Bharat Rakshak

BTW, Clinton Noise Nutwerks Election Din headlines
A historic day
Americans will cast their verdicts on Clinton and Trump
LATEST UPDATES7 things to watchElection forecastHow CNN calls an election

America's Choice 2016
Clinton wins Dixville Notch vote
1 h
Control of Congress is up for grabs
2 h
Key ballot measures: From pot to labor laws
Trump tests Republican brand
Ana Navarro: I'm voting for Clinton
Navarro: Trump gives kids nightmares

Paul wrote:Praful Bidwai. Choked on a fishbone in the Netherlands.

Manish_Sharma wrote:What time result will be declared?

disha wrote:Hmmmm... An irrational, paranoid and self-destructive fool is

1. Has some $3-4 Billion in wealth
2. Has some iconic landmarks in his name
3. Has a great family (which even his opponent publicly acknowledged)

And in the republican primaries., ran as an outsider in a total 17 person field and beat each of them fair and square and in the process broke the all-time record of winning the most primary votes.

So to call such a person a 'fool' just because he sees an opportunity which is later exploited is pure foolishness and intellectual dishonesty.

brar_w wrote:Last Florida EV update given that most of the data for Sunday is in. This is a demographic data on Early Voting compared to 2012 :

- White : + 900,000 ( +27%)
- Hispanic : +454,000 ( +87%)
- AA : + 71,000 (9.2%)
- Others : +121,000 (48%)

Obama's last minute Florida push seems to have worked to get more AA's out early. 2 Sunday's and 2 "Souls to the Polls " would have also contributed in these higher numbers since there was only one EV Sunday in 2012. However, this is likely to be partly due to cannibalization as most expect the overall AA turnout to be a few percentage points lower than 2012.

These numbers don't look good for Trump (when 40% of the higher EV turnout is fueled by non-whites) or the GOP's GOTV effort which has improved but so far has not been shown to be as effective as the democrats when it comes to getting low propensity voters out early ( those that have not voted in the last 3 elections (President and non-presidential) or have voted in 1 of 3). High early turnout amongst hight propensity voters generally points to cannibalization. The higher white turnout is merely keeping pace with the overall increase in EV and not adding significantly to the overall %age from 2012. In fact, this is the most diverse EV electorate Florida has ever had with white %age of the EV vote-share down from 2012.

Trump would need to bring out massive number of white voters today to compensate. As I had mentioned earlier, the number to watch is Dade and Broward turnout. If more than 1.2 Million people vote in Dade, Florida it could be game over. Florida could still go either way!

ROGER STONE: Nevada I think is problematic. Frankly Trump has run one of the worst campaigns in modern political history in the state and the crew there is really left over from the primary, these old Americans for Prosperity folks. Nice people just don't argue about politics and actual getting elected. So I'm disappointed with the campaign there. On the other hand if we have a tide, even Nevada could sweep for Trump.

Dinesh S wrote: I am not sure how exactly you consider this unsustainable swamp of high divorce rates , single mother rates, low tfr and the consequent high time rates as "advanced society".

Dinesh S wrote:

Trans Atlantic trade happened at what 17th century? So blacks have been enslaved for 3 centuries? Hindus have been dhimmis under muslims/british rule for 10 centuries. So Why could hindus achieve in usa while blacks are struggling?

Btw, interesting fact i came across this issue- for all the talk about liberalism, women empowerment, "insert liberal buzzword" in usa and western world, the majority of taxes are still being paid by men( i think to the tune of 60%). But the majority of drawing from the welfare states are by women(i think to the tune of 60%). So nothing much has actually changed because of liberalism in western world other than making women there miserable and alone. Before this advent of feminism and its march to destroy family, men earned most of the wealth and gave to women to raise families through family. Now because of feminism, men earn most of the wealth and give to women for raising families through government. Of course in the case of latter, the child is raised without a father and hence with all the added bonuses of being raised without a father like high crime rate, incarceration , poverty etc.

Regarding Pakis, yeah well that is one reason why i don't think the answer is strict religion either. After all, i am pretty sure pakis have as low a divorce rates as hindus and yet still fare poorly in usa. So we need to know what makes the indian communties to do better in usa and have prevented indian society from decaying into chaos like africa has. It must be the combination of religion and it's strong traditional values in science and education( how many religions do you know have separate deities for education and knowledge like Hindus?)

Austin wrote:

Kashi wrote:Interesting that most Indian-Americans and Pakistani-Americans are united in their support of Hillary.

Thats probably because it would benefit those thousand of NRI businessman out there , Its more of a personal gain for many of these people because of business link , I just saw news clipping of Mr Chatwal a Big hotelier professing his friendship with hillary and how he knew her for long time and how donald trump would throw all the NRI kids out of country

These folks are more interested in their personal wealth enrichment due to their contacts then any real concern or benefit for India , ofcourse they always use the countrys name for their gains

brar_w wrote:Sometimes you have to make sure.."Trust but Verify"

brar_w wrote:Swing state EV stats

70 and 71% early votes? That's fraud, pure and simple.

UlanBatori wrote:

brar_w wrote:Sometimes you have to make sure.."Trust but Verify"

Come on! That's "Follow The Leader".

Nevada thing does sound like some "adjustment" if not rigging.