Bharat Rakshak

ISLAMABAD: General (retd) Pervez Musharraf on Thursday escaped from the premises of the Islamabad High Court after the cancellation of his bail application by Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui in the judges detention case.

Immediately after the bail cancellation, police tried to reach the former military ruler but he was escorted by his personal security, fleeing in his bullet-proof black four-wheeler.

Musharraf had arrived at the IHC for the hearing and a large contingent of police and Rangers personnel was stationed at the court’s premises for security purposes.

Earlier last week, the former military ruler was granted a six-day interim bail after he surrendered before the court in the judges’ detention case in which he had been declared a proclaimed offender.

The case is based on an FIR against the retired general registered in August 11, 2009 on the complaint of Chaudhry Mohammad Aslam Ghumman advocate.

He had asked the police to initiate legal proceedings against Musharraf for detaining over 60 judges, including Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, after proclamation of a state of emergency in the country on November 3, 2007.

ISLAMABAD: General (retd) Pervez Musharraf on Thursday escaped from the premises of the Islamabad High Court after the cancellation of his bail application by Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui in the judges detention case.

Immediately after the bail cancellation, police tried to reach the former military ruler but he was escorted by his personal security, fleeing in his bullet-proof black four-wheeler.

According to police, Musharraf has reached his farmhouse in Chak Shahzad on the outskirts of Islamabad and police is expected to carry out his arrest.

Rajdeep wrote:As usual a paki general runs away from the fight #bhagouda_mush

Anujan wrote:Though every terrorist has a paki connection, Not all pakis are terrorists. The world should realize this.

ArmenT wrote:
According to police, Musharraf has reached his farmhouse in Chak Shahzad on the outskirts of Islamabad and police is expected to carry out his arrest.

India appears to have successfully climbed into the category of a nuclear “have,” overcoming the divisions enshrined in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and enforced fervently by its adherents. Although not publicly acknowledged, India’s entry is the de facto reality and irreversible.

Nowhere was this more evident than at the recent Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference (April 8-9, 2013, at the Ronald Reagan Building International Trade Center, Washington D.C.) attended by more than 800 experts from around the world. Being the premier event of all things nuclear, the forum has long been the bastion of what Indian policymakers like to call the “nuclear ayatollahs” — those who obsessively pursue the NPT’s non-proliferation goals to the exclusion of almost everything else, especially disarmament.

Pakistan’s case

Unsurprisingly, India’s new status rankles Pakistan no end. Its team of more than 20 official and quasi official spokespersons raised objections against India in almost every panel at the conference. They demanded parity and a nuclear deal similar to the one the U.S. pushed through for India. Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani Ambassador, said if Pakistan doesn’t get “equal treatment,” it would continue building nuclear stockpiles — a move that already has the nuclear community on edge.

Pakistan’s gripe is understandable — to a degree. Like India, it never signed the NPT and technically breached no undertaking by going nuclear. But its record on non-proliferation has been bad. The A.Q. Khan affair and his nuclear supply lines are and will remain a blot. So when Pakistani delegates tried to find analogies between their dilemma and every extant nuclear problem, they got a polite silence.

When M.J. Chung, a prominent member of South Korea’s National Assembly, provocatively advocated his country’s right to leave the NPT and build bombs in response to North Korean threats, a Pakistani delegate promptly equated India’s behaviour with North Korea’s. She demanded to know why South Korea wasn’t sympathetic to Pakistan’s case since her country had also tested the nuclear bomb in reaction to India.

When an Iranian attendee asked a panel why Iran was being targeted when, in fact, a Talibanized Pakistan was the main nuclear threat, a Pakistani countered that Maoists were a “bigger threat” to Indian nuclear reactors than al-Qaeda and Taliban were to Pakistani installations. The effect was often comical, sparking sniggers. If the idea was to drag India through the mud, no matter how disingenuous the argument, it failed. It only helped relegate Pakistan further to the margins.

JE Menon wrote:but not funny for shiite...

SSridhar wrote:Sour Notes at the Nuclear High Table - Seema Sirohi & Abhijit-Iyer Mitra, The Hindu
Excerpts

India appears to have successfully climbed into the category of a nuclear “have,” overcoming the divisions enshrined in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and enforced fervently by its adherents. Although not publicly acknowledged, India’s entry is the de facto reality and irreversible.

Pakistan’s case

Unsurprisingly, India’s new status rankles Pakistan no end. Its team of more than 20 official and quasi official spokespersons raised objections against India in almost every panel at the conference. They demanded parity and a nuclear deal similar to the one the U.S. pushed through for India. Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani Ambassador, said if Pakistan doesn’t get “equal treatment,” it would continue building nuclear stockpiles — a move that already has the nuclear community on edge.

Pakistan’s gripe is understandable — to a degree. Like India, it never signed the NPT and technically breached no undertaking by going nuclear. But its record on non-proliferation has been bad. The A.Q. Khan affair and his nuclear supply lines are and will remain a blot. So when Pakistani delegates tried to find analogies between their dilemma and every extant nuclear problem, they got a polite silence.

When an Iranian attendee asked a panel why Iran was being targeted when, in fact, a Talibanized Pakistan was the main nuclear threat, a Pakistani countered that Maoists were a “bigger threat” to Indian nuclear reactors than al-Qaeda and Taliban were to Pakistani installations. The effect was often comical, sparking sniggers. If the idea was to drag India through the mud, no matter how disingenuous the argument, it failed. It only helped relegate Pakistan further to the margins.

Gola had no exit strategy in Kargil but he has a exit strategy from Pakistan.

kish wrote: wow. Is this for real? Is this how pakisatan represent itself in a nuclear high table?

If someone can find a video of this conf please upload it here. I will stop watching comedy central, I'll rather watch pakis speak in international conference.

Joseph wrote:

kish wrote: wow. Is this for real? Is this how pakisatan represent itself in a nuclear high table?

If someone can find a video of this conf please upload it here. I will stop watching comedy central, I'll rather watch pakis speak in international conference.

I just found the link and haven't watched any of the videos yet.

2013 Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference

chetak wrote:Musharraf on the run after bail cancellation

Two people lost their lives in different incidents of violence here Wednesday.

The victim identified as Kalim alias Commando was going somewhere, when unidentified pillion-riders shot him and managed to flee.

Four members of a family were gunned down over old enmity in an adjoining area of Mian Chunu Thursday, Geo News reported.

According to police, man of rival group opened fire on a family that killed thee persons on the spot in 7/125 R area of Mian Channu while the fourth succumbed to injuries in the hospital(Inshallah, the 4th one too was killed, a bullet has not been wasted).

All four victims were the members of the same family and were aged between 18 and 50 years.

Neela wrote:So I read the news and came straight here...BRF does not disappoint.

Philip wrote:James! naughty boy what? Amazing technological advances in Pak, a "Pig can fly!"

RajeshA wrote:If Mushy now takes US help to exit the country, basically his reputation would be so finished and in swine piss, that he is useless of the US.

The only place safe for him in Pakistan is either the US Embassy and he can clean the toilets there to make himself useful, or in jail hoping that the jailer is not some Red Mosque graduate.

Otherwise he is like a Begum running naked in the streets of Karachi. Everybody and anybody can jump on him.