g.sarkar wrote:Gagan wrote:What can GoI do?
It can't officially ban Pakistanis participating in events that the government has no oversight of.
Yet it is common knowledge that these sneering scumbags hate the kafirs, pass snide remarks against the kafirs, but like kafir money.
I for one support the Shiv Sena on this wholesomely! Their methods are crude, but once the fear is created, they won't have to resort to actually doing things. One hopes that in the future, just a kindly worded letter from the Shiv Sena politely requesting people not to employ pakistanis in India will suffice.
I agree completely that there should be no politics with Cricket and so on. But, beheading Indian soldiers is not politics by any ones standard! There is one thing GoI can easily do. When I was living in Germany many Moons ago, their government had one way of completely shutting out non-European foreigners. They would make the employers explain why the job could not be given to German or an European. It was very difficult for any one to argue that any one particular job could be done by no German. This law kept out all but the very best. GoI can easily implement something similar.
Gautam
Indeed. Terrorism is not politics. I can even understand the concept of playing with your arch-enemies. Not to my liking, but understandable. But, playing games with barbaric terrorists is beyond understanding. Its just undefendable by any logic.
A proper method of protest is a side issue. The bigger issue is, "can Pakistan be treated like a civilized country when it behaves like a barbarian?"
----
Gagan saar,
I think the ones who know most intimately about artificiality of Pakistan is Pakjabis themselves. They know that Pakistan is not meant to thrive or even survive. So, from their perspective, survival for any short period is seen as a great victory. Let me give an analogy: lets say some naxals occupy a group of villages in dhesh and declare it as an 'independent redistan'. Do they expect that 'country' to survive? No. Its just chance pe dance thing. They expect Dhesh to retake those villages. The same is the case with Pakjabis and Pakistan. When Pakijabis say that they are sitting on strategic location, they mean to say that they are occupying a part of Bhaarath.
Now, interestingly, Bhaarath has not shown any inclination to take back Pakistan. This is a boon and curse for Pakistan. Boon for Pakistan because it survives. Curse for Pakistan because its cut off from Bhaarath. They feel as if they are cut off and alone. So, they try to comfort themselves by running in to the lap of some massa or ummah. And massa and ummah treat pakjabis like slaves.
Pakistan sees itself as part of Bhaarath. It behaves as part of Bhaarath. Pakjabis take their cues from sec-lib narrative. Most of the points are given to Pakjabais by dheshi sec-libs only. I wonder how the rest of the world sees indo-pak thing. How does a westerner differentiate between Pakistani and Indian? For example, how do we view Taiwan vs China thing?
What is most interesting is that:
The sec-libs support playing games with Pakistan.
The sec-libs support making movies with Pakistan.
The sec-libs support all kinds of cultural contacts with Pakistan and other friendly relations with them, even when there is proxy-war. Even when soldiers and citizens are dying in droves. Yet, they want to continue with their games and dances.
The same sec-libs absolutely oppose the idea of Akhand Bhaarath. Isn't that strange. If we can be so friendly friendly with Pakistan, then why have Pakistan as separate entity? Shouldn't Akhand Bhaarath be the highest form of lovey dovey with Pakistan? I can understand communal Hindhus opposing Akhand Bhaarath. But, what logic can sec-libs have for opposing the idea of Akhand Bhaarath? Sec-lib narrative is that the muslims are a wonderful community who have given a lot to the country and civilization. So, what logic can they have for opposing the idea of Akhand Bhaarath? Surely, inclusion of Pakistan into Bhaarath is going to be wonderful because muslim community has given so much in past according to them.
If Pakistanis want to come to Bhaarath to make movies, sell books, play games, ...etc, then why even have a separate country?
I think Pakistan has been allowed to survive by kongis deliberately. (This is clearly seen during shimla. Its a clear lifeline.) Pakjabis seem to know this very well. Just listen to the narrative of kongis and Pakjabis. Its one and the same. They both say the same thing in a different way. Kongi sec-lib depends on Paki jihad and vice versa. Both of them are afraid of saffron because it will end their fake nonsense. These are same set of elites planted during colonial rule. One set were given one part of the country and another set given another part to rule as puppets.
Now, one puppet has been dethroned. So, the other puppet is counting its days. The sec-libs know that Pakistan is an artificial country. They know that it will break at the slightest action of Dhesh. Thats why they run to its rescue.
There was a point raised in 'evolution of Indian strategic thought' thread: What is the actual goal of Bhaarath? What is the goal of accumulation of power and wealth?
I think the first simple and straight-forward answer to that question is: Akhand Bhaarath.
To restore Bhaarath's territory which was lost due to invasions and colonialism. And then to ghar-wapas the people of those locations and to connect them back to the Bhaarath's civilization. Akhand Bhaarath is not just about Pakistan. But, Pakistan is definitely the biggest stumbling block to realizing Bhaarath's full potential. Akhand Bhaarath is equivalent to One China Policy. We should learn from China on this point.
As for Kashmir, Pakistan has no locus standi on Kashmir. They have no case whatsoever. They are the ones who are illegally occupying Kashmir. The whole noise about Kashmir is just a distraction. The fact is Pakistan is sitting on Lahore which was Bhaarath's territory. Sindhu-saraswathi civilization thrived in those areas. And they belong to Bhaarath civilization.
This post seems better for strategic evolution thread, so I'll cross-post it there.