PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Post Reply
sudhan
BRFite
Posts: 1155
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 17:53
Location: Timbuktoo..

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by sudhan »

Singha wrote:well maybe during hard movements the tow cable could snag or break off. OK for big bombers like B52/B1, maybe not so ok for fighters.
does any sher khan fighter use towed decoys?
The SH seems to use the AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/ALE-55_ ... owed_Decoy
Juggi G
BRFite
Posts: 1070
Joined: 11 Mar 2007 19:16
Location: Martyr Bhagat Singh Nagar District, Doaba, Punjab, Bharat. De Ghuma ke :)

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Juggi G »

PAK-FA to be Built Jointly by India, Russia
Daily News & Analysis
After Air Chief, PV Naik, saw the fifth generation fighter aircraft flight in Russia last month, on Tuesday secretary of defence production, RK Singh, was given a flight demonstration of the PAK-FA (Prospective Airborne Complex of Frontline Aviation).
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

Interesting aspects include the areas where India would be focused on contribution?
regardless, some of the areas could be:

1. stealth coverings for rear and further clarify on intake rcs.
2. Indian mission computers and software
3. Indian software for AESA?
4. weapons integration, and other bvr stores /types [172 wala]
5. advanced composites
6. ECM and avionics - dual supply for both aMCA & FGFA
7. test bed for few of the AMCA technology thought about.
8. Importantly internal weapons bay controls
9. low emission AL47
10. other retractable pods, sensor fusion and OLS

quite a bit to learn
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Austin »

PARIS: Russia's PAK-FA fighter shows promise
By Alan Dron
Russia's Sukhoi PAK-FA stealthy fifth-generation fighter is showing promise in its test-flight programme and will probably fly at Moscow's MAKS air show in August, says United Aircraft chief Mikhail Pogosyan.

"There is no aircraft in the world that doesn't undergo certain modifications based on the test [programme] results. The most successful only require minor modifications to support systems. Our experience so far gives us confidence that we will avoid significant problems. The past year gives us sound grounds to say we are moving in the right direction.

"We're quite happy and pleased with the course of testing."

Two prototypes are now flying at the Gromov flight test centre at Zhukovsky, a suburb southeast of Moscow.

Russia has a requirement for 150 or more of the aircraft, which carries the internal Sukhoi designation of T-50, to enter service from 2015-16. India plans to buy between 200 and 250 of a modified design under the designation Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft.

Pogosyan denies that New Delhi is simply providing funding for Russian designers to produce a modified aircraft for the Indian air force's requirements.

He says India is bringing its own engineering input to the joint variant, although he declines to detail New Delhi's contribution beyond saying it covers aspects of airframe design, software development and other systems.

Pogosyan points to previous co-operation between the two countries in which Indian engineers helped to develop the capabilities of the Sukhoi Su-30MKI in Indian service as evidence of India's engineering expertise.


Asked for his professional opinion on China's J-20 stealth fighter unveiled in January, Pogosyan says: "You'd better ask the Chinese."

Pressed on whether he feels the aircraft is a genuine prototype or merely a technology demonstrator, he says: "China's aviation industry has achieved really significant progress. But on the other hand, to create a really competitive product is time-consuming, demands significant experience in the engineering field and experienced human resources."
prithvi

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by prithvi »

article on PAK-FA on Aviation Week..

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/de ... d4224d634e
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Karan M »

PV Naik on FGFA

http://s188567700.online.de/CMS/index.p ... &Itemid=47
Lockheed-Martin and Pentagon – feeling that the F-16IN would not be selected – in the months ahead of AERO-INDIA have ‘circulated’ an Indian participation in the lentghy F-35 programme. Questioned on that idea, an obviously ‘nerved’ minister Antony replied: “Already we are engaged with Russia to produce a fifth-generation fighter. No other country has offered us these technologies in the past or would in the future. We are way ahead now in the partnership with Russia. There is no question of going back...!”

Russian UAC and Sukhoi in December 2010 signed a D&D-contract with Indian aerospace ‘giant’ HAL, to jointly develop the design for a new 5G multirole fighter. It is based on Sukhois T-50 (PAK FA) design, who’s second prototype T-50-2 only flew on March 3rd. The overall costs of the project are likely to be US$ 6 billion and according to the UAC-head M. Pogosyan, “the work between India and Russia will be distributed in a 35/65 proportion. Between 200 and 250 are planned for both airforces.” To ACIG Pogosyan also confirmed the Indian demand for receiving mainly two-seaters of what they now call PMF (Perspective Multirole Fighter), a focus originally not on Sukhoi’s agenda. ACM Naik added: “We are looking for a fifth generation aircraft. We are looking for an aircraft which is capable of supercruise, capable of very potent long range weapons, capable of a higher level of integrated avionics which are not there in a fourth generation aircraft. We also think that in modern scenarios highly saturated EW and ECM, with all the real-time targeting and datalinks and a BVR-environment with new missiles, you need a second human. 2017 is our expected induction date to start with this design....”
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21037
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Rakesh »

Nice quote KaranM! I really hope they go for the two seater Rafale/Eurofighter using the same logic.
Gaur
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2009
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 23:19

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Gaur »

^^
Not necessarily a good idea. If the a/cs are not originally designed keeping twin seater config in mind, there may be performance degradation. Case in point- Differences b/n Mig-29UB and Mig-29KUB. In Mig-29UB, the nose cone gets smaller because cockpit is shifted forwards. Also, the fuel capacity gets compromised. On the other hand, Mig-29KUB is unique because they started designing from twin seater first. So, the cockpit is designed and arranged so that the nose cone remains unaffected. Plus, Mig-29KUB is practically a total redesign of Mig-29 and gives it a much greater fuel capacity.

So, it would first have to be seen if the twin seater versions of the Eurocanards are designed keeping these considerations in mind or not.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

prithvi wrote:article on PAK-FA on Aviation Week..

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/de ... d4224d634e
Old article. BR knows it rather well.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21037
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Rakesh »

Gaur wrote:^^
Not necessarily a good idea. If the a/cs are not originally designed keeping twin seater config in mind, there may be performance degradation. Case in point- Differences b/n Mig-29UB and Mig-29KUB. In Mig-29UB, the nose cone gets smaller because cockpit is shifted forwards. Also, the fuel capacity gets compromised. On the other hand, Mig-29KUB is unique because they started designing from twin seater first. So, the cockpit is designed and arranged so that the nose cone remains unaffected. Plus, Mig-29KUB is practically a total redesign of Mig-29 and gives it a much greater fuel capacity.

So, it would first have to be seen if the twin seater versions of the Eurocanards are designed keeping these considerations in mind or not.
The twin-seater Rafale B was designed to be just as effective as the single-seater Rafale C. In fact the French Air Force has more twin-seater Rafales than they have single-seater Rafales! Our resident Typhoon expert - Viv S - can probably comment on the Eurofighter.
pragnya
BRFite
Posts: 728
Joined: 20 Feb 2011 18:41

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by pragnya »

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Russia-India business dialog

An interesting business dialog is available on the site of SIEF. Between most important high technology news : one Indian company will produce GaN chips in S-Petersburg starting from the next year. I think the news can be crossed with PAK FA development (radar choice).
Russia-India business dialog

:roll: :roll:
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

Something I have been saying from day 1:

Ajai Shukla: Indo-US jet trainer - the Indus moment
Why then should India work with the US when Russia is willing to partner India in jointly developing a Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA), which incorporates not just cutting-edge but even bleeding-edge technologies? The fact, which top officials in the ministry of defence (MoD) ruefully admit in private, is that Russia will not pass on any key technologies to India. Sukhoi, the Russian partner in the FGFA project, has already developed the single-seat flying prototype that Moscow says meets the demands of the Russian Air Force. The work that remains mainly involves avionics and electronics systems and will fall largely into India’s share. The best that the Indian partner, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, can hope to gain from this “joint development” is a level of expertise in project management.
They ALL are shades of the same color!!!!!

Do NOT expect either France nor EADS to part with bleeding edge technologies. They cannot and will not.

Which is, from an Indian stand point, the AMCA MUST rule.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

NRao, we are talking at least a decade for that to take shape. Of course LCA and aMCA must rule., else no point investing in planning for them to begin with. I guess, the enabling technologies are important, and joint ventures could give us heads up is what I am reading from all those in between the lines.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

You will have to be more specific about what you mean by enabling technologies.

That article clearly states "Russia will not pass on any key technologies to India", which has been my contention all along. It also states that the best India can get out of this is "a level of expertise in project management." With the US MMRCA options I had suggested the best was "supply chain".

US declined whatever, France declined missile seekers (Israelis supplied them), now we get to know not to expect much from Russia. (Recall my prediction was this FGFA may die after this design phase.)

I am not sure what to make out of the reduction in the number of FGFAs - that is nearly a 15% reduction (for a nation that can actually afford that many).

Perhaps I am totally wrong - hope so. But I am curious to know what are the expectations of others. What does India expect and what will she get from the FGFA effort. (Be as specific as possible please. No "engine" or "radar". Thx.)

Back in two days.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

No body will give you technology.. what enables is the partnership and an opportunity to build a 5th gen program.. It is important to know various aspects, and you know that Indian components are to be part of FGFA. Now, having said that, enabling technologies are the ones that we are interested to put on the russian platform.

Q: Why do we simply beg for technologies? No one will give it, even for hard cash. what you get is hardly screw driver.. You know it.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Austin »

I would be wary of Ajai Shukla when it comes to F-35 , his obsession with F-35 is similar to Carlo obsession with F-22 and Ajai would go to great length to prove his point.
Dmurphy
BRFite
Posts: 1542
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 11:20
Location: India

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Dmurphy »

Austin wrote:I would be wary of Ajai Shukla when it comes to F-35 , his obsession with F-35 is similar to Carlo obsession with F-22 and Ajai would go to great length to prove his point.
Second that. While he has been wanting to champion the cause of domestic industries in the defence sector, he conveniently oversees how much they tend to lose by purchasing the F-35 off the shelf as opposed to manufacturing the MMRCAs under TOT here in India. :evil:
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

NRao.. what I would also like to add to the enabling technologies, is that skill set that just does not remain as knowledge area with key concepts that which our labs does R&D, but getting to have the real skill sets, to establish our competency areas.

From a basic example like a surgeon who is extremely knowledgeable but not done a single surgery yet, compared to another surgeon who has done some 100s of heart surgery. Obliviously you would choose the later... and thus it enable us to do our AMCA without losing a leg for IAF, rather come with full force 4 legged animal that they can deploy and use.
jaladipc
BRFite
Posts: 456
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 20:51
Location: i CAN ADA

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by jaladipc »

in this videos ACM says inducting 250-270 FGFA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQnw-oIDfms
Watch from 1:30 onwards.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

wow! that would be $30b! only russian stupidity (spares, price jacking) can destroy this.
Boreas
BRFite
Posts: 315
Joined: 23 Jan 2011 11:24

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Boreas »

^^^ spares problem bcoz USSR broke up.. supply chain got disrupted and there was no money to set up everything in russia.
^^^ failed to deliver on contract price coz negotiated rates were too low, and Russia didnt had money to do fill the bill themselves.

They are not stupid. They are the one who helped us everytime we were in need.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

^^^

For some parts, etc one can understand. But, for pretty much everything, to the extent that Indian armed forces preparedness is impact, those are no more than excuses.

As an example, tires for the MKI. For that matter anything to do with the latest set of products: MKI/Talwars/etc these are all Russian (NOT USSR) contracts. IF it were some old tanks, TU, etc one could understand.

The fact that the GoI allowed the armed forces to look for assistance outside of Russia is proof enough that the situation was really bad. Besides that it did not precipitate overnight. It took years for India to look for help outside of the contractual agreements.
They are not stupid.
Greed perhaps? A wild guess.
They are the one who helped us everytime we were in need.
USSR did. Russia has not quite been at that level without getting her blood and flesh.

Let us see where the FGFA goes.
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2196
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Shrinivasan »

jaladipc wrote:in this videos ACM says inducting 250-270 FGFA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQnw-oIDfms
Watch from 1:30 onwards.
I'll miss ACM Naik...he has a straight talk no bullshit attitude which is endearing. Him telling the reporter no bases needed in Gujarat is funny...a nitpick, both Punjab and Rajastan have more bases than Gujarat.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by svinayak »

[quote="Shrinivasan" ] Him telling the reporter no bases needed in Gujarat is funny...a nitpick, both Punjab and Rajastan have more bases than Gujarat.[/quote]
TO keep the public assured and build confidence
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

correct.
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2196
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Shrinivasan »

Acharya wrote:Him telling the reporter no bases needed in Gujarat is funny...a nitpick, both Punjab and Rajastan have more bases than Gujarat.
TO keep the public assured and build confidence
which is exactly why I like him... he did the same thing during the NDTV interview about Air defence. assured people that our RADAR and AD network is the best and are working to make it better.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

best is not good, better is better. :wink:
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2196
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Shrinivasan »

SaiK wrote:best is not good, better is better. :wink:
Cocky confidence is need for SDREs, in the midst of millions of Dhoti shiverers, ACM Naik stands out big!!! Hope to hear more pearls of wisdom from him during the rest of his tenure and during his retired life!!!
VishalJ
BRFite
Posts: 1033
Joined: 12 Feb 2009 06:40
Location: Mumbai
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by VishalJ »

The T-50 should be seen in action within 30 days at MAKS Image
MAKS FLIGHT PROGRAM
http://www.aviasalon.com/en/static/page ... rogram.htm

The exhibits will include Russian modern multipurpose fighters Su-35, MiG-35, Su-30 MK2, as well as the novelty of the Russian civil aircraft industry – Sukhoy superjet-100 aircraft.
For the first time Russian PAK FA fighter of the Fifth generation will take part in the flight program

At the static parking area the Russian Air Force will present the full range of military airplanes and helicopters: Tu-160, A-50, Tu-95, Su-27 SM, MiG-29SMT, Su-24M, Su-25SM, Su-34, MiG-31B, Jak-130, helicopters Ka-52, Mi-26, Mi-8 MTV-5, Mi-28.
Also, Russian Helicopters, JSC will demonstrate their wide range of military and civil helicopters.
Apart from this, themed flight performances are in the schedule: "Search and Rescue" with participation of Ka-226Т Mi-34S1 helicopters; “Anti-terror” with participation of Ka-52 Mi-28NE, Mi-8 helicopters.
Then there's Katrina kumari Image
The French Air Force will demonstrate Rafale fighters in their flight program and the Italian Air Force will demonstrate the only cargo aircraft in the world, performing aerial stunts – S27.
Image And then Al-Amreeka will display their state-of-the-art planes such as
This year, after 4-year break, US Air Force airplanes will take part in the Salon. For the first time S-5А Galaxy military transport airplane, А-10 attack planes and R-3 reconnaissance plane will be presented at the static parking area. The Salon’s visitors will also be able to see traditional MAKS participants - KS-135 transport airplanes, F-16 and F-15 fighters as well as В-52 bomber. F-15 multipurpose fighter will perform a new 15 minute long program.
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2196
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Shrinivasan »

I propose this as the Lungi Dance Smiley...it looks like we need to have one ready ASAP...
http://freesmileyface.net/smiley/happy/ ... er-130.gif
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Austin »

It will be good to see Su-35 in action more than PAK-FA , since PAK-FA wont be doing much flying as they would have limitation on flight envelop , all in all displaying PAK-FA would delay flight testing program.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

From the Naval thread:
Cosmo_R wrote:@NRao ^^^: OT in naval discussions but related. What happens with FAKPA :) /FGFA etc? That's an even bigger rabbit hole
Cannot say for sure. But here are my observations (tea leaf reading):

1) The CURRENT Indo-Russian FGFA effort is limited. Both nations have pledged to (and I have no reason to believe that they have not) fund the current stage of the FGFA
2) FGFA is NOT PAKFA. FGFA, at best, is based on the PAKFA. IMHO, FGFA will be superior to the PAKFA, but that is a diff thread. Sorry, just my feel
3) #1, in MVVHO, is designed by India to ensure that any problems created by the Russians will still ensure the progress of the FGFA. In short after this stage if the Russians pose any problems India will continue on her own. My logic is that since the funding is JUST for this stage of the FGFA, there is a very neat cutoff. I SUSPECT (I have no proof for this) that India will at that point in time have enough to go on her own if need be, perhaps with help from some other vendor
4) I am eagerly waiting to see the next phase (honestly I do not care for this stage, sorry). IF the Russians want a part of the action after the current phase, my feel is that India will place a huge amount of emphasis on transfer of knowledge and IP (NOT ToT)
5) I would not be surprised at all if the FGFA will have more non-Russian components - perhaps including the engine and radar. I just cannot see the FGFA being held hostage like the current set of Russian products in use in the Indian armed forces. I understand that the word "hostage" is a very, very strong word to use, but after some thought I think it is appropriate one to use. Irrespective of what the Russians think OR do, the FGFA, from an Indian PoV, HAS to survive. No two ways about that. I feel it is up to the Russians to "behave" (yes, it is a strong word) within the norms of a relationship
6) The PAKFA needs Indian money to fund it. IF in 2011 RuAF can field some 40-50 Su-35s, there is just no way they can afford 150 PAKFA - even with the oil money. That is my opinion, others can have their own and I will respect that
7) IF #6 is true, then India will have quite a bit of say in the matters of the FGFA. In fact, I very strongly feel that even the current agreement is because the Russians have had very little to say in the matter. The current set up favors India - IMVVHO and this may sound as a knock on the Russians, but it is not - just an observation - the Russians are cornered. (based on: it is my understanding that there are two Indo_Ruso teams - one in Indian and the other in Russia, they share a common system between the two geographic areas. Talk of fool proofing a system!!! : ) )
8 ) See #4. That is critical and will actually tell us a LOT about Indo-Russian relations. IF Russia wants to play ball, then it will be on Indian terms, else the FGFA will take on a "Western" hue, with perhaps engines from GE/France, radar from Israel, etc

Honestly, this project will define Indo-Russian relation AND I very strongly feel it is up to the Russians to prove their presence. What happened in 1990-2005 is passe, it is worthless (I mean that) IMVVHO

On the "rabbit hole" stuff: IMHO, up to the Russians. FGFA cannot fail. That is the bottom line
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Austin »

Russia pitches PAK-FA to the 'other' Korea
There was a time when any Russian military equipment offered to forces on the Korean peninsula would have stopped slightly north of the 38th parallel, but those days are apparently over.

Although only 18 months beyond first flight, the Sukhoi PAK-FA stealth fighter has been offered to the South Koreans for FX-III. Local reports (see here and here) in Seoul today say that South Korea's defence acquisition agency -- DAPA -- has included the PAK-FA in its short-list of competitors.

For those keeping score, this is the first real competition between the PAK-FA and any foreign fighter. South Korea also is considering the Boeing F-15SE Silent Eagle, Eurofighter Typhoon and the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. This could get interesting, folks.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by SaiK »

NRao, before we jump on evaluating the project's worth, we need to grab more information on the details of the project that even ddm does not know now.

So,.. let us not give a wrong picture imo.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

Just saying ................... FGFA is not a silver bullet.
Nikhil T wrote:MMRCA deal: IAF might order 63 more jets
"But yes, if the timelines for the Tejas LCA (light combat aircraft) and the stealth Indo-Russian FGFA (fifth-generation fighter aircraft) projects are not met, we will go for more MMRCA to retain IAF's combat edge," he added.

.................................

This, however, is the first time that top defence officials have directly linked the progress in the LCA and FGFA projects to the possibility of exceeding the MMRCA acquisition beyond the first 126 jets.
Ouch that hurts!!!

The flag has already gone up.

Again, just a data point. This is July 25, 2011.
kmc_chacko
BRFite
Posts: 326
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 10:10
Location: Shivamogga, Karnataka

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by kmc_chacko »

^^ they are just making it clear that there will be further increase in MRCA order, and a way to get more bargaining power.

nothing else PAKFA will be inducted before 2018
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2196
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Shrinivasan »

kmc_chacko wrote:^^ they are just making it clear that there will be further increase in MRCA order, and a way to get more bargaining power.
Agreed, this is an opening gambit before price negotiation to get a good handle on the cost. Whoever blinks last wins!!!
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19329
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by NRao »

Yar, Srini and kmc_chacko, jo cheese khol ke dekeni chaije, wo to kholte nahi, dikta hai adat sey galat cheese kolte ho!!!!
Pandit from that article wrote: When the MMRCA selection process was initiated by the defence ministry in mid-2007, the overall project cost was pegged at Rs 42,000 crore, or $10.4 billion for 126 fighters. But it will zoom well beyond $20 billion, if India eventually decides to opt for 189 jets since inflation is also being factored in. Even with 126 jets, this is the biggest such fighter contract going around the world as of now.
But, keep that to yourself. Do not tell the French or the EADS people that we already have a price in mind - which is WELL OVER $20 billion!!!

Crap.

It is a GoI that has been painted into a corner by China. Simple as that. GoI cannot afford to slip any more if GoI wants to defend India. Which means the MoD cannot slip. Which means that the IAF (IA or IN or Coast Guard) cannot slip. Which means that the FGFA and LCA projects HAVE to deliver - on time.

Which is why the "senior MoD official" is setting the table.

Simple.

IF the FGFA or LCA do not produce India provides China with a small window to play pranks. Perhaps with Pakis who will have enough rash all over to scratch that resulting itch. (Those Chinks in PoK will never leave. Bet on that. They need to be pushed out.)
Shrinivasan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2196
Joined: 20 Aug 2009 19:20
Location: Gateway Arch
Contact:

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by Shrinivasan »

NRao, let me answer you in a different way... LCA, FGFS, PAK-FA, MKIs, MMRCA and the older birds are all different arrows in our quiver. Just because we get a new arrow we don't throw an old one, till it is really no longer an arrow. Desh would increase the MMRCA count irrespective of LCA / FGFA. Because these 3 birds have 3 different purposes (3 different arrows). the $20Bil number could be DDM or it is deliberately leaked by someone in MOD with official connivance.
Agree will your "paintes into a corner" remark. some effort by Cheena, some by our commie lovers, much of it a self goal by Desh over the years. (latest examples Chusul, ITBP under MOD...)
shukla
BRFite
Posts: 1727
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Location: Land of Oz!

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread

Post by shukla »

Russian T-50 Shortlisted for New Korean Fighter Contest
The credibility of including the Sukhoi T-50 in the shortlist is open to question. In the past, South Korea has acquired several Russian systems, such as the Il-103 trainer, Ansat and Ka-27 helicopters, S-300 SAMs and space technology. The Sukhoi Su-35 was also included in the four candidates for the original FX competition. However, it remains to be seen just how much Russia would be prepared to reveal to the Koreans about the T-50’s technology and capabilities.
I hope the Koreans don't get to know more about it than we eventually would..
Post Reply