Bharat Rakshak

The latest clip from Julian Assange’s interview with John Pilger has been released.

He points to the Wikileak showing Hillary being aware of the fact that Saudi Arabia is funding ISIS as the most important one in the collection.
Because of course, Saudi Arabia is also funding Hillary Clinton. These people have given over $100 million to the Clinton Foundation, ostensibly for charity purposes – you know, helping Haiti flood victims and so on. The Saudis are big on Haiti flood victims.

RT:
In the second excerpt from the John Pilger Special, to be exclusively broadcast by RT on Saturday, courtesy of Dartmouth Films, Julian Assange accuses Hillary Clinton of misleading Americans about the true scope of Islamic State’s support from Washington’s Middle East allies.
In a 2014 email made public by Assange’s WikiLeaks last month, Hillary Clinton, who had served as secretary of state until the year before, urges John Podesta, then an advisor to Barack Obama, to “bring pressure” on Qatar and Saudi Arabia, “which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [Islamic State, IS, ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups.”

“I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection,” Assange, whose whistleblowing site released three tranches of Clinton-related emails over the past year, told Pilger in an exclusive interview, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.

“All serious analysts know, and even the US government has agreed, that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS and funding ISIS, but the dodge has always been that it is some “rogue” princes using their oil money to do whatever they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that it is the government of Saudi Arabia, and the government of Qatar that have been funding ISIS.”

Assange and Pilger, who sat down for their 25-minute interview at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the whistleblower has been a refugee since 2012, then talk about the conflict of interest between Clinton’s official post, which held throughout Obama’s first term, her husband’s nonprofit, and the Middle East officials, whose stated desire to fight terrorism may not have been sincere.

John Pilger: The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the first two, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is secretary of state, and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly Saudi Arabia.
Julian Assange: Under Hillary Clinton – and the Clinton emails reveal a significant discussion of it – the biggest-ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia: more than $80 billion. During her tenure, the total arms exports from the US doubled in dollar value.
JP: Of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious jihadist group, called ISIL or ISIS, is created largely with money from people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation?
JA: Yes.
Assange also said that he doesn’t think Trump would be “permitted” to win.
“My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment,” said Assange. “Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.”
The good news is: we’re not asking for permission.
We are winning, by sheer force of will.

The most obnoxious spin of the 2016 campaign came this week, as Democrats, their media allies and even President Obama accused the FBI of stacking the election. It’s an extraordinary claim, coming as it does from the same crew that has—we now know—been stacking the election all along in the corridors of the Justice Department.

This is the true November surprise. For four months, FBI Director James Comey has been the public face of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server. He played that role so well, putting the FBI so front and center, that the country forgot about Mr. Comey’s bosses. Revelations this week build the case that President Obama’s politicized Justice Department has been pulling strings and flacking for Mrs. Clinton all along.

One piece of evidence comes from WikiLeaks, in a hacked email between the chairman of the Clinton campaign, John Podesta, and Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik. It was sent in May of 2015 via a private Gmail account, which has become the favored way for Obama employees to hide communications from the public. “Heads up,” Mr. Kadzik warned, informing the campaign about a coming hearing and a recent legal filing about Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

Don’t let Mr. Kadzik’s fancy title fool you: He is a Clinton partisan. Before joining the Justice Department in 2013, Mr. Kadzik spent 30 years at the (now-closed) law firm Dickstein Shapiro, engaging Democratic causes—and Clinton causes. Mr. Kadzik’s wife, Amy Weiss, was deputy press secretary in Bill Clinton’s White House and a communications director for the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Kadzik also represented the DNC. Campaign-finance records show the two variously donated to Hillary’s Senate leadership PAC, to her 2008 presidential campaign and to her current campaign.

Mr. Kadzik is also an old buddy of Mr. Podesta’s. The two go back to Georgetown Law School. When Marc Rich was lobbying Bill Clinton for a pardon, according to a 2002 House Oversight Committee report, the fugitive financier recruited Mr. Kadzik “because he was a long-time friend of White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.” Mr. Kadzik even represented Mr. Podesta, during the Monica Lewinsky saga.

WikiLeaks emails show the two chatting about birthday parties and dinner meetings with fellow Democratic power players. A 2014 email lists donors for a fundraiser that Mr. Podesta held for his daughter, running for a school board in California. Mr. Kadzik (as he sat at the Justice Department) is shown giving $250. Also appearing are the usual Clinton glitterati: Doug Band, Harold Ickes, Neera Tanden, Betty Currie, Madeleine Albright, Carol Browner. This is Mr. Kadzik’s social circle.

The Justice Department has tried to dismiss Mr. Kadzik’s tip-off to the Clinton campaign as a note “about public information,” sent “in his personal capacity, not during work hours.” But Mr. Kadzik is a senior government official. He does not get to feed any information to a potential target of an investigation, at any hour of the day or night.


What the email reveals is the mind-set of the senior officials at the Justice Department. They are in it to win it for Hillary. They have taken a cue from their boss, the president, who has felt free to personally absolve Mrs. Clinton, no matter how inappropriate that is.

Those leaders include Leslie Caldwell, head of the Criminal Division, an antibusiness activist tapped by Mr. Obama in 2014. Benjamin Mizer, who leads the Civil Division, went to bat for Mrs. Clinton last year in Freedom of Information Act litigation over her emails. He cowrote a brief insisting her email production had been “over-inclusive” and arguing there was no evidence that she had “intentionally deleted” public records. The Office of Legal Counsel is under Karl Remon Thompson, once a counselor to the über-political Eric Holder. A Washington Free Beacon report from May found that 228 Justice Department employees had donated some $75,000 to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign. Mr. Trump? Two contributions totaling $381.

So what else has the department done? While Mrs. Clinton was under investigation, Mr. Kadzik had the opportunity to feed her campaign plenty during personal meetings with Mr. Podesta at dinner and the latter’s home. In a previous WikiLeaks email, another Clinton staffer references “DOJ folks” who leaked him information. And Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton would have us believe they only talked grandchildren on that tarmac in Arizona.

Or what about those immunity deals for Clinton aides? Mr. Comey told Congress that they were provided by Justice Department lawyers. The Journal reported this week that “from the start” of the FBI probe into the Clinton Foundation, “Justice Department officials were stern, icy and dismissive of the case.” From the start—meaning before evidence was collected. That story says senior leaders (unnamed) pressured the FBI to shut down the investigation. (Aside: For a supposed hotbed of Trump activism, the FBI sure did a good job of keeping this probe quiet for a year.)

Mr. Comey has botched plenty in the Clinton affair. Maybe the biggest was providing a shield for Justice Department shenanigans. Because if this feels sordid now, just wait for the actual Clinton Justice Department.

svenkat wrote:http://edition.cnn.com/videos/cnnmoney/2016/10/05/donald-trump-playboy-video-cnnmoney.cnnmoney/video/playlists/money-and-politics/
Two more Trump playboy videos uncovered.

Qatari representative was given five minutes with Bill Clinton for a million-dollar check and many other examples. Can you…?
Read more
Assange: Clinton & ISIS funded by same money, Trump won’t be allowed to win (JOHN PILGER EXCLUSIVE)
JA: …Or $12 million from Morocco.
JP:...$12 million from Morocco... yeah.
JA: ... for Hillary Clinton to attend.

half the Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from Citibank. It is quite amazing.
President Barack Obama meets with members of his Cabinet in the Cabinet Room at the White House. © White House WikiLeaks emails shows Citigroup’s major role in shaping Obama administration’s cabinet
JP:Well, it is… Didn’t Citibank supply a list?
JA: Yes.
JA: Which turned out to be...
JP: mostly the Obama cabinet.
JA: Yes.
JP:So, Wall Street decides the cabinet of the president of the United States.
JA: If you were following the Obama campaign back then closely, you could see it had become very close to banking interests. It wasn't so close to oil interests but it was very close to banking interests.
JP:Yeah. Yeah.
JA: So, I think you can't properly understand Hillary Clinton's foreign policy without understanding Saudi Arabia. The connections with Saudi Arabia are so intimate.
‘Libya is Hillary Clinton’s war’
JP:Why was she so demonstrably enthusiastic about the destruction of Libya? Can you talk a little about just what the emails have told us – told you – about what happened there? Because Libya is such a source for so much of the mayhem now in Syria: the ISIL, jihadism, and so on. And it was almost Hillary Clinton's invasion. What do the emails tell us about that?
JA: Libya more that anyone else's war was Hillary Clinton's war. Barack Obama initially opposed it. Who was the person who was championing it? Hillary Clinton. That's documented throughout her emails. She had… She put her favored agent in effect, Sidney Blumenthal, onto that. There's more than 1,700 emails out of the 33 thousand of Hillary Clinton's emails we published just about Libya. It's not about that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state something that she would use to run in the general election for president. So late 2011, there's an internal document called the "Libya Tick Tock" that is produced for Hillary Clinton, and it's all the... it's a chronological description of how Hillary Clinton was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan state. As a result, there are around 40,000 deaths within Libya. Jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in. That led to the European refugee and migrant crisis, because not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people then fleeing Syria, destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows. The Libyan state itself was no longer able to control movement of people through it. So, Libya faces on to the Mediterranean. So, it had been effectively the cork in the bottle of Africa. So, all problems, all economic problems, the civil war in Africa... Previously, the people fleeing those problems didn’t end up in Europe because Libya policed the Mediterranean. And that was said explicitly at the time, back in 2011, by Gaddafi: what do these Europeans think they are doing, trying to bomb and destroy the Libyan state? There’s going to be floods of migrants out of Africa, and jihadists into Europe. And that is exactly what happened.

HKumar wrote:I don't know their full pedigree. do you ?

Pervez is a mohajir from old dilli...

Mort Walker wrote:Now Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado, Nevada and New Hampshire are tied.

Pennsylvania 46-46
Michigan 43-43
Colorado 39-39
New Hampshire 44-44
Nevada 45-45

Throw in the fact there are quiet DT supporters, around 3-4%, who are afraid of retribution that will vote, then most likely DT will win these states come Tuesday.

Donald Trump will be in Reno on Saturday, but the Republicans almost certainly lost Nevada on Friday.

Trump's path was nearly impossible, as I have been telling you, before what happened in Clark County on Friday. But now he needs a Miracle in Vegas on Election Day -- and a Buffalo Bills Super Bowl championship is more likely -- to turn this around. The ripple effect down the ticket probably will cost the Republicans Harry Reid's Senate seat, two GOP House seats and control of the Legislature.

How devastating was it, epitomized by thousands of mostly Latino voters keeping Cardenas market open open in Vegas until 10 PM? This cataclysmic:

----The Democrats won [ The SOS data on party registrations for those voting] Clark County by more than 11,000 votes Friday (final mail count not posted yet), a record margin on a record-setting turnout day of 57,000 voters. The Dems now have a firewall -- approaching 73,000 ballots -- greater than 2012 when Barack Obama won the state by nearly 7 points. The 71,000 of 2012 was slightly higher in percentage terms, but raw votes matter. The lead is 14 percentage points -- right at registration. You know what else matters? Registration advantages (142,000 in Clark). Reminder: When the Clark votes were counted from early/mail voting in 2012, Obama had a 69,000 vote lead in Clark County. Game over.

----The statewide lead (some rurals not posted) will be above 45,000 -- slightly under the 48,000 of 2012, but still robust. That's 6 percentage points, or right about at registration. The GOP turnout advantage was under a percent, worse than 2012 when it was 1.1 percent.

habal wrote:Anonymous Release bone-chilling video of Huma Abedin every American Needs to See

vijayk wrote:Trumpazee is total whack job.

Hillary is an interventionist who caused hundreds and thousands of people in Iraq/Syria/Libya just like Dubya did. BTW, she supported Iraq war and Clintons were involved in encouraging insurgencies all around the world.

Funny to see forum member fighting all over for them.

Dinesh S wrote:

habal wrote:Huma Abedin may have well been the UPA pointsperson for ban on Modi USA visa.

Look at the urgency with which she is arranging the MMS meeting with Hitlery. She is pointsperson in SD for RAPE and for Congi. So she is also Indian but different camp. Maybe in Ahmed Patel's camp.

IMO, people like Konrad elst or Francois Gautier are far more indian than reform rats aka Vatican coolies like John dayal and others . Being born in india/having indian parents doesn't make one Indian and that's how I see it. Of course, the presence of so many pakis with indian skin and name inside india makes me think I am right as well. Anyway, that's just how i see it

komal wrote:GOP = Party of Jesse Helms/Dan Burton who wanted India dismembered by Pakistan.

GOP = Party of Evangelical Christians who denied a visa to Modi-ji because they claimed he had committed "genocide"

GOP = Party of Grover Norquist who is doesn't even bother hiding his allegiance to Islam

GOP = Party of Colin Powell and G. W. Bush who gave tens of billions of dollars to Pakistan as long as they confined their terrorist activities to India

GOP = Party of Nixon/KIssinger who tried to blackmail India and abetted genocide in Bangladesh

komal wrote:GOP = Party of Jesse Helms/Dan Burton who wanted India dismembered by Pakistan.

GOP = Party of Evangelical Christians who denied a visa to Modi-ji because they claimed he had committed "genocide"

GOP = Party of Grover Norquist who is doesn't even bother hiding his allegiance to Islam

GOP = Party of Colin Powell and G. W. Bush who gave tens of billions of dollars to Pakistan as long as they confined their terrorist activities to India

GOP = Party of Nixon/KIssinger who tried to blackmail India and abetted genocide in Bangladesh

vijayk wrote:
Either way whoever wins, the world is in for a hard hard time. Only happy campers will be Terroristan and insurgents all over the world

ManishC wrote:Hillary has the wrong instincts and no sense of optics, which makes her a lousy politician. Over prepares for mundane things, gets bogged down in the details, and comes to the wrong conclusions.

komal wrote:GOP = Party of Jesse Helms/Dan Burton who wanted India dismembered by Pakistan.
GOP = Party of Evangelical Christians who denied a visa to Modi-ji because they claimed he had committed "genocide"
GOP = Party of Grover Norquist who is doesn't even bother hiding his allegiance to Islam
GOP = Party of Colin Powell and G. W. Bush who gave tens of billions of dollars to Pakistan as long as they confined their terrorist activities to India
GOP = Party of Nixon/KIssinger who tried to blackmail India and abetted genocide in Bangladesh

Never fear, America. This is just your government's top diplomat breaching an ethics requirement to accept a cool million bucks from a repressive Middle Eastern regime that has funded ISIS...according to her own future assessment.

UlanBatori wrote: But but but... a tax-free million only paid for 2 SlickWillie speeches!