Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

China revamps military command structure - Atul Aneja, The Hindu
China has revamped its military command structure, tailoring it for joint operations of the Army, the Air Force and the Navy — a move that may have acquired fresh urgency on account of the “Pivot to Asia” doctrine of the U.S. and recent political changes in Taiwan.

On Monday, President Xi Jinping, who is also the head of the apex Central Military Commission (CMC), inaugurated the formation of five-theatre commands, which will be geared to seamlessly deploy military assets on land, air and sea to “win wars”.

The Eastern, Western, Northern, Southern and Central theatre commands will focus on joint combat. The CMC will exercise overall political, supervisory and administrative control over the armed forces.

General Liu Yuejun, 61, has been appointed head of the eastern command. The western command would be headed by General Zhao Zongqi.{This faces India after combining Chengdu & Lanzhou military regions}

General Wang Jiaocheng would lead the southern command, while General Song Puxuan will be at the helm the northern command. Lieutenant General Han Weiguo will head the Central Command.

Highlighting the necessity of integrated warfare, President Xi at the inaugural ceremony said: “Each command must concentrate on studying modern warfare … and proactively seize the initiative in a future war”.

He added: “[You should] enhance joint command, joint action and joint logistics, and ensure troops are combat ready and complete military missions.”

‘Chinese dream’

In the broader context, the President visualises military reforms as a core element of an ongoing effort to realise the “Chinese dream”.

Analysts say that acquisition of hard power— economic, military, scientific, political and diplomatic —are necessary elements to achieve this goal, though achieving economic equity and clean air are also part of the mix.

Yet there may be pressing geopolitical considerations that are driving urgent military reforms. Observers say the “Pivot to Asia” doctrine, envisaging bulk concentration of U.S. forces in the Asia-Pacific, has imparted urgency to China’s military modernisation.

Notwithstanding a credible nuclear deterrent and missiles that can destroy aircraft carriers, Chinese military planners acknowledge that the gap between the military capabilities of China and the U.S. was still too wide. An editorial in the Global Times , a state-run tabloid, was blunt in acknowledging that recently. “China's military strength still significantly lags behind that of the US.”

In China’s blogosphere, there is a reference to the emergence of a more nationalist government in Taiwan as a factor driving speedy military reforms. “The real war Xi is preparing is the war to unify Taiwan with China. Xi cannot be sure that Taiwan will not pursue independence with a pro-independence President in power. Nor is he sure that the U.S. will not interfere if China takes Taiwan by force.

Sovereignty threats

Due to strong nationalism among Chinese people, Mr. Xi and his party will become entirely unpopular if they fail to take Taiwan by force if Taiwan pursues independence,” says blogging website Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements.

In an earlier advocacy for military reforms, a Xinhua write-up listed “invasion, subversion” and “sovereignty threats” as areas which need to be addressed for ensuring that “development and stability are not interrupted or sabotaged”.

During Monday’s ceremony, President Xi stressed that centralisation of the military architecture was vital, and all the theatre commands should “unswervingly follow the absolute leadership of the Communist Party of China over the military and carry out the orders and instructions of the CPC Central Committee and the CMC to the letter”. {Xi Jinping, in the last couple of years, has given enough hints that the PLA was out-of-control at times}
From The Diplomat
Most of the commanders of the new military regions previously commanded one of China’s seven military regions, based at Shenyang, Beijing, Jinan, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Chengdu and Lanzhou. However, many were given command of theaters far from their original base of power, ensuring no one commander can maintain a network of personal loyalty that supersedes Party authority. Liu Yuejun, formerly the commander of the Lanzhou Military Region (MR) in northwest China will now command the Eastern Theater. The former commander of the northern Shenyang MR, Wang Jiaocheng, will take over the Southern Theater Command, while Zhao Zongqi of the eastern Jinan MR move to commander of the Western Theater Command.

The Beijing MR saw the least displacement for its commanders – and, in fact, a double promotion. Former Beijing MR commander Song Puxuan will head up the Northern Theater Command, while his former deputy commander, Han Weiguo, received a promotion to commander of the Central Theater.

On the other end of the scale, three previous MR commanders were left high and dry: Nanjing MR commander Cai Yingting, Guangzhou MR commander Xu Fenglin, and Chengdu MR commander Li Zhocheng.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

India, Brunei discuss South China Sea dispute - Kallol Bhattacharjee, The Hindu
Brunei on Tuesday held discussion with an Indian delegation led by Vice-President Hamid Ansari on Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea which has the potential to affect free maritime traffic in Southeast Asia.

“Brunei briefed us on the negotiation under way for the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea. India supports a negotiated settlement of Brunei’s maritime dispute with China,” said Mr. Anil Wadhwa, Secretary (East), following the conclusion of a bilateral defence agreement between India and Brunei. The pact is aimed at ensuring uninterrupted energy lanes between India and Southeast Asia.

An Indian military source in Brunei said the defence cooperation will provide both sides the institutional foundation for more collaborative work on maritime security and secure India’s energy lanes to Brunei.

Brunei’s main port, Muara — one of the main ports in Southeast Asia through which the bulk of the country’s oil and gas exports to India take place — is in the South China Sea region and will become a major component of India’s growing maritime partnership with Brunei. Sources tell The Hindu that India has taken note of the growing Chinese influence on Muara.

Mr Wadhwa said that the part of South China Sea that Brunei claims is largely “unexplored” and might contain hydrocarbon reserves vital for the country’s economy.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12393
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by A_Gupta »

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... runei.html
India offers to send its Gurkhas to Brunei
On an official visit ending on Wednesday, Indian vice-president Mohammad Hamid Ansari signed a bilateral defence agreement involving joint military exercises and training, in part designed to shore up Brunei against Chinese claims on its disputed maritime territory.

Sources present at the meeting told The Indian Express that India had also offered to provide troops including retired soldiers from its own Gurkha Regiment, potentially supplanting the current role of the British Forces Brunei.
vijaykarthik
BRFite
Posts: 1169
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by vijaykarthik »

Pretty interesting article.
wadar is poor. When a house was recently burgled in the fishing settlement on Pakistan’s desert coast, the only items stolen were cans of fresh water – a staple that has soared in value since reservoirs dried up. It lies in Balochistan, a province in the grip of a long-running separatist insurgency and Pakistan’s most neglected.

Yet local officials dream of a future where Gwadar becomes a second Shenzhen, the Chinese trade hub bordering Hong Kong. Visitors are told that with Chinese investment the small settlement will become a major node of world commerce boasting car factories, Pakistan’s biggest airport and a string of five-star resort hotels along Gwadar’s sparkling seafront.

But residents are aghast, and not just because the fishing community, long settled on the neck of the peninsula, will be moved to new harbours up to 40km away.

“This is all being done for China, not the people,” said Elahi Bakhsh, a fisherman bewildered by the plans to turn Gwadar into China’s deepwater access point to the Arabian Sea.

Like others he complains of chronic underdevelopment in a district judged food insecure by the UN in 2009 and a town with only rudimentary health and education services. Bakhsh had not had enough water to wash his clothes in weeks. He and five of his colleagues turned down an offer of tea – the mandatory accompaniment to any meeting in Pakistan – in favour of bottles of mineral water.

“The whole area has been captured by the government with local people pushed aside,” he said.

If all goes to plan, the existing 80,000 population will be joined by another 2 million people over the next 20 years, including 20,000 Chinese residents, according to an official at the Gwadar Development Authority.

Advertisement

It was Dubai, not Shenzhen, that was being touted as the model for Gwadar’s future 10 years ago. But that initiative only succeeded in ruining countless property speculators. Officials say things are different this time because of the China-Pakistan economic corridor (CPEC), a project announced last year with pledges from Beijing of $46bn (£32bn) in investment loans.

It will help pay for the expansion of Gwadar’s currently unused deepwater port and the construction of a road network the exact route of which is subject to hot inter-provincial controversy that will connect the port to the Chinese border 1,800km to the north amid Himalayan peaks.

Pakistan hopes the corridor will turn the country into a critical land route for the world’s second-biggest economy. In theory exporters in Xinjiang will have a much shorter journey to the Arabian Sea and international markets than via China’s eastern ports.

In practice sceptics wonder whether trucking goods over one of the world’s highest mountain ranges will ever be cheaper than existing sea routes. They suspect China is more interested in Gwadar as a potential naval base near the oil supplies of the Gulf.

Ensuring security on long stretches of road in a province wracked by a persistent, low-level insurgency is the biggest challenge to CPEC. Fear of being outnumbered by outsiders from the rest of Pakistan is fuelling a violent rebellion in Balochistan.


The Pakistan-China economic corridor is a particular target because separatists see it as a demographic threat to the native Baloch, who are thought to make up just over half of the 8 million people living in the province.

Advertisement

“The corridor passes through what is currently the heart of the insurgency,” says Kaiser Bengali, an economic adviser to Balochistan’s chief minister. He said the notion that the two special brigades formed by the army will be enough to protect road traffic was “laughable”.

“If every convoy of trucks has to be accompanied by half a dozen tanks, armoured carriers and helicopters the cost is going to be exorbitant,” he said.

All five rebellions that have hit the province since 1947 were underpinned by Baloch claims that Islamabad exploits the province’s extensive gas and mineral riches for the benefit of the country’s ruling establishment in Punjab.

Pakistan says arch-enemy India also stirs up trouble. “Foreign adversaries have been more than eager to exploit any opportunity to destabilise Pakistan by harbouring, training and funding dissidents and militants”, said army chief General Raheel Sharif, who joined the prime minister in Balochistan on Wednesday for the inauguration of a section of CPEC highway.

The current rebellion was triggered by the rape of a female doctor by a military officer in 2005. The year before a car bomb killed three Chinese engineers in Gwadar.

Pakistan naval guards stand near the wreckage of the 2004 car bomb that killed three Chinese engineers in Gwadar
Facebook Twitter Pinterest
Pakistan naval guards stand near the wreckage of the 2004 car bomb that killed three Chinese engineers in Gwadar. Photograph: Aamir Qureshi/AFP/Getty Images
Chinese visitors say they remain worried about security despite the elaborate efforts to keep them safe. Investors and officials from Beijing only move about Gwadar accompanied by military vehicles and only after all the roads have been cleared of traffic. The road is picketed with policemen at 50-metre intervals.

Advertisement

“For the locals it’s like being a prisoner in your own town,” said Shamshad Ahmed a retired army officer who has been coming to the town for years as part of his work at the Pearl Continental, Gwadar’s only five-star hotel that recently reopened after being mothballed for years. “Of course they are not happy about their freedom being taken away,” he said.

The sense of containment will only increase with plans to build a security fence that will completely surround the town as the port is developed. “Everyone coming in will have to show a residency pass so we can keep a record of who lives in Gwadar,” police inspector Chakar Khan explained.

Officials in Gwadar say the main town is safe, even if trouble remains in outlying areas. On 9 January two Pakistan coast guard officials were killed and three injured by a roadside bomb in the district.

Strenuous efforts have been made to secure the thinly populated but vast province, roughly the size of Germany. The military campaign to weaken a scrappy and deeply divided insurgency has had some success and in 2015 separatist violence fell 36% to 194 attacks, according to a tally of press reports by the Pakistan Institute of Peace Studies.

But critics say the army has disastrously mishandled the situation with improved security won at the cost of deepening alienation among the Baloch. Former moderates have been driven into the hands of increasingly intransigent separatists, detractors say.

Road users complain of routine humiliations at checkpoints where busloads of passengers can be detained for hours.

It is the issue of “missing persons” that has caused most anger. Intelligence agents, often accompanied by the paramilitary Frontier Corps, are accused of snatching suspected militants who “disappear” into secret detention sites. Many turn up dead in deserted areas, their dumped bodies often showing signs of torture.

An aerial view of Gwadar port
Facebook Twitter Pinterest
An aerial view of Gwadar port in 2014. Photograph: Alamy
Last year the provincial government revealed the bodies of 800 people linked to the insurgency were recovered between 2011 and 2014. It also estimated 950 people are still missing, although some claims go as high as 14,000 according to a 2013 report by a UN fact-finding team.

Where previous rebellions were led by tribal chieftains in northern Balochistan, who were amenable to cutting deals with the state, the current uprising is dominated by the non-tribal middle-class in Makran, the belt stretching some 200km inland from Gwadar.

And unlike in the past, rebels have targeted non-Baloch civilians. Human rights groups say more than 1,000 such “settlers” have been killed since 2006, including a teacher at a school where pupils were forced to sing the Pakistani national anthem.

Civilians from Makran complain of being caught between the insurgents and the Frontier Corps, who are fighting where the infrastructure for the China-Pakistan corridor is to be built.

Gwadar: Pakistan's new Great Game
Rina Saeed Khan
Read more
“Fighting erupted when work started on the road and we had to flee our homes,” said Shahab Baloch, a shopkeeper from Hoshab who like many others was forced to find safety in a larger town. “People are living in miserable conditions but are too afraid to go back.”

In a sign of the rebels’ enduring local influence just 4% of voters turned out for a provincial assembly by-election in Makran on 31 December after insurgents warned people to stay away from the polls. A brother of one candidate was kidnapped while another had his house burned down.

Those who remain engaged in electoral politics have hardened their positions. Akthar Mengal, leader of the Balochistan National party (BNP) and a former chief minister of the province, said Pakistan’s leaders “look at us worse than slaves”.

“In their mind we are not a province of this country, we are a colony,” he said. “In the name of development they want to turn us into a minority in our own land.”

Efforts by the provincial government to negotiate a political solution with separatist leaders, some of whom are living in self-exile in Europe, are under way. But civilian politicians say they are powerless to restrain the military’s counter-insurgency operations.


Moderate Baloch leaders meanwhile say any deal with the insurgents must include constitutional protections for indigenous people, particularly in Gwadar where many residents feel more attachment to Oman, which owned the peninsula until 1958. Aziz Baloch, a BNP party official in Gwadar, said a system of work and residency permits should be established so outsiders would be barred from voting in elections.

Advertisement

Some hope the jobs and economic activity created by CPEC will weaken support for the separatists. Many locals are sceptical however, pointing out that people from Balochistan, with its tiny share of the national population, are entitled to only 6% of government jobs and are rarely qualified for the best ones.

A newspaper advert for jobs last March in Gwadar’s fisheries department offered senior, technical positions to Pakistanis from Punjab and only menial roles such as cleaners and guards to locals.

“The suspicion is that all the Baloch will get from CPEC is the right to repair punctures on Chinese tires,” said Bengali, the economic adviser.

Pakistan’s prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, struck a conciliatory tone in December at a ceremony to inaugurate a section of CPEC. He said Balochistan must have “the first right over all resources which have been explored in the province”.

But he also announced an upgrade for an existing highway running along the sparsely populated desert coast.

It would allow Chinese trucks to head east towards Karachi before going northwards on secure roads in other provinces, bypassing much of troublesome Balochistan entirely.

The Pakistan-China economic corridor is a particular target because separatists see it as a demographic threat to the native Baloch, who are thought to make up just over half of the 8 million people living in the province.

Advertisement

“The corridor passes through what is currently the heart of the insurgency,” says Kaiser Bengali, an economic adviser to Balochistan’s chief minister. He said the notion that the two special brigades formed by the army will be enough to protect road traffic was “laughable”.

“If every convoy of trucks has to be accompanied by half a dozen tanks, armoured carriers and helicopters the cost is going to be exorbitant,” he said.

All five rebellions that have hit the province since 1947 were underpinned by Baloch claims that Islamabad exploits the province’s extensive gas and mineral riches for the benefit of the country’s ruling establishment in Punjab.

Pakistan says arch-enemy India also stirs up trouble. “Foreign adversaries have been more than eager to exploit any opportunity to destabilise Pakistan by harbouring, training and funding dissidents and militants”, said army chief General Raheel Sharif, who joined the prime minister in Balochistan on Wednesday for the inauguration of a section of CPEC highway.

The current rebellion was triggered by the rape of a female doctor by a military officer in 2005. The year before a car bomb killed three Chinese engineers in Gwadar."
Read entire article here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/f ... hina-plans
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Dhaka cancels port to be built by China, India eyes another - Indrani Bagchi, ToI
With India's relations with Bangladesh on an upswing, New Delhi has expressed interest in developing the neighbour's newest deep sea port, Payra.

It's a big move by India and an expression of the trajectory of strategic ties between the two countries. Separately, Japan may develop another deep sea port, Matarbari, in Cox's Bazar.


As the Asian allies synergise converging interests, Bangladesh has quietly killed the Sonadia project in Cox's Bazar, which was to have been developed by China.

For India, the Sonadia port, as the Hambantota and Gwadar ports, were deemed to be part of China's much talked about "string of pearls" strategy to encircle India in its maritime neighbourhood.

The Payra seaport, which is on the south-western corner of Bangladesh, close to Chittagong, is much closer to the Indian coastline.

Dhaka has cancelled a port that China proposed to build at Sonadia, on the south-eastern corner of Bangladesh, which if completed would have brought the Chinese presence close to India's Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

While the official reason for cancellation of the Sonadia port was lack of commercial viability,the Japan-developed Matarbari is only 25km away.
China had not only prepared a feasibility study for Sonadia, it had reportedly promised deep funding for the port. The cancellation of Sonadia is clearly a strategic decision by Bangladesh, doubtlessly helped along by India, Japan and the US.

The Payra port has gathered steam only since 2014, with a Payra Seaport Authority being setup under the Chittagong administrative authority.

The Bangladeshi government has decided the port will be built on a public-private partnership (PPP) basis and sources said a UK-based consultant is in the process of working out a feasibility study.

The port will take over seven years to build, but it's not just the port, a deep channel would have to be cut through the heavily silted port to allow big vessels to come through. The Chittagong port is so heavily silted that only small vessels, taking advantage of incoming and outgoing tides, can come in at present.

Indian companies have reportedly started taking an investment interest in the Payra project. Bangladesh has also invited Chinese companies to build the port, and reports from Dhaka say some 10 countries have expressed interest in the project. That, sources said, was very different from China designing, funding and building a port all on its own, which would have a commercial as well as a potential military role. The loss of Sonadia for China comes after it lost its competitive edge in Sri Lanka with the loss of Mahinda Rajapaksa's government.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by Prem »

Gong Hei Fat Choi
Exclusive: U.S. and India consider joint patrols in South China Sea - U.S. official
The United States and India have held talks about conducting joint naval patrols that a U.S. defence official said could include the disputed South China Sea, a move that would likely anger Beijing, which claims most of the waterway.Washington wants its regional allies and other Asian nations to take a more united stance against China over the South China Sea, where tensions have spiked in the wake of Beijing's construction of seven man-made islands in the Spratly archipelago.
India and the United States have ramped up military ties in recent years, holding naval exercises in the Indian Ocean that last year involved the Japanese navy.But the Indian navy has never carried out joint patrols with another country and a naval spokesman told Reuters there was no change in the government's policy of only joining an international military effort under the United Nations flag.
He pointed to India's refusal to be part of anti-piracy missions involving dozens of countries in the Gulf of Aden and instead carrying out its own operations there since 2008.

The U.S. defence official said the two sides had discussed joint patrols, adding that both were hopeful of launching them within the year. The patrols would likely be in the Indian Ocean where the Indian navy is a major player as well as the South China Sea, the official told Reuters in New Delhi on condition of anonymity.The official gave no details on the scale of the proposed patrols.There was no immediate comment from China, which is on a week-long holiday for Chinese New Year.Neither India nor the United States has claims to the South China Sea, but both said they backed freedom of navigation and overflight in the waterway when U.S. President Barack Obama visited New Delhi in January 2015.Obama and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi also agreed at the time to "identify specific areas for expanding maritime cooperation".More than $5 trillion in world trade moves through the South China Sea each year. Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, the Philippines and Taiwan also claim parts of the waterway.In December, the issue of joint patrols came up when Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar visited the U.S. Pacific Command in Hawaii, an Indian government source said."It was a broad discussion, it was about the potential for joint patrols," said the source, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter.India has a long-running land border dispute with China and has been careful not to antagonise its more powerful neighbour, instead focusing on building economic ties.But it has stepped up its naval presence far beyond the Indian Ocean, deploying a ship to the South China Sea almost constantly, an Indian navy commander said, noting this wasn't the practice a few years ago.The commander added that the largest number of Indian naval ship visits in the South China Sea region was to Vietnam, a country rapidly building military muscle for potential conflict with China over the waterway.Still, the idea of joining the United States in patrols in the region was a long shot, the officer added.
The Philippines has asked the United States to do joint naval patrols in the South China Sea, something a U.S. diplomat said this month was a possibility.
vijaykarthik
BRFite
Posts: 1169
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by vijaykarthik »

^Since its the BJP govt, we just might agree to a jt patrol in SCS?
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Hong Kong ‘riots’ disrupt New Year - Atul Aneja, The Hindu
Overnight violent clashes between a group of protesters and the police in Hong Kong have injured scores, raising questions about underlying tensions in the glitzy financial hub.

Late on Monday, in the neighbourhood of Mong Kok — a shopping district, which was one of the epicentres of student protests in 2014 — clashes broke out after police ordered illegal street food hawkers to disperse.

The quarrel apparently triggered a wave of violent clashes — after around 100 protesters melded into the fracas — which continued to smoulder, even in the early hours on Tuesday.

‘Not spontaneous’


The police said the “rioting” was not spontaneous. It began on the first day of the Chinese Lunar New Year — a symbolically important date.

Besides, the protesters, apparently equipped with home-made shields, goggles, helmets and gloves, were well prepared for a long-haul clash.

The Hong Kong daily, South China Morning Post , is reporting that a “localist” group, known by the trademark T-shirts of its followers, was among the protesters, who confronted the police with glass bottles, flower pots and bricks.

The police responded with pepper spray, but as the violence spiralled, two shots were fired in the air.

The authorities say 48 policemen were injured in the back-and-forth on the streets during the night, in which protesters set alight the metal trash bins and ripped apart pavement stone to reinforce their attack.

Social media reports said those arrested included Leung Tin-kei, spokesman for “localist” group Hong Kong Indigenous (HKI). The HKI is an amalgamation of radical groups, known for their strong anti-mainland stance. Many seek full independence for Hong Kong, or wish to drastically restrict Beijing’s role in the city, governed under the ‘One country, two systems’ formula.

Nameless commoners

“We are a group of nameless Hong Kong people who are on the frontline of protests. Since the old resistance methods have failed against the authorities, we have no choice but to stand out and break the stalemate,” read a statement posted on the HKI Facebook page.

Analysts say that unlike the failed 2014 “umbrella revolution” protests, which were mostly non-violent, and had the trappings of a “colour revolution”, the latest street action was smaller in scale, but violent in intent.

Consequently, Leung Chun-Ying, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive, had no hesitation in branding the overnight protest as a “riot”, which needed to be addressed, not as a political problem, but as an administrative issue of restoring public-order.

“Any big city facing a similar nature of events would classify it as a riot, not just for the government but society as a whole,” Mr. Leung observed.

Though the police managed to contain the violence after six hours, the embers of the intense clashes were still aglow after daybreak.

On Tuesday morning, rubbish and debris were seen strewn on the streets, while the acrid smoke that hung in the air was a reminder of the intensity of the overnight violence.

For the authorities, the danger lies in a fusion of the remnants of the 2014 protesters and the HKI, which could lead to a protracted political tug-of-war that could be easily internationalised.

Yet, the Hong Kong government appeared confident. Despite the clashes, the authorities announced the traditional New Year fireworks display, which is likely to attract crowds of several thousand on Tuesday night, would go ahead. Mr. Leung warned protesters to stay away from the event.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by Prem »

China Lament One Munna Policy
( China Running into Traditional roadblock: Inability to Think Long Term )

'China has only one real ally'
One of the Chinese establishment's leading foreign-policy voices thinks that China is alarmingly short on allies — a label that he reserved for one unexpected country.In an interview with The New York Times published on Tuesday, Yan Xuetong, director of the Institute for International Relations at Beijing's Tsinghua University, said, "China has only one real ally, Pakistan."In context, Yan seemed to be working off of a narrow definition of alliances.North Korea, he said, is not a Chinese ally because of Beijing's 2013 declaration that the two countries had "normal relations," and the fact that the "two countries' leaders haven't met for years."In contrast, Pakistani-Chinese relations are surprisingly energetic. China and Pakistan inked a $46 billion energy and infrastructure deal in April 2015.That November, a Chinese state-owned enterprise took control of the strategically located and Chinese-built port of Gwadar, which could easily serve as a future way station for the country's commercial and military vessels.As the RAND Corp.'s Jonah Blank wrote in Foreign Affairs in 2015, Pakistan owes much of its vaunted military might — far out of proportion to the country's middling economic development — to Chinese assistance."China has provided Pakistan with much of its nuclear weapons program, an even greater portion of its ballistic missile program, a steady stream of conventional arms, and steadfast diplomatic support that has spanned over half a century," Blank writes.Close ties with Pakistan offer obvious benefits to Beijing: The country counter-balances India, one of China's top regional rivals, and gives China a strategic reach into Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Indian Ocean basin.While Yan doesn't define what an "ally" really is, he at least implies that allies serve as an extension of Chinese hard power, as Pakistan arguably has.
"We should scale back this economic assistance and switch to military aid," Yan says when asked about what form Chinese aid to the country's international partners should take. "Military aid should be given to friendly countries to improve strategic cooperation and secure political support."Yan is one of China's top foreign-policy experts and the editor-in-chief of the Chinese Journal of International Politics, and was one of Foreign Policy Magazine's top 100 public intellectuals in 2008. He has a somewhat hawkish, anti-internationalist reputation and enjoys a degree of official influence that belies his apparent lack of formal connections to the Chinese state.So it's notable that such an important establishment foreign-policy figure takes such a narrow view of what could constitute an "alliance" for a China that aspires to superpower status.
In Yan's mind, it isn't enough for China just to have trading partners — he told The Times that he doesn't "think China's One Belt, One Road initiative for economic development across Eurasia can fundamentally change the nature of the relations."Neither does Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea represent a significant development in Beijing's international behavior. "China's South China Sea policy is only intended to safeguard its own interests, so I don't think it's overly assertive," Yan said, adding that "previous policies were not forceful enough."I[/bnstead, China's alliance-building and power projection implicitly involves shared strategic objectives, the hosting of Chinese strategic assets, and a high degree of diplomatic and economic loyaltyYan believes that more Chinese alliances will actually help relations between China and the US: "The more allies China makes, the more balanced and stable the relationship will be." But one of China's leading foreign-policy thinkers believes Beijing has its work cut out for it
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Jhujar wrote:'China has only one real ally'
One of the Chinese establishment's leading foreign-policy voices thinks that China is alarmingly short on allies — a label that he reserved for one unexpected country.In an interview with The New York Times published on Tuesday, Yan Xuetong, director of the Institute for International Relations at Beijing's Tsinghua University, said, "China has only one real ally, Pakistan.
Even that is not sure. At present, yes. But, Pakistan is the most untrustworthy nation in the entire world, more than even the US!
vinod
BRFite
Posts: 980
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by vinod »

^^^ v. true. Ask Saudis and emiratis...
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

India and U.S. deny plans for joint patrols - Dinakar Peri, The Hindu
In a first indicator that India is reconsidering its reluctance to joint military policing with other countries, a senior U.S. naval officer says Indian and U.S. officials have discussed joint naval patrols, though concrete steps are yet to be finalised.

Speaking to The Hindu , he refused to elaborate if the discussions covered joint patrol of the South China Sea.

The disclosure comes a year after the two countries signed a joint vision statement which called for “safeguarding maritime security and ensuring freedom of navigation and over-flight” throughout the Asia-Pacific region. The U.S. officer’s statement comes in the light of a Reuters report two days ago claiming that the two sides have held talks on conducting joint naval patrols, including in the disputed South China Sea. The report was denied by the U.S. State Department later.

India and the U.S. continue to explore ways to deepen their bilateral defence cooperation, the officer said, including in the area of maritime security within the “Framework for the U.S.-India Defence Relationship”, signed by Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and U.S. Defence Secretary Ashton Carter during the former’s visit to the U.S. last June.

“We continue to work with our Indian counterparts on how and where to expand engagement in this area. On the matter of joint patrols, I can confirm that some informal discussions have occurred, but no decisions have been made,” the officer told The Hindu in an e-mail response.

He refused to provide more specifics at this time due to the “sensitivities” involved with the subject.

Responding to questions on the Reuters report, the U.S. State Department said denied plans for joint patrols at present, but did not rule out holding discussions. “The U.S. and India do have a shared vision of peace and prosperity in Asia,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner said in Washington on Thursday.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

How US is directly competing with China for power in Southeast Asia - NYT
When President Barack Obama holds the first American summit meeting with Southeast Asian leaders in California beginning Monday, an underlying goal involves a country that will not be represented there: China.

Since the Obama administration began its "pivot to Asia" in 2011, the United States has been in direct competition with China for economic power in Southeast Asia, and the political influence and security arrangements that frequently go with it.

"There may be a better term for it than 'Cold War,' but there's a lot of economic competition," said Stuart Dean, a retired executive with General Electric who spent 24 years working in Southeast Asia. "It's a commercial Olympics, as it were."

As if to underline the subtext of the summit meeting, it will be held at the Sunnylands estate in Rancho Mirage, California, where Obama met with President Xi Jinping of China three years ago.

In meeting with the leaders of the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, Obama will address a group that represents a population of more than 620 million and a collective economy of around $2.4 trillion, the third largest in Asia behind those of China and Japan.

Geographically astride the world's busiest and most strategic shipping lanes, the region is the fulcrum of the administration's rebalancing toward Asia.

While the leaders will certainly discuss regional security issues, including territorial disputes in the South China Sea, North Korea's nuclear program and counterterrorism, they will devote equal time to economic issues, including the U.S.-led Trans-Pacific Partnership, policies aimed at promoting further growth and integration, and identifying ways to encourage more trade and investment through innovation and entrepreneurship.

U.S. officials briefing reporters in Washington on Wednesday did not get into specifics, saying the meeting would not be tightly scripted.

"It is not a laboriously negotiated, strict, by-the-Roman-numerals agenda," said Daniel R. Russel, assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs. "It is an open discussion among the leaders."

While officials said the gathering was not an "anti-China" meeting, Washington is clearly trying to exert its leadership in Southeast Asia through investment, analysts said.

"China's actions in the South China Sea have undermined its narrative of a peaceful rising and fostered new suspicions about its economic and geopolitical intentions in the region," said Kevin G. Nealer, a China expert and a partner with the Scowcroft Group, based in Washington. "America's most difficult relationships in the region are healthier and more high-functioning than China's best relations, and the deep and consistent American investment there has created habits of cooperation and shared goals with ASEAN that trade alone doesn't yield."

China has been ASEAN's largest trading partner since 2009, with two-way trade surpassing $366 billion in 2014, according to ASEAN trade data. The United States was fourth last year behind the European Union and Japan. Southeast Asia was also America's fourth-largest export market that year.

However, America's strategy has focused on direct investment, where it is far ahead of China. U.S. companies poured $32.3 billion into Southeast Asia from 2012 to 2014, according to ASEAN data, compared with $21.3 billion from China.

From 2000 to 2014, the United States invested $226 billion in Southeast Asia, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, more than in China, Japan and India combined.

The United States aims to maintain its dominance in investment while taking the lead in trade, according to analysts, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership is the chief weapon in that quest. Four of ASEAN's 10 member states have already joined the pact, while three others — Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand — have either declared their intention to join or said they were considering doing so.

Alexander C. Feldman, president and chief executive officer of the U.S.-ASEAN Business Council, said the summit meeting was the culmination of U.S. economic strategy in the region dating back to Obama's first weeks in office.

In early 2009, Hillary Clinton made her first overseas trip as secretary of state to Indonesia, a Group of 20 member that boasts Southeast Asia's largest economy, and which is the unofficial leader of ASEAN.

"I think the strategy by the Obama administration has been a long-term one which reflects a whole vision of Asia and realizes that ASEAN is a critical piece of the puzzle often not focused on by past administrations," Feldman said. "Since Day 1 they have focused on this region and understood that it was really the battleground for the future of Asia."

The region's trade with China has been robust. Southeast Asia has been a huge source of raw materials and commodities to feed both China's economic engine and its growing consumer class, supplying products like minerals and palm oil from Indonesia and Malaysia and electronics components from Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand, said Murray Hiebert, a Southeast Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

"China is also a big aid donor, particularly for infrastructure projects, an area in which U.S. companies have had trouble competing because Southeast Asian governments produce so few bankable projects that U.S. banks are willing to finance," he said.

That said, China's dependability as a trading partner is waning. While nearly 12 percent of total exports from ASEAN went to China in 2014, the most to any one country, exports to China slumped last year as commodity prices tumbled and are expected to fall further this year because of China's economic slowdown.

The region's leading economies, including Indonesia, will feel the pain, according to economists.

"The sensitivity of Indonesia to China's economy is very large, and that's also the case for ASEAN," said Destry Damayanti, an economist and commissioner at Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corp. who is based in Jakarta.

It remains to be seen whether the United States can profit from China's downturn to increase its trade with the region.

But the U.S. edge in direct investment may be the greater long-term benefit, said Dean, the retired General Electric executive
.

"Our business progress and biggest deals have been driven by investing," he said. "It ensures a long-term presence, builds long-term relationships and makes us a local company in each country where we invest.

"Trading is short term and can go away faster than investment, and China will always have a competitive advantage due to its proximity."
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

With an eye on China, India sends aircraft carrier to Male - ToI
It's 44,500 tonnes of robust Indian diplomacy cruising on the high seas, hot on the trail of the Chinese in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), first in Sri Lanka and now, Maldives.

India has dispatched its largest and most potent warship, aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya, accompanied by destroyer INS Mysore and tanker INS Deepak, to Maldives to reaffirm its abiding commitment to be "the net security provider" in the IOR.

"INS Vikramaditya made its first-ever foreign port call at Colombo on January 21-22. Now, it will be on a goodwill visit to Male from February 15 to 18, as part of the overall policy to shape a favourable maritime environment in IOR with both presence and engagement," said an officer.

What is left unsaid is that India is slowly but surely cranking up its military maritime diplomacy with "Project Mausam" to effectively counter the ever-expanding Chinese strategic footprint in the entire IOR.

From the Gwadar port in Pakistan to Hambantota in Sri Lanka, China has assiduously forged deep linkages with several IOR countries with an eye on the future.

India is now trying to play catch-up, even though its sluggishness in delivering on its promises continues to be a major stumbling block. The strategically-located Maldives, in particular, has emerged as a key area in the ongoing geopolitical jostling.

After a chill during the bitter internal power struggle in the 1,190-island archipelago, India's bilateral ties with Maldives are now on an upswing once again with some quiet diplomacy. In the backdrop of international pressure on the absence of political reforms in the archipelago, and Indian foreign secretary S Jaishankar travelling to the country last month as PM Modi's special envoy, Maldives President Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayoom this week announced his intention to re-start a multiparty dialogue in his country.

On the bilateral defence front, India also assured visiting Maldivian defence minister Adam Shareef last month of its continuing commitment to step up its military training and maritime surveillance as well as supply of Dornier patrol aircraft and helicopters to the archipelago.

There is also a plan underway to assist Maldives in setting up 10 coastal surveillance radar system (CSRS) stations in tune with overall policy to provide military aid and help in "capacity-building" of IOR countries.

The first of the eight such CSRS stations planned for Seychelles - five on the mainland and three on the outlying islands -- was inaugurated by PM Narendra Modi in March last year.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

On Maldives:

China has also offered to Maldives to build a naval dockyard on the Uthuru-Thialafalhu island much in the same way Beijing had constructed ports at Myanmar (Sittwe), Sri Lanka (Hambantota). Indian Navy regularly conducts surveillance and does hydro-graphic tasks for Maldives. Maldives has also received two Dhruv advanced light weight helicopters, one Dornier patrol aircraft and a surveillance radar from India. In addition to more Dhruvs and Dorniers, Maldives has sought fast-attack craft, amphibious landing craft and small arms from Inda. Maldives has also demanded India to train 40-60 officers of the Maldivian National Defence Force in Indian training establishments. Indian Army Chief Gen. Bikram Singh visited Maldives in May 2014 to discuss the naval dockyard project and also the sale of these equipment. Since c. 2007, the two armies have carried out four joint military exercises until c. 2013. These were on hold since the airport project fiasco (GMR) and the political disturbances.

On Seychelles:

China has also been wooing Seychelles which has a strong relationship with India. Out of the 18 foreign naval bases that China is building, Seychelles is one. It is meant for logistics supply plus PLAN personnel rest & recreation. The Chinese President Hu Jintao visited Seychelles in c. 2005. China transferred two Y-2 turboprop aircraft for maritime patrolling and also received permission for PLAN to make frequent port calls. In Dec. 2011, the Seychelles also announced naval resupply facilities for PLAN including a fuelling facility. The Deputy Chief of the People’s Liberation Army, Gen Ma Xiaotian met with President of Seychelles James Michel in mid-July, 2012 and reaffirmed China’s commitment to deepen bilateral military cooperation. While China claims that these developments are normal state-to-state relationships and that it is genuinely interested in protecting its SLOCs, the fact remains that India must be on extensive guard because these can be turned quickly by China into strategically encircling India. During PM Narendra Modi’s “Ocean Outreach’ visit in March 2015 to neighbouring island states in the IOR, India bagged “infrastructure developmental rights’ to the Assumption island of Seychelles. The Indian Prime Minister also said, “We also hope that Seychelles will soon be a full partner in the maritime security cooperation between India, Maldives and Sri Lanka”. India also agreed to give the Seychelles a second Dornier aircraft for coastal surveillance. In an interview with The Hindu in December 2015, the Seychelles President James Michel said that the Assumption Island project was a “joint project between India and Seychelles involving our two Defence Forces in enhancing our mutual security along our western seaboard. Seychelles is absolutely committed to the project”. He also said that the “The Maritime Radar Project is a major development for Seychelles’ and India’s mutual desire for security in the field of maritime security,” A fully operational coastal radar system (CRS) based in Seychelles is expected to become operational from March 2016, which will provide India with the ability to gather intelligence and assist in surveillance operations of the vital energy lanes near Seychelles
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19291
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by NRao »

Here we go .................................

China road name rage
The US Senate's unanimous move to back a plan to rename a road in front of the Chinese embassy in Washington after a leading pro-democracy dissident provoked an angry reaction from a state-run Chinese newspaper today which termed it "petty" and "rash".

The US Senate had unanimously approved a bill to rename the stretch of road in front of the Chinese embassy after Liu Xiaobo, who was jailed for 11 years in 2009 for subversion.

The bill, passed on Friday, was put forward by Senator Ted Cruz, a leading contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. A similar bill was passed by the House of Representatives in June 2014.

This would change the address of China's embassy in Washington from 3505 International Place to 1 Liu Xiaobo Plaza, embarrassing Beijing as every letter arriving at the beige-stoned compound would bear the name of the incarcerated Chinese dissident.

Reacting to the Senate's move, Global Times, a state-run Chinese newspaper known for its nationalistic views, said: "The apparently provocative move intends to outrage and unsettle China. But this is no big deal.

"In addition to anger, it will enable us to learn more about the US from another perspective: the US has big problems in abiding by the rules and keeping self-respect and its Congress acts so rashly," it said in an editorial.

It noted that the US has been "at its wits' end in dealing with China as it is reluctant to employ military threats or economic sanctions that may backfire."

"This latest move by Congress cannot change the fact that Liu jeopardised China's national security and was sentenced to jail," it said.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Djibouti, Myanmar, Sri Lanka anchor Silk Road - Atul Aneja, The Hindu
A military base in Djibouti along with major port development projects in Myanmar and Sri Lanka are defining the contours of China’s Maritime Silk Road—an oceanic connectivity project, of which, the Indian Ocean is the core.

Reuters is quoting Ismail Omar Guelleh, Djibouti’s President, as saying that China will soon commence work on the naval base. The Horn of Africa nation is strategically located on the junction of the Indian Ocean and he Red Sea—a gateway to the Suez Canal via the Strait of Bab Al-Mandab.

Ideal location

Djibouti would become an ideal location for securing sea lanes, in the vicinity, which radiate from this area towards Africa’s Indian Ocean coastline and the Arabian Sea.

China says it is establishing naval “support facilities” in Djibouti, which has the ambition of emerging as another Singapore, leveraging its position at the intersection of busy shipping lanes.

The Chinese facility will be established at Doraleh Multi-Purpose Port —a $590 million project that is being steered by China Merchants Holdings International in the south of the country. The Chinese Navy would use one of the berths.

Last month, Mr. Guelleh signed a deal with China to build a new free trade zone, whose first phase would open later this year. China is also providing the bulk of the $12.4 billion that Djibouti intends to invest by 2020.

Raising stakes in Myanmar


China has also quietly signed a deal to develop an Industrial Park and a deep water port in Kyaukphyu in Myanmar. The facility in the Bay of Bengal amplifies Beijing’s pitch to deepen its stakes in Myanmar in order to lower its dependence on the Straits of Malacca—a strategic commercial channel, dominated by the U.S. sixth fleet.

Xinhua has reported that a consortium led by the China International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC), a construction company, has won the bid towards the end of last year to develop the two projects.

The deep sea enterprise includes development of 10 berths at the Maday Island Terminal and the Yanbye Island Terminal. It will be completed in four phases spanning a period of 20 years.

Maday Island has already emerged as a major pillar of China’s energy security. Last year, a pipeline from the island transited oil sourced mainly from West Asia and Africa to China’s Yunnan province, thus avoiding the “Malacca trap”.

The oil channel complemented the gas pipeline, which starts at Kyaukphyu, bringing methane purchased from [both Burma and Qatar] {Somehow that bit was missing in The Hindu report}

A proposed railway project from Kyaukphyu to Kunming, capital of Yunnan province has been shelved, but Kyaw Hlaing, President of consultancy Myanmar Survey Research, told The Hindu that “with the development of the port and the SEZ, connectivity would be required”.

He added: “So, in the future, we may also consider the construction of the rail.”

Colombo port city

Sri Lanka has added another dimension to China’s Maritime Silk Road (MSR). Chinese bloggers are pointing to improved prospects of the revival of the stalled Colombo port city project under new conditions, and the establishment of an SEZ in Humbantota—both projects feeding into the gradual unfolding of the ambitious MSR.

China is already steering the Gwadar to Kashgar economic corridor, adding another node to its growing Indian Ocean profile.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

PM Lee Hsien Loong calls on US to stay the course in Asia - Straits Times
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has urged the US to stay the course in Asia, stressing that a consistent trajectory was crucial as the country still has an important role to play in the region.

Speaking at a working dinner on Feb 15 at the end of the first day of the landmark US-Asean summit in Sunnylands, California, PM Lee stressed that the US is an important player in a broad range of security issues.

Said Mr Lee: "The relationship with China is most important. At the same time, you have a key role to play in fostering stability in North-east Asia, especially given the issues in the Korean Peninsula, and particularly the nuclear issue. On other security issues, America plays an important role in the region too, such as terrorism, freedom of navigation and rule of international law."


"What's most important is that the direction be sustained and enhanced, and there is predictability and conviction by all players that this is the direction which America has committed to taking," he added.

Mr Lee's remarks come at a pivotal time for the Obama administration's policy of rebalancing to Asia. Thus far, Asia has failed to feature prominently in the US presidential campaign, and it is not yet clear if the next president will place the same level of importance in the country's engagement with the region.

The US-Asean summit has thus been billed as a critical move by President Barack Obama to signal the importance of the region to his successor. And as the prime minister thanked Mr Obama for his leadership on this front, Mr Lee also hoped the next US president would take the same path.

"All of us are following the processes of the US November Elections with great interest as well as concern, and we hope that the new President, whoever he or she may be, will build on the good work that has been done, sustain its direction and ensure that Asia is a stable and secure region, in which all countries big and small can prosper together," said Mr Lee.

In his speech, Mr Lee also highlighted three trends which would influence the strategic landscape in Asia for years to come; the progress of Asean; as well as the rise of China, and India.

He acknowledged that Asean was "not a perfect union" but said he was certain countries in the region would become closer and more effective over time. He said the grouping needs to press on with economic integration and deepen regional ties.

On China, the Prime Minister said the East Asian country's role in the region will grow, but its rise could also lead to frictions like the South China Sea issue. He stated that the matter needs to dealt with on the basis of international law, but added that this must be viewed in the context of a "co-operative relationship and not in a hostile way".

On India, Mr Lee said that if reforms succeeded there, the South Asian country would have a greater influence in the region, and "will take a more active role engaging in international affairs, and will be an additional constructive player in the region".
deejay
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4024
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by deejay »

First train from China to reach Iran. The new silk route is active.

https://www.rt.com/business/332631-chin ... n-arrives/

Image
The first freight train to resurrect the ancient Silk Road route arrived in Iran from China on Monday.

It took just 14 days for the 32-container train loaded with Chinese goods to complete the 5,900 mile (9,500km) journey from China’s eastern Zhejiang province through Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

It’s 30 days shorter than the sea voyage from Shanghai to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, according to the head of the Iranian railway company, Mohsen Pourseyed Aqayi.


“The arrival of this train in less than 14 days is unprecedented,” he said, adding that the revival of the Silk Road is crucial for the countries on its route.

Aqayi says there will be a train every month and more frequently if necessary.

The railway will not stop in Tehran, Aqayi said as they are “planning to extend the railway to Europe in the future” with transits generating more income for Iran.

China is Iran’s biggest trading partner, accounting for most of Tehran's oil exports. Trade between the two countries stood at around $52 billion in 2014. Last month Chinese President Xi Jinping and his Iranian counterpart agreed to increase trade turnover to $600 billion within the next 10 years.
...
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12393
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by A_Gupta »

http://disruptiveviews.com/social-scori ... 2_17_2015)
Unless you are a Chinese national or serious gamer you have probably never heard of Sesame Credit, but you should at least be aware of what may become the greatest mass surveillance tool ever devised. Sesame Credit is promoted as a credit scoring system constructed by Ant Financial Services Group, an affiliate of the Alibaba...
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Obama, Asean issue statement on South China Sea tensions but no mention of China - Straits Times
US President Barack Obama said he and leaders of South-east Asian countries discussed the need to ease tensions in the South China Sea, and agreed that any territorial disputes there should be resolved peacefully and through legal means.

But a joint statement agreed on after a two-day summit with the Association of South-east Asian Nations at the Sunnylands retreat in California did not include the specific mentions Washington had been seeking regarding China and its assertive pursuit of territory in the South China Sea.

Mr Obama told a news conference on Tuesday (Feb 17) that leaders at the meeting reaffirmed "our strong commitment to a regional order where international rules and norms and the rights of all nations, large and small, are upheld."

"We discussed the need for tangible steps in the South China Sea to lower tensions including a halt to further reclamation, new construction and militarisation of disputed areas," Mr Obama said.

"When Asean speaks with a clear and unified voice, it can help advance security, opportunity and human dignity."

After a first day discussing trade and economic issues with the 10 Asean states, US officials had been hoping to arrive at a common position on the South China Sea, where China and several Asean states have conflicting claims.

Not all Asean members agree, however, on how to handle the disputes, and some, such as current Asean chair Laos and its neighbour Cambodia, have close economic ties to China.

Rather than turning a spotlight on China, the joint statement reiterated broad key principles of US-Asean cooperation, including "mutual respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity, equality and political independence of all nations ... and a shared commitment to peaceful resolution of disputes."

It also reaffirmed "a shared commitment to maintain peace, security and stability in the region, ensuring maritime security and safety, including the rights of freedom of navigation and overflight.

China claims most of the South China Sea, but Asean members Malaysia, the Philippines, Brunei and Vietnam have rival claims.

Fox News, citing civilian satellite imagery, reported on Tuesday that the Chinese military had deployed an advanced surface-to-air missile system to one of its contested islands in the South China Sea.

The United States has criticised China's building of artificial islands and facilities in the sea and has sailed warships close to disputed territory to assert the right to freedom of navigation.

China accused Washington of seeking maritime hegemony through such patrols.

Mr Obama said freedom of navigation "must be upheld, and lawful commerce should not be impeded," and added the United States would "continue to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, and ... support the right of all countries to do the same."

He also said that Washington would continue to help allies and partner countries strengthen their maritime capabilities.


Mr Obama said the two sides made progress on trade and investment and had agreed to launch a new effort to help all Asean nations meet the criteria of the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal, of which four are so far members along with the United States.

At the news conference, Mr Obama announced an initiative, dubbed US-Asean Connect, which he said would involve a network of hubs across the region to better coordinate economic engagement.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

China deploys surface-to-air missile system to disputed South China Sea island - Straits Times
China has deployed an advanced surface-to-air missile system to one of the disputed islands it controls in the South China Sea, Taiwan and US officials said, ratcheting up tensions even as US President Barack Obama urged restraint in the region.

Taiwan defence ministry spokesman David Lo told Reuters that the missile batteries had been set up on Woody Island. The island is part of the Paracels chain, under Chinese control for more than 40 years but also claimed by Taiwan and Vietnam.

“Interested parties should work together to maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea region and refrain from taking any unilateral measures that would increase tensions,” Major General Lo said on Wednesday (Feb 17).

A US defence official also confirmed the “apparent deployment” of the missiles, first reported by Fox News.

China’s foreign minister said the reports were created by“certain Western media” that should focus more on China’s building of lighthouses to improve shipping safety in the region.

“As for the limited and necessary self-defence facilities that China has built on islands and reefs we have people stationed on, this is consistent with the right to self-protection that China is entitled to under international law so there should be no question about it,” Mr Wang Yi told reporters in Beijing.

China claims most of the South China Sea, through which more than US$5 trillion (S$7 trillion) in global trade passes every year, and has been building runways and other infrastructure on artificial islands to bolster its title.

The United States has said it will continue conducting “freedom of navigation patrols” by ships and aircraft to assure unimpeded passage through the region, where Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, the Philippines and Taiwan have rival claims.

Admiral Harry Harris, the commander of the US Pacific Command, said the deployment of missiles to the Paracels would not be a surprise but would be a concern, and be contrary to China’s pledge not to militarise the region.

“We will conduct more, and more complex, freedom of navigation operations as time goes on in the South China Sea,” Admiral Harris told a briefing in Tokyo. “We have no intention of stopping.”

RISING TENSIONS


News of the missile deployment came as Mr Obama and leaders of the Association of South-east Asian Nations concluded a summit in California, where they discussed the need to ease tensions in the South China Sea but did not include specific mention of China’s assertive pursuit of its claims there.

China’s increasing military presence in the disputed sea could effectively lead to a Beijing-controlled air defence zone, analysts said.

“(The missile deployment) reinforces the view that China intends to exert growing control in these international waters, including potentially by declaring an Air Defence Identification Zone,” said Dr Rory Medcalf, Head of the National Security College at the Australian National University.

Dr Mira Rapp-Hooper, a South China Sea expert from the Centre for a New American Security, said it was not the first time that China has sent such weapons to the Paracels.

“I do think surface to air missiles are a considerable development,” she said. “If they have been deployed they are probably China’s effort to signal a response to freedom-of navigation operations, but I don’t think it is a totally unprecedented deployment.”

A US Navy destroyer sailed within 12 nautical miles of Triton Island in the Paracels last month, a move China condemned as provocative.

China last month said it would not seek militarisation of its South China Sea islands and reefs, but that did not mean it would not set up defences.

“Woody Island belongs to China,” said Dr Ni Lexiong, a naval expert at the Shanghai University of Political Science and Law. “Deploying surface-to-air missiles on our territory is completely within the scope of our sovereign rights. We have sovereignty there, so we can choose whether to militarise it.”

Taiwan President-elect Tsai Ing-wen said tensions were now higher in the region. “We urge all parties to work on the situation based on principles of peaceful solution and self-control,” she told reporters.

Vietnam’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment. But in a rare move, the country’s prime minister on Monday pressed Mr Obama for a greater US role in preventing militarisation and island-building in the South China Sea.

Images from civilian satellite company ImageSat International show two batteries of eight surface-to-air missile launchers on Woody Island, as well as a radar system
, Fox News said.

The missiles arrived over the past week and, according to a US official, appeared to show the HQ-9 air defence system, which has a range of 200 km and would pose a threat to any airplanes flying close by, the report said.

In November, two US B52 strategic bombers flew near artificial Chinese-built islands in the Spratly Islands.

Asked about the report, Mr Bill Urban, a Pentagon spokesman, said: “While I cannot comment on matters related to intelligence, we do watch these matters very closely.”
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by Philip »

X-posted from the main China td.
China 'sends missiles to contested South China Sea island'
Beijing accused of increasing tensions in disputed area as satellite images appear to show missile batteries on Woody Island, part of the Paracels chain
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... racel.html

This move by China will send littoral ASEAN nations into a tizzy.The summit between O'Bomber and ASEAN leaders in the US just ended,could see a new coalition of the reluctant ASEAN group to fall in line with the US militarily.Some nations already have close ties in place. The sheer arrogance of the Chinese military-political elite could lead them into a very dangerous conflict where they may face off with the USN.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Respect 2002 norms on S China Sea, India tells Beijing - ToI
As the US confirmed deployment of missiles by China in South China Sea, India on Thursday warned Beijing that any unilateral action which could raise tension in the region should be avoided.

The foreign ministry spokesperson said it was important to ensure full and effective implementation of the 2002 declaration on conduct of parties in the South China Sea. He said early conclusion of negotiations to establish a code of conduct by consensus will also contribute to peace and stability in the region.

Foreign minister Sushma Swaraj in a speech the oceans and seas, including the South China Sea, were pathways to our prosperity and security.

"The security of sea routes in the Asia-Pacific is essential for India's economy as a majority of our global trade flows across the straits of Malacca and beyond. Moreover, the development of a Blue Economy and optimum utilization of marine resources can only take place within the ambit of internationally recognized rules and norms," she said, while speaking at Delhi Dialogue VII, an annual forum to brainstorm on all aspects of the ASEAN-India relationship.

"The need for resolving disputes peacefully, without threat or actual use of force, cannot, therefore, be underestimated. In this regard I would also like to stress that we support the evolution of an inclusive, balanced, transparent and open regional architecture for security and cooperation in the Asia-Pacific.," she said.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

US slams China for increased 'militarisation' in South China Sea - Reuters, AFP - Straits Times
United States Secretary of State John Kerry slammed China for its increased "militarisation" in the South China Sea and said Washington expects to have "very serious" talks with Beijing.

"There is every evidence, every day, that there has been an increase of militarisation of one kind or another," Mr Kerry said on Wednesday following reports that Beijing had deployed advanced surface-to- air missiles to a disputed island in the Paracel chain of islands.

"It's of a serious concern," he added.


Reports of the deployment were met with alarm and criticised by governments in the region. Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, who is in China, expressed concern and said she raised the matter with Chinese officials yesterday.

A US official said the missiles, which arrived on Woody Island in the past week, appeared to be HQ-9s, which have a range of 200km. Experts say these could be used to target enemy aircraft.

A day after Chinese officials refused to deny or confirm the deployment, China's Defence Ministry confirmed that "China has deployed weapons on the island for a long time", reported the Global Times newspaper. It did not specify which weapons were on the island.

Beijing has controlled all of the Paracels, also claimed by Hanoi and Taipei, since 1974.

But tensions in the South China Sea, through which a third of the world's oil passes, have risen in recent months since China transformed contested reefs in the Spratly Islands further south into artificial islands capable of supporting military facilities.

Washington says the move threatens free passage in a strategically vital area and has sent warships to sail close to the disputed islands to assert freedom of navigation, raising fears of escalation.

"We have said repeatedly with respect to China that the standard that should be applied to all countries with respect to the South China Sea is no militarisation," Mr Kerry said.

He recalled that Chinese President Xi Jinping vowed not to militarise the disputed waters during his US visit last year.


"We had these conversations with the Chinese and I'm confident that, over the next days, we will have further very serious conversations on this," he said.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Wednesday that China was entitled to "limited and necessary self-defence facilities" under international law.

Some analysts believe China's increasing military presence in the South China Sea could potentially lead Beijing to declare an Air Defence Identification Zone there. {We knew when the ADIZ was announced in East China Sea about three years back that SCS would be next}
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

China’s Foreign Exchange Reserves Dwindling Rapidly - NYT
As markets around the world have churned, China has long taken comfort in having what in the financial world amounts to a life preserver: its vast holdings of other countries’ money.

A year and a half ago, China held as much as $4 trillion in foreign exchange reserves. The reserves represented a symbolic trophy for China’s leaders, who have described them as the “blood and sweat” of the workers and upheld them as a sign of national strength.

Now, as China’s economic growth slows, that sign of national strength is slowly ebbing.

China’s foreign exchange reserves are shrinking steadily as money flows out of the country, and Beijing moves to shore up its currency.

The country’s reserves have shrunk by nearly a fifth since the summer of 2014 — and more than a third of the shrinkage has been in the last three months.

By the end of January, reserves stood at $3.23 trillion
, a level that has prompted speculation about how much lower Beijing will let them go.

With a smaller pot of reserves, Chinese leaders have less room to maneuver, should the economy undergo a sudden shock. The reserves situation also weakens China’s control over the value of its currency, the renminbi.

The drop in reserves could also hurt China’s efforts to raise its global profile, as it doesn’t have as much money to pump into major projects in developing countries.

“If you use up $700 billion of reserves, how much more is going to follow? That is the basic problem,” said Guntram Wolff, the director of Bruegel, a nonprofit economic research institute in Brussels.

The dwindling reserves are one of the many factors shaking global investor confidence because of the impact the slide could have on China’s financial system. A number of investors are now betting that China may have to let its currency depreciate, rather than dip further into its reserves.

Chinese officials are fighting back. In a rare interview published last weekend by Caixin, a Chinese magazine, Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of China’s central bank, said, “China has the largest volume of foreign exchange reserves in the world, and we will not let speculative forces dominate market sentiment.”

During China’s biggest boom years, its currency could have risen in value as huge sums in dollars, euros and yen flowed into the country. Instead, Beijing tightly controlled the value of the renminbi, buying up much of the inflows and putting them into its reserves instead. That brought angry accusations from the United States and Europe that it was manipulating its currency to help keep Chinese exports inexpensive and competitive in foreign countries.

Now that the renminbi faces pressure to fall, China is spending its reserves in an effort to prop up the currency. But many American lawmakers and presidential candidates still accuse China of keeping its currency artificially weak.

The reserves are still considerable, more than double Japan’s
, which has the world’s second-largest amount. The central bank chief, Mr. Zhou, and others have questioned whether the reserves are too big and the money could be better invested if left in the private sector. Mr. Zhou led a move over the last two years to make it easier for Chinese companies and families to invest their own money overseas, only to find in recent months that the outflows have been disconcertingly fast at times.

China has taken steps to stem further flows out of the country. This winter the Chinese authorities arrested the leaders of underground banks that were converting billions of renminbi into dollars and euros. They also made it harder for Chinese citizens to use their renminbi to buy insurance policies in dollars.

More quietly, Beijing bank regulators have halted sales within China of investment funds known as wealth management products that are denominated in dollars.

Beijing has also instructed bank branches in Hong Kong to limit their lending of renminbi to make it harder for traders and investors to place bets against the Chinese currency in financial markets.


“We did receive notice from Beijing in the earlier part of January to be more stringent in approving renminbi-denominated loans,” said a Hong Kong-based China bank executive, who insisted on anonymity for fear of employer retaliation. “It is no fun being caught in the middle, with marketing officers wanting to do more business and the higher-ups telling you to be tougher when reviewing credit proposals.”

The erosion of reserves is also politically awkward, given public perception, and Beijing has taken steps aimed directly at shoring them up.

One move would keep more of its reserves free of long-term commitments. China’s central bank now demands that at least some foreign money managers who want to invest part of the reserves pledge to achieve an annual return of as much as 26 percent or else their management fees will be reduced, said a person with knowledge of China’s foreign reserves who insisted on anonymity to avoid retaliation.

Chinese markets rose this week, as some investors bet that China could slow the erosion. Expectations have faded that the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates this year, making China look more attractive. And China is running huge trade surpluses, bringing in a steady inflow of foreign money.

Economists inside and outside China are increasingly trying to guess how far reserves must fall before China might consider a sharp devaluation of the currency. An International Monetary Fund model suggests that an economy of China’s size needs $1.5 trillion with strict capital controls and $2.7 trillion without them.

Brad Setser, a former United States Treasury official now at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that China could manage with smaller reserves because the model exaggerates the need for reserves in a country like China with very large domestic banking deposits.

The Texas hedge fund manager J. Kyle Bass, who has bet on a fall in the renminbi, recently told clients that his firm believes China doesn’t even have the ability to tap all of its reserves because as much as $1 trillion is already committed to long-term investments. But most economists disagree, saying that no more than $300 billion has been committed to various projects and not yet disbursed, while the rest of China’s $3.23 trillion in reserves is readily usable.

Longer term, China looks less likely to commit its reserves to big projects that build up its image abroad, said Victor Shih, a specialist in Chinese finance at the University of California, San Diego. “When you’re losing $100 billion a month, you can’t afford to invest in a highway in the middle of nowhere or a railway in Pakistan that could be blown up, :) he said.

In 2014, President Xi Jinping announced that China would provide the bulk of the $50 billion to set up an Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and then said a month later that China would also set up a $40 billion fund to invest in many of the same countries that would borrow from the bank.

Last month, Mr. Xi announced yet another fund for additional infrastructure projects in the world’s poorest countries. Its total: just $50 million, barely enough to build a few roads in a single impoverished country.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

The next world war will be in the South China Sea. Ask Thucydides... - Peter Popham, The Independent
Climb into my time machine and come fly with me two years into the future. Here we are, November 2018, with celebrations of the centenary of the end of the First World War in full swing. And we find ourselves part of the grand coalition that has just declared war on China.

Throughout the noughties and beyond, the itch we couldn't stop scratching was the Muslim world. Our war was the war on terror, we were told, and when that "crusade" collided head-on with the Arab Spring, the result was Syria. Seven years on, the bloody stalemate grinds on. Nobody can win. Nobody is prepared to yield an inch. It's Flanders Field all over again.

But meanwhile, at the beginning of 2016, a real old-fashioned war was boiling up in the South China Sea, only we were not paying attention. And now the British government is talking about conscription - a century after the heroes came home. It's so funny it hurts.

It was when politicians started talking about Thucydides that we should have pricked up our ears. President Xi Jinping started it in a speech in Seattle in September 2015 - only to flatly deny the ancient Greek historian any relevance to the growing rivalry between the US and China. "We want to deepen mutual understanding with the US on each other's strategic orientation and development path," he said. "There is no such thing as the Thucydides Trap in the world. But should major countries time and time again make the mistake of strategic miscalculation, they might create such traps for themselves."

The "Thucydides Trap" explained the origins of the Peloponnesian War. "It was the rise of Athens, and the fear that this inspired in Sparta," Thucydides wrote with classical crispness, "that made war inevitable." And that ancient conflict set the tone for 2,400 years of organised butchery, with the First and Second World Wars as the most recent specimens. Until now.

The rise of Germany and the threat that Germany's ever-expanding navy posed to Britain set the scene for the Thucydides Trap of the First World War. The nature of the danger was spelled out in 1907 in a note by a British Foreign Office official called Eyre Crowe. "Germany would clearly build as powerful a navy as she can afford," Crowe wrote, and that navy would pose a fatal challenge to the British Empire whatever Germany's protestations to the contrary. As Crowe noted, dry as sandpaper, "Ambitious designs...are not as a rule openly proclaimed, and even the profession of unlimited and universal political benevolence [is] not conclusive evidence" against "unpublished intentions." Seven years later these two brotherly powers were duly fighting to the death.

The growth in tensions between the US and China has been uncannily similar. In Seattle, Mr Xi pooh-poohed the dead Greek but in the years before that speech, China had converted thousands of merchant ships for military use, developed a "carrier killer" missile specifically designed to sink American aircraft carriers, tested hypersonic glide vehicles said to be capable of striking the US with nuclear warheads, and stealthy submarines armed with ballistic missiles. In 2015, despite the general slowdown of the economy, China increased its military budget by 10 per cent, and one Chinese general warned that once the build-up was complete, "No enemy will dare to bully us."

That is the assertion that is now to be tested. February 2016 marked the point of no return. Five years before, as its economic power ballooned, Beijing submitted a diplomatic note to the UN Secretary-General asserting its sovereignty over islands in the South China Sea - batting aside rival claims to coastal zones by Vietnam, Taiwan, the Phillipines, Malaysia and Brunei. Instead China claimed the lot. Regional hegemony was in China's national DNA. Historically all its petty neighbours had tried to ensure peace by paying annual tribute. In the modern world, tribute took the form of unresisting obedience.

But then Barack Obama came to power in Washington and he and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose to execute a "pivot to Asia", to bolster the morale of those Asian small fry while making it clear that China would not have it all its own way. And as has happened in international summitry since the time of Pericles, sweet talk, fraternal visitations and hearty dinners proceeded in tandem with steely military build-ups on both sides. The Chinese version is sketched above. The US military budget continued to dwarf those of all its possible rivals put together, and America carried out huge war games in the Pacific to practice fighting China. Then in February 2016, after American incursions into the South China Sea, the US accused China of installing surface-to-air missiles on Woody Island, one of the uninhabited atolls on which tension had focused. China retorted that it was US air and naval patrols in the region that had "escalated tensions." And there was to be no looking back.

s this, then, the dawn of the nuclear Doomsday we have lived in fear of since Hiroshima? In a study some years back, Harvard professor Graham Allison analysed 16 cases of the Thucydides Trap during the past 500 years, noting that 12 of them resulted in war. The good news - the glass half-full - was that four of them didn't. Three of those, notably the Soviet-US Cold War, post-date the Second World War. The nuclear threat was part of the reason. But where war was avoided, Professor Allison wrote: "It required huge, painful adjustments in attitudes and actions on the part not just of the challenger but the challenged."

Huge, painful adjustments are hard to achieve once war has been declared. If only we - and they - had made a start on them earlier in the game.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Navy commander: South China Sea not a U.S.—versus—China battle - PTI
The U.S. Navy’s 7th Fleet’s commander said on Monday he is wary of the situation in the South China Sea being painted as a battle between the U.S. and China, but added the presence of a Chinese missile system on a disputed island will not stop the U.S. military from flying over the region.

U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Joseph Aucoin’s comments come a week after it was revealed that Beijing had deployed surface—to—air missiles on an island in the fiercely contested region.

The U.S. said the presence of missiles provided increasing evidence of militarisation of the area by China.

China subsequently accused the U.S. of militarising the region, saying patrols by U.S. Navy vessels and military aircraft had escalated tensions and raised concerns about stability in the area.

Last month, a U.S. warship deliberately sailed near one of the Beijing—controlled islands in the Paracel chain in a so— called freedom of navigation exercise. China, Taiwan and Vietnam have overlapping claims in the Paracels.

Vice Adm. Aucoin, whose Japan—based fleet covers a region from India to the international dateline in the Pacific Ocean, said the U.S. is not making such manoeuvres to single out any country, and wants all nations that are reclaiming land to stop.

“I wish it wasn’t portrayed as US versus China,” Vice Adm. Aucoin told reporters in Sydney, one of his stops on a visit to Australia to meet with defence officials.

“This shouldn’t seem provocative. What we’re trying to ensure is that all countries, no matter size or strength, can pursue their interests based on the law of the sea and not have that endangered by some of these actions.”


Last week, U.S. and Taiwanese officials confirmed commercial satellite images showed anti—aircraft missiles had been placed on Woody Island in the Paracel chain. China has not denied the appearance of the missiles, but says it is entitled to defend its territory.

Vice Adm. Aucoin said the missiles had provided a “destabilising effect” across the region, and urged China to be transparent about its intentions. Asked whether the presence of the missile system would affect U.S. preparedness to fly over the area, he said no.

“We will fly, sail, operate wherever international law allows, including those areas,” he said.

Vice Adm. Aucoin also expressed concerns about North Korea’s recent nuclear test and rocket launch.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

India set to seal major power deal in Bangladesh, beating China - ToI
State-run Indian firm Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL) is poised to seal a contract to build a $1.6 billion power plant in Bangladesh, beating out a Chinese competitor in the latest commercial tussle between the region's two dominant powers.

After China's recent success in pushing development projects in Sri Lanka, a breakthrough in Bangladesh would be welcome news for Indian officials who have long fretted over Beijing's encroachment on to territory it considers its own back yard.

India believes Bangladesh is a part of a "String of Pearls" China is building across the Indian Ocean that stretches from Gwadar port in Pakistan to Djibouti on the African coast where it is building a naval base.

After years of negotiations, BHEL will sign a contract to build a 1,320-megawatt (MW) thermal power station in Khulna in southern Bangladesh on February 28 {BHEL and India must deliver} , officials in New Delhi and Dhaka said.

China's Harbin Electric International Company Ltd, which has power projects in Iran, Turkey and Indonesia among others, lost the bid on technical grounds, said a Bangladesh official, speaking on condition of anonymity since he was not authorised to talk to journalists.

But Anwarul Azim, a spokesman for the Bangladesh-India Friendship Power Company Limited, a joint venture set up to build the coal-fired plant, said BHEL was the lowest bidder.

The Indian government's external lending arm, the Exim Bank, has backed up BHEL's offer with nearly 70 percent funding of the project's costs at a soft interest rate of around 1 percent above Libor, the leading global benchmark for pricing transactions, an Indian government official said.

He declined to be named, saying the two sides were about to seal the contract.

On Friday, Libor stood at 1.13 percent for a dollar loan for a year.

"Exim is very positive about it, very bullish about it and looking to taking this forward," David Rasquinha, the bank's deputy managing director, told Reuters of the Khulna project.

It would be the biggest foreign project by an Indian power firm, eclipsing a plant already built in Rwanda and a planned one in Sri Lanka.

Officials at China's Harbin who dealt with the bid were not immediately available for comment.

But an employee in the after-sale service department said: "The company has been involved in many such tenders, it is very normal - either we win or lose the bids."

Second setback


India and China have stepped up bids for infrastructure projects in the region in recent years, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi pushing for a greater engagement with smaller neighbours after years of neglect.

The loss of the power project is the second setback for China, after Japan muscled into Bangladesh's port sector last year, offering 80 percent financing on easy terms for a seaport, barely 25 km from a $8 billion deep water port that Beijing was negotiating to construct.

The proposed power plant will have two units of 660 MW that will generate power for local consumption. Nearly two-fifths of Bangladesh's 160 million people do not have access to electricity, according to the World Bank.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

US to China: Hawaii is not South China Sea - PTI
The US has strongly refuted the Chinese claim that what it is doing in the disputed South China Sea is akin to the US's deploying of defence facilities in Hawaii, saying no other country has a claim on Hawaii.

"There is no other country that has a claim on Hawaii. But yet when you consider the land features in the South China Sea, there are a variety of overlapping territorial claims that a variety of countries have made on those features," White House press secretary Josh Earnest said on Monday.

Earnest's remarks came in response to Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying who on Monday said China was doing in the South China Sea what the US does in Hawaii.

"China deploying necessary national defence facilities on its own territory is no different from the US deploying defence facilities on Hawaii," Hua said.

Recognising that Chinese government may have disagreement about the claims made by other countries, Earnest said that is precisely the reason the US believes all the parties should resolve their differences about this matter in a way that does not provoke a military confrontation.

"That is why we have urged all parties who are claimants to these features - the US is not among them, we've encouraged all of the countries that do have claims to resolve them in a peaceful, legal manner and to avoid confrontation and to seek to avoid escalating the tensions in that area of the world," Earnest said.

Noting that America hoped that tensions in that part of the world would be reduced, Earnest said they can be reduced if all of the claimants to the land features in the South China Sea make the same kind of commitment that was seen from the leaders of ASEAN in California just last week.

"In the context of the summit, the leaders of ASEAN committed to not building up a military presence on those features that are the subject of competing claims," he said.

"That is a responsible way to resolve differences of opinion over those features, and we certainly would urge the Chinese and every other country that has a competing claim here to abide by that standard," Earnest said.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

China sends fighter jets to South China Sea island - AFP
China has deployed fighter jets to the same contested island in the South China Sea to which it also has sent surface-to-air missiles, US officials said.

Citing two unnamed US officials, Fox News said US intelligence services had spotted Chinese Shenyang J-11 and Xian JH-7 warplanes on Woody Island in the disputed Paracel Islands chain over the past few days.

Navy Captain Darryn James, a spokesman for US Pacific Command, confirmed the report but noted that Chinese fighter jets have previously used the island.

Woody Island, which is also claimed by Taiwan and Vietnam, has had an operational airfield since the 1990s but it was upgraded last year to accommodate the J-11.

"We are still concerned that the Chinese continue to put advanced arms systems on this disputed territory," James said.

The move was reported as US Secretary of State John Kerry hosted his Chinese counterpart, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, in Washington.

Last week, China confirmed it had placed "weapons" on Woody Island, defending what it said was its sovereign right to do so.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Nurturing relations with Sri Lanka - G.Parthasarathy, BusinessLine
Excerpts
Prime Minister Narendra Modi struck an emotional chord in his address to Sri Lanka’s parliament when he proclaimed: “For India, the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka are paramount.” Referring to the “shared heritage and shared future” of the two countries, Modi averred: “I bring the blessings from the land of Bodh Gaya to the land of Anuradhapura.” Referring to the realities of the geopolitics of the Indian Ocean region, where India and Sri Lanka occupy centre-stage, India’s Prime Minister noted: “We should expand maritime security cooperation between, India, Sri Lanka and Maldives, to include others in the Indian Ocean area.”
While India was ready to take a liberal and understanding view of Chinese assistance for developing the port facilities in Hambantota, the constituency of the Rajapakse family, visits by Chinese warships to Colombo and the award of the Colombo port city project involving the allocation of 576 acres of land on ‘free hold’ to a Chinese company, set alarm bells ringing in New Delhi.
The growing Chinese interest in port facilities in Sri Lanka and the offer by Pakistan to supply Sri Lanka, Chinese-designed JF-17 fighter aircraft on favourable terms, suggests the emergence of a joint China-Pakistan axis to establish a cooperative defence network across the Indian Ocean.

Cash-strapped Pakistan, which has never had grandiose maritime ambitions, is in the process of acquiring four frigates and eight submarines from China. We can only conclude that the existing military, missile and nuclear weapons cooperation between Pakistan and China is set to attain new maritime dimensions across the western Indian Ocean.

In any case, China has all the facilities it needs in Gwadar, at the mouth of the Persian Gulf. Just after the visit of former Chinese prime minister, Zhu Rongji, to Pakistan in 2003, President Pervez Musharraf had warned that in the event of conflict, India would find the Chinese navy operating out of Gwadar.

Sri Lanka appears determined to go ahead with the Colombo port city project with China, though it is likely to have the terms amended to address the concerns of its other partners. There are naturally concerns in India that the Chinese built port city does not become a centre for surveillance and snooping in the port of Colombo, whose earnings as a point of transit for goods destined for India are substantial. Hence, the original project parameters would have to be suitably modified. {True, but SL does not seem to have significantly modified the parameters except to make it a 99-year lease rather than free-hold. This may be just to please India. Without restrictions on the Chinese on what they can and cannot do on this land, the change carries no stick}

Wary and watchful

In the larger scheme of things, India will have to balance Chinese power in the Indian Ocean with strategic partnerships and intensive dialogue with Japan, Asean partners such as Indonesia and Singapore, together with the US. We cannot ignore the importance of expanding utilisation of Trincomalee port in the Bay of Bengal in this effort. Modi had indicated New Delhi’s readiness to “make Trincomalee a petroleum hub”. India would do well to undertake such projects in collaboration with Japan and even perhaps Asean members such as Singapore.

Given the manner in which Pakistan is stalling the entire process of economic integration and connectivity in Saarc, India should now activate cooperation across its eastern borders through Bimstec, of which Sri Lanka is a member. Pakistan has secured its participation as a sectorial dialogue partner of Asean, though it shares no land or maritime borders with any Asean member.

India would do well to promote similar Sri Lankan partnership with Asean, given its location and proximity to its members.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

China claims South China Sea defences 'absolutely necessary' - Straits Times
China's defences in the South China Sea are "absolutely necessary", Beijing said on Thursday, as it accused the US of militarising the region.

The defence ministry spoke out as tensions rose between the two powers over reports that Beijing has deployed surface-to-air missiles, fighter jets, and radar installations in the contested region.

"The US is truly the one pushing militarisation in the South China Sea," said ministry spokesman Wu Qian at a regular monthly briefing.

"China's building of defence facilities on the South China Sea islands and reefs is absolutely necessary."

Beijing claims almost the whole of the South China Sea - through which a third of the world's oil passes - while several other littoral states have competing claims, as does Taiwan.

"It is China's legitimate right to deploy defence facilities within its own territory - no matter whether that deployment was in the past or at the present, no matter whether for a temporary or long-term basis, and no matter what kind of equipment has been deployed."

A US official told AFP that Beijing has deployed surface-to-air missiles on Woody Island in the disputed Paracels chain - apparently HQ-9s, which have a range of about 200km.

Citing two unnamed US officials, American broadcaster Fox News said on Tuesday that US intelligence services had spotted Chinese Shenyang J-11 and Xian JH-7 warplanes on the same island.

Reports also surfaced this week of probable radar installations on reefs in the nearby Spratly islands that would "exponentially improve" the country's monitoring capacities.

Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi on Thursday concluded a visit to the US for talks with US secretary of state John Kerry, who told reporters last week: "There is every evidence, every day, that there has been an increase of militarisation of one kind or another. It's of a serious concern."
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

PLAN ships continue to prowl around Andamans - Jayanta Gupta, ToI
On Tuesday, alarm bells went off in Delhi after a blip on a coastal radar screen. It was an unidentified vessel close to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. An alert was sent to the Andaman and Nicobar Command (ANC) immediately but by then the ship was already under surveillance. It was a submarine tender of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). The presence of this supply and support ship made Indian Navy officials suspect that one or more PLAN submarines were prowling in the Area of Responsibility (AoR) of the ANC.

"We were monitoring the movement of the Chinese vessel. This is not the first time that PLAN ships have been detected around the islands. In fact, there is greater focus on defences of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands as the situation has changed. There is frequent movement of certain navies in the AoR of ANC. There are both surface and sub-surface vessels. This is all the more reason why we should tighten our belts," Vice Admiral P K Chatterjee, commander-in-chief, ANC (CINCAN), said when asked about the Chinese ship.

Over the last couple of years, the CINCAN's efforts for better infrastructure in the Andamans have borne fruit. A lot of development has occurred over the last 8-9 months and the defence minister has himself accepted that the Andamans is the eastern maritime frontier and not the Coromandel coast as had been thought previously.

"It will be a different story in the next five years. Over the last 12 months, there has been more infrastructure build-up than ever before. No wonder the best engineer's trophy among 33 zones has gone to the ANC. The mindset is changing now. Additional forces have been promised. There are efforts to develop both military and civil infrastructure. The missile corvette INS Karmuk will be sent to the ANC from April 1 and a P8I is already operating. We have also got additional radars. There has been a lot of improvement along our strategic sides. More radars are in the pipeline. Efforts are also on to convert the base at Car Nicobar into a permanent one. In the next few years, the archipelago will have formidable defences," Vice Admiral Chatterjee said.

While the missile corvette is a welcome addition, ANC requires at least two other command ships. These will be located in the north, south and central sections of the archipelago. The Andamans is nearly 1,200 km from the mainland where the bulk of India's military assets are based. At any point of time, PLAN ships and submarines are within a 500 km radius of the islands, increasing their vulnerability. The runways at the air bases in the north and south also need to be extended. Even the Indian Air Force (IAF) is looking to develop better infrastructure on the islands. Land acquisition was a major issue but this was resolved a few days ago. Given the improvement of infrastructure, more Indian Navy ships are now stopping at ANC for repairs. According to a source, even strategic vessels have visited the command and carried out launches of missiles. {Wow}

"We have submitted infrastructure plans for the next 10 years. In the next financial year, we shall surpass our target for inftrastructure development," Vice Admiral Chatterjee added.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Australia unveils ‘massive’ increase in defense spending - Japan Times
Australia unveiled a massive new investment in the nation’s defense capabilities on Thursday to address what Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull called “high stakes” and “momentous times” in Asia.

Citing increased defense spending around the region and potential flash points in the South China Sea and the Korean Peninsula, he said the government was committed to combating the most challenging strategic environment “we have faced in peacetime.”

“These are momentous times. The stakes are high. And as the opportunities expand, so does the cost of losing them,” Turnbull said in launching a new Defense White Paper in Canberra.

“A stronger Australia supports a safer Australia, a safer region and a safer world.”

The government said it would spend 195 billion Australian dollars ($139 billion) over the next decade, including a doubling of its submarine fleet to 24, three additional destroyers, nine new frigates and 12 offshore patrol boats.

Maritime surveillance would also be boosted by the purchase of seven U.S.-made MQ-4C Triton drones and eight P-8A Poseidon aircraft.

New air defense weapons would boost the force’s capabilities with 72 F-35s, known as Joint Strike Fighters, added from 2020
, while the army’s equipment and armored vehicle fleet will be upgraded.

Some 2,500 new military roles will be created to expand the total defense force to 62,400 personnel, with 900 jobs focused on improved cyber, intelligence and space security.

The cash injection would take Australia’s defense spending to 2 percent of GDP by 2020-21, three years earlier than previously outlined, Turnbull said.

Regional tensions

The announcement comes as Australia’s close ally the United States pursues a foreign policy “pivot” toward Asia, while Beijing flexes its muscles in the region through a military build-up in the contested South China Sea.

At the same time, tensions are high on the Korean peninsula after North Korea’s January nuclear test and a rocket launch this month.

Turnbull said that in the next two decades, there would be increased military capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region, including “half the world’s submarines and half the world’s combat aircraft.”

“We would be concerned if the competition for influence and the growth in military capability were to lead to instability and threaten Australia’s interests, whether in the South China Sea, the Korean peninsula or further afield,” he added.

“We have a strong, vital, vested interest in the maintenance of peace, stability and respect for the rule of law. The decisions we take now will impact on our defense capability and outlook for decades to come.”


John Blaxland, a military expert at the Australian National University’s Strategic and Defense Studies Centre, said Canberra’s boost was consistent with other nations, adding that the global average for defense spending was between 2.1-2.3 percent of GDP.

“In a world where the clouds are getting darker and where power dynamics are shifting and that shifting is creating rub points that could turn into spark points, the insurance policy which is the … Australian Defense Force is becoming less politically contentious,” Blaxland told AFP.

Three international bidders — DCNS of France, Germany’s TKMS and the Japanese government — are competing for a submarine project worth some AU$50 billion ($36 billion) to replace Australia’s current diesel and electric-powered Collins Class submarines.

A decision on the winner is due this year.

Australia is part of the U.S.-led campaign against the Islamic State group in Iraq, contributing military jets and special forces. It also started carrying out airstrikes against IS targets in Syria last year.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

China ‘seriously concerned’ by Australian defense document - Japan Times
Chinese officials say they are “seriously concerned” by an Australian strategic evaluation of the South China Sea and warned Australia against compromising the stability of the Asia-Pacific region.

Australia announced a 20-year plan Thursday to bolster its naval strength with more submarines and warships as part of a military buildup it said was needed to maintain peace in the region.

The strategic document, the Defense White Paper, said Australia was “particularly concerned by the unprecedented pace and scale of China’s land reclamation activities” in the South China Sea.

While not taking sides on competing territorial claims, Australia opposed “the use of artificial structures in the South China Sea for military purposes” and the assertion of maritime rights not recognized by international law.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a press conference later Thursday that China was “seriously concerned about and dissatisfied with the White Paper’s negative statement on issues concerning the South China Sea and the development of China’s military strength.”

Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Col. Wu Qian appeared to warn Australia against following the United States’ lead by sailing near one of the Beijing-controlled islands in the Paracel chain.

“We urge the Australian side to cherish the hard-won good momentum of development in bilateral relations and don’t take part in or conduct any activities that may compromise the stability of the region,” he said.

“The military alliance between Australia and the U.S. should get rid of the Cold War mentality,” he added.
Chinese officials use the phrase “Cold War mentality” to refer to thinking that harks back to an era when the world was less integrated.

Asked for comment about the document, the Chinese Embassy on Friday referred The AP to the two officials’ comments.

The document also said the United States will remain the pre-eminent global military power and will continue to be Australia’s most important strategic partner over the next two decades.

A major conflict between the United States and China was unlikely, but friction between the two powers over the East China and South China Seas could raise tensions, it said.

“It will be important for regional stability that China provides reassurance to its neighbors by being more transparent about its defense policies,” it said.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

From the Australian Defence White Paper 2016

Excerpts
As Australia’s strategic environment becomes more complex it is important to further develop our international partnerships including with our allies the United States and New Zealand, and with Japan, Indonesia, India, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, China and other key partners . . . The relationship between the United States and China continues to evolve and will be fundamental to our future strategic circumstances. Territorial disputes between claimants in the East China and South China Seas have created uncertainty and tension in our region. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea continues to be a source of instability. . . . Our security and prosperity depend on a stable Indo-Pacific region and a rules-based global order in which power is not misused, and threats to peace and stability from tensions between countries can be managed through negotiations based on international law and the threat from terrorism can be addressed by concerted international action. This is our third Strategic Defence Interest. In the Indo-Pacific region Australia must continue to work with the United States and regional partners to make a positive contribution to security and stability in ways that advance our national interests. . . . While China will not match the global strategic weight of the United States, the growth of China’s national power, including its military modernisation, means China’s policies and actions will have a major impact on the stability of the Indo-Pacific to 2035 . . . While major conflict between the United States and China is unlikely, there are a number of points of friction in the region in which differences
between the United States and China could generate rising tensions. These points of friction include the East China and South China Seas,
the airspace above those seas, and in the rules that govern international behaviour, particularly in the cyber and space domains
. . . . The Government will seek to deepen and broaden our important defence relationship with China while recognising that our strategic interests may differ in relation to some regional and global security issues . . . . Australia does not take sides on competing territorial claims in the South China Sea but we are concerned that land reclamation and construction activity by claimants raises tensions in the region. Australia opposes the use of artificial structures in the South China Sea for military purposes. Australia also opposes the assertion of associated territorial claims and maritime rights which are not in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) . . . . Australia is particularly concerned by the unprecedented pace and scale of China’s land reclamation activities. . . . It is important that claimant countries are open and transparent about the end state purposes of land reclamation activities. The absence of
an agreed framework for managing the competing claims in the South China Sea highlights the importance of ASEAN and China agreeing to a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea as soon as possible. Unresolved territorial disputes also contribute to tensions in the area. China’s 2013 unilateral declaration of an Air Defence Identification Zone in the East China Sea, an area in which there are a number of overlapping Air Defence Identification Zones, caused tensions to rise. Australia is opposed to any coercive or unilateral actions to change the status quo in the East China Sea . . . . The Indian Ocean has become an important focus for Australian strategic policy in recent years. India is an increasingly important economic and security partner for Australia and we share key interests in regional stability and order. India’s modernisation of its armed forces and participation in the regional security architecture, particularly through the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium and Indian Ocean Rim Association, supports Australia and India’s shared interests in Indian Ocean security. India is also increasing its security partnerships, including with Australia, the United States, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam. In addition to having a stronger role in the Indo-Pacific region, India is also likely to become a more active and influential global power, supported by its economic growth. India could be the world’s third-largest economy before 2030. India’s relationships with other major powers including China, the United States and Japan will help shape the global security environment out to 2035. . . . India is a rising major power and Australia welcomes its increasingly active role in Indo-Pacific security. Our shared interests with India in areas such as Indian Ocean maritime security, regional stability and countering terrorism – in addition to our shared democratic values – form a solid basis for engagement. Australia sees India as a key security partner in the Indian Ocean and broader Indo-Pacific region. The Framework for Security Cooperation announced in November 2014 reflects the deepening and expanding security and defence engagement between Australia and India. In line with the Framework for Security Cooperation, the Government will seek to further mature our defence relationship with India in support of our shared strategic interests. This will include pursuing a regular program of strategic dialogue, bilateral training, and exercise opportunities – including our first major bilateral maritime exercise which was conducted in 2015. We will strengthen our cooperation in maritime security, counter-terrorism, capability acquisition and defence science and technology. India’s ‘Act East’ policy provides opportunities for greater bilateral and multilateral cooperation in the Indo-Pacific particularly through our common membership of the East Asia Summit and ADMM-Plus. We will also deepen our cooperation in the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium and Indian Ocean Rim Association.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

India, China discuss terrorism, connectivity - PTI
India and China have held extensive discussions on terrorism and connectivity in Asia during exchange of views and perspectives on foreign policy priorities of their respective countries here [New Delhi], External Affairs Ministry said on Sunday.

“A Chinese delegation led by Wang Yajun, Director General in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, travelled to Delhi for the dialogue. The talks were led on the Indian side by Santosh Jha, Joint Secretary (Policy Planning & Research).

“The two sides had a productive exchange of views and perspectives on the foreign policy priorities of their respective countries, their relations with the major powers of the world, issues of global governance, terrorism, connectivity in Asia, etc,” the Ministry said in a release.

The dialogue helped enhance the understanding between both foreign ministries on these important issues, it said.

The interaction, which was held last week, is part of the long-standing mechanism between the two countries to understand broad policy decisions and outlook, sources said.
The Indian demand in the UN for proscribing Maulana Masood Azhar as a terrorist seems to have been taken after the above meeting. I do not expect any change in the Chinese policy of not doing anything to embarrass their Pakistani friends. It would be interesting to watch the development especially after India has become a full-fledged member of the SCO which is ostensibly formed to tackle terrorism.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by Prem »

http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/confirme ... ign=buffer

Confirmed: Construction Begins on China's First Overseas Military Base in Djibouti
LASst week, China’s Ministry of Defense confirmed for the first time that construction on “support facilities” for the People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) in Djibouti, on the Horn of Africa, has started. Colonel Wu Qian, a spokesperson for the Chinese defense ministry, said on Thursday that “construction of infrastructure for the support facilities has started, and the Chinese side has dispatched personnel to Djibouti for relevant work.” China has been careful to avoid describing its facility in Djibouti as a “military” or “naval” base, preferring to use the terms “support facilities” or “logistical facilities” instead. Djibouti hosts military and support facilities for the United States, France, and even Japan’s Maritime Self-Defense Forces.
According to Wu, China will use the bases primarily to ensure that PLAN ships carrying out anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden, western Indian Ocean, and the Arabian and Red Seas are able to resupply and receive maintenance without making the long journey across the Indian Ocean to Chinese naval bases on the mainland. Wu added that the “facilities will mainly be used for logistical support and personnel recuperation of the Chinese armed forces conducting such missions as maritime escort in the Gulf of Aden and waters off the Somali coast, peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance.”Reports regarding China’s interest in a coastal base in Djibouti emerged for the first time early last summer, when Djibouti’s president, Ismail Omar Guelleh, confirmed that Djibouti and China had entered talks on the possibility of a naval base in the port city of Obock, along the northern coast of the Gulf of Tadjoura. In November 2015, China publicly confirmed that it would establish a facility in Djibouti. In late Janaury 2016, the two sides “reached consensus” on the terms under which the facilities would be built. The time frame over which China conceived of and began the construction of this facility–hardly nine months–is notable. Beijing could conceivably pursue similar initiatives with other Indian Ocean littoral states over a similar time span.Not all states will share China’s view of this facility in Djibouti. For India, for example, the addition of a base along the Indian Ocean’s periphery will serve to intensify long-standing fears regarding a Chinese “string of pearls” encircling it; Indian analysts and observers have long-feared that China’s investment in civilian ports in the region is leading up to a sudden proliferation of dual-use or military facilities in the Indian Ocean region.
The United States, similarly, has taken note of Chinese operations in the western Indian Ocean. Last year, the U.S. Department of Defense confirmed, for the first time, that China’s nuclear powered Shang-class and Song-class submarines have deployed in the Indian Ocean. If these submarines continue to operate in the region and perhaps even make an appearance at Obock, it would suggest that China sees its Djibouti facility as a naval base designed to fully support the PLAN’s expeditionary expansion toward West Asia and beyond. (Nuclear submarines armed with YJ-18 supersonic anti-ship missiles typically aren’t necessary for humanitarian assistance or anti-piracy missIONS
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25119
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Managing Chinese Threat (09-08-2014)

Post by SSridhar »

Jhujar wrote:Confirmed: Construction Begins on China's First Overseas Military Base in Djibouti
. . . Reports regarding China’s interest in a coastal base in Djibouti emerged for the first time early last summer, when Djibouti’s president, Ismail Omar Guelleh, confirmed that Djibouti and China had entered talks on the possibility of a naval base in the port city of Obock, along the northern coast of the Gulf of Tadjoura. . . .
Let us be clear here. China is setting up *TWO* bases in Djibouti, one at Obock, at the entrance to the Gulf of Tadjoura but in the north and another at Doraleh, at the south edge of the Gulf.

In May 2015, the President of Djibouti announced high level talks between China and Djibouti on the construction of the naval base in the northern part of Obock. Early this year, reports said that the Chinese facility would be established at Doraleh Multi-Purpose Port —a $590 million project that is being steered by China Merchants Holdings International in the south of the country. The Chinese Navy would use one of the berths there.

We need not split our hairs on whether it is just a facility or a base. In early December 2015, China and Djibouti signed a 10-year lease agreement for the base that will hold 700 troops at any time for an annual rent of USD 100 million. So, it is very clearly a 'naval base'.
Locked