Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Post Reply
V_Raman
BRFite
Posts: 1445
Joined: 04 Sep 2008 22:25

Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022

Post by V_Raman »

If IAF/IN is serious about more Mk1A - then this is the time to talk to GE about more engines so they can place orders in their supply chain.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13917
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022

Post by Vayutuvan »

sanjayc wrote: 05 Aug 2025 22:39 I wish LCA Tejas was built around a Russian or French engine, but I guess planners got obsessed with tech specs of engines (in which GE engines are the best) and did not consider strategic aspects. That was poor decision making.
Are Russians reliable going forward? They seem to be in a bind in that they have to choose between Sona Bandar or Eleven Jin Pegs. If they make up with Orange-u-tang, their southeastern border with Sugarland might become warm. China might start salami slicing just like they were trying to do in Ladakh.

Chinese need Russian oil. That may prevent China for a few years before they turn on Russia.

That leaves only France. And ofc our own defence labs/private industry.
Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 21244
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022

Post by Rakesh »

V_Raman wrote: 06 Aug 2025 00:36 If IAF/IN is serious about more Mk1A - then this is the time to talk to GE about more engines so they can place orders in their supply chain.
Interest in the Tejas (from the services) is equivalent to what is doled out in their "Atmanirbhar Bharat" speeches that they give.

* The follow-on 97 Mk1A order should have been sanctioned a lot earlier
* There is zero movement on talking to GE about a second contract for GE F404 turbofans, for the 97 order.
* Discussions on the GE F414 turbofan is stuck at 99 turbofans and that will translate to only around 5 squadrons (~20 aircraft each)

There is no seriousness whatsoever. The services' track record is this;

1) Let the Su-30MKI fleet languish for upgrades, because their precious CAPEX had to be set aside for the MRFA boondoggle.

2) When the Super Sukhoi upgrade was finally sanctioned, it was for a mere 84 airframes (against 260+ in service) and over a 7 year period.

3) Starved the TEDBF program of funding, because Rafale M had to be inducted at all costs. If not 54 aircraft in one go (the original MRCBF requirement), then do 26 as a first tranche and order the rest later.

But will give gyan on Atmanirbhar Bharat at every Navy Day, Air Force Day, Independence Day, Republic Day, etc.
Bharadwaj
BRFite
Posts: 541
Joined: 09 Oct 2006 11:09

Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022

Post by Bharadwaj »

Given the present situation, it would make sense for DRDO to at least have a small team looking at the possibility of integrating the m88. I am quite sure if this scenario heads into secondary sanctions we will lose the f404/414 supply. The state department specifically spoke of secondary sanctions(not tariffs) today. The rd93 infused with the same technologies as the 177s can also be a possibility. The Russians are promising 6000hr life for the 177s. Even 4000 hrs would be acceptable rather than letting the Tejas program die. I am not panicking or exaggerating- the situation is heading beyond what any of us foresaw.
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6736
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Air Force Tejas Mk1A: News & Discussions: 02 January 2022

Post by Manish_P »

^^ depressing reading, Admiral sir.

Well GoI can divert all the funds to Missiles. Who needs aircraft when you have missiles hain... :P
Post Reply