Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV
Posted: 06 Jun 2026 01:26
Not sure what the rona-dhona in the Nitishastra article is about. India has not compromised on the trade deal under discussion, and will not compromise. I have a lot of respect for Navroop Singh, but he would be well advised to stop catastrophizing over some imaginary surrender by GOI that has not taken place, and definitely should not use PRC propaganda terminology like "blood bag" in his think pieces.
The new Section 301 tariffs are an empty threat intended to pressurize nations to accept US terms (especially India, which is already under stress from the Iran/Hormuz shock). Why empty? They are going to be ripped apart in court. Even the process of refunding American importers the $175 B they lost under the IEEPA tariffs struck down by the US Supreme Court is far from over-- this will inevitably be cited in challenging the 301 tariffs. Then there is the domestic economic mess Chump has waded into by starting the Iran war, and the looming prospect of getting hammered in the midterms as economic pain mounts for the American consumer. It's one thing to issue press releases about a new tariff structure and quite another to actually impose them.
The new Section 301 tariffs are an empty threat intended to pressurize nations to accept US terms (especially India, which is already under stress from the Iran/Hormuz shock). Why empty? They are going to be ripped apart in court. Even the process of refunding American importers the $175 B they lost under the IEEPA tariffs struck down by the US Supreme Court is far from over-- this will inevitably be cited in challenging the 301 tariffs. Then there is the domestic economic mess Chump has waded into by starting the Iran war, and the looming prospect of getting hammered in the midterms as economic pain mounts for the American consumer. It's one thing to issue press releases about a new tariff structure and quite another to actually impose them.