From the Naval thread:
Cosmo_R wrote:@NRao ^^^: OT in naval discussions but related. What happens with FAKPA

/FGFA etc? That's an even bigger rabbit hole
Cannot say for sure. But here are
my observations (tea leaf reading):
1) The CURRENT Indo-Russian FGFA effort is limited. Both nations have pledged to (and I have no reason to believe that they have not) fund the current stage of the FGFA
2) FGFA is NOT PAKFA. FGFA, at best, is based on the PAKFA. IMHO, FGFA will be superior to the PAKFA, but that is a diff thread. Sorry, just my feel
3) #1, in MVVHO, is designed by India to ensure that any problems created by the Russians will still ensure the progress of the FGFA. In short after this stage if the Russians pose any problems India will continue on her own. My logic is that since the funding is JUST for this stage of the FGFA, there is a very neat cutoff. I SUSPECT (I have no proof for this) that India will at that point in time have enough to go on her own if need be, perhaps with help from some other vendor
4) I am eagerly waiting to see the next phase (honestly I do not care for this stage, sorry). IF the Russians want a part of the action after the current phase, my feel is that India will place a huge amount of emphasis on transfer of knowledge and IP (NOT ToT)
5) I would not be surprised at all if the FGFA will have more non-Russian components - perhaps including the engine and radar. I just cannot see the FGFA being held hostage like the current set of Russian products in use in the Indian armed forces. I understand that the word "hostage" is a very, very strong word to use, but after some thought I think it is appropriate one to use. Irrespective of what the Russians think OR do, the FGFA, from an Indian PoV, HAS to survive. No two ways about that. I feel it is up to the Russians to "behave" (yes, it is a strong word) within the norms of a relationship
6) The PAKFA needs Indian money to fund it. IF in 2011 RuAF can field some 40-50 Su-35s, there is just no way they can afford 150 PAKFA - even with the oil money. That is my opinion, others can have their own and I will respect that
7) IF #6 is true, then India will have quite a bit of say in the matters of the FGFA. In fact, I very strongly feel that even the current agreement is because the Russians have had very little to say in the matter. The current set up favors India - IMVVHO and this may sound as a knock on the Russians, but it is not - just an observation - the Russians are cornered. (based on: it is my understanding that there are two Indo_Ruso teams - one in Indian and the other in Russia, they share a common system between the two geographic areas. Talk of
fool proofing a system!!! : ) )
8 ) See #4. That is critical and will actually tell us a LOT about Indo-Russian relations. IF Russia wants to play ball, then it will be on Indian terms, else the FGFA will take on a "Western" hue, with perhaps engines from GE/France, radar from Israel, etc
Honestly, this project will define Indo-Russian relation AND I very strongly feel it is up to the Russians to prove their presence. What happened in 1990-2005 is passe, it is
worthless (I mean that) IMVVHO
On the "rabbit hole" stuff: IMHO, up to the Russians. FGFA cannot fail. That is the bottom line