The British establishment left India in total exasperation unable to handle the "Half-naked Fakir" who dared to meet their king in his loincloth.When asked afterwards what he thought about the king ,Gandhi famously remarked that "he had on enough clothes for both of us"!
Therefore,unable to deal with India's moral superiority-Nehru,remember they locked him up for 11 years (talk about Aung San Su Kyi);as India's first PM had tremendous moral authority respected globally despite our military prowess then being miniscule but for manpower.Non-violent,"Socialist" India was most unlikely to support the west's adventurism and fight for them in the Cold War.It was therefore neccessary to separate the martial Muslims from India to further their interests in a separate state where they could remain forever "yours obediently",willing to do their master's bidding for the customary scraps from the high table.Pakistan was to be the US's springboard into Central Asia,a bulwark against the Russians and the Chinese.It is ironic that those days India had far more respect around the world than it has today where a nuclear and military giant acts like a timid rabbit.Unfortunately,our neglect of military pwoer enabled the Chinese to teach us a signal lesson which we thought was well learnt,but for the timidity of the current leadership.
The track record of Pakistan ever since partition has been one of animosity and hatred towards India.Its liberal western educated elite whom Jinnah represented and hoped would usher in a sub-continental version of Turkey,are now in a microscopic minority.Most have fled to Blighty and other western haunts .The military in Pak have like cancer spread their tentacles of hate over most of the structure of the state and have effectively brainwashed the majority of the populace that India is an eternal enemy and that Kashmir has to be regained by force or treachery.Baluchistan and Indian "involvement" is being now handed over to them thanks to MMS,as a legitimate reason for their India-directed terrorism.
However,the undying hatred of Pak towards India has been realised by certain western states,as the Brit. delegation just observed,as being a key factor in the collapsing entity that Pak is today.
It is astonishing that our friends abroad are talking about Pak's inability to change mentality when our dear King-of-Capitulation,is willing to trust Pak despite the mountainous evidence to the contrary.The west is thus trying to make the weaker of the two nations succumb to its interests.If terrorist,malevolent,diabolic Pak is unwilling to change mentality,then the weaker party,India, must neccessarily give way to Pak and compromise on Pak's terms,in order that Pak stops anti-western terrorism conducted form the safety of its territory.That is the price that Pak is demanding from the west and India is being armtwisted to sucumb under the weakest regime ever in our country's history,the US making full use of "Surrender Singh" at the helm of affairs.
While all this is going on on our western front,on the eastern front too the situation is darkening by the day.Apart from China's perfidy and masterplan to teach India another military lesson and bite off a chunk of Arunachal Pradesh,it is surreptitiously trying to turn Burma into another nuclear weapons state throough its proxy NoKo.We on BR warned of this development a few years ago-that Burma would harbour N-ambitions and China would encourage and sponsor it through a rogue state.China wants to have three "rogue states " (NoKo,Pak and Burma)as its "all-weather" friends,all with N-weaponry,to be able to defeat its enemies and rivals using these proxies.
China's highway through J&K is a prelude to it in the future transferring land forces into Baluchistan/Gwadar and approach the Gulf squatting in Paki territory just as the US is doing in Afghanisatn.Baluchistan is therefore becoming a most vital strategic spot in the region by the day,with very high stakes involved in who controls Pak's largest province.If Pak collapses and Baluchistan becomes an independent entity,China's huge ambitions of using Gwadar as a major naval and submarine base will be sunk.China therefore is planning its own independent Baluchi strategy if Pak cannot hold onto it.The ideal option is to bolster Pak first.India therefore has to be prevented at all costs from playing any role in the province to encourage its independence.Imagine this scenario.Pak "invites" China to send its forces to Gwadar and Baluchistan help in the security of Chinese nationals involved in building the port,etc.,just as the Afghan regime invited the Soviets to help bolster their regime under covert attack from the west.Under MMS,India will hardly raise a squeak!
PS:Why Baluchistan/Gwadar is so important,at the approaches to the Gulf,containing the world's largest oil supplies.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/scien ... 66585.html
Warning: Oil supplies are running out fast
Catastrophic shortfalls threaten economic recovery, says world's top energy economist
By Steve Connor, Science Editor
(In a stark warning to Britain and the other Western powers, Dr Birol said that the market power of the very few oil-producing countries that hold substantial reserves of oil – mostly in the Middle East – would increase rapidly as the oil crisis begins to grip after 2010.
"One day we will run out of oil, it is not today or tomorrow, but one day we will run out of oil and we have to leave oil before oil leaves us, and we have to prepare ourselves for that day," Dr Birol said. "The earlier we start, the better, because all of our economic and social system is based on oil, so to change from that will take a lot of time and a lot of money and we should take this issue very seriously," he said. )
