Bharat Rakshak

Pakistani youth turned Jinnah mausoleum into brothel - Ultimate gift to Founding Father of Pakistan


I wonder what Djinna must be doing in his grave...

^^^
Pakis are renting out Baba-e-quam's final resting place to couples for ahem ahem

Wonder if there is an MMS which shows such activity.

This is not surprising considering that Quaid started pimping Bakistan out from the day of its independence. Didn't he say "You are free; you are free to go to my mausoleum in piss"

IMHO, this only furthering his vision for bakistan.

At least they are using his grave for Luvv

Mehh only following in the footsteps of their four fathers, randibaaji (prostitution) is taken into account while calculating GDP. Lel at joo pee brained kuffars doing science and stuff while randibaaji and nashakhori (drugs) is the new standard of developed nations.

Araps gave a pure miss to Peshawar attack, thereby leaving pakis purely confused how Indians have shown more sympathy.

Pakis have declared this situation very 'complex' thereby not having to be ashamed of & demoralized about how pakis are at the bottom of brotherhood pyramid.

yootoob link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyqqbUeQGxg

Don't know if posted before. Kapil Komireddy slices and dices on some Brit channel. The anchor on top of everything slides the blade in with "I don't think South Asia should ever have been divided"...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBef2Wrqa0Y

Mushal Malik, wife of Yasin Malik, in a debate on J&K - Al Jazeera

anticipating comments

OMG she has 'issues', is she Pakistani by birth?

Mushal Malik is blatantly lying with the usual paki hyperbole, which is normal considering she a paki of brit origin and we all know...jo london mein g**ndu woh...

"my friends in kashmir told me X so all the news reports are false".

"More than 800,000 security forces in J&K apparently." (clearly mushal malik can't count past a million, else she could have said 8million)

"history of nuclear wars between India and pakistan" around 23:57
Rants and rants and rants without taking a breath...sheesh.

As for the anchor and Victoria Schofeld, it is funny to see them gas about referendum in J&K based on the UN resolutions of 1947. Saba Naqvi's anal-e-cess is as expected given her history.

3 confujed wimmens talking about geopolitics.
Bullcrap Sheesh !!!

They should have gotten Ayesha the goat in there too...

Shreeman wrote:....

-1. Do what is right, regardless of who is visiting and when.

Shoot self in foot by playing paki game -2

Saba Naqvi was disappointing. She could have left her political bias while answering that Al Jazeera moron who asked standard India baiting questions. But at least she debunked that Paki's assertion (with the Brit's silence) that women voters were coerced.

The Victoria chic is a known pro Paki, "right of self determination" propagandist. Leave aside the details of UN resolutions, but anybody talking about right of self determination without mentioning Islamic separatism and Paki terrorism, which is what India is up against in the valley, is a bold-faced liar.

Well, the Paki. Not worth wasting any more time on her than it took to write this sentence. Only thing I'll ask is that while she looks quite plump and healthy, does the vegetarian terrorist have the energy and pelvic strength to keep her warm in the Srinagar cold?

Rahul M wrote:

SSridhar wrote:Does anybody have an idea of this 'Former R&AW official' Rana Bannerjee?

how did his name crop up ?

He was a panelist in yesterday's Karan Thapar show and he was blaming India's new policy of retaliation for escalation along the IB and wanted India to de-escalate irrespective of who started it first. He said we must negotiate peace and the escalations have happened only after May. He said that covering fire for infiltratiion by Pakis happens about 200 times a year and last year's score was also the same. As India was used to that, there was no need to change our tactic. The Paki on the panel and the Paki-supporting Indian journalist Jyoti Malhotra, and of-course Karan Thapar latched on to every word of what he said gleefully. I was stunned.

Cosmo_R wrote:

Shreeman wrote:....

-1. Do what is right, regardless of who is visiting and when.

Shoot self in foot by playing paki game -2

-3 Let pakis smuggle in boat, shoot a few border sentries and blow up something other than charlie hebdo because US president is visiting?

Since when is doing the right thing playing the paki game?

We seen many Paki rage boys before. Mushal, the paki rage girl (woman), blabbering concocted lies at best.

CRamS wrote:Very good interview that Rajnath Singh gave except for the last part on TSP's Samjautha allegation. He did say the right thing by saying no terrorist will be spared in India, but he could pointed to UN and US dept of treasury's case that Samjautha was done by pigLeTs.

He did the right thing by saying that we'll get to the bottom of the matter on our own. No need to score a self goal by pointing out what UN or some inconsequential US dept said. This will set an unwelcome precedent.

Others will ignore everything and latch onto the UN US bit and bring in Chuck Hagel, Kerry and a host of other US propaganda rants.

Gagan wrote:Abdul enquyoob faislabadi's legend lives on in cyberspace

Why did Rehman take ayesha to the 'tool' shed hain ji?

Gagan Ji

Elementary my dear Watson : For "Tooling" Ayesha.

Cheers

To show her his tool.

SSJi, I just watched Karan Thappad's show, and I believe several posts back you were wondering about some ex RAW chief Banarjee something, and if its the same guy, there was Banarjee on Thappad's show. As always, after watching Thappad's show, I am fuming with anger. This show was yet another example of how deliberately, wilfuly he pushes the Paki view point only to diss ModiJi. Some observations:

1. This Banarjee seemed like some kind of a coward saying that India must resume talks. He went only to add only 200 or so pigLeTs entering. This arse-hole was a RAW chief? No wonder ISI has a field day.

2. Jyothi as usual, and I really sorry guys for my language, was playing the role of a Paki concubine than a serious journalist. Nothing more need be said.

3. GP was as usual on the pulse. He gave it back to Thappad when Thappad accused him of pushing the govt line, GP hit back saying don't insinuate, if he (Thappad) plays that game, then GP said, he will insinuate that Thappad is pushing the Paki line.

4. The Paki RAPE b@satrsd as usual was gleefully latching onto everything the Banarjee-Jyothi-Thappad trio were puking. He couldn't control his orgasm when Thappad thundered that ModJi's tough policy against TSP failed, and TSP can be as maacho as India is in hitting back. Almost as if, this was the script he wanted to enact the moment ModiJi announced his Paki policy.

5. Now, to my fury. Now, whether or not one agrees with ModiJi's policy, don't the bloody punks on Indian side know what TSP has always been up to? ISI's diabolical machinations? Was TSP's policy any different even under a pro-Paki MMS? When did 26/11 take place? How demented can one be to suggest that your govt has failed in front of Paki whose govt is responsible for the escalation? Of course Thappad will hide behind "journalistic objectivity" and say both sides say the other violated. Then he should use his judgement and brains. Who stands to gain? Why have a Paki in the first place when you very well know what their line is going to be?

6. The only sensible point Banarjee made is that TSPA is deliberately targeting Hindus along the LoC and IB. The rationale being, according to Banarjee, that they will then tell ModiJi, your machismo is hurting us. But once again, even if this is true, is it not incumbent as an Indian citizen, and that too an ex-member of the security apparatus to castigate this inhuman, barbaric policy of TSP to deliberately target civilians to make a political point? And he says its ModiJi's policy, to the nodding approval of that b!tch Joythi, of breaking off talks with TSP that has brought us to this. I have no words to describe my fury.

7. Finally, GP made the best point, that DGMOs can talk any time, so this breaking off talks is just a canard. The real issue here is what is TSP to gain with his hara kiri? Is it infiltration? Is it to create instability? These are the only issues to be debated, and that too, only by Indians. Not by inviting a Paki punk.

8. Last, but not the least, I will give ModiJi and Indian army, BSF etc more time. But at the end of the day, they have to deliver and silence TSP and our own traitors. Otherwise this game will continue.

Bottom line is that it may be time to end PoK and TSP. Call their bluff, escalate 5 levels ahead of them, bomb the cra* out of Islamagood. Delhi, Mumbai and Amritsar need rebuilding anyway and Srinagar needs to be levelled and the Kashmir valley re-populated.

CRamS wrote:SSJi, I just watched Karan Thappad's show, and I believe several posts back you were wondering about some ex RAW chief Banarjee something, and if its the same guy, there was Banarjee on Thappad's show. As always, after watching Thappad's show, I am fuming with anger. This show was yet another example of how deliberately, wilfuly he pushes the Paki view point only to diss ModiJi. Some observations:

Not ex RAW chief, but special secretary or something like that:
http://www.ipcs.org/staff-profile/rana-banerji-142.html

Blasphemy accused killed after release

TAXILA: A blasphemy accused freed a few days ago was shot dead here on Wednesday.

^Special Secretary to the Cabinet Secretariat - a RAW position.

Is it me or you guys watch too much of Indian DDM nonsense ?
These people are in the business of entertainment yet you folks get so much worked up by what is clearly not NEWS.

JE Menon wrote:^Special Secretary to the Cabinet Secretariat - a RAW position.

Head of RAW would be Secretary (R) (R for Research). This fellow was an IAS officer (while RAW chiefs are generally from RAS or IPS cadre). He is a babu in cabinet secretariat adding bureaucracy to RAW than being a native RAW person?

Guys he is angling for Track thoo invite me thinks ... if he is not already on it. Me thinks the Track thoo is funded by outside money (Baki/Brit/US) so anyone expecting or angling for an invite has to confirm to the funders narrative.

Al Jazeera program should also be viewed in the same context. Run by Arap/Baki/Brutshit it pushes the baki agenda. The composition of the panel accordingly reflects that bias. It is a wonder that Dhoti was not invited to present the Indian viewpoint!

Same with Indian channel that push a Anti-Modi agenda (Turdesai's previous job) or a pro-pak agenda (pappad's panels).

CRamS wrote:SSJi, I just watched Karan Thappad's show, and I believe several posts back you were wondering about some ex RAW chief Banarjee something, and if its the same guy, there was Banarjee on Thappad's show. As always, after watching Thappad's show, I am fuming with anger. This show was yet another example of how deliberately, wilfuly he pushes the Paki view point only to diss ModiJi.

Thapar is not pushing paki position, he is pushing USA position.

It is in US interests to show India in a poor light when it comes to confrontation with Pakistan. The reason is also pretty simple. Without public opinion in India in Pakistan's favor, Pakistan will fail when it comes to any confrontation with India.

Also I disagree with statements that Paksitan initiated this round of hostilities. This round has very clearly been planned with offensive defence in mind. And that is what prompts such statements from US mouthpieces

Thappad thundered that ModJi's tough policy against TSP failed, and TSP can be as maacho as India is in hitting back.

After an year or so of such hostilities, whatever ensues between India and Pakistan will be far more sustaining than before. If Pakistan ups the ante, then it gives the hawks an opportunity to finish the task or else Pakistan desires and respects peace far more than ever.

An operation at the western theatre is the best time to molest the TSPA and also check their geo-strategic ambitions and cut them down to size.

Everything else is maya.

This is a WSJ piece by the gutsy Ms Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Worthwhile read.

How to Answer the Paris Terror Attack

Why's it in the TSP thread? Coz she highlights this nice little Paki connection to the modern concept of jeehard.

There are numerous calls to violent jihad in the Quran. But the Quran is hardly alone. In too much of Islam, jihad is a thoroughly modern concept. The 20th-century jihad “bible,” and an animating work for many Islamist groups today, is “The Quranic Concept of War,” a book written in the mid-1970s by Pakistani Gen. S.K. Malik. He argues that because God, Allah, himself authored every word of the Quran, the rules of war contained in the Quran are of a higher caliber than the rules developed by mere mortals.

In Malik’s analysis of Quranic strategy, the human soul—and not any physical battlefield—is the center of conflict. The key to victory, taught by Allah through the military campaigns of the Prophet Muhammad, is to strike at the soul of your enemy. And the best way to strike at your enemy’s soul is through terror. Terror, Malik writes, is “the point where the means and the end meet.” Terror, he adds, “is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy; it is the decision we wish to impose.”

Those responsible for the slaughter in Paris, just like the man who killed the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004, are seeking to impose terror. And every time we give in to their vision of justified religious violence, we are giving them exactly what they want.

I dont think Modi cares one bit for what Thappad or Jyoti or Dorka Butt or Turdesai think or say.
According to me the biggest problem that they have with the current PM is that he has made these fellows look like idiots by becoming the PM.
And why are we still watching or following these idiots and talking about what they say.

Hari Seldon wrote:This is a WSJ piece by the gutsy Ms Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Worthwhile read.

How to Answer the Paris Terror Attack

Why's it in the TSP thread? Coz she highlights this nice little Paki connection to the modern concept of jeehard.

...

Those responsible for the slaughter in Paris, just like the man who killed the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004, are seeking to impose terror. And every time we give in to their vision of justified religious violence, we are giving them exactly what they want.

Theo ji fantastic find. And that statement in the end is an amazingly clear view of terrorism and the follow on apologetic media coverage.

This line needs to be tweeted.

As always, there is confusion in number of uniformed pigs killed in pakisatan.

paki tribune URL has "7 pigs killed in landmine explosion" in the link, when you open the link it just reports about the death of 4 pigs

[url=httpxxx://tribune.com.pk/story/818637/kurram-agency-7-security-personnel-killed-in-landmine-explosion/]Kurram Agency: 4 security personnel killed in landmine explosion[/url]

Link

Replying to a question on Pak-China ties, she said that both the countries are actively engaged at various levels to promote trade and economic ties and always resolve any issue through mutual consultation in this regard.

Can Pakistan & China even have 'issues' that need to be resolved through 'mutual consultation'?

All hail bakistans's new resolve to fight terrorism!

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/new ... 809743.cms
Pakistan hanging cancelled after last-minute pardon

Ikramul Haq, a member of banned Sunni militant outfit Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, was sentenced to death by an anti-terror court in 2004 for killing a Shiite Muslim in 2001.

He was set to be hanged in the eastern city of Lahore early Thursday but his family came to a deal with the victim's relatives on Wednesday night, Haq's lawyer, Ghulam Mustafa Mangan, told AFP.

"The hanging was cancelled after we reached a compromise with the complainant's family. They have pardoned my client," Mangan said, without giving further details of the deal.

Well LEJ, LET, Good Taliban are virtually untouchable in Pakistan.
They are sunni, army subserviant, punjabi, army subservient-pakhtoons after all

bit OT.

SSridhar wrote:

Rahul M wrote: how did his name crop up ?

He was a panelist in yesterday's Karan Thapar show and he was blaming India's new policy of retaliation for escalation along the IB and wanted India to de-escalate irrespective of who started it first. He said we must negotiate peace and the escalations have happened only after May. He said that covering fire for infiltratiion by Pakis happens about 200 times a year and last year's score was also the same. As India was used to that, there was no need to change our tactic. The Paki on the panel and the Paki-supporting Indian journalist Jyoti Malhotra, and of-course Karan Thapar latched on to every word of what he said gleefully. I was stunned.

thx. he was in line to make chief. didn't make it somehow.
intel people do tend to have a bias against military action since it disturbs usual info flow.

Head of RAW would be Secretary (R) (R for Resuarch). This fellow was an IAS officer (while RAW chiefs are generally from RAS or IPS cadre). He is a babu in cabinet secretariat adding bureaucracy to RAW than being a native RAW person?

he was not a babu, he spent 25 years in that org as per news reports & ended as #2.
what exactly is a "native" RAW person ? all come from other services, Vikram Sood was from postal service.

pankajs wrote:All hail bakistans's new resolve to fight terrorism!

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/new ... 809743.cms
Pakistan hanging cancelled after last-minute pardon

Ikramul Haq, a member of banned Sunni militant outfit Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, was sentenced to death by an anti-terror court in 2004 for killing a Shiite Muslim in 2001.

He was set to be hanged in the eastern city of Lahore early Thursday but his family came to a deal with the victim's relatives on Wednesday night, Haq's lawyer, Ghulam Mustafa Mangan, told AFP.

"The hanging was cancelled after we reached a compromise with the complainant's family. They have pardoned my client," Mangan said, without giving further details of the deal.

Right, LeJ will carefully avoid killing members of the complainant's family for the next ten years or some such thing. Maybe a some few counterfeited Indian rupees too as "compensation".

pankajs wrote:Guys he is angling for Track thoo invite me thinks ... if he is not already on it. Me thinks the Track thoo is funded by outside money (Baki/Brit/US) so anyone expecting or angling for an invite has to confirm to the funders narrative.

Al Jazeera program should also be viewed in the same context. Run by Arap/Baki/Brutshit it pushes the baki agenda. The composition of the panel accordingly reflects that bias. It is a wonder that Dhoti was not invited to present the Indian viewpoint!

Same with Indian channel that push a Anti-Modi agenda (Turdesai's previous job) or a pro-pak agenda (pappad's panels).

What is the status of a paki outside India? Even in arap lands they are called muskeens or something. However in India, pakis have been given a lot more than a little elbow room, for example on par treatment of paki actors as heroes in Bollywood.

All this importance generated for pakis seems to be only to look down upon on Indians as 'worse than' kind of attempts.

Worse than pakis is a trick to prove that:
much better than pakis == much much better than yindoos.
This is why araps ignored Peshawar attacks.

Pakis as usual get to be too smart by half thereby slipping even more into pakistaniyat and dragging Afghans/Sindhis/Balochis along.