Re: Levant crisis - III
Posted: 25 Aug 2016 11:14
real power is now with turkish police and erdonanist mobilization fronts and grey wolves.
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
she's had to fire warning shots before in the strait of hormuz.Singha wrote:amrikan LPD dhoti shivering with gatling guns on jeeps on deck during bosporus transit
https://twitter.com/JosephHDempsey/stat ... 4888331268
Two American fighter pilots who intercepted Syrian combat jets over northern Syria last week said they came within 2,000 feet of the planes without the Syrians aware they were being shadowed....
The sudden move by Bashar al-Assad’s regime in the city of Al-Hassakah, north eastern Syria, was really interesting both in terms of the target chosen and the timing. The regime has launched air raids against Kurdish militias inside the city and its environs while there are increasing signs of a scaling down of tension between Turkey and Iran, specifically after the visit of Mohammad Jawad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister to Turkey.Contrary to Washington’s silent approval of a “Greater Kurdistan”, it is obvious that neither Ankara nor Tehran accept such a project; indeed, it is where their interests converge. In the meantime, since the failed coup attempts Turkish leaders have been sending ambiguous signs regarding Ankara’s current views on the Assad regime which may be construed as indirect messages to influential regional players.This has been taking place while preparations gather pace in Iraq for the “liberation of Mosul”, against continued confusion surrounding the roles of the Kurdish Peshmerga and Shi’ite ‘People’s Mobilisation’ militias in the expected battle for Mosul, the Arab Sunnis’ largest city in Iraq.
chanakyaa wrote:Y.Kanan, so you are saying that upon returning from Moskow (emphasis, Erdo went to Moskow, Pooteen did not visit Istanbul), he feels so confident that he can show his teeth without expecting any consequences?? C'mon on....it is very tough to believe that. In fact Russians, may have trapped YooS and Erdo in a awkward position (and I wonder that is why Bye-den visiting him). Forget Erdo's territorial ambitions, and regardless of who you are rooting for, i bet Erdo is thinking that the opportunity to eliminate or severely minimize curdish threat is now and it may not happen with YooS blessing/partnership (fortunately or unfortunately), knowing fully well that YooS has not shied away from supporting independent curdish nation/state....
snahata wrote:Completely disagree kanan saheb on your analysis.It is not the size of the dog but fight in the dog.It is my prediction if NATO attacks Russia with conventional forces on Russian soil they will be defeated and their armies destroyed without using any nuclear weapons. It has happened several times already in the last few centuries and I hope the Europeans and Americans have learned that lesson.Because if they have not they will learn it the hard way again.
It is also my prediction that Russia will come out ahead in the Syrian crisis keep watching grand master Putin,s next move.It is true that Russia does not have a land border with Syria and that limits options for the Russian army unlike in Ukraine but Russia has plenty of naval and air power they can bring to bear if and when necessary as also air borne troops if needed.
If u look at historical battles like Alexander vs durius or Babar vs Lodhi. it is the much smaller army that won.Modern warfare is not the same I understand but basic concept have not changed. More things change more they are the same as they say.
Victory in wars have very little to do with size of the economy and the bigger economy therefore will be the winner, not at all.American economy was much bigger than German economy at the start of the 2nd world war but I am sure that german army would have bitten the crap out of americans in a land war one to one.
Come on - common sense will tell you the US, or even Turkey, could wipe out all the Russian air power in Syria with a series of concentrated strikes in less than a day (if they were willing to risk nuclear war). That's been true since Day 1 of the intervention. If Russia didn't have nukes, their Syrian expeditionary force probably would have been wiped out already (indeed would never have been sent). The fact is, Russia has very limited conventional combat power in theatre. Only in a defensive war on its own soil could Russia prevail without using nukes. To believe otherwise demonstrates an inability to think critically. Those who pump up Russian military power are the same ones who like to engage in delusional chest puffing and jingoism about our own military, too.habal wrote:incredibly weak, miniscule, military weakness, huge bluff .. you nees to stop using such incredible superlatives because without Russia there would well have been no Syria today, the country was 2/3rd gawn. From a position of incredible disadvantage, Assad forces are in advantageous position through out Syria and on the offensive instead of on the defensive. Now, within a few weeks they will take over aleppo too .. was all this imaginable in jan, 2015.