HKumar wrote:This is funny. Nobody mocks Drumph better than Obama. Drumpf's twiter access was taken away by his campaign
https://www.cnet.com/news/obama-laughs- ... rivileges/
A number of printed media wallahs have prepared two alternative editions - just so they have something ready to go. this is old practice - there is a famous picture of Truman I believe holding up a paper proclaiming his rival as having wonhabal wrote:Interesting news.
SuperStation95 has found out that Tuesday's Election is so RIGGED, that Newsweek has already printed a Special Commemorative PRINTED ISSUE to hit newsstands on Wednesday!
In India's freedom movement, opportunists sided with British, became zamindars & jagirdars, raibahadur. Then there were those who did not jump the wall, struggled, endured and fought for independence.HKumar wrote:^ you do realize that you would be the other side of this wall ?
habal wrote:Interesting news.
SuperStation95 has found out that Tuesday's Election is so RIGGED, that Newsweek has already printed a Special Commemorative PRINTED ISSUE to hit newsstands on Wednesday!
trying hard to find the Trump victory publication, so far unsuccessfulHKumar wrote: you do realize that is very very very common ?? no need for conspiracy hats. they always have two editions ready and release the winners the same day or next.
same happens for shirts/cap of any winning (and losing ) professional sports. ever notice how the winning team has the "champions" cap / shirts at end of the game?
habal wrote:In India's freedom movement, opportunists sided with British, became zamindars & jagirdars, raibahadur. Then there were those who did not jump the wall, struggled, endured and fought for independence.HKumar wrote:^ you do realize that you would be the other side of this wall ?
In mughal days, Sikhs & Marathas didn't jump the wall, those who jumped the wall today are called pakistanis.
depends upon which side of the wall you belong ..
habal wrote:trying hard to find the Trump victory publication, so far unsuccessfulHKumar wrote: you do realize that is very very very common ?? no need for conspiracy hats. they always have two editions ready and release the winners the same day or next.
same happens for shirts/cap of any winning (and losing ) professional sports. ever notice how the winning team has the "champions" cap / shirts at end of the game?
keep searching, my friend. meanwhile I have a wall in arizona to sell... quite cheapThe table refers to (as does the title of the book) - Death by Government, i.e. people of a given nation (or those controlled by a conquering force) killed within their own country by their own leader or government. The 'Democide' as he calls it thus involves the deliberate murder of the citizenry.komal wrote:I notice that Churchill is left out.Primus wrote: From Table 1.4, page 8 "This Century's Bloodiest Megamurderers"
Numbers are in millions (rounded)
Joseph Stalin: 42.7
Mao Tse-Tung: 37.8
Adolf Hitler: 20.9
Chiang Kai-shek: 10.2
Vladimir Illich Lenin: 4.0
Tojo Hideki: 3.99
Pol Pot: 2.4
Yahya Khan: 1.5
Josip Tito: 1.17
Yes, the math is a bit off. I did leave Hideki out of it. Still, 90 million is no small number.Viv S wrote: Sorry to nitpick but the arithmetic seems a little off to me. You know Chiang Kai-shek & Tojo Hideki were nationalists right?
The commies do seem to have a 'healthy' 2:1 advantage over the Fascists on the body count stats.
The GOP declares debate victory for Mike Pence, 90 minutes before it startshabal wrote:trying hard to find the Trump victory publication, so far unsuccessful
Some of the insiders were saying that they ran out of Orange ink so couldn't print Trump covers. Is this true or not? I don't know, you tell me!habal wrote:Stacks of boxes with the Special Edition ‘Madam President’ cover depicting Hillary Clinton winning the U.S. presidential race next week were secretly photographed by a Newsweek employee who says that there were no Trump versions made.
ramana wrote:HKumar, There are two reports on your posts. I would suggest you refrain from making personal comments or get banned.
Do you want that now just before voting is counted?
The elephants need to get donkey's brains. Even now, unless there is a Clinton tsunami (entirely possible now that she is seen to have been UNFAIRLY ACCUSEDbrar_w wrote: I see the let's expand the tent and prepare to contest a more diverse electorate voices being drowned by the other two side to a point where the GOP may even split. This sucks because in the absence of this Clinton was toast!
by the Extremists) all that the elephants have to do is to grovel before the Independents, though it may be way too late for that since they are unlikely to get any Electoral College delegates. Only the 5 congressional districts are split (outside of their state), rest all of the states go winner takes all in the December Electoral award.Am I right? Unless they win one state clean, they can't get any delegates?
ramana wrote:Meanwhile the Diwali Stamp has been issued and unless there is demand for it wont be printed next years so go out and buy some Diwali stamps and send them to your nephews and nieces to start them on stamp collecting.
https://about.usps.com/news/national-re ... 16_066.htm
McMullin's strategy is to block both Trump and Clinton from hitting the 270 electoral vote threshold to win, which would send the tiebreaker election to the House of Representatives. An election hasn’t been decided by the House since 1824.
. ABC needs something to do till they can share exit poll data . There are literally no realistic scenarios where this is possible although I'm sure it would be a media dream come true.By that metric, jinnah and Musharraf and whole of pakistan are indians and of indian descent and their actions have been beneficial for india because they are of indian descent .Gus wrote:dead donkey, braying donkey...fact is, she has Indian descent. Whether that means she cannot be anti-Indian or not is not an argument I am making.Rudradev wrote:As I recall, the "argument" advanced by our Clintonistas was fairly typical: Hindu Americans should not call out Huma Abedin on her Paki and Saudi connections, but rather stay dhimmified in the hope of getting on her good side, because after all she is "1/2 Indian" (sic). It was not specified whether this was supposed to mean 1/2 Indian citizenship or 1/2 Indian descent.
*cutting out irrelevant stuff*
End of argument, until you saw fit to flog that poor dead Donkey once again... but don't let me interrupt your efforts
Her father was Indian. Born in 1928 in dilli. Probably moved to US for PhD..not clear. I am assuming he went to US on Indian passport sometime after 1950
Given that he was an Indian citizen, and never a citizen of Pak or BD - Huma would even qualify for OCI, if not for her mother who probably held paki citizenship - which excludes OCI eligibility.
https://passport.gov.in/oci/If she tweets to Sushma Aunty, she might even get a waiverA foreign national, - (i) who was a citizen of India at the time of, or at any time after 26th January, 1950; or (ii) who was eligible to become a citizen of India on 26th January, 1950; or (iii) who belonged to a territory that became part of India after 15th August, 1947; or (iv) who is a child or a grandchild or a great grandchild of such a citizen; or (v) who is a minor child of such persons mentioned above; or (vi) who is a minor child and whose both parents are citizens of India or one of the parents is a citizen of India - is eligible for registration as OCI cardholder.
..
However, no person, who or either of whose parents or grandparents or great grandparents is or had been a citizen of Pakistan, Bangladesh or such other country as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify, shall be eligible for registration as an Overseas Citizen of India Cardholder.
Aren't you letting your impatience get in the way of thinking through your chain of arguments?I appreciate your pointing us to the conclusion that India allows "dual citizenship" to born US citizens, by the way... hadn't noticed this on the MEA website. You learn something new from Killary's fact-checkers every day
You made the claim that how can any US born person be 1/n of any other country.
To which I said, US does allow dual citizenship with some countries. I did not mention India anywhere there.
And here you are making a ulta pulta statement attributing to me - "your pointing us to the conclusion that India allows "dual citizenship" to born US citizens"
I am very well aware of Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis issues and India's non dual citizenship regime etc.
Now now comrade, Hillary has only 1/10th the body count of Monsieur Stalin. Here is to hoping that she becomes the president and matches his numbers so that we can see proof that women are exactly the same as men. Also, we wouldn't want the reform rats/Vatican coolies inside india to run out of moola and support now do we ? I mean who would civilize the unwashed heathens/pagans if the ghoul doesn't win presidency ? And not to mention the friend of khalistani indians, as many Huma Abedin supporting jingos(?) here would like to put it, like Tim Kaine as vice president?Viv S wrote:While he had no qualms about employing nationalist themes for propaganda 1941-45, Stalin was actually an ethnic Georgian (born Iosef Dzugashvili) not a Russian.LokeshC wrote:Nitpick. 'Coba' aka Stalin was a nationalist too, and a psychopath. So was ch000thchill
She can't be worse than a genuine 'Kenyan Muslim'. Which is better than giving a moron* the reins.Dinesh S wrote:Now now comrade, Hillary has only 1/10th the body count of Monsieur Stalin. Here is to hoping that she becomes the president and matches his numbers so that we can see proof that women are exactly the same as men. Also, we wouldn't want the reform rats/Vatican coolies inside india to run out of moola and support now do we ? I mean who would civilize the unwashed heathens/pagans if the ghoul doesn't win presidency ? And not to mention the friend of khalistani indians, as many Huma Abedin supporting jingos(?) here would like to put it, like Tim Kaine as vice president?
But that's not what I look for in a President. They have Advisers and Generals and Assistants to do things like send FAXes, set up email servers etc. What they need from the POTUS is general direction and gut feeling. Reagan did that, he was a success though he was ignorant on the details. Jimmy Carter tried being a detail man, and was a disaster at everything. Nixon kept assiduous records (tapes) of everything, and look what it got him.Came to the Debate With His Collar Button / Fly Unbuttoned!
She said that like 6 times.I was right there, MONITORING the mission that killed Bin Laden.
Thanks. Your penchant for missing the point (or for that matter, the side of a barn) is illuminated by the precise section of my quote that you leave out as "irrelevant" to Huma Abedin where Indians are concernedGus wrote:dead donkey, braying donkey...fact is, she has Indian descent. Whether that means she cannot be anti-Indian or not is not an argument I am making.Rudradev wrote:As I recall, the "argument" advanced by our Clintonistas was fairly typical: Hindu Americans should not call out Huma Abedin on her Paki and Saudi connections, but rather stay dhimmified in the hope of getting on her good side, because after all she is "1/2 Indian" (sic). It was not specified whether this was supposed to mean 1/2 Indian citizenship or 1/2 Indian descent.
*cutting out irrelevant stuff*
End of argument, until you saw fit to flog that poor dead Donkey once again... but don't let me interrupt your efforts
Traders expect U.S. stock prices to swing by about 2 percent in either direction on Wednesday, the day after the election, based on the price of S&P 500 index options. Options on the PowerShares QQQ Trust Russell 2000 ETF, are pricing similarly large swings before the week is out.
Some banks are projecting a more extreme drop in the event of a victory for Republican Donald Trump, with Citigroup ( C )
estimating that a Trump victory could trigger a 3-5 percent sell-off for the S&P 500.
U.S. stocks rose on Monday as Democrat Hillary Clinton's prospects brightened after the FBI said it would not press criminal charges related to her use of a private email server.
Investors have tended to see Clinton as a more status quo candidate, while Trump's stances on foreign policy, trade and immigration have unnerved the market. After the election, Morgan Stanley ( MS ) will hold a call for financial advisers and clients with Chief Investment Officer Mike Wilson on Wednesday morning.
Goldman Sachs ( GS ) is also hosting a call for its private wealth clients led by Chief Investment Officer Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani and members of Washington lobbying groups Elmendorf Ryan and CGCN Group, according to an invitation sent to clients. More than half of the stock and bond fund managers polled by Northern Trust in the third quarter said they expected the election to cause a large increase in market volatility.
On Tuesday night, when results begin to come in, JPMorgan ( JPM ) will have additional traders on duty in New York to back up its Asian trading teams in case of surges in volume, said bank spokesman Brian Marchiony. The extra staffing is similar to what the bank did during Britain's vote to leave the European Union, he said.
She certain sounds artificial though I wouldn't go as far 'snake'. And Trump very far from honest no matter how earnest he sounds. Take a look at his Politifact profile for a start. Think the Clinton Foundation was peddling influence? Check out the Trump Foundation if you fancy a laugh.UlanBatori wrote:Hmm... can't disagree. But Da Man was honest - he showed what he was. And lost to the snake. That still doesn't win my vote for the snake.
