Page 35 of 72
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 12:30
by RajeshA
shiv wrote:As I see it the only way to bring down the most egregious aspects is by publicly and indirectly shaming the supporters by showing how hypocritical they are by resorting to murder and suppression of Muslims who disagree while denying that it occurs. Killing of kafirs by Muslims does not matter one bit. A live kafir slave or dhimmi is held up as a sign of liberalism in Islam.
shiv saar,
even here, in green-on-green violence, there is a growing acceptance. The greener ones think that they are stopping shirk and the less greener - they will continue to plead for brotherhood and consider all violence a conspiracy by the Yahud-Hanud-Nasara and Takfiris. From Iran's reaction, we see that they continue to speak in favor of Pan-Islamism, even as Shia die by the hundreds every week.
The more one tries to tell them that they are dying because of Islam, the more they will consider you as part of the conspiracy.
So even here there are defensive psychological mechanisms. Perhaps what may help is a lot more video coverage of the gory details of green on green. Too few videos are coming out!

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 13:40
by dada
Summary of non muslims in pk (from a paki source)
2.77 million nonm voters in pakistan
concentrated in 13 districts of Sindh & 2 districts in Punjab
breakup : 1.40m hindus + 1.23m christians + 0.116m ahmadis + 5,934 Sikhs + 3,650 Parsis + 1,452 Buddhists + 809 Jews
Note : use a multiplying factor in the range 2.25-2.50 to estimate the total number.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 14:48
by anupmisra
dada wrote:Summary of non muslims in pk (from a paki source)
1.40m hindus + 1.23m christians + 0.116m ahmadis + 5,934 Sikhs + 3,650 Parsis + 1,452 Buddhists + 809 Jews
If it is from a paki source, you've got to believe these numbers. 809 Jews and not one functioning synagogue? Most, if not all, Parsis live in k'rachi and they do not number more than 1700
clicky. Buddhists in pakiland?
Now that's some potent Islam-is-secular stuff that paki is pedaling.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 14:53
by anupmisra
Jhujar wrote:Pakistan was made for all the right reasons and religious extremism was not one of them!
?
Had Pakistan been created only for Muslims then all the minorities would have tried to immigrate to India
Yep! In a logical extension of this argument, there was a gush of non-Islamic minorities headed from India to Pa'astan in 1947 and beyond.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 15:04
by Narad
anmol wrote:
THAT is the only confusing thing about this man.
The fellow is a staunch anti-islamist, anti-Jihadi.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 15:36
by anupmisra
AQKhan's latest
"..stresses quality education"
He said that trend of obtaining degrees and passing examinations through illegal means was increasing.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 16:36
by Rajdeep
Maybe he wants the talibs be provided better guns and bums.
Or he wants them to be provided with better HDR capable cameras to take fast and clear photu.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 17:35
by anmol
Narad wrote:anmol wrote:
THAT is the only confusing thing about this man.
The fellow is a staunch anti-islamist, anti-Jihadi.
I know, but sometimes praises Muhammad and Islam.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 17:44
by akashganga
sanjaykumar wrote:Until the majority of Pakistanis start thinking like Fateh, Akhand Bharat is a delusion and extremely undesirable. However if they do demonstrate Fateh's free thinking, rationality, humanism and decency, India will HAVE to take them back.
This is something that may be difficult to accept.
Majority of Pakistanis thinking like Fateh. Wet dreams. Forget it. For spaniards it took several centuries of horrible inquisition to get rid of islamic culture in middle ages. If by a miracle original muslims of arabia start reforming, acknowledging their centuries of violence against kafirs, etc then their chamchas in non-arab lands like pakistan/bangladesh will follow suite. One stupid mistake we bhartiyas keep making is falling for paki charm when they speak good urdu or punjabi. Remember for every Fateh there are a lakh jehadi terrorists.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 18:12
by member_23858
Dr Soon-to-be-Qadrified Khan is crying hoarse for his watan Pakshitstan
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9 ... ur-country
He Finds new scientific theories about dreaming, which will even make Freud roll over in his grave
PindiChana Theory
One usually dreams when one has indigestion, has been eating or drinking too much or when one is under tension. Only saintly people have dreams that have relevance to actual events
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 20:33
by member_22872
^^^Saar, A.Q.Khan wanted to fund the 'research work' of water-kit 'scientist'. Too bad he didn't keep his promise. Pak land must elect A.Q.Khan. He is awesome, he is my hero. Pak land needs great heroes now more than ever, malsi too is in danger as always...so the need is now.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 21:49
by pankajs
Stephen P Cohen: Pakistan has a race between growing competence and problemsHow would you rate the performance of the Peoples Party government?
Not great but much better than expected. It tried to undo some dangerous trends of the past. It evolved a policy of normalcy with India and it requires Indian reciprocity and control over groups that would derail the normalisation process.{Nothing new from uneven} It played a double game in Afghanistan but it is evolving its own form of good relations with major regional and non-regional powers — not simply a foreign policy of 'help me or else', which is how it related to the US for years.
The US contributed to Pakistan's problems by failing to support internal reform and political democracy. Our policies have changed but we still do not have a policy for all of South Asia - instead, the US has a good India policy, a risky Afghan policy and perhaps several Pakistan policies.
But the major states of South Asia cannot wait for the US to come to a conclusion about what its interests are. India and Pakistan should take the lead in promoting regional cooperation which would include trade, energy, water and environmental issues, let alone an understanding of how to manage their nuclear weapons programmes.
India needs a stable and forward-looking government in Pakistan, one that has the confidence of the Pakistan army and can move forward. New Delhi can also provide assurances and inducements to Pakistan, so this becomes the agenda of their shared future - not another 65 years of hostility.
Puke worthy on many points but essential to understand your enemies.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 21:51
by pankajs
Five Nato trucks set ablaze in PakistanGunmen in Pakistan on Monday set ablaze five trucks carrying Nato equipment out of Afghanistan as the international military alliance winds down its combat mission there, officials said.
Four masked gunmen on two motorbikes opened fire at the vehicles, forcing them to stop and then doused them in petrol to set them on fire in the southwestern province Baluchistan.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 21:55
by pankajs
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 22:12
by pankajs
British aid is 'helping fund re-election campaign of Bhutto family' in PakistanBritain is giving £300m of taxpayers’ money to a controversial programme of cash handouts in Pakistan which is accused of bankrolling the re-election campaign of Benazir Bhutto’s former party.
“It is not stolen to the extent to which previous cash transfers were stolen, but this is the mechanism - which is funded partly by DFID - to make friends and influence people. This is the re-election campaign of Mr Zardari, which is funded by DFID,” he said. “Well done.”
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 22:38
by ramana
pankajs wrote:Stephen P Cohen: Pakistan has a race between growing competence and problemsHow would you rate the performance of the Peoples Party government?
Not great but much better than expected. It tried to undo some dangerous trends of the past. It evolved a policy of normalcy with India and it requires Indian reciprocity and control over groups that would derail the normalisation process.{Nothing new from uneven} It played a double game in Afghanistan but it is evolving its own form of good relations with major regional and non-regional powers — not simply a foreign policy of 'help me or else', which is how it related to the US for years.
The US contributed to Pakistan's problems by failing to support internal reform and political democracy. Our policies have changed but we still do not have a policy for all of South Asia - instead, the US has a good India policy, a risky Afghan policy and perhaps several Pakistan policies.
But the major states of South Asia cannot wait for the US to come to a conclusion about what its interests are. India and Pakistan should take the lead in promoting regional cooperation which would include trade, energy, water and environmental issues, let alone an understanding of how to manage their nuclear weapons programmes.
India needs a stable and forward-looking government in Pakistan, one that has the confidence of the Pakistan army and can move forward. New Delhi can also provide assurances and inducements to Pakistan, so this becomes the agenda of their shared future - not another 65 years of hostility.
Puke worthy on many points but essential to understand your enemies.
IOW he wants India to pay baksheesh instead of US! And US will tell how the baksheesh is to be doled out.
He forgets the golden rule:He who has the gold, rules.
The reporter should have asked him what the good India policy was! But then he works for TOIlet.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 01 Apr 2013 23:00
by pankajs
ramana wrote:IOW he wants India to pay baksheesh instead of US! And US will tell how the baksheesh is to be doled out.
Exactly! And he is not alone. The other often quoted South Asian expert Bruce Riedel too said the same thing not long ago but wasn't so explicit. Both of them frame this advice of theirs as the only option for India.
I will try locating that farticle.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 00:20
by Gerard
Good, refreshing news is that our colleague (if I may be allowed to call myself a columnist) and senior and prominent anchorperson, Najam Sethi, has been selected to be the interim chief minister of Punjab. He was a minister in the interim setup of Malik Mairaj Khalid. He is a well-informed, well-read scholar of international affairs and, by using his little birdie, is able to foretell many events.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 01:45
by member_23370
Both uneven cohen and reidel are retards that no one in Delhi takes seriously. Pakistan is in a race to civil war India can wait and watch or act and accelerate the process.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 02:18
by member_22872
by using his little birdieis able to foretell many events.
Now it is clear, little birdie is no one else but he himself. All this while he had been talking about his own prospects as interim CM with the army and other ruling goons of TSP promoting self interests all along. Throwing in inside info as 'analysis' to his audience.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 02:32
by RCase
Al Bakistan, (a vanishing state) to join elite club of nations
keep insisting on the old course declaring extremism as a tactical weapon and wait to join the club of African nations like Guinea or Somalia.

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 03:01
by Vayutuvan
To me "his little birdie" sounds like a double entendre - "his little d**k"?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 03:27
by RamaY
In the tape, a teenage suicide bomber named Masood, who was involved with a May 2008 double suicide bombing in Lahore, stated: "Suicide bombers are the atomic weapons of Muslims because Muslims do not have the latest weapons to fight enemies who are committing atrocities against Muslims in Kashmir, Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq."
....
Taleban wants to start suicide attacks in India - we must be prepared to deter and repel them.
Does it mean any soosai attack by any Apdul on Indian soil/soldier/interests can be considered as a WMD attack and responded in kind by SDRE India?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 06:04
by RCase
Pigs being bred to be slaughtered
Pakistan has a population of 180 million; it contains 2.58 per cent of the world’s population and is the sixth most populous country in the world. Its total fertility rate (TFR) is three, which is the highest when compared with the world birth rate of 1.1 per cent. Economically, Pakistan has no more than three per cent economic growth — almost equal to the birth rate — clearly showing unstable economic growth.
....
During the recent democratic government’s rule, Balochistan had a TFR of 4.1 and there seemed to be no activity by the Population Welfare Department in the province. Sindh and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa have had a TFR of 4.3 for the last 10 years and no significant progress has been made. Punjab also has a TFR of 3.9 and again, the Population Welfare Department lagged behind and only remained engaged for five long years with the health department on power transfers.
OK. Which province Ayeshas and Abduls are non pious and have a low TFR to pull the overall average down to 3.0; while the rest of the country is clocking around 4? Can some learned maulaner help clarify the Madrassa Math on population statistics?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 06:14
by shiv
RajeshA wrote:shiv wrote:As I see it the only way to bring down the most egregious aspects is by publicly and indirectly shaming the supporters by showing how hypocritical they are by resorting to murder and suppression of Muslims who disagree while denying that it occurs. Killing of kafirs by Muslims does not matter one bit. A live kafir slave or dhimmi is held up as a sign of liberalism in Islam.
shiv saar,
even here, in green-on-green violence, there is a growing acceptance. The greener ones think that they are stopping shirk and the less greener - they will continue to plead for brotherhood and consider all violence a conspiracy by the Yahud-Hanud-Nasara and Takfiris. From Iran's reaction, we see that they continue to speak in favor of Pan-Islamism, even as Shia die by the hundreds every week.
The more one tries to tell them that they are dying because of Islam, the more they will consider you as part of the conspiracy.
So even here there are defensive psychological mechanisms. Perhaps what may help is a lot more video coverage of the gory details of green on green. Too few videos are coming out!

True. Part of the problem (and part of Islam's powerful defence) is the fact that most Muslims in the world are taught to be proud to be completely illiterate and believe that the Mullahs fart=great knowledge handed down from Allah. Illiteracy and backwardness is a patented Islamic tool. As you point out it is difficult to cut through such formidable differences.
Illiterate Muslim masses will simply be killing each other and non Muslims. The first obvious step is to reduce the threat to non Muslims with adequate safeguards. As non Muslims become more secure and safe from being killed by Muslims, the percentage of Muslims killing each other becomes evident and visible to the world. This is the stage that has been reached in Pakistan, Syria and Iraq.
The educated Muslim elite probably understand but they are powerless to change the course of Islam. But among the educated elite are a bunch of educated power brokers - for example the Paki army and RAPE class of Pakistan who profess to be devout Muslims and use the support of illiterate Muslim masses to simply kill someone or the other for personal goals/glory. Illiterate Muslims make great slave armies that can be manipulated by controlling the Muslim elite.
The West has learned this trick of manipulating the Muslim elite for their own ends, so the entire "Muslim world" especially the more moronic Muslim countries in the "Green crescent" from Egypt to Pakistan are all slaves of the west, except Iran. Whenever an Islamic country tries to "break away" that is, when the moronic illiterate bulk of Islamic masses break away from control of their elite who are slaves of the west, the west punish them by various means ranging from sanctions to military action. But as long as Muslim masses follow the lead of the elite Muslims (who are slaves of the west) the countries get praise and aid that caters to Islamic pride. This is how Muslim countries are armed against Zionist Israel and Hindu India or against "Godless communists". In other words radical moronic Muslims actually earn praise and rewards from the west as long as they are killing each other and killing people and forces that the west seeks to keep "balanced" and unstable.
Islam is too primitive to understand this along with 90% of the world's Muslims. Such a situation was not even dreamed of 1300 years ago.
So I think twin goals have to be aimed at. The first is the breaking away of stupid brainless Muslim forces from western control. The second is shaming of all Muslims in the world by holding a mirror to their faces and showing them how barbaric Islam is in encouraging killing fellow Muslims. Kafirs must protect themselves first and ensure that they are safe no matter which way Islamic forces turn. Reform of Islam is possible, but that is by reforming 1 billion Muslims. This can only be done by shakinah. Kindness and arguments won't cut it.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 07:09
by akashganga
shiv wrote:
The educated Muslim elite probably understand but they are powerless to change the course of Islam. But among the educated elite are a bunch of educated power brokers - for example the Paki army and RAPE class of Pakistan who profess to be devout Muslims and use the support of illiterate Muslim masses to simply kill someone or the other for personal goals/glory. Illiterate Muslims make great slave armies that can be manipulated by controlling the Muslim elite.
Not necessarily true. Osama Bin Laden was a civil engineer. Many among the 9/11 attackers of US were educated in the US or Europe. Islamism affects both educated and uneducated.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 08:01
by Prem
Its not for kaffirs to pass judgement on the last dins of last Deen of Muhamadan god. Kaffirs will do themselves a big favour and to the whole humanity by taking the initiative and do not let faithfool feel Hoors are Dhooor.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 08:07
by SSridhar
RajeshA, the growing acceptance of the green-on-green violence should not be a surprise at all. That is the innermost beauty of Islam. While all religions have never-ending debates on minor issues, protocols etc, the takfiri philosophy allows any Muslim to brand any other muslim as a shirq or munafiq and kill him/her. There is thus a never ending process of refinement and distillation towards purity according to one's own interpretation of what is pure. The justification given by the killer and his steadfastness make him/her appear exalted in the eyes of the other lesser mortals while the dead is obviously reviled. This effect was was brought out in all its glory during the Qadrification of Taseer.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 08:51
by Prem
Just Another Misgiving Day in Islamic Paradize" Allah Har Din Frydin Karde
Rocket attack on Peshawar’s grid station kills two
PESHAWAR: At least two people were killed when unknown assailants fired rocket at a grid station in Peshawar’s Budh Berh area in the early hours of Tuesday morning, DawnNews reported.
According to police, the attack killed a policeman and Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) employee adding that the grid station was completely destroyed in the incident.Soon after the attack, electricity went off and the area plunged into darkness.Moreover, the incident spread fear among residents of the area.Police cordoned off the area after the attack and started investigations
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 09:05
by Prem
Nothing we know Not but still Glad Tidding for Analaizing Parasitestan
In 2002, a cleric called for Muslims to kill Christians, right before Christmas day, motivating two men killing three girls during a Christian sermon in Chianwala.
On June 5, 2006, a Christian labourer, Nasir Ashraf, drank water from a nearby public water facility, using a glass chained to it. Muslims, who caught him do that, battered him for polluting the glass. A crowd gathered and assaulted Ashraf, with bystanders cheering the attackers and calling Ashraf a ‘Christian dog; he was hospitalised later.In June 2009, International Christian Concern reported the rape and killing of a Christian man in Pakistan, for refusing to convert to Islam and those who raped the poor man were obviously Muslims.During a press conference in Karachi, on May 30, 2011, Maulana Abdul Rauf Farooqi and other clerics of Jamiat-Ulema-e-Islam Sami-ul-Haq group, demanded to ban the Bible. Maulana Farooqi said, “Our lawyers are preparing to ask the court to ban the book.”Children at tender age, through academic books, are infused with ideas full of religious heroism and demagoguery, glorifying one religion over the other. Our young minds are bred on a notion propagating other religions as inferior and portraying them to be anti-Islamic. Consequently, they grow up to be self-righteous, superior individuals, set out to make the world right according to their own ideals.
The intolerance for other religions has steeped so deeply in our society that Christian house cleaners and helpers have to convert to Islam merely for economic purposes. For most Muslims, they are considered ‘untouchables’
and would not get a job in a society, thumping with Muslim population. The irony is that when these Christians convert to Islam, they are rated as ‘second class or ‘half-Muslims’ and are called ‘Muslas’ 
. Had Bertrand Russell been a Pakistani, instead of intellectualising the premise of his famous essay “Why I am not a Christian”, he would have justified the notion with fear, discrimination and victimisation.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 09:16
by shiv
akashganga wrote:shiv wrote:
The educated Muslim elite probably understand but they are powerless to change the course of Islam. But among the educated elite are a bunch of educated power brokers - for example the Paki army and RAPE class of Pakistan who profess to be devout Muslims and use the support of illiterate Muslim masses to simply kill someone or the other for personal goals/glory. Illiterate Muslims make great slave armies that can be manipulated by controlling the Muslim elite.
Not necessarily true. Osama Bin Laden was a civil engineer. Many among the 9/11 attackers of US were educated in the US or Europe. Islamism affects both educated and uneducated.
No I think you have misinterpreted my statement. I am not getting into that fake argument of educated/uneducated. In Islam, only the educated have a remote chance of being exposed to what is wrong and understanding it. They get killed/exiled if they so much as squeak about it. Many more educated Islamists like Osama and the Paki elite remain Islamist because they can use the uneducated Muslims as ready assassins while they retain power. It is the educated Islamists who can pretend to be moderate and still maintain relations with the west and the uneducated Muslims soosai masses. In fact Saddam, Gadhafi, Osama, the Paki establishment are all examples of educated Muslim elite who used their own masses as fighters for their own or someone else's cause. (or both)
But when Osama stopped listening to the west, he was eliminated. Same thing for Gadaafi and Saddam. The Paki army and ISI are still slaves of the west. Ultimately they take money from the west to try and stop the west's applecart from being upset. The Taliban need to get out of their control and stop being vicarious servants of the west. They will continue to murder, but the educated elite who are currently using them (Pak Army/ISI) will lose their power over them and their ability to make the mad uneducated Islamists follow the porders of the west.
The Taliban have understood that the Paki army and ISI are ultimately slaves of America. As long as the US-Paki army combine keep the Taliban in check the cosy relationship of western powers controlling idiot Muslims masses will continue. It is the way the western powers control the elite Muslims that makes Islamism more dangerous to non western nations. If the Taliban are allowed to become their murderous selves, out of the control of the slave Pakistan army and their western masters it will be easier to expose true Islam to the whole world.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 09:18
by Dipanker
akashganga wrote:shiv wrote:
The educated Muslim elite probably understand but they are powerless to change the course of Islam. But among the educated elite are a bunch of educated power brokers - for example the Paki army and RAPE class of Pakistan who profess to be devout Muslims and use the support of illiterate Muslim masses to simply kill someone or the other for personal goals/glory. Illiterate Muslims make great slave armies that can be manipulated by controlling the Muslim elite.
Not necessarily true.
Osama Bin Laden was a civil engineer. Many among the 9/11 attackers of US were educated in the US or Europe. Islamism affects both educated and uneducated.
OBL was not a civil engineer, he was arts major and had a BA degree or something like that.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 09:33
by shiv
Osama was a freedom fighter
Saddam was a secular leader
The Pakistan army are a secular army in a moderate democracy
Iran got F-14s and Phoenix missiles, Cobra gunships
Saudi Arabia gets F-15s and AWACS. Even NATO nations did not get F-15s.
Pakistan got F-86, F-104, F-16, C-130, Orion, Harpoon, Sidewinder, AMRAAM, Cobra, Stingers
Taliban got logistics and comm from Pakistan army and their own Stingers
The west arms Islamist nations as long as they support the West. Just check which Islamist nations are still being armed by the west to see which nations are still helping the west implement their work.
"Islamism" is defined as "not supporting the west"
"Moderate, enlightened, secular" is "supporting the west"
Are the Taliban right or wrong in fighting the west?
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 11:53
by Aditya_V
RCase wrote:Pigs being bred to be slaughtered
Pakistan has a population of 180 million; it contains 2.58 per cent of the world’s population and is the sixth most populous country in the world. Its total fertility rate (TFR) is three, which is the highest when compared with the world birth rate of 1.1 per cent. Economically, Pakistan has no more than three per cent economic growth — almost equal to the birth rate — clearly showing unstable economic growth.
....
During the recent democratic government’s rule, Balochistan had a TFR of 4.1 and there seemed to be no activity by the Population Welfare Department in the province. Sindh and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa have had a TFR of 4.3 for the last 10 years and no significant progress has been made. Punjab also has a TFR of 3.9 and again, the Population Welfare Department lagged behind and only remained engaged for five long years with the health department on power transfers.
OK. Which province Ayeshas and Abduls are non pious and have a low TFR to pull the overall average down to 3.0; while the rest of the country is clocking around 4? Can some learned maulaner help clarify the Madrassa Math on population statistics?
POK, Kashmir, Afghanistan & Bangladesh . These are all part of Pakistan No.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 12:21
by ArmenT
Dipanker wrote:
OBL was not a civil engineer, he was arts major and had a BA degree or something like that.
Wiki is mixed on the issue. OBL himself stated that he had studied economics and business administration in King Abdulaziz university in Saudi Arabia in an interview. Another source says he completed a civil engineering degree in 1979 and a third one says he completed a degree in Public Administration in 1981. Yet another source says he left in his 3rd year without completing a degree.
I think the rumor that he had a civil engineering degree started because he owned a construction company. Of course, the real reason he owned the construction company was because it came from the inheritance he received from his father, who owned a major construction group in the middle-east.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 12:26
by wig
raid on Peshawar power plant
At least seven people have been killed in an attack by dozens of militants on an electricity plant in the Pakistani city of Peshawar, officials say.
A policeman and a plant employee were killed on the spot and 10 people were taken hostage, police said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21999352
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 12:59
by amit
I recently caught the new G I Joe movie which has been banned in Pakistan.
While the ostensible reason for the ban is that the opening scene shows the Paki nukes falling into the hands of terrorists and the Joes snatching them back, I think the real reason for the ban is further into the film.
Without giving away the plot let's just say that at the climax of the movie we have a scene where the leaders of all nuclear power states are seated at a negotiating table and the Indian PM has a pretty prominent part to play there both in calling the US "president" mad and in pushing the trigger to start bomb delivery. Heck you even had a North Korean guy in the scene.
So you have on the one hand Pakistan depicted in its true colours of terror central from where the Joes have to go and snatch the illegal nukes and you have India depicted as a big nuclear power along with France, Russia, Britain, China, Israel and even NoKo.
No wonder the Pakis got their chaddis in a twist. This film is following a trend of depicting the bad guys of being always based in Pakistan. The country has supplanted the "small Middle East country ruled by a dictator" as the source of all the evil which American special ops guys go in and destroy. And yes you had this pretty female Joe kick a**s of some guys dressed up exactly like the Talibunnies! Ouch!
What a fall for the TFTA self esteem. And like it or not, such movies shape public perception of foreign countries in Middle America.

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 13:24
by svinayak
amit wrote:I recently caught the new G I Joe movie which has been banned in Pakistan.
While the ostensible reason for the ban is that the opening scene shows the Paki nukes falling into the hands of terrorists and the Joes snatching them back, I think the real reason for the ban is further into the film.
Without giving away the plot let's just say that at the climax of the movie we have a scene where the leaders of all nuclear power states are seated at a negotiating table and the Indian PM has a pretty prominent part to play there both in calling the US "president" mad and in pushing the trigger to start bomb delivery. Heck you even had a North Korean guy in the scene.
:
The movie was to show the Pakistani that they are not behaving like a nukliar power. Even NoKO has a better NWS behavior.
They removed the player who does not fit in the table. There is a std for being in the table.
But another subtle thing which was shown. The Indian rep and the French person see and nod together. They have common interest.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 13:26
by Narad
Ijjlamic comedy continues in Al-bakistan.
Candidates for the May 11 elections to undergo quran test.
KARACHI:
Before joining the race for parliament, candidates for the May 11 elections may have to prove their ‘adequate knowledge’ of Islamic teachings and the Quran and may be requested to recite a ‘Sura’ or particular Quranic verses and answer questions about the number of ‘rakats’ in any of the five daily prayers.
But according to some political parties, this is an “astounding addition” to the process of scrutiny.
However, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has described it as being in conformity with ‘constitutional’ requirements
.What a senior ECP official termed a process of “
ruthless” scrutiny began on Monday with a number of candidates appearing before returning officers had to answer different questions, including those about religious injunctions.
One such case was recorded by TV channels when Owais Muzaffar Tappi, PPP candidate for a Sindh Assembly seat and President Asif Ali Zardari’s close aide, was asked about the number of Namaz one is required to offer in a day. He took a couple of seconds to tell the number of ‘rakats’ in Fajr prayers.In Hyderabad region, nomination papers of a Muttahida Qaumi Movement candidate were rejected during scrutiny. The party says if lack of knowledge about Islamic teaching was declared as the reason behind the rejection, it would challenge the process of scrutiny.
“Papers of one of our candidates from Matiari were rejected by the returning officer,” said Advocate Aslam Pervez of the MQM’s legal aid committee. “The reason is not yet mentioned but the candidate was asked several questions about Islamic teachings and if it would be the cause of the rejection we would definitely file an appeal.”He said returning officers had no authority to ask such questions, adding that a person’s faith could not be gauged through questions relating more to his memory than his knowledge about Islam and its teachings.
But a senior ECP official justified the questions and said that under article 62 (e) of the constitution candidates were required to have adequate knowledge of Islamic teachings.“There is no harm in asking such questions if the returning officers want to satisfy themselves about an important element of the qualification clauses”, he said.The article 62 of the constitution explains the criterion of “qualifications for member of Majlis-i-Shoora (parliament)” and its clause (e) reads: “He has adequate knowledge of Islamic teachings and practices obligatory duties prescribed by Islam as well as abstains from major sins.”But political parties deem it “inappropriate” to judge any candidate’s knowledge about Islamic teachings through a set of questions. They argue that memorising answers of certain questions could not determine anyone’s faith.“Nomination papers of our party candidates have not been rejected because of that particular reason but I still believe that testing a candidate’s faith in Islam through his memory is not appropriate,” said the Awami National Party’s provincial general secretary Bashir Jan. “One can’t reject any honest and upright candidate just because he has not learnt any Quranic verse by heart.”Rashid Rabbani of the PPP agreed with Mr Jan and said:“I don’t think it’s justified to weigh one person’s knowledge of Islamic teachings through these questions.”
What a deep shit this so called nation is in!! My humble AoA to the Paindoo fcuklamist Aholes of al-bakistan.
Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Feb 21, 2013
Posted: 02 Apr 2013 13:42
by Anand K
^^
Quran questionnaire? Is there a Rapid fire round? A Multiple Choice round? Sudden Death Round? Why am I reminded of that scene from Indiana Jones the Holy Grail?
Chief Election Mullahssioner Lalbrof Al-Gold's Gymi tucks away his RPG, strokes his luxurious beard and sniggers at the charred remains of what used to be Dus-Percenti;
"He chose..... poorly".
