manjgu wrote:Boss ...i.am BR AWACS on the ground ... treat me with respect

manjgu wrote:Boss ...i.am BR AWACS on the ground ... treat me with respect
Beat me on that ... oohooharish_ch wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/saahilmengha ... 4533848064
CNN News18 reporting Massod's death news...
If true,this is a wonderful outcome...
Me on cloud 9 !!!
Not surprising. Puki Military sham courts have worlds highest conviction rate based on CONFESSION.Lalmohan wrote:i initially posted a joke about MA needing dialysis, but now it is actually being claimed as such! how comes all of the top emirs seem to have kidney problems? and then need dialysis in a Pak Mil hospital?
Don’t fall for it, it might be paki psycops to wiggle away from escalation or UN resolution or some such.harish_ch wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/saahilmengha ... 4533848064
CNN News18 reporting Massod's death news...
If true,this is a wonderful outcome...
Me on cloud 9 !!!
Absolutely....Either way it is going to be a win for usnam wrote:Even if it is planted by Pak does not matter, either ways they have handed us on a platter.
Could this be a Chanakyan strategy on our part?nam wrote:If Pak accepts the death, we will go to town that he died of air strike.
If pak says he is not, then will be forced to show him. India will.push for sanctions in SC putting China in an uncomfortable position. Will nudge pak to tell everyone he is dead.
Yes exactly.rhytha wrote:Don’t fall for it, it might be paki psycops to wiggle away from escalation or UN resolution or some such.harish_ch wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/saahilmengha ... 4533848064
CNN News18 reporting Massod's death news...
If true,this is a wonderful outcome...
Me on cloud 9 !!!
Wait for official GOI announcement if any, don’t trust the ddmon this.
Sir, the IAF clearly said they have the images and it is upto the govt to release it. Which meant they are ok with them being in public. I don’t need to see them. I trust my govt and armed forces. When I said we missed a trick by not showing the before after images during the MEA press meet, what I meant was we let the pakis use the opportunity to take over the whole narrative with enough time to circulate fake images of some trees being bombed.chetak wrote:
what's tickling you about the images?? and why??
In reply some qtiya bakis asksLt Gen H S Panag(R) @rwac48
Three parachutes came down as per Pakistani villagers. One was Abhinandan. Two were from F16. One was hospitalised(allegedly Indian pilot) as Ghafoor said in his first Press Conf. The story adds up.
To whichHamid Ali Chatha @HamidAliChathaMar 2
Replying to @rwac48
Simply concocted for moral boosting.
Mig 21 Shot F-16 @Rish_077 Mar 2
haven't you listened DGISPR's speech ???
where is the second pilot(of F-16) he was claiming to be in hospital ?
Exactly what we should have focused on instead of debris analysis which always going to be dicey. I had written about this before.Lt Gen H S Panag(R) @rwac48 Mar 2
Their own pilot!
pankajs wrote:I think Iyerval act too smart at time but is not "put India down" to gain brownie point with gora or to sound cool amongst the self delusional libs. He does make an occasional mistake but that can be overlooked. Happens to the best.
The mistake that some of our Indian friends on twitter made was to focus on proving an F-16 went down and getting bogged down. Instead they should have turned the table by focusing on the multiple ejections clearly recorded by the bakis and asked them what where they hiding while hammering home ISPR's change of story.
That would have had the same result but the bakis defending and Indians attacking (asking relentless questions) till the truth came out. Ultimately would have leads to the F-16 and the downed baki pilot.
Objective achieved but in a round about way. A matter of tactics.
With respect to your goats in distant Mongolia Sir, I do not think GOI is jumping like a squirrel. In fact, GOI has been cautious and limited in the way it has shared info, allowing imaginations to flourish. This has led to many tactically brilliant mistakes by the Paki Lovers and the officials of that country. They are digging their grave and GOI shall in the end pour concrete over it. Sat Imagery can wait. IMVHO, pls.UlanBatori wrote:Shows why today's armchair warriors stay behind the curve through failure to read more than Twits.
1) Masood Azhar was **NOT** the Chief Goat-Bu**er at Balakot. His brother was (same momma, different/many poppas). The one who is said to have come out and delivered the Intention to Strike All Of India. Main purpose of that was to claim that he did not get Hourized at Balakot. Maye it WAS his voice, maybe that of one of his many half-brothers.
2) Masood Azhar dying or not is totally irrelevant. In fact it just means that GOI is like a squirrel jumping at a nut - only to find the nut empty.
Now needs to prepare all-new-from-scratch Dossier etc etc. on another terrorist. Hope they do it for someone who is not over 70 this time, hain? You'd think GOI was going by Seniority like Indian Parliament. Think RaGa. (OK, oxy-moron)
If the Bro survived Balakot, the strike evidently missed wherever he was situated that night. Maybe the goat-shed. We need those sat-images!!
So now best strategy may be to put out a small reward and announce it, for the Bro.
Your friends are a cynical lot. First time it was demontization, Kerala floods, then Sabarimala and now Balakot. Everytime the argument starts with "my friends". It is very hard to convince the people who doesn't want to accept the truth.jpremnath wrote:Sir, the IAF clearly said they have the images and it is upto the govt to release it. Which meant they are ok with them being in public. I don’t need to see them. I trust my govt and armed forces. When I said we missed a trick by not showing the before after images during the MEA press meet, what I meant was we let the pakis use the opportunity to take over the whole narrative with enough time to circulate fake images of some trees being bombed.chetak wrote:
what's tickling you about the images?? and why??
You can’t expect every Indian to think like BRFites and do a threadbare analysis of the entire events like in this forum. The real world works a bit differently. From early days of elation and pride, I can sense a deflated feel among most in my friends, family and office circles. Much of it has to do with what happened in the following days. But it has come to such that they even start to feel we did indeed miss but it is ok as we crossed their border. Now I might be just thinking too much and probably the morale of the common folk is not really important in this current scenario.
I have 5 or 6 Pakis in my office and they are clearly pumped which is quite contrary to what many think here. Which is why I said the pakis managed to take an upper hand in the SM war. Their coordinated psy ops of convincing their aam abduls how their AF stood up and struck back at an enemy whose economy is 10 times their size and even downed one of our jet has succeeded to quite an extent. Our agencies’ total absence in this space means, it was left to the normal desh bhakts to counter a well-coordinated psychological warfare with random news and unverified scoops.
I believe this is a tactical brilliance by pakis to take the heat away from the presence of masood azhar by announcing his death, albeit temporarily.harish_ch wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/saahilmengha ... 4533848064
CNN News18 reporting Massod's death news...
If true,this is a wonderful outcome...
Me on cloud 9 !!!
How many times have Mulla Omar/ Baghdadi etc have died only to be resurrected after the heat is gone.Rahul M wrote:I believe this is a tactical brilliance by pakis to take the heat away from the presence of masood azhar by announcing his death, albeit temporarily.harish_ch wrote:https://mobile.twitter.com/saahilmengha ... 4533848064
CNN News18 reporting Massod's death news...
If true,this is a wonderful outcome...
Me on cloud 9 !!!
Once the heat dies down they will trott him out once again to show how the dirty hindoos have been fooled once again.
whatever you say is irrelevant to the GoI.jpremnath wrote:Sir, the IAF clearly said they have the images and it is upto the govt to release it. Which meant they are ok with them being in public. I don’t need to see them. I trust my govt and armed forces. When I said we missed a trick by not showing the before after images during the MEA press meet, what I meant was we let the pakis use the opportunity to take over the whole narrative with enough time to circulate fake images of some trees being bombed.chetak wrote:
what's tickling you about the images?? and why??
You can’t expect every Indian to think like BRFites and do a threadbare analysis of the entire events like in this forum. The real world works a bit differently. From early days of elation and pride, I can sense a deflated feel among most in my friends, family and office circles. Much of it has to do with what happened in the following days. But it has come to such that they even start to feel we did indeed miss but it is ok as we crossed their border. Now I might be just thinking too much and probably the morale of the common folk is not really important in this current scenario.
I have 5 or 6 Pakis in my office and they are clearly pumped which is quite contrary to what many think here. Which is why I said the pakis managed to take an upper hand in the SM war. Their coordinated psy ops of convincing their aam abduls how their AF stood up and struck back at an enemy whose economy is 10 times their size and even downed one of our jet has succeeded to quite an extent. Our agencies’ total absence in this space means, it was left to the normal desh bhakts to counter a well-coordinated psychological warfare with random news and unverified scoops.
Fair enough...chetak wrote:
Please end this futile discussion here.
Don't feel bad.jpremnath wrote:Fair enough...chetak wrote:
Please end this futile discussion here.
In the media industry nobody looks at the credibility of the document. They only look at the credibility source peddling it. If it is an in-house correspondent then in 99% of the cases it is taken at face. If it is an outside source it is accepted if it is Arundhati or Kugelman type.Dileep wrote:If.. some crazy soul buys the satellite image and makes a scoop, he should be smart enough to sell it to the media first and make a nice profit, right? What is wrong in making a bit of moolah while serving jingoness hain jee?
Well not really. If it were intact and showing signs of a dormitory for 300 males with no provision for bathing, and a firing range, and a swimming pool and obstacle courses, then the bigger question on people's minds is why does a seminary need all this paraphernalia.nam wrote:But as I mentioned, Pak would taken the whole world to the seminary, if it was intact.
More confirmation that NatSecJeff is a Paki psyops handle that gullible Indians were taken in by, due to the non-Paki sounding name.A_Gupta wrote: Here is an article about information warfare from the Director of Geopolitical Research at Command Eleven, which is an org. affiliated with @NatSecJeff's org.
https://www.globalvillagespace.com/insi ... n-warfare/