ks_sachin wrote:And your rant without any justification is a guarantee of your intelligence? I understand you disagree but please justify why you disagree with Gen Panag's point of view.
In such situations, only the PM or the RM should make a terse and clear political statement and leave it at that. Political capital was already on the table. Now it is lost in the shrillness of election rhetoric. Pakistan’s smart response and our political frenzy have diluted the gains of this watershed SF operation.
Gen. Panag proclaims Pak response as smart and claims that it led to the dilution of the impact of the surgical strikes. This is exactly what his leader Kejriwal was harping about, when asking for proof. So did Digvijaya.
Do you find this agreeable?
Moreover, he has a lot to say about the "political handling" of the issue, except for the role of
his party, the AAP.
As opposed to the brilliant SF operation, the political management of the aftermath was an unmitigated disaster. Jingoistic political and public emotions were allowed to run wild. No effort was made to rein in the more-than-compliant media.
Now how is this different from what his party AAP and Congress and others have been ranting about? He laments that "public emotions were allowed to run wild". What was GoI suppose to do, lathicharge the
aam junta that was expressing its jubilation on the streets? And the media was compliant? The same media such as BBTV, Chindu and others who were the first to question the strikes and carry Baki rebuttals on primetime and ask for proof? Even going so far as to question the IA of hiding their losses on LoC?
To the contrary, it was egged on by the credible and not so credible leaks to raise war hysteria knowing fully well that sooner than later, it will emerge that it was a one-off operation to signal a strategic intent. A junior minister commented on the use of helicopters leading to more speculation. The Raksha Mantri, of all the people, said the Indian Army like Hanuman had awakened to rediscover its prowess. Without any complementary mobilisation of the Armed Forces, the evacuation of villages in Punjab up to 10 km from the international border, made the action politically suspect.
Now read this bit and tell me is this a general writing or a politico? DGMO announcement was war hysteria. Not a world of Congress spokies and leaders going on national TV and announcing that
they "carried out four surgical strikes". No mention of his
dear leader proclaiming that India and not Pakistan was isolated. No mention of the 56 inchi taunts that were emanating from his partymen. But GoI deciding to evacuate citizens in the probable danger zone is "politically suspect"?
Gen. Panag has explained the military part well ad perhaps that's where he should have left it. He acknowledges the brilliance of the plan and the support it had at the highest level. But the politico in him cannot come around to commending the person whom his party and
dear leader loathe zealously.