote:This is american power as the world understands it after the demise of USSR, crumbling right in front of the eyes.
I submit that West Germans were retaining the nuclear option via centrifuge technology to Pakistan.chetak wrote:Follow the links to understand how the germans were complicit in nuclear proliferation on a global scale.
Their relationship with the pakis goes back many decades.
They would not have dared to do all this without the approval and permission of their ameriki masters
These people are a janus faced culture, this explains their longstanding Hindu phobia as well as Indophobia
https://www.dw.com/en/germans-allegedly ... /a-1108768
https://www.dw.com/en/german-ship-seize ... /a-1075724
https://www.dw.com/en/a-new-turn-in-ger ... s/a-905390
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-scrutinizes-be ... /a-1058231
Every American executive and engineer working in China’s semiconductor manufacturing industry resigned yesterday, paralyzing Chinese manufacturing overnight.
One round of sanctions from Biden did more damage than all four years of performative sanctioning under Trump.
Both germany and japan are just a few screwdriver turns away from becoming full fledged nuclear weapon states.ramana wrote:I submit that West Germans were retaining the nuclear option via centrifuge technology to Pakistan.chetak wrote:Follow the links to understand how the germans were complicit in nuclear proliferation on a global scale.
Their relationship with the pakis goes back many decades.
They would not have dared to do all this without the approval and permission of their ameriki masters
These people are a janus faced culture, this explains their longstanding Hindu phobia as well as Indophobia
https://www.dw.com/en/germans-allegedly ... /a-1108768
https://www.dw.com/en/german-ship-seize ... /a-1075724
https://www.dw.com/en/a-new-turn-in-ger ... s/a-905390
https://www.dw.com/en/eu-scrutinizes-be ... /a-1058231
All done under the table with a benign US watch.
Am sure the German BND was getting the Chinese nuke designs as pro quid quo.
We haven't explored what were the Germans getting in return?
the so called "flight and expulsions" were hate filled and wholesale butchery, like what the pakis did to the Hindus and sikhs in punjabDuring the later stages of World War II and the post-war period, Germans and Volksdeutsche fled and were expelled from various Eastern and Central European countries, including Czechoslovakia and the former German provinces of Silesia, Pomerania, and East Prussia, which were annexed by Poland and the Soviet Union. The idea to expel the Germans from the annexed territories was proposed by Winston Churchill, in conjunction with the Polish and Czechoslovak exile governments in London at least since 1942.[1][2] In late 1944 the Czechoslovak exile government pressed[citation needed] the Allies to espouse the principle of German population transfers. On the other hand, Polish prime minister Tomasz Arciszewski, in an interview for The Sunday Times on 17 December 1944, supported the annexation of Warmia-Masuria, Opole Regency, north-east parts of Lower Silesia (up to the Oder line), and parts of Pomerania (without Szczecin), but he opposed the idea of expulsion. He wanted to naturalize the Germans as Polish citizens and to assimilate them.[3]
Joseph Stalin, in concert with other communist leaders, planned to expel all ethnic Germans from east of the Oder and from lands which from May 1945 fell inside the Soviet occupation zones.[4] In 1941, his government had already transported Germans from Crimea to Central Asia.
Between 1944 and 1948, millions of people, including ethnic Germans (Volksdeutsche) and German citizens (Reichsdeutsche), were permanently or temporarily moved from Central and Eastern Europe. By 1950, a total of approximately 12 million[5] Germans had fled or been expelled from east-central Europe into Allied-occupied Germany and Austria. The West German government put the total at 14.6 million,[6] including a million ethnic Germans who had settled in territories conquered by Nazi Germany during World War II, ethnic German migrants to Germany after 1950, and the children born to expelled parents. The largest numbers came from former eastern territories of Germany ceded to the People's Republic of Poland and the Soviet Union (about seven million),[7][8] and from Czechoslovakia (about three million).
The areas affected included the former eastern territories of Germany, which were annexed by Poland[9] (see Recovered Territories)[10] and the Soviet Union after the war, as well as Germans who were living within the borders of the pre-war Second Polish Republic, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, and the Baltic States. The Nazis had made plans—only partially completed before the Nazi defeat—to remove many Slavic and Jewish people from Eastern Europe and settle the area with Germans.[11][12]
The death toll attributable to the flight and expulsions is disputed, with estimates ranging from 500,000–600,000[13][14] and up to 2 to 2.5 million
For the first time after several years of sustained efforts, a resolution has been tabled in the US House of Representatives declaring Pakistan Army's action against Bengalis and Hindus in 1971 during the Liberation War of Bangladesh as a "genocide" and "crime against humanity". Sustained efforts were made in the last few years after which the first resolution has been introduced which has called on the Pakistan government to apologise to the people of Bangladesh for its role in such a genocide, United News Bangladesh reported.
The legislation was introduced by two Congressmen Ro Khanna, and Steve Chabot, who recognized that such atrocities against ethnic Bengalis and Hindus constitute crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.
Congressman Chabot said legislation looks to recognize that the mass atrocities committed against Bengalis and Hindus, in particular, were indeed a genocide.
Should the United States therefore not apologize for coming to the military aid of pakistan while it was carrying out a genocide ????Dilbu wrote:US resolution terms Pakistan army's act in 1971 Bangladesh war as 'genocide'For the first time after several years of sustained efforts, a resolution has been tabled in the US House of Representatives declaring Pakistan Army's action against Bengalis and Hindus in 1971 during the Liberation War of Bangladesh as a "genocide" and "crime against humanity". Sustained efforts were made in the last few years after which the first resolution has been introduced which has called on the Pakistan government to apologise to the people of Bangladesh for its role in such a genocide, United News Bangladesh reported.
The legislation was introduced by two Congressmen Ro Khanna, and Steve Chabot, who recognized that such atrocities against ethnic Bengalis and Hindus constitute crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.
Congressman Chabot said legislation looks to recognize that the mass atrocities committed against Bengalis and Hindus, in particular, were indeed a genocide.
Seems like a joke as US has been waving sanctions like a magic danda!
Today, nations increasingly carry out geopolitical combat through economic means. Policies governing everything from trade and investment to energy and exchange rates are wielded as tools to win diplomatic allies, punish adversaries, and coerce those in between. Not so in the United States, however. America still too often reaches for the gun over the purse to advance its interests abroad. The result is a playing field sharply tilting against the United States.
“Geoeconomics, the use of economic instruments to advance foreign policy goals, has long been a staple of great-power politics. In this impressive policy manifesto, Blackwill and Harris argue that in recent decades, the United States has tended to neglect this form of statecraft, while China, Russia, and other illiberal states have increasingly employed it to Washington’s disadvantage.”
―G. John Ikenberry, Foreign Affairs
“A readable and lucid primer…The book defines the extensive topic and opens readers’ eyes to its prevalence throughout history…[Presidential] candidates who care more about protecting American interests would be wise to heed the advice of War by Other Means and take our geoeconomic toolkit more seriously.
―Jordan Schneider, Weekly Standard
TOKYO, Nov 1 (Reuters) - Japan has decided to retain its stake in the new Russian operator of the Sakhalin-1 oil and gas project and has asked Japanese consortium members to stay to ensure the country's energy security, the industry minister said on Tuesday.
"The Sakhalin-1 is extremely important for Japan's energy security as it is a valuable source outside of the Middle East," industry minister Yasutoshi Nishimura told a news conference, citing that Japan was highly dependent on Middle East crude oil
many countries are only just beginning to understand India's position of "supreme national interest"Cyrano wrote:A lot of countries simply went along with the US narrative that Russia with its rusted army has no chance in front of NATO's freshly minted Ukry boys, and that its moth eaten economy will simply disintegrate under the shock n awe of sanctions, that ruble will be rubble etc, and imagined a badly mauled bear to retreat back into its den in 3 months max, lick it's wounds through summer and go back to sulky hibernation in winter. Including Japan. Tsk tsk...