Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Apr. 11, 2010

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 11 May 2010 08:30

The water factor
Amitabh Mattoo
http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=238568

What explains this new shrill campaign? Firstly, Pakistan is facing the most severe water crisis in its history. Secondly, in the new Pakistani discourse inspired by military thinking, India's hypothetical plans to construct dams, despite their being within the ambit of the treaty, could potentially create the capability to choke water flow to Pakistan. Here, intentions are not a factor, but just the capability that India may possess in the future. Thirdly, one episode over the filling of the Baglihar water reservoir by India and the alleged "delayed" release of water has been cited as an example of India's mala fide intentions. There are also Pakistani concerns about the Kishanganga project.

In any case, none of these issues calls for hysteria, but constructive engagement and bilateral dialogue within the scope of the Permanent Commission or outside it. What is also clear is that while the Indus Water Treaty is still a vital document, it may be important to think of ways of harnessing the waters of the Indus Basin jointly for more optimal use of the resources, given new technology, better practices, greater scarcity, and lessons learnt from the past. These could be included though an additional protocol to the treaty.
In fact, Article VII of the Treaty on "Future Cooperation" leaves open the possibility of newer avenues of cooperation without the need for the signatories to renegotiate or abandon the treaty. Water is a common, increasingly scarce resource which needs to be shared for the mutual benefit.
We have given the world an example in the form of the Indus Water Treaty. The time is ripe to build on this cooperation.

derkonig · Post by **derkonig** » 11 May 2010 08:40

Gerard wrote:And all the Yankee sound and fury has no more bite than a "befitting reply" promised by an Indian neta

Don't forget the dossier bombardment of our mananiya Paki Minister MMS

ArmenT · Post by **ArmenT** » 11 May 2010 08:46

National bird sighted again -- takes out at least four.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6480DY20100511

Prasad · Post by **Prasad** » 11 May 2010 08:49

Suppiah wrote

The biggest advantage unkil has is that TSP lacks missiles that can hit unkil.

Which is why they're $hit scared of people getting on to airplanes with wires and batteries and padded undies. These guys didn't need missiles for 9/11 did they. Though it will take some exceptinoally crazy amongthe tspa/isi to carry out another one like that.

RamaY · Post by **RamaY** » 11 May 2010 08:53

Muppalla wrote: First tell a lie 108 times and it becomes truth. Now start analysis on this truth and there will be a 108 analysts. There will be several debates and TV shows that will follow and recruit these analysts.

Whatever it is guys, USA is willing to makes sacrifices like 911 to save this piece of land in South Asia from breaking down that may be advantageous to India even by a mile.

Muppala garu,

Are you saying that TSP is really nuke nude, or Unkil has a complete handle on pakin nudes (sorry nukes)?

N^3-ji categorically proved that TSP is nuke nude and we have discussed threadbare on TSP's nuke bluff.

That begs one final question. Why is the article you quoted so wrong in saying that TSP would have been destroyed if not for TSP nukes?

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 11 May 2010 08:57

Shahzad could be JeM's Headley. From the level of training he got it looks like they too were not keen.

SSridhar · Post by **SSridhar** » 11 May 2010 08:58

Prem wrote:The water factor
Amitabh Mattoo
http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=238568
. . . it may be important to think of ways of harnessing the waters of the Indus Basin jointly for more optimal use of the resources, given new technology, better practices, greater scarcity, and lessons learnt from the past. These could be included though an additional protocol to the treaty.
In fact, Article VII of the Treaty on "Future Cooperation" leaves open the possibility of newer avenues of cooperation without the need for the signatories to renegotiate or abandon the treaty. Water is a common, increasingly scarce resource which needs to be shared for the mutual benefit.
We have given the world an example in the form of the Indus Water Treaty. The time is ripe to build on this cooperation.

All that pious hope and suggestions put forward by Mr. Mattoo are infeasible. He should spell out clearly what is meant by 'optimal use' especially if he also does not want to renegotiate the treaty and change the allocations.

Before the IWT was signed, there was a suggestion to treat the Indus Basin as a single entity. That is the only way an 'optimal use' of water can be ensured. (It is another matter that regional, sub-regional egos, requirements and sentiments might still thwart such an optimal use.) However, such an approach was found impracticable even then. Modern technology, greater scientific understanding and best practices are fine when there is enormous trust, not when there is an enormous trust-deficit.

India should not make the mistake of using 'water' to build trust by either postponing much-needed Indian projects on these rivers, or changing the specifications of the projects to 'accommodate' imaginary Pakistani fears, or in the worst case abandoning the projects.

The need to be opaque is understandable while negotiations are still going on and when some big-bang announcement is likely in a couple of months' time. However, the concessions given to Pakistan in Havana, Washington, Sharm-el-Sheikh and Thimpu do not inspire confidence that Indian interests will be fiercely defended. There is trust-deficit brewing between the people and the GoI.

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 11 May 2010 09:22

Hillary did not warn Pakistan of 'severe consequences': US

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 915695.cms

Carl_T · Post by **Carl_T** » 11 May 2010 09:30

Suppiah wrote:Guys have you stopped to wonder one thing - an attack that did not even spoil the seat covers of a car, that too happening in the regime of the most liberal wimpish of all US regimes, has triggered all this sound and fury. Contrast that with our regimes.

The liberal wimpish regime is the one that is openly authorizing assassinations against rogue preachers and drone strikes against Talibans very liberally. I would go easy on the wimpish aspect, bleeding heart liberal is the image Obama is happy to put out, whether that is how it works in reality is a different story.

SSridhar · Post by **SSridhar** » 11 May 2010 10:07

A Letter in DT

Are you a Paki?

Sir: There has been news about Pakistani nationals posing as nationals of another country in the US after the failed terrorist ploy of NYC to avoid discrimination. The news is very depressing. Although the US has made concrete statements that no Pakistani national will be discriminated against, as there are always bad apples everywhere, but just for a moment think about the situation when you have to pose as a different national for specific reasons.

Suppiah · Post by **Suppiah** » 11 May 2010 10:36

Carl_T wrote:
Suppiah wrote:Guys have you stopped to wonder one thing - an attack that did not even spoil the seat covers of a car, that too happening in the regime of the most liberal wimpish of all US regimes, has triggered all this sound and fury. Contrast that with our regimes.
The liberal wimpish regime is the one that is openly authorizing assassinations against rogue preachers and drone strikes against Talibans very liberally. I would go easy on the wimpish aspect, bleeding heart liberal is the image Obama is happy to put out, whether that is how it works in reality is a different story.

They are running a govt., that too of a super-power, not a law court. Punishing those they know as 100% guilty is not bravery and does not show non-wimpishness. Not doing even that implies something far worse, too crass to to name here.

It is when they act against someone they kind-of know, strongly suspect and practically sure particularly in short future, of being an enemy, of being ready to wage war against you, that is when you admire them. The unkils' definition of collateral damage in TSP should be foreigners, oppressed minorities, no one else. That is the day you can call them non-wimpish

Carl_T · Post by **Carl_T** » 11 May 2010 10:49

Suppiah wrote:
It is when they act against someone they kind-of know, strongly suspect and practically sure particularly in short future, of being an enemy, of being ready to wage war against you, that is when you admire them. The unkils' definition of collateral damage in TSP should be foreigners, oppressed minorities, no one else. That is the day you can call them non-wimpish

So many more Iraq invasions repeated across the world would make you happy?

Your definition of non-wimpish is killing civilians? That is bravery to you? Very manly indeed.

I think as long as the US is taking operations successfully against enemies of the state while avoiding collateral damage if possible, well done. Wimpish or non wimpish I don't know.

VikramS · Post by **VikramS** » 11 May 2010 11:01

JwalaMukhi wrote:It is one thing and understandable when TSPA threatens and blackmails India using Chinese supplied "new clear bums". It will be laughable when others such as China, US start giving excuses and conducting blackmails using TSPA's "new clear bums". It was a conscious decision to allow TSPA that capability, without which, TSPA had no chance to be of any use to the handlers. The mad dog is now on suicidal mode and apparently not on leash.
The use of TSPA, nay the existence of TSP itself which is on suicidal mode, is giving nightmares to US.

Why would a nuke-less TSPA of less use to its handlers? In fact a nuke-less TSPA would likely be more pliable and available for a much lower price than what it can extract right now

The article clearly asserts that the TSP nukes severely limit the operational freedom which the Khan has within TSP. He claims that the primary fear is a nuke-war in the sub-continent if the Jehadis see Kayamat (B-52s) dancing overhead. He does not talk about a JDAM already in place in the continental US which too is not out of question. Even if there is no JDAM outside the TSP, there is nothing which prevents the TSPA from claiming that one exists.

Your other comment about how the US could call TSP's bluff by going hammer and tongs on the TSPA since the risk of the bum does not endanger the US is not thought through. The bum could be used against the US fleet; it could be used against US ground forces. Further any ground assault is likely to be bloody and not have enough political support at home. And of course, there could be a JDAM already in place, may be even before 9/11. Post 9/11 there were news items of massive efforts to detect radiation sources within the confines of major cities. Who knows, perhaps the TSPA may have bluffed Amritraj with a JDAM threat after he talked about sending the TSP back to its golden period (stone age).

Suppiah · Post by **Suppiah** » 11 May 2010 11:06

Carl_T,

The laws of humanity cannot be applied to TSP.

Iraq is entirely different situation it was deliberately done by molding intelligence to suit the personal needs of the Rumsfled, Cheney & Co.

There are also times when you suspend all considerations of innocent civilians and deal with monster first, and then do a Marshall plan for those innocents that survive, as was done with Nazis and Japanese regime of WWII and so on...if ever there was such a situation where it can be justified, TSP of today is the one...

In the process the so-called innocents also learn a very valuable lesson they will not forget for a few dozen generations - that is if you allow yourself to be ruled by Hitler/TSPA-ISI/Polpot, you will reap destruction of a scale that is unimaginable.

Carl_T · Post by **Carl_T** » 11 May 2010 11:17

I don't disagree with you, but you're projecting Indian interests wrt TSP onto the US and implying that the US needs to deal harshly with TSP when it's really our responsibility to do so.

US coddling TSP isn't wimpy, as long as TSP attackers don't bomb Times Square etc. it is perfectly fine.

Suppiah · Post by **Suppiah** » 11 May 2010 11:25

Carl_T wrote:I don't disagree with you, but you're projecting Indian interests wrt TSP onto the US and implying that the US needs to deal harshly with TSP when it's really our responsibility to do so.

US coddling TSP isn't wimpy, as long as TSP attackers don't bomb Times Square etc. it is perfectly fine.

Unfortunately correct...but partly so if you consider 9/11 as an incident where TSPA-ISI had several fingers in the pie...if not directly indirectly...but then even CIA itself had a role to play in events that led to 9/11 so I guess that does not count...

arun · Post by **arun** » 11 May 2010 11:59

kenop wrote:Why is Hillory talking like this?

"Some Pakistani officials were more informed about al-Qaeda and Taliban than they let on", secretary of state Hillary Clinton has said.

"I'm not saying that they're at the highest levels but I believe that somewhere in this government are people who know where Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda is, where Mullah Omar and the leadership of the Afghan Taliban is and we expect more cooperation to help us bring to justice, capture or kill, those who attacked us on 9/11," Clinton told CBS in an interview.

Turns out that Hillary Clinton was not talking like that at all

. She was rather talking like this

.

So there we have it. No warning to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan of "severe consequences" for a terrorist attack on the US by the US Secretary of State :

abhishek_sharma wrote:Hillary did not warn Pakistan of 'severe consequences': US

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 915695.cms

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 11 May 2010 12:01

S. M. Krishna to visit Pak in July: NDTV

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 11 May 2010 12:19

P. Chidambaram to visit Pak on June 26: NDTV

arun · Post by **arun** » 11 May 2010 12:27

X Posted.

Yet another case where the State Policy of the Government of the Islamic Republic of supporting Islamic Terrorism globally is sought to be buried by claiming that “State Actors” are somehow “Rogue”.

The UK Telegraph is reporting that US investigators believe that there may exist a possible link between Faisal Shahzad, the failed Pakistani origin Islamic Terrorist who tried to car bomb New York’s Times Square and “Rogue” intelligence agents of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan:

Rogue Pakistani intelligence agents 'involved in Times Square plot'

American investigators believe rogue Pakistani intelligence agents may have been involved in the Times Square bomb plot, a potentially devastating blow to the country's shaky anti-terror credentials.

Rob Crilly, in Islamabad
Published: 6:00AM BST 11 May 2010

They are probing a possible connection between Faisal Shahzad and Pakistan's powerful military and intelligence establishment.

His background as the son of a senior Air Force officer may have brought him into contact with intelligence agents who helped build the Afghan Taliban and who have channelled cash and training to home-grown Jihadis, according to a source familiar with the investigation.

You don't know who he might have been introduced to in that sort of military environment," said the source.

Such a connection would be desperately embarrassing to the government in Islamabad, which is under pressure to demonstrate its commitment to tackling terrorism.

But it would help investigators make sense of how a boy raised in the secular, moderate environment of Pakistan's military schools could stand accused of terrorism.

Investigation teams, which have been arriving from the US since the start of the week, are at work in Peshawar, close to Shahzad's family home, Karachi, where he spent time as an adult as well as in Rawalpindi, where the Army and intelligence agencies are based, according to the source.

They believe he may have used colleagues of his father – Air Vice Marshal Baharul Haq – to make contact with the Pakistan Taliban.

Pakistan has a history of using Jihadi groups as a tool of its foreign policy. Its Inter-Services Intelligence agency helped equip and train Afghan Mujahideen fighting Soviet occupation during the 1980s and then used the Taliban to fill the resulting vacuum. They have supported militant groups in Indian-controlled Kashmir. ………………...............

The Telegraph, UK

Lilo · Post by **Lilo** » 11 May 2010 12:51

For any journalist who visits these forums, i would ask for a writeup comparing Faisal Shahzad the terrorist and Shah Faisal the UPSC Civils Topper 2010.

Hopefully before this time's square furor dies down.

Anindya · Post by **Anindya** » 11 May 2010 13:25

Lilo - why don't you take a cut at writing one - getting such things published may not be all that difficult, if you have a reasonably good piece.

JwalaMukhi · Post by **JwalaMukhi** » 11 May 2010 13:56

VikramS wrote: Your other comment about how the US could call TSP's bluff by going hammer and tongs on the TSPA since the risk of the bum does not endanger the US is not thought through. The bum could be used against the US fleet; it could be used against US ground forces. Further any ground assault is likely to be bloody and not have enough political support at home. And of course, there could be a JDAM already in place, may be even before 9/11. Post 9/11 there were news items of massive efforts to detect radiation sources within the confines of major cities. Who knows, perhaps the TSPA may have bluffed Amritraj with a JDAM threat after he talked about sending the TSP back to its golden period (stone age).

Extremely well said. That's the main point. US is running scared because, it does not know how to contain the frankenstien that it helped sustain and helps to still be around. That being said, the concern about bakis lobbing a few across at India, is as you have clearly given reasons above, is nonsense. That's my main point too. US worried about action because of baki bums directed at India, simply is untenable. At best, it is pathetic excuse and blackmail of India using baki bums.
US is worried about baki bums and its derivatives directed against it. period.
(If anything, the threat of baki bums if it gets spread to/against India, it would dilute the overall threat level against US)

arun · Post by **arun** » 11 May 2010 14:01

Lilo wrote:For any journalist who visits these forums, i would ask for a writeup comparing Faisal Shahzad the terrorist and Shah Faisal the UPSC Civils Topper 2010.

Hopefully before this time's square furor dies down.

Another and perhaps more compelling comparison is between Pakistan born Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh and India born Nasser Hussain.

Both Muslims who migrated to the UK though from different countries. Both studied at the elite Forest School there.

Pakistan born Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh drifted into Islamic Terrorism culminating with involvement in the kidnap and throat slitting of Jewish Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl bringing calumny to his adopted country.

India born Nasser Hussain went on to Captain the English cricket team bringing laurels to his adopted country.

arun · Post by **arun** » 11 May 2010 14:40

US Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg on PR China’s reported bid to supply two nuclear reactors to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan without a NSG waiver a la India being in place :

US studying China-Pakistan nuclear deal

anandsgh · Post by **anandsgh** » 11 May 2010 15:33

from Yaawn.. Pakis being.... well .. Pakis

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... assy-qs-13

anupmisra · Post by **anupmisra** » 11 May 2010 16:12

anandsgh wrote:from Yaawn.. Pakis being.... well .. Pakis
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... assy-qs-13

From the article:

The man said he did not know where it had come from and he was only at the embassy to renew his visa.

Do all visa applicants in Chile get tested for traces of explosives? I wonder what alterted the Chileans? That he was a paki to begin with?

SSridhar · Post by **SSridhar** » 11 May 2010 16:46

India brought around to talks

India at last was brought round to restore the process of negotiations with Pakistan, Geo News reported Tuesday.

‘Water issue is of huge proportions and hence, it necessitates serious discussion,’ the FM Qureshi said adding Pakistan has reservations over Kishan-Ganga Dam and India has been apprised of the same.

Suppiah · Post by **Suppiah** » 11 May 2010 16:49

anupmisra wrote: Do all visa applicants in Chile get tested for traces of explosives? I wonder what alterted the Chileans? That he was a paki to begin with?

I guess explosive sniffing / testing is standard curriculum in all US embassies. But the fact that he was Paki would have made them look for nano-particles too...

SSridhar · Post by **SSridhar** » 11 May 2010 17:02

So, who's surprised ?

In a story published in a section of our press on May 6, 2010, we are told that the former head of Military Intelligence, Maj Gen Nadeem Ijaz was cleared by the three-member ‘fact-finding committee’ on the basis of a two-page letter written by him on Dec 28, 2007, addressed to the COAS after the incident of hosing down the crime scene where Benazir Bhutto was assassinated on Dec 27, 2007.

According to the paper: “The people involved in washing down the crime scene, actually spoiled the evidences,” wrote Nadeem Ijaz in the letter. “Many evidences, which could have been useful in criminal investigation, have been washed away,” he added.

This purported letter was reportedly shown to the prime minister by the COAS after the UN report put the blame on the MI chief. The news report again: “Consequently, Prime Minister Gilani, instead of clearing the name of the former MI chief on the basis of the letter written by Nadeem Ijaz on Dec 28, 2007 to the army chief, agreed to do it in a proper manner and constituted a three-member committee on April 24, 2010 with a ‘one-point mandate’ and that was to investigate and find out as to who actually was behind the hosing down of the crime scene in such a hurry after the tragedy”. The rest as they say is history.

Now then, if this is the case, why was the letter not released to the press as soon as the UN report came out? Surely there were no military secrets contained in it — it was just proof that the MI chief had done his duty and done it well, pointing out to the COAS that washing the crime scene was the wrong thing to do. It would have immediately brought the army out in a very good light; there would have been no dark rumours going about; and news and talk-show anchors would not have had several field days. In addition, three government officials would have gone about their regular duties and not wasted their time on something that was already a proven fact; just one day after poor Benazir Bhutto was mercilessly shot to death.

Which be it as it may, I continue to believe that someone high up ordered the crime scene to be washed clean; that a mere CPO could never have done it on his own. So go figure.

rkirankr · Post by **rkirankr** » 11 May 2010 17:03

Banality of evil - Rajeev Sreenivasan. Good read Please delete if posted earlier

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 11 May 2010 17:34

One more paki arrested in Peru. Come on guys Pakis are present all over the globe now I think the last place I expected a paki was in Peru Bolivia and other L American countries

Pakistani man arrested at US embassy in Chile

The suspicious substance was detected when the man identified as Mohamed Said Uf Rejaman, 28, went through a security checkpoint on Monday, prompting embassy staff to notify police. He was arrested on site.

He arrived in Chile about three months ago on a visa and had been working at a hotel in the capital.

Another guy working in construction. Whats going on with terrorists and construction?

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 11 May 2010 17:34

Dawn

We, of course, know India’s stance. It wants the world to believe that its nuclear weapons are not South Asia-specific. This is absurd. India is not in a race with China, for it kowtows to Beijing. It has conceded Aksai-chin to China without demur and would in all probability do the same in the northeast, too. To Pakistan, it would not concede an inch, whether it was the Berubari enclave or the 10 per cent of Rann of Kutch that was awarded to Pakistan by the international mediators.

Samay · Post by **Samay** » 11 May 2010 17:50

It seems that the amrikis are so much frustated with pakistanis that wherever they meet,its full of suspicion,just like what they did with people with names ending with chev,tov,pov,lov,sky etc 2 decades earlier

Their institutionalized media needs to be credited for that, that they so cleverly hide and ignore this truth from their own people,,
this could be a big election issue in the us if people come to know that pakistan is able to stand on its feet,survivie(despite being a failed concept) and spread pakistaniyat around the globe only because of amriki support,which was increased by Pajama,
otherwise India would have cleansed that place much earlier,like its rivers cleanse the paki land everyday

USG should be made accountable for all the problems that exist in the subcontinent , and if they could give free weapons to pakis to fight friendly jihadis then they should also give us weapons and technologies to counter a maniac jihadi army, all for free,and free logistic support as well
they shuold be reminded by our brage netas that its now their liability.

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 11 May 2010 17:53

Paki strategy for many years rather from its inception has been to rely on lies. They use lies like cluster bombs you just overwhelm opponents with so much information that they do not get time to analyze each for its merit and by the time they do it you thow in few more

Example:
1)We are moderate peace loving people fighting extrmists
2) We created them for US and West to fight communism
3) We won you cold war
4) We need strategic depth
5) They are non state actors
6) Parity with India in conventional weapons will reduce chances of nuke bum
7) We need nuclear deal to wean people away from talibunnies

If we go down we will take India
9) ISI and Military is serious of combating bunnies
10) We have democracy and that needs funding to survive so friends of porkies pay up
11) Kashmir is the root cause of all world problems
12) Water is porkies main problem
13) Partition is unfinished business
14) Evil yindoo is not letting us progress
15) Our pop music is being stolen by yindoos
16) Mohenjodaro is our culture but we are not proud of it
17) We are C Asians Turks and Arabs
18) If amrikhans attacks us we will give bum to bunnies

You can keep adding more takiya to this list

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 11 May 2010 18:16

Is it me or this guy is this news report looks similar to FS
Faisal Shahzad's Taliban link gives President Obama an excuse to unleash fury on Pakistan evildoers

BTW Hizb-ut-Tahrir has a wiki page
Its message is:

"Your forefathers destroyed the first crusader campaigns. Should you not proceed like them and destroy the new crusaders? ... "Let the armies move to help the Muslims in Iraq, for they seek your help."

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 11 May 2010 18:27

Is unkil now learning the lesson talk soft and hit hard. That way you acheive intended results and protect H&D of paki gernails

Drone Strikes Pound Western Pakistan

In an unusually ferocious American attack on militants in Pakistan, about 18 missiles fired from pilotless aircraft killed at least 14 fighters and wounded four others on Tuesday in the tribal area of North Waziristan, a security official and a resident of the area said.

The militants killed in the attack belonged to the forces of Sadiq Noor, a commander who is loyal to the Haqqani network, which specializes in operations in Afghanistan, the resident said

These are ISI's good talibunnies that it protects and nurtures now they will not appreciate that ISI is hiding when unkil is bashing them.

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 11 May 2010 18:34

If anyone is interested in seeing Khwaja's bullet riddled body

WARNING Graphic contents

British hostage in Pakistan seeks help in video appeal

Hindu has published it without any blurrying I am not sure if newpapers should be publishing such pics

Suppiah · Post by **Suppiah** » 11 May 2010 18:44

Like I posted many weeks ago, though Unkil is outwardly singing praise of kiya-nahin, he is creating facts on the ground by these drone attacks - it appears most are targeting the pigs that kiya-nahin considers 'assets'.....this is bound to create suspicion in the mind of pigs that kiya-nahin is selling them out by providing GPS coordinates.

Suppiah · Post by **Suppiah** » 11 May 2010 18:47

A resident of Miranshah, the capital of North Waziristan, said in a telephone interview Tuesday he saw a truck stacked with empty coffins heading for Datta Khel after the attack.

Can't help thinking about the Eastwood classic where he places order for the coffins before heading out to take on the baddies. Wonder if the predator can do the same - email an order for coffins and then take out the pigs...