eklavya wrote:BTW, if Japan or any other country had Iran's immense hydrocarbon resources, and insisted on its right to develop uranium enrichment capabilities, it would be fairly safe to assume that the country in question is looking for a strategic deterrent, and not merely an alternative source of energy.
It is evident that you are not able to view Iran objectively, but only through a Western media lens, or else because Iran is Islamic.
Iranian oil production peaked in 1974, and has not been able to rise because of embargoes on technology since the revolution in 1979. With the technology available to it, Iran's oil production is shrinking at 8-10% per year.
PS: you also have to ask the question, why is it not rational for Iran to do now, what it was doing under the Shah, with respect to energy?
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/nuke.htm
Iran's nuclear program began in the Shah's era, including a plan to build 20 nuclear power reactors. Two power reactors in Bushehr, on the coast of the Persian Gulf, were started but remained unfinished when they were bombed and damaged by the Iraqis during the Iran-Iraq war. Following the revolution in 1979, all nuclear activity was suspended, though subsequently work was resumed on a somewhat more modest scale. Current plans extend to the construction of 15 power reactors and two research reactors.
Why with such immense hydrocarbon reserves, was it OK for Iran to develop nuclear power under the Shah of Iran?