Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion
Posted: 25 May 2014 07:53
Dudes on the forum, am I the only one who thinks that the khans have an army of drones to put across their views on BRF. like the 50 cent a post users from the PRC.
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
UBji, me thinks the selection is not that difficult (unless I'm missing a berry berry deep point u are making). World's last untapped reserve of billions of hungry consumers are in China and India. If you were top 100 MNC, you would personally call Clinton and give her marching order to FOCUS (and everything that comes with the focus)....
Let's see: what continent should we focus on for the next 4 years? spin the globe: Oirope? Naw! That ain't "diverse" enough. Africa? Naw, BO is already pouring $$B down the sewer there, and all he's getting for it is more Boko Haram and Somalian warlords. Antarctica? It's breaking up. South America? Nah! I cyaint speak Portuguese and them Brazilians are getting snooty. North America? Wait a minute, we are so close to it that it comes under the Dept of Homeland Security, not State.
That leaves: Australia? Nah! Not diverse enough. Which leaves ASIA!!
Oh, can I name one country in Asia? How about IndiaPakistan? Great! We're already owned by China, so that's fine. OK.
I mean, the way they decide is like: The SoS has said that we are going to focus on Asia. India is in Asia! So India QUALIFIES for this year's Attention Quota.
....
They don't need to. They are better at PR than chipanda.Pratyush wrote:Dudes on the forum, am I the only one who thinks that the khans have an army of drones to put across their views on BRF. like the 50 cent a post users from the PRC.
My point is that all this focus-hocus is absurd. The US foreign policy establishment appears to be full of drones (of the Drones Club variety, not Predator variety) too lazy and incompetent to study each country in the world as a distinct entity, and determine the best course to have good relations with each. I for sure don't feel thrilled to hear that the US is going to "focus" on India because India is one of the countries in Asia, and Her EJness HC has declared that her focus is going to be on Asia.unless I'm missing a berry berry deep point u are making
Darshan,darshhan wrote:I have a noticed a trend amongst America lovers on BRF and elsewhere. They always want to use the negativity surrounding Indo China relations for their own cynical benefits. Their best strategy for a pliant India is to keep trumpeting how China poses a threat to India and how America will be our saviour (Ofcourse we saw how that worked for Georgia and Ukraine).schinnas wrote:
Even otherwise, I see increasing aggressiveness and belligerence of China as both a strategic threat to India.
America is far worse compared to Chinese. Chinese are atleast pragmatic. One can work with them. Americans are ideological. It is impossible to rely on America
Rsangram ji, I do not keep track of my previous life. I am sorry, I will not be able to answer this question of yours.rsangram wrote: Darshan,
Was your name by any chance Jawahar Lal in your previous life ? No ? Nehru, perhaps ?
Not an accident as most of them were trained at Oxbridge to be extremely gracious to the natives. And even learn to pronounce ootacamand.UlanBatori wrote: The US foreign policy establishment appears to be full of drones (of the Drones Club variety, not Predator variety)
Cosmo ji good point. A hat tip to you sire.Cosmo_R wrote:I do. Weakness is provocative. Blood in the water and all
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130001
That coupled with evangelical - I mean literally not some bhusa bhusa azure evangelist or cloud evangelist - legions is a forceful driver.udaym wrote: World's last untapped reserve of billions of hungry consumers are in China and India. If you were top 100 MNC, you would personally call Clinton and give her marching order to FOCUS (and everything that comes with the focus)
Indian court drops charge against NYPD officer
by Associated Press, washingtonpost.com
November 30th -0001
NEW DELHI — A court in India’s capital has dropped a weapons charge against a New York City police officer and is allowing him to leave the country, his lawyer said Saturday.
Officer Manny Encarnacion was arrested in March while visiting his wife in New Delhi after Indian airport authorities discovered three bullets he had accidentally packed in his luggage. He had been out on bail since his arrest, but was barred from leaving India until the case was resolved.
Before leaving for India, Encarnacion went to a police firing range and put the bullets in a coat pocket, according to New York City police. He packed the coat for the trip, forgetting that the ammunition was there, the police said.
Encarnacion, 49, joined the NYPD in 2004 and is assigned to a precinct in Harlem.
His lawyer, Samarjit Pattnaik, said the court heard the case Friday. “All charges against the officer were quashed,” he said.
Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association President Patrick J. Lynch said, “We are pleased that police officer Encarnacion’s unfortunate ordeal has been resolved and that he’ll soon be returning home.”
Encarnacion’s arrest took place months after a diplomatic spat between the United States and India over the arrest and strip search of an Indian consular official for alleged visa fraud in New York. But Indian authorities say Encarnacion’s arrest had nothing to do with the spat.
Pattnaik said he would approach the court early next week to get Encarnacion’s passport released, and that the officer should be set to leave the country by the end of next week.
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
OT. And just because they copied a few symbols of Bharatiyata, you assume that they changed over from an exclusive to an inclusive philosophy?schinnas wrote:
1. GoI grants and support to Indic NGOs and movements regardless of religion (There are several Christian leaders who have incorporated the wisdom of Bharath or atleast fully appreciate wisdom and values of Bharath. Ex: http://www.ocoy.org/, http://www.vagamon.com/kurisumala/kurisumala.htm, ) .... Bharatanatyam etc.
Dont blame you. I would not want to keep track of my previous life either, if it was Jawahar Lal's.darshhan wrote:Rsangram ji, I do not keep track of my previous life. I am sorry, I will not be able to answer this question of yours.rsangram wrote: Darshan,
Was your name by any chance Jawahar Lal in your previous life ? No ? Nehru, perhaps ?
How can it be "too lazy"?? When I compared the presence of their military to 50 years ago..all I see is expansion. Electronic surveillance can touch every single human being on the planet with modern electronic gadgets. Is that a sign of "incompetence"?? Now under the name of BK Halam, they are now in Nigeria.
...too lazy and incompetent to study each country in the world as a distinct entity, and determine the best course to have good relations with each. I for sure don't feel thrilled to hear that the US is going to "focus" on India because India is one of the countries in Asia, and Her EJness HC has declared that her focus is going to be on Asia.
rsangram wrote: Dont blame you. I would not want to keep track of my previous life either, if it was Jawahar Lal's.
No, just your assertions that China is better than the US and that "we can deal with the Chinese", reminds me of Nehru's over the top emotional investment in the Chinese. In your case, it is in the reverse. An over the top negative emotional investment in Massa.
"Massa is bad". "Massa is so bad that it puts Paki to shame". "No No, Massa is so bad that the Chinese are even better". "No No, the spinach my mom made me eat as a child was enormously more delicious than Massa". "No, No, I would rather make love to my dog's excrement than Massa". "No No, Massa is so bad, my dog would not want to go excrete on it". "Massa women are overweight, ignorant and of course, loose(no pun intended), not to mention racist." "Massa men, well the less said about them the better"."Massa lawyers are the worst in the world, the only thing even worst is Massa Medical System". "Oh, I forgot, Massa education system, particularly higher ed, thumbs down, all way down or maybe up Massa's you know where." "The only thing worse than Massa are those Indians in India who are the admirers of Massa who think Massa can do no wrong, if you dont count, of course, those Indians in Massa who are just so grateful that they have been allowed to come and live in clean, segregated Massa neigborhoods."
I get it. "Massa bad--India good"!
Ah! A clear, clear demonstration of how the American (At least Noo Yoik) Legal System is vastly superior to the SDRE Indian kangaroo courts.Officer Manny Encarnacion was arrested in March while visiting his wife in New Delhi after Indian airport authorities discovered three bullets he had accidentally packed in his luggage. He had been out on bail since his arrest, but was barred from leaving India until the case was resolved.
Before leaving for India, Encarnacion went to a police firing range and put the bullets in a coat pocket, according to New York City police. He packed the coat for the trip, forgetting that the ammunition was there, the police said.
Encarnacion, 49, joined the NYPD in 2004 and is assigned to a precinct in Harlem.
His lawyer, Samarjit Pattnaik, said the court heard the case Friday. “All charges against the officer were quashed,” he said.
1. Yuwar Honner, this is a Serious Case of Deliberate Fraud, Concealment, and Conspiracy to Use a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD).
2. The Defendant did, with malice aforethought, visit the Police Range, where he proceeded to acquire several Weapons of Mass Destruction.
3. He then showed deliberate intent to conceal, by placing said WMD inside the pocket of a thick article of outerwear, which he then folded several times and concealed at the bottom of a suitcase.
4. The State submits that the use of a thick outerwear (a.k.a. Coat) is clear evidence of malicious intent: No one needs a Coat in India. A langoti would have been quite sufficient, consistent with the attire preferred by most American tourists.
5. Defendant then brought said suitcase to India, using unspecified means to get the WMD through the detection machines at a US airport. This indicates that he had accomplices at the US airport, both at baggage check-in, and at baggage loading checkpoints.
6. The plot was obviously extreme in its potential to kill and maim Americans. There were several items of WMD in Defendant's possession. Even one of those would have been sufficient to penetrate and destroy the tire of a large airliner, hereinafter referred to as Airliner of The First Part (ATFP) during the takeoff run with full fuel and passenger load from a major international airport. This would have caused said airliner to veer out of control, and impact another full airliner, hereinafter referred to as Airliner of the Second Part (ATSP) waiting to cross the runway.
7. The State presents evidence that the US Secretary of State (hereinafter referred to as SoS) was scheduled to visit India during that period. Had said SoS chosen to visit at this time, the airliner carrying him and his entourage of 180 people, could have been on the ground as ATSP waiting to cross said runway. Impact of ATFP with ATSP would have caused a major fire and the death of nearly a thousand people, in addition to causing numerous deaths on the Delhi roads as the US Embassy SUVs were driven by DUI drivers towards said airport.
8. Thus, Yuwar Honner, this is a case of deliberate, premeditated Attempted Mass Murder Using Weapons of Mass Destruction, and should be punished in the most severe manner as appropriate. We submit that Defendant is guilty on all 6 counts of Attempted Mass Murder, Mayhem, 181 counts of Denial of Rights, 180 counts of Assault with Intent to Kill Against a Federal Official, and 12 counts of Concealment of Weapons at an Airport. He should be sentenced to a minimum of 20 years on each count, adding up to 6893 years to be served consecutively without parole.
Afghanistan is jihadi central right now. Probably made it easier for secret service and other agencies to ensure his safety.Raja Bose wrote:Obama slips into Afghanistan to visit US troops
The most powerful man in the world and defender of FREEDOOMMM!!!...sneaks in like a thief?
Lost would mean they had to have gained before. At best they stitched together a "government" full of drug lords and others out to make a quick buck. The US as we know it is in the terminal stage of cancer. They have finished themselves with their fiscal policies and monetary easing. It's time for India to step up to the plate and bring about positive change in the neighborhood.Raja Bose wrote:You mean the USA lost in AfPak just like the ill-equipped Rooskies?!
Resentment is OK. I feel the resentment too. I guess, I was never overly enamored with either Massa or the West to begin with, to feel "let down", or "betrayed", which seems to be the source of a lot of the angst and hurt feelings here. I suspect, again I am not sure, but I suspect, some of the ill feelings also arise here from individual bad experiences in the US or US Embassy or Consulates or from individuals on the forum who are part of the elite in India and therefore, enjoy a privileged life in India and are not terribly bothered by the status quo in India, and in fact have a stake in perpetuating the status quo in India. Status quo in India looks bad, very bad by all measures to status quo in the US. So, a reflexive over criticism of the US emerges from a defensive mindset, which is meant to defend the status quo in India, no matter how bad it gets. How else can we make Indian status quo look good or even not as bad or even if bad, somewhat defensible, compared to the US ?Shankk wrote:rsangram, what is the exact thing that is bothering you? Why is it so hard for you understand the resentment amongst the members here?
People see it and react to it. You apparently don't like it. What do you expect from Indians in general and BRFites on this forum?
- It is abundantly clear that India wanted NM to be a PM. It is a proven fact now and no more a wishful thinking.*
- America actively tried to sabotage any chances of election of NM as PM. US senator is on record confirming that.*
- India is a sovereign democratic country and US claims to be a friend but covertly tried to sabotage the aspirations of majority.*
- It is proven beyond doubt that America has interests in Asian and middle eastern countries keep fighting with each other so the west derives benefit out of it. Even if you ignore the world, take a look at India and Pakistan...they have always tried to foment the fights between two countries while paying lip service to talks and peace. BTW that is one of the main reason why US wants to get itself involved in India Pakistan peace initiatives...they can find ways to scuttle any such initiative. In American terminology "being in driver seat"
Batori jiUlanBatori wrote:It is both laziness and incompetence on the part of the STATE Department, whose supposed portfolio is diplomacy, not military action, nor intelligence ( ha!) gathering. Ordering an invasion is a poor substitute for patient, intelligent (I mean of the intelligent kind, not videotaping ppl in bedrooms kind) engagement and building trust and understanding. As the experience in Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Syria, and soon, Nigeria, show.
I don't for a moment imagine that either the military or the intel-gathering depts are lazy or incompetent. Also, they DO get the "Best of the Best of the Best" both in sheer bravery and strength on the part of the soldiers, and smarts on the part of the ppl in the tech caves. And it shows.
Meanwhile, the vast expenditure on the State Dept. appears to be a waste of $$. They could install automatic visa machines next to the condom dispensers at airports and bus stations and close down the super-fortresses protecting Ambassador Paco and his cretins.
Blackwater has changed its name, just like all other good non state actors. That is all.Neshant wrote:Black water was a terrorist organization engaged in killing people in foreign countries that had been invaded by the US to expropriate resources.
They probably dissolved because of lawsuits being launched against them by family members & relatives whom they had killed overseas.
The privatization of war fighting is a real bad idea.
I haven't been reading all posts in detail, but the above statement caught my eye.rsangram wrote:
And I have some news for you. Of all the countries in the world, no one is really a genuine friend of India's, no not even Bhutan. The government in exile of Tibet come closest. And as bad as this may sound, but in relative terms, the only country with any significant power that we can reach some sort of even an imperfect alliance with(not friendship) in today's, is unfortunately, Massa. And trust me, we need allies. We absolutely need allies, as imperfect as they may be and as imperfect as we are.
UBji, I'm not an expert in US VA administration, but later this year important US elections are coming up, presidential in 2016; and whenever elections in US come up, issues that otherwise go on unnoticed or cared less about, somehow become extremely important. VA issue becomes particularly important as it allows Dems' opponents to hit Dems hard on their turf of "healthcare"; somehow making a link between Obamacare and everything that is going wrong in healthcare. VA's inefficiencies are well documented and it is not the first time they are have come under fire. And the reason they need all the firepower is because they attempted to use Obamacare in his 2nd term elections and it did not work. Republicans are looking for holes in healthcare, and VA, unfortunately due to high demand, becomes an easy target. Just my view on the episode looking from outside.....
. look at the unfolding Veterans Administration Hospital scandal, where officials are being reamed out for HIDING the truth that many veterans have been denied appointments to get attention for critical illness, and have died waiting. Do you know WHY the officials felt compelled to do this? It is because the demand for attention from injured/disabled veterans is so huge. So why hide it? Because the government dare not ask for the resources needed to take care of this huge increase of wounded patients, because that would expose how bad the human cost of the wars is on the American side..
Bagram (Afghanistan) (AFP) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai was offered a meeting with President Barack Obama at Bagram Air Base outside Kabul but declined, a US official said Sunday.
Whatever you think of him, Narendra Modi’s victory is a global event. Nobody knows whether Mr Modi will embrace the US-India relationship or walk the multipolar walk. His swearing-in on Monday as India’s prime minister coincides with Vladimir Putin’s “pivot to Asia” with the 30-year China-Russia gas deal.
US President Barack Obama’s own pivot looks increasingly content-free. If the US president is to retrieve the geopolitical initiative, he will need to win over India’s new strongman. India, as they say, is the “global swing state” of the 21st century. Mr Obama must ensure it swings America’s way.
That looks like a bit of a stretch right now. Mr Modi is bristling with resentment at a US that denied him a visa in 2005 over his role in the 2002 Gujarat massacres and only lifted the ban recently. In contrast, Mr Modi visited Japan five times during that period and China on three occasions – always getting the red carpet treatment.
Normally Indian chief ministers meet one member of the Chinese politburo. On his most recent trip Mr Modi met four. Uniquely for a provincial leader, he was also received in the Great Hall of the People. President Xi Jinping clearly saw Mr Modi coming. Mr Obama denied him entry. That, at least, is how Mr Modi sees it.
Nor does he make a secret of his grievance. Mr Modi’s advisers have put it out that his first two trips are likely to be to Japan and China, both of which he admires for their ability to execute big projects and create manufacturing jobs – core planks in the Bharatiya Janata party’s election platform. After that, he is likely to visit the Brics summit in Brazil in July where he will get a photo opportunity with Mr Xi and Mr Putin. Only in September will Mr Modi touch down on US soil (visa in hand) for the UN summit in New York.
“There is no need for Mr Modi to go to Washington and beg for a lunch meeting with the US president,” wrote Kanwal Sibal, who is on the short list to be Mr Modi’s national security adviser.
Successive administrations – starting from Bill Clinton’s – might argue that the US has already bent over backwards to seduce India into its fold. George W Bush carved out a giant exception to his weapons of mass destruction policy by accepting India into the nuclear weapons club.
Mr Obama completed that deal and offered his first state dinner to Manmohan Singh, the then Indian prime minister, whom he described as his guru. Mr Obama even travelled to New Delhi in 2010 to declare that the US supported India’s permanent membership of the UN Security Council – again, a giant exception that was offered to no other country. But Mr Obama’s UN gesture had little impact on Indians.
To borrow a phrase from Mohandas Gandhi, they viewed it as a postdated cheque on a failing bank. Can Mr Obama write any cheques that do not bounce?
The answer is clearly yes – if he wants to. For all of Mr Modi’s resentment at the US, he has already shown his pragmatism. In addition to having laundered his image since 2002 by focusing on Gujarat’s development, Mr Modi has swallowed one genuine enmity before he is even sworn in.
By inviting Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan’s prime minister, to attend today’s oath-taking in New Delhi, Mr Modi signalled he is open for business. His mandate is to lift India’s growth rate and create jobs for the millions of young men roaming the countryside. War with Pakistan would derail that agenda. So too would friction with China.
It is difficult to imagine he would pick a fight with the US, which remains the world’s largest investor. This is where Mr Obama’s diplomatic skills will be tested. In the first instance, he needs to restore Mr Modi’s “face”.
India’s prime minister believes America has treated him as an untouchable. Only the royal treatment would atone. It is very hard to imagine Mr Obama taking anyone into the Oval Office and calling them “buddy”. That was Mr Bush’s speciality. But he will need to make a big gesture to break the ice.
The US must also show it is willing to help Mr Modi’s agenda. In the past few years India has treated foreign investors badly, including US companies, by imposing arbitrary and retroactive tax bills. Assuming Mr Modi puts India’s venal tax bureaucracy in its place, the door will be open for the country’s foreign investment boom to resume.
Whatever lift the US can give to Mr Modi’s development goals will be worth its weight in diplomatic gold.
US business leaders remain agitated by India’s failure to give them a liability waiver on nuclear power plant accidents. They should move past it. The world has changed since the meltdown in Fukushima.
The US is unlikely to reap the commercial dividends of its nuclear deal with India. Like China, India has a limitless appetite for cheap energy. Mr Modi is likely to take whatever pipelines are on offer, whether they originate in Russia or Iran. Sentiment is unlikely to pose any obstacles.
Without meaning to, Mr Modi has laid down a challenge to Mr Obama. The US president was never happier than when he was exchanging words with Manmohan Singh – another well-intentioned leader seemingly powerless to act.
Like him or not, Mr Modi is a man of action. At a time when most of the Bric countries are moving away from the US, Mr Modi’s ascent poses an existential question. Can Mr Obama be a statesman of action?